Third Party
Gold Member
- Jan 1, 2019
- 7,616
- 634
- 275
True, but Trump was less hateful if at all than Cummings-you could see it in the eyes.You say hateful, I say truthful-to quote a Democrat, "If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen".It is NOT his rhetoric, it is the way the left interprets what he says. For example, he makes the comment about Balitimore,being rat infested, which it literally is, and the left screams racism and then calls it hateful rhetoric. Brilliant strategy by the left that evidently works on gullible folks.
When the defense is "That's not what he really meant" you have no defense. "Go back to their huts" was supposed to be an uplifting statement?
But that is what he said. Democrats make the assumption that because Balitmore has a large black population that he was referring to them as rats. They do this because it fits the narrative they want to sell. He can't say anything without it being racist in some way. If he disagrees with a black Democrat on any topic, it is racist. If he disagrees with a women it is misogynistic. If he disagrees with a homosexual it is homophobic. This is an intellectually dishonest strategy the left has used for years.
It was hateful rhetoric either way. One could make a good argument against Cummings but Trump was unable to because all he knows is hateful rhetoric.
Hateful can be truthful. You can be truthful and not be hateful.