If you were trying to paint me crazy, thats not going to help.^ proving my point that Hobelim has more in common with atheists than people of faith.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you were trying to paint me crazy, thats not going to help.^ proving my point that Hobelim has more in common with atheists than people of faith.
That doesn't make sense....faith is taken without evidence....If he had any faith at all he would accept the evidence presented by reality every day and every night
It is very hard for people to get past the flesh realm thoughts; and it is difficult for the same to understand that the Word covers all realms.^ proving my point that Hobelim has more in common with atheists than people of faith.
No it isn't. We write books and movies about that all the time. We call them, "fiction".It is very hard for people to get past the flesh realm thoughts
The impossibility of the contrary is proof enough for me, on my existence. Perhaps you require more proof than your thoughts that you think....but its self evident for me.I.e., not proof, or even evidence.Its proof to the self,
Not necessarily.That doesn't make sense....faith is taken without evidence....If he had any faith at all he would accept the evidence presented by reality every day and every night
Exactly. But not enough for anyone else by any standard. So, not really proof or evidence. Instead, that's faith.The impossibility of the contrary is proof enough for me
Yes, necessarily. Taking a belief without good evidence is faith. Making a determination of what is likely, on evidence, is the opposite. And will always be. And no amount of rearranging words in just the right order in order to be contrarian is going to get you or anyone else around this.Not necessarily.
He is not the God of the dead, but the God of the living. You are therefore greatly mistaken.No it isn't. We write books and movies about that all the time. We call them, "fiction".It is very hard for people to get past the flesh realm thoughts
false equivocation fallacy. i wasnt referring to anyone else to begin withExactly. But not enough for anyone else by any standard. So, not really proof or evidence. Instead, that's faith.The impossibility of the contrary is proof enough for me
Ok, I will prove my point then. Here is a link to a video where a world renowned cosmologist explains what I have been telling you. It's slightly over 3 minutes long and I doubt you have ever even watched it.You made the claim, it’s up to you to back it up.Tell me what you disagree with and you back that up with what you believe is real science.Not backed up by a real science site, so just your personal opinion. Man, you sure suck at this.The proof you are so sorely seekingSo no real proof, just personal opinion. Got it.
You will dismiss it like you always do and you won't provide any evidence or links to support it. Checkmate.
Yes, necessarily. Taking a belief without good evidence is faith. Making a determination of what is likely, on evidence, is the opposite. And will always be. And no amount of rearranging words in just the right order in order to be contrarian is going to get you or anyone else around this.Not necessarily.
Ok, I will prove my point then. Here is a link to a video where a world renowned cosmologist explains what I have been telling you. It's slightly over 3 minutes long and I doubt you have ever even watched it.You made the claim, it’s up to you to back it up.Tell me what you disagree with and you back that up with what you believe is real science.Not backed up by a real science site, so just your personal opinion. Man, you sure suck at this.
You will dismiss it like you always do and you won't provide any evidence or links to support it. Checkmate.
He’s theorizing, not providing proof. Know the difference. And he’s not saying that a creator made the universe. Please try again.
You will dismiss it like you always do and you won't provide any evidence or links to support it. Checkmate.
You don't need my help for that.If you were trying to paint me crazy, thats not going to help.^ proving my point that Hobelim has more in common with atheists than people of faith.
Ok, I will prove my point then. Here is a link to a video where a world renowned cosmologist explains what I have been telling you. It's slightly over 3 minutes long and I doubt you have ever even watched it.You made the claim, it’s up to you to back it up.Tell me what you disagree with and you back that up with what you believe is real science.Not backed up by a real science site, so just your personal opinion. Man, you sure suck at this.
You will dismiss it like you always do and you won't provide any evidence or links to support it. Checkmate.
He’s theorizing, not providing proof. Know the difference. And he’s not saying that a creator made the universe. Please try again.
I totally nailed it. See?
You will dismiss it like you always do and you won't provide any evidence or links to support it. Checkmate.
![]()
And yet man feels so strongly about right and right that he expects everyone to know and understand it even when people disagree with it.No it isn't. We write books and movies about that all the time. We call them, "fiction".It is very hard for people to get past the flesh realm thoughts
Ok, I will prove my point then. Here is a link to a video where a world renowned cosmologist explains what I have been telling you. It's slightly over 3 minutes long and I doubt you have ever even watched it.You made the claim, it’s up to you to back it up.Tell me what you disagree with and you back that up with what you believe is real science.
You will dismiss it like you always do and you won't provide any evidence or links to support it. Checkmate.
He’s theorizing, not providing proof. Know the difference. And he’s not saying that a creator made the universe. Please try again.
I totally nailed it. See?
You will dismiss it like you always do and you won't provide any evidence or links to support it. Checkmate.
![]()
It’s not proof, just a theory, like what you propose, a theory.
You don't need my help for that.If you were trying to paint me crazy, thats not going to help.^ proving my point that Hobelim has more in common with atheists than people of faith.
You disagree with my theology but I don't know any atheist who agrees with my theology. Especially the militant ones like yourself.You don't need my help for that.If you were trying to paint me crazy, thats not going to help.^ proving my point that Hobelim has more in common with atheists than people of faith.
Yeah I know.. In a world full of Jesus eaters anyone who has the audacity to say out loud that God is not edible is bound to seem crazy.
Brace yourself Nancy, you ain't seen nothing yet.
You disagree with my theology but I don't know any atheist who agrees with my theology. Especially the militant ones like yourself.You don't need my help for that.If you were trying to paint me crazy, thats not going to help.^ proving my point that Hobelim has more in common with atheists than people of faith.
Yeah I know.. In a world full of Jesus eaters anyone who has the audacity to say out loud that God is not edible is bound to seem crazy.
Brace yourself Nancy, you ain't seen nothing yet.