Can someone tell me when it was that Gays had different drinking fountains?...

[Redfish]

There is no Justification to deny two Sisters Marriage if Gays can have it.

Name the Justification.



peace...

Name the justification for denying a brother and a sister marrying NOW, without any reference to gays being married.

Tell us why keeping marriage between a Man and Woman exclusively serves to justify denying a Man and a Woman, who happen to be related, the right to marry.

You can't do it, I guarantee, which makes your argument above useless.

Same thing goes for Polygamy. Polygamy is a heterosexual institution and the justification for it is there or it isn't, separate from consenting adult gays legally marrying. They know the sibling thing is ridiculously flinging poo against a wall, but with Polygamy there is just enough for them to latch on to despite being no evidence linking legalization of same sex marriages and polygamy.

There are actually countries where Polygamy is legal. Guess what isn't legal in those countries? That's right, same sex marriages. Same goes the other way. Gays have been marrying for a decade or more in a few places...where they have not allowed Polygamy, incest or inanimate object marriages.

those groups will claim that their civil rights to marry are being denied to them. they will use gay marriage as a legal precedent, and they will win.

you do understand legal precedents don't you?

if an "anything goes" society is what the majority want, then so be it. But it will destroy this country and the world if it spreads.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Name the justification for denying a brother and a sister marrying NOW, without any reference to gays being married.

Tell us why keeping marriage between a Man and Woman exclusively serves to justify denying a Man and a Woman, who happen to be related, the right to marry.

You can't do it, I guarantee, which makes your argument above useless.

Same thing goes for Polygamy. Polygamy is a heterosexual institution and the justification for it is there or it isn't, separate from consenting adult gays legally marrying. They know the sibling thing is ridiculously flinging poo against a wall, but with Polygamy there is just enough for them to latch on to despite being no evidence linking legalization of same sex marriages and polygamy.

There are actually countries where Polygamy is legal. Guess what isn't legal in those countries? That's right, same sex marriages. Same goes the other way. Gays have been marrying for a decade or more in a few places...where they have not allowed Polygamy, incest or inanimate object marriages.

those groups will claim that their civil rights to marry are being denied to them. they will use gay marriage as a legal precedent, and they will win.

you do understand legal precedents don't you?

if an "anything goes" society is what the majority want, then so be it. But it will destroy this country and the world if it spreads.

You have no idea what legal precedents are.

How does defining marriage, legally, as one man one woman prevent a brother and sister from claiming the right to marry?

 

[Seawytch]

Name the justification for denying a brother and a sister marrying NOW, without any reference to gays being married.

Tell us why keeping marriage between a Man and Woman exclusively serves to justify denying a Man and a Woman, who happen to be related, the right to marry.

You can't do it, I guarantee, which makes your argument above useless.

Same thing goes for Polygamy. Polygamy is a heterosexual institution and the justification for it is there or it isn't, separate from consenting adult gays legally marrying. They know the sibling thing is ridiculously flinging poo against a wall, but with Polygamy there is just enough for them to latch on to despite being no evidence linking legalization of same sex marriages and polygamy.

There are actually countries where Polygamy is legal. Guess what isn't legal in those countries? That's right, same sex marriages. Same goes the other way. Gays have been marrying for a decade or more in a few places...where they have not allowed Polygamy, incest or inanimate object marriages.

those groups will claim that their civil rights to marry are being denied to them. they will use gay marriage as a legal precedent, and they will win.

you do understand legal precedents don't you?

if an "anything goes" society is what the majority want, then so be it. But it will destroy this country and the world if it spreads.

They don't need gays for that. The precedent has already been set if you believe they have justification. Gays have nothing to do with it.

Name the country that has legalized both Polygamy and Same Sex Marriage.

 

[Redfish]

Same thing goes for Polygamy. Polygamy is a heterosexual institution and the justification for it is there or it isn't, separate from consenting adult gays legally marrying. They know the sibling thing is ridiculously flinging poo against a wall, but with Polygamy there is just enough for them to latch on to despite being no evidence linking legalization of same sex marriages and polygamy.

There are actually countries where Polygamy is legal. Guess what isn't legal in those countries? That's right, same sex marriages. Same goes the other way. Gays have been marrying for a decade or more in a few places...where they have not allowed Polygamy, incest or inanimate object marriages.

those groups will claim that their civil rights to marry are being denied to them. they will use gay marriage as a legal precedent, and they will win.

you do understand legal precedents don't you?

if an "anything goes" society is what the majority want, then so be it. But it will destroy this country and the world if it spreads.

You have no idea what legal precedents are.

How does defining marriage, legally, as one man one woman prevent a brother and sister from claiming the right to marry?

related people cannot legally marry now.

if gay marriage is legalized on the basis that the civil rights of gays have been denied to them regarding marriage-------then that exact same legal argument will be made for bigamy and polygamy and other forms of "marriage".
Using gay marriage as a civil rights precedent, those groups will win in court.

 

[Redfish]

Same thing goes for Polygamy. Polygamy is a heterosexual institution and the justification for it is there or it isn't, separate from consenting adult gays legally marrying. They know the sibling thing is ridiculously flinging poo against a wall, but with Polygamy there is just enough for them to latch on to despite being no evidence linking legalization of same sex marriages and polygamy.

There are actually countries where Polygamy is legal. Guess what isn't legal in those countries? That's right, same sex marriages. Same goes the other way. Gays have been marrying for a decade or more in a few places...where they have not allowed Polygamy, incest or inanimate object marriages.

those groups will claim that their civil rights to marry are being denied to them. they will use gay marriage as a legal precedent, and they will win.

you do understand legal precedents don't you?

if an "anything goes" society is what the majority want, then so be it. But it will destroy this country and the world if it spreads.

They don't need gays for that. The precedent has already been set if you believe they have justification. Gays have nothing to do with it.

Name the country that has legalized both Polygamy and Same Sex Marriage.

achient Greece

 

[NYcarbineer]

There is no Justification to deny two Sisters Marriage if Gays can have it.

Name the Justification.



peace...

Name the justification for denying a brother and a sister marrying NOW, without any reference to gays being married.

Tell us why keeping marriage between a Man and Woman exclusively serves to justify denying a Man and a Woman, who happen to be related, the right to marry.

You can't do it, I guarantee, which makes your argument above useless.

Incest and Pedophilia - The next Domino on that slippery slope.

So you wanna marry your Sister ? You sick little Puppy.

The ban on Incestual Marriage is based on the actuality of Marriage being the societal foundation of the Family and procreation - breeding and child rearing - The products of incest are demonstrably geneticall inferior human beings- prone to an inordinbate amount of Birth Defects and Mental issues - much like Homosexuals.

We don't deny marriage rights to non-related couples with transmissible genetic defects so that argument is dead.

Got anything else?

 

[Seawytch]

those groups will claim that their civil rights to marry are being denied to them. they will use gay marriage as a legal precedent, and they will win.

you do understand legal precedents don't you?

if an "anything goes" society is what the majority want, then so be it. But it will destroy this country and the world if it spreads.

They don't need gays for that. The precedent has already been set if you believe they have justification. Gays have nothing to do with it.

Name the country that has legalized both Polygamy and Same Sex Marriage.

achient Greece

I'm sorry, I should have been more specific for the ridiculous. How about in the last two centuries.

 

[NYcarbineer]

those groups will claim that their civil rights to marry are being denied to them. they will use gay marriage as a legal precedent, and they will win.

you do understand legal precedents don't you?

if an "anything goes" society is what the majority want, then so be it. But it will destroy this country and the world if it spreads.

You have no idea what legal precedents are.

How does defining marriage, legally, as one man one woman prevent a brother and sister from claiming the right to marry?

related people cannot legally marry now.

if gay marriage is legalized on the basis that the civil rights of gays have been denied to them regarding marriage-------then that exact same legal argument will be made for bigamy and polygamy and other forms of "marriage".
Using gay marriage as a civil rights precedent, those groups will win in court.

Brother/sister marriage is not same sex marriage.

 

[Seawytch]

Granted, this is strictly empirical, but all the gay people I know have heterosexual parents and all the adult kids of gay parents I know are straight...so if gay is a genetic defect according to Bean, isn't it the hets that are the carriers?

 

[NYcarbineer]

those groups will claim that their civil rights to marry are being denied to them. they will use gay marriage as a legal precedent, and they will win.

you do understand legal precedents don't you?

if an "anything goes" society is what the majority want, then so be it. But it will destroy this country and the world if it spreads.

You have no idea what legal precedents are.

How does defining marriage, legally, as one man one woman prevent a brother and sister from claiming the right to marry?

related people cannot legally marry now.

if gay marriage is legalized on the basis that the civil rights of gays have been denied to them regarding marriage-------then that exact same legal argument will be made for bigamy and polygamy and other forms of "marriage".
Using gay marriage as a civil rights precedent, those groups will win in court.

Can you cite the US federal statute that bans states from legalizing polygamy NOW?

 

[GreenBean]

You don't profess to be a Christian do you? Are you a secular hater?

If you can't take a Joke get out of the Flame Zone. I don't truly wish you Death and eternal torment in the Lake of Fire. I only wish to torment you here on Earth. Hopefully in your next life you'll be Happy Healthy and Hetero - a whole person.

[That's WHOLE ...not Hole]

This thread isn't in the Flame Zone, imbecile, but oh gosh it was just a death joke. Those are so popular these days, how could I have missed that.

I am whole, darlin'. Whole, complete, happy and enjoying the good life...and some chocolate Easter eggs stolen from my kid's basket.

Sacrelig !!! Heretic !!! WITCH !!!!

Thou Shalt Not Suffer a [Sea]Witch to Live ! Exodus 22:18

And a Beast as well , an unclean animal as per Paul

Whosoever lieth with a beast shall surely be put to death. Exodus 22:19

Lest thou bear false witness , and accuseth thou of being a Bible THumper - Ponder on this you unclean animal you !

hu·mor
ˈ(h)yo͞omər/Submit
noun
1.
the quality of being amusing or comic, esp. as expressed in literature or speech.
"his tales are full of humor"
synonyms: comedy, comical aspect, funny side, fun, amusement, funniness, hilarity, jocularity; More

 

[NYcarbineer]

There is no Justification to deny two Sisters Marriage if Gays can have it.

Name the Justification.



peace...

Name the justification for denying a brother and a sister marrying NOW, without any reference to gays being married.

Tell us why keeping marriage between a Man and Woman exclusively serves to justify denying a Man and a Woman, who happen to be related, the right to marry.

You can't do it, I guarantee, which makes your argument above useless.

Incest and Pedophilia - The next Domino on that slippery slope.

So you wanna marry your Sister ? You sick little Puppy.

The ban on Incestual Marriage is based on the actuality of Marriage being the societal foundation of the Family and procreation - breeding and child rearing - The products of incest are demonstrably geneticall inferior human beings- prone to an inordinbate amount of Birth Defects and Mental issues - much like Homosexuals.

Marriage down to the age of 13 is legal in some states already. What caused that 'slippery slope'?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Minor children have been able to get legally married in this country for centuries. Why wasn't that the slippery slope to 10 year olds, or 5 year olds, getting married?

Stop with the slippery slope argument. It's a logical fallacy, aka, in terminology you rightwing nuts can understand,

a stupid argument.

 

[Seawytch]

 

[GreenBean]

Name the justification for denying a brother and a sister marrying NOW, without any reference to gays being married.

Tell us why keeping marriage between a Man and Woman exclusively serves to justify denying a Man and a Woman, who happen to be related, the right to marry.

You can't do it, I guarantee, which makes your argument above useless.

Incest and Pedophilia - The next Domino on that slippery slope.

So you wanna marry your Sister ? You sick little Puppy.

The ban on Incestual Marriage is based on the actuality of Marriage being the societal foundation of the Family and procreation - breeding and child rearing - The products of incest are demonstrably geneticall inferior human beings- prone to an inordinbate amount of Birth Defects and Mental issues - much like Homosexuals.

Marriage down to the age of 13 is legal in some states already. What caused that 'slippery slope'?

13 can get you 20 - in more modernized states . Back in the day - when life expectancy was around 30 or 35 it was more common for country folk to start early - 13 was nearly halfway through life . Going back even further in history it was the norm - The Jews consider 13 to be the magical number when Boys are Bar Mitzvahed , and in modern times Girls Bat Mitvahed . Getting into Fag society - Me thinks they'dprefer to lower the age of consent to the moment a chiild is weaned offf its mamas teats.

 

[Pop23]

You have no idea what legal precedents are.

How does defining marriage, legally, as one man one woman prevent a brother and sister from claiming the right to marry?

related people cannot legally marry now.

if gay marriage is legalized on the basis that the civil rights of gays have been denied to them regarding marriage-------then that exact same legal argument will be made for bigamy and polygamy and other forms of "marriage".
Using gay marriage as a civil rights precedent, those groups will win in court.

Can you cite the US federal statute that bans states from legalizing polygamy NOW?

We, the federal government invaded the Utah territories to insure they would do away with polygamy.

 

[Pop23]

Granted, this is strictly empirical, but all the gay people I know have heterosexual parents and all the adult kids of gay parents I know are straight...so if gay is a genetic defect according to Bean, isn't it the hets that are the carriers?

Genetic defects don't always show up in consecutive generations. If it is a genetic defect, it should be known so when one picks a mate they know the risk.

 

[GreenBean]

So taking the slippery slope theory out of the context in which you are attempting to frame it we could safely say that if

A = Applying Pesticide and Z= DDTs in the food chain, and hence our food supply

or

A = Continued use of Fossil fuels Z = Global Warming

or

A = I punch you in the Mouth B- You Bleed C. You Cry D. You shout "Hate Crime" Z = You don't punch me Back because that would tend to disproove your slipperyslope horse shit

You simply can not dismiss the analysis of Cause and effective relationships , with a simple off handed reference to Slippery Slopes and Dominoes - sometimes the analysis of what could happen really could happen - but it's still just speculation from ewither side of the fence.

 

[Pop23]

Boy, there are a lot of people that don't have any idea what a slippery slope fallacy is...or they just don't care.

Then answer the questions in post 647.

 

[Pop23]

There is no Justification to deny two Sisters Marriage if Gays can have it.

Name the Justification.



peace...

Name the justification for denying a brother and a sister marrying NOW, without any reference to gays being married.

Tell us why keeping marriage between a Man and Woman exclusively serves to justify denying a Man and a Woman, who happen to be related, the right to marry.

You can't do it, I guarantee, which makes your argument above useless.

Same thing goes for Polygamy. Polygamy is a heterosexual institution and the justification for it is there or it isn't, separate from consenting adult gays legally marrying. They know the sibling thing is ridiculously flinging poo against a wall, but with Polygamy there is just enough for them to latch on to despite being no evidence linking legalization of same sex marriages and polygamy.

There are actually countries where Polygamy is legal. Guess what isn't legal in those countries? That's right, same sex marriages. Same goes the other way. Gays have been marrying for a decade or more in a few places...where they have not allowed Polygamy, incest or inanimate object marriages.

Of course it was heterosexual, heterosexuals married. You can't marry more than one of the same gender when you don't marry at all.

Geez.