Meriweather
Not all who wander are lost
- Oct 21, 2014
- 17,910
- 3,715
- 165
Meri,
so you admit knowing what the word anointed translates to so what's your excuse with Ezekiel 28 only selectively placing Jesus in scripture whereby you admitted they do often falaciously, but chose to change that standard everytimevit reveals Jesus fulfills Lucifer prophecy.
Your reference to Ezekiel 28 continues to puzzle me. In this chapter, God is clearly addressing Ezekiel by the term, "Son of man" (ben Adam) instead of using his given name of Ezekiel. I do not place Jesus in Ezekiel. Where do you see him?
By turns you seem to be accusing Jesus of being Yehudah, Theudas, Krishna, Lucifer, and now Ezekiel? The first four are not even mentioned in scripture. Ezekiel flat out says that God is addressing him as Son of Adam or Son of Man instead of by his given name of Ezekiel.
Just as Jesus was not the only one anointed to accomplish a certain purpose, nor was he the only one in scripture referenced as Son of Man or ben Adam.
Since Lucifer is not mentioned in scripture, I have no idea what Lucifer prophecy you are speaking of.
By the way, I ignore personal commentary. I am not here to discuss other USMB members, and I have no interest in discussing (or reading about) me. For me, I find it best to focus solely on discussion and opinions of religious beliefs and teachings. Thus far, I have shown why I believe Jesus cannot be Yehudah, Theudas, Krishna, Lucifer, and now Ezekiel. I do not see a proven case that Jesus was any of the above people you have mentioned.
Jesus was simply the person described by the New Testament, Tacitus, and even Josephus. Therefore, I do not see a checkmate, but if you say it is game over, then shall we both move on to other threads?