Can the Dem Party really be viewed as the ‘big tent’, ‘inclusive’, ‘tolerant party’ these days?

[MinTrut]

Democrats have Republicans beat bad in the insane conspiracy department - those poor conservatives will NEVER catch up with you guys!

Republicans say stuff like this but they rarely support their statements as is the case here. They just say it.

As is the case here.

Do they; is it? Do they?

Is it?

 

[MinTrut]

Democrats have Republicans beat bad in the insane conspiracy department - those poor conservatives will NEVER catch up with you guys!

Republicans say stuff like this but they rarely support their statements as is the case here. They just say it.

As is the case here.

Whats more insane than believing a man can look down at a penis yet be a woman?

That's the least - and least dangerous - aspect of Democrat hysteria and psychopathy.

 

[BrokeLoser]

What are your thoughts about diversity BTW? Do you promote and support it?

Why would anyone think it’s necessary to “promote” or “support” diversity?
By promoting and supporting diversity aren’t you also promoting and supporting the exclusion of caucasians?
Greater diversity always means fewer whites...why would any sane white get behind such lunacy?

 

[Slade3200]

The hate whitey mantra, their blatant support for speech suppression and fascism kinda changes things a bit...doesn’t it?

Do you think the Republicans fit that description better?

Far better.
Republicans invite all CITIZENS who want to fight to protect and preserve all things American.
They don’t speak of skin color..they don’t talk about how cool it is when there are fewer whites participating.

If their policies are so inviting to a diverse demographic then why aren’t they a diverse party? What are your thoughts about diversity BTW? Do you promote and support it?

How do recent conservative and Republican persons "of color" such as Condolezzaa Rice;

Condoleezza Rice - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

LT. Col. Allen West;

Allen West (politician) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Dr. Ben Carson;

Ben Carson - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Herman Cain;

Ben Carson - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Thomas Sowell;

Thomas Sowell - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

ETC.
... not reflect diversity with the conservative side and the Republican party?

As for diversity, can't speak for others, but with my family which has Armenian ancestry (still awaiting reparations check from Turkey for their genocide of my people a century ago), I also have two sons whom are one-quarter Black(Nigerian), a grandson one quarter Chinese, and two grand-daughters whom are one quarter Korean (their mother, my daughter-in-law is half Korean). Also, through my recently departed younger sister, we have here former husband (Sikh), their son~ half Sikh, and former husband's current wife whom is also Sikh(Indian).

My local Republican party is also supporting a local Sikh whom is running for our county council.

Just the tip of the iceberg, FWIW.

You can always cherry pick examples but when you look at the numbers as a whole it is extremely lopsided especially when you look at the Trump effect. I’m a big fan of Rice BTW. Would love to see her run for higher office

Then provide some cherry pick examples of your own and document that claim of "extremely lopsided". All we've gotten from you so far is bloviated opinion.
Meanwhile that check has yet to arrive and clear the bank.

I also admire Rice but understand why she hesitates to run and become a target of the Leftist loonies. FWIW, I was supporting Carson, whom is far more intelligent and capable a leader than Obama, before Trump got the ticket.

Like many whom supported Trump, I am one of those "deplorables" whom can't stand "what does it matter" SHillary, so went with the lessor of dangers to our nation. FWIW, Trump made clear stands and positions compared to the mush-mouthed flip-flop of most of the others contenting the 2016 nomination.

I don’t need to cherry pick anything. The stats speak for themselves

View attachment 505875

The changing composition of the U.S. political parties

Over the past quarter-century, the demographic profile of the U.S. has been changing: The country has become more racially and ethnically diverse, less

www.pewresearch.org

At least you've finally provided something other than your biased and prejudice opinions.

As someone whom has run for office and helped in campaigns of others, the first point to consider is that running for office is a choice, no one is "drafted" (though at times I've wondered if that wouldn't be better than the current system).

The differences between R and D here reflect not any exclusion buy design or substance of intent of either party on candidates, but rather which is the party out to loot the national treasury and provide hand-outs to get votes and representation.

Like Martin L. King, the Republican Party is interested in the color of one's mind and we select for those whom want true equal opportunity and rights, wealth creation; versus the Democrats whom use racism as a tool to engage in wealth redistribution, plunder of the nation, and increasing the Deficit and Debt to future generations.

If you are riding in a commercial airliner, do you want it piloted by some one whom is skilled and competent or would you rather that person in the cockpit is there because of race~ethnic~gender~orientation, etc. ???

Equity says skill and ability don't matter; just race, ethnic, gender, or "other" not relevant factor does.
Equality says that skill and ability are what count, race, ethnic, gender, or "other" are NOT relevant factors.

It’s easy to say you want the most skilled and capable when you’re in the group that holds the advantages. Of course we want the most skilled and capable in positions of power, but after generations of systemic oppression where blacks women and minorities were not given the opportunity to get educated, receive home loans, compete in the business world, or be equally treated by our law enforcement and legal system… well then we reach a point where we need to evaluate how to rectify and repair that situation. Get them caught up in those areas. I’m sorry if you don’t agree but that’s how I see it.

 

[Slade3200]

W

The hate whitey mantra, their blatant support for speech suppression and fascism kinda changes things a bit...doesn’t it?

The mantra is that they hate racism.

The practice(actions) is they perform racism.
See CRT and 1619 as classic examples of distortion and disinformation from the party of the forked tongue.

What’s specifically is disinformation from CRT and 1619…. Not your words their words… can you cite and example or two?

You are a nothing name on a message board, and likely Leftist troll as well, but for others and further information;
Part One CRT
......
Critical race theory (CRT) is a theoretical framework or set of perspectives by which structural and institutional racism may be examined.[1] It developed as an academic movement of civil-rights scholars and activists in the United States who sought to critically examine U.S. law as it intersects with issues of race in the U.S. and to challenge mainstream American liberal approaches to racial justice.[2] CRT examines social, cultural and legal issues as they relate to race and racism in the United States[3][4] and, more recently, England and Australia.[5][6][7][8]

CRT originated in the mid-1970s in the writings of several American legal scholars, including Derrick Bell, Alan Freeman, Kimberlé Crenshaw, Richard Delgado, Cheryl Harris, Charles R. Lawrence III, Mari Matsuda, and Patricia J. Williams.[2] It emerged as a movement by the 1980s, reworking theories of critical legal studies (CLS) with more focus on race.[2][9] CRT is grounded in critical theory[10] and draws from thinkers such as Antonio Gramsci, Sojourner Truth, Frederick Douglass, and W. E. B. DuBois, as well as the Black Power, Chicano, and radical feminist movements from the 1960s and 1970s.[2]

CRT emphasizes how racism and disparate racial outcomes can be the result of complex, changing and often subtle social and institutional dynamics, rather than explicit and intentional prejudices by individuals.[11][12] It also views race and white supremacy as an intersectional social construction[11] which serves to oppress people of color and marginalized communities at large (i.e gender and class).[13][14][15] [16] In the field of legal studies, CRT emphasizes that merely making laws colorblind on paper may not be enough to make the application of the laws colorblind; ostensibly colorblind laws can be applied in racially discriminatory ways.[17] Intersectionality – which emphasizes that race can intersect with other identities (such as gender and class) to produce complex combinations of power and disadvantage – is a key CRT concept.[18]

Academic critics of CRT argue that it relies on social constructionism, elevates storytelling over evidence and reason, rejects the concepts of truth and merit, and opposes liberalism.[19][20][21] Since 2020, conservative lawmakers in the United States have sought to ban or restrict critical race theory instruction along with other anti-racism programs.[12][22] Critics of these efforts say the lawmakers have poorly defined or misrepresented the tenets and importance of CRT and that the goal of the laws is to silence broader discussions of racism, equality, social justice, and the history of race.[23][24][25] CRT has since 2020 been seen as part of the "culture wars" in the political landscape of the United Kingdom and Australia as well.[1][26][8]
...

Critical race theory - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Red highlight mine.
~~~~~~~~~~~
critical race theory (CRT), intellectual movement and loosely organized framework of legal analysis based on the premise that race is not a natural, biologically grounded feature of physically distinct subgroups of human beings but a socially constructed (culturally invented) category that is used to oppress and exploit people of colour. Critical race theorists hold that the law and legal institutions in the United States are inherently racist insofar as they function to create and maintain social, economic, and political inequalities between whites and nonwhites, especially African Americans.
...

Critical race theory (CRT) | Definition, Principles, & Facts

Critical race theory, intellectual and social movement and framework of legal analysis based on the premise that race is a socially constructed category that is used to oppress and exploit people of color. Critical race theorists hold that racism is inherent in the law and legal institutions of...

www.britannica.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
...
Critical race theory is fast becoming America’s new institutional orthodoxy. Yet most Americans have never heard of it—and of those who have, many don’t understand it. It’s time for this to change. We need to know what it is so we can know how to fight it.

In explaining critical race theory, it helps to begin with a brief history of Marxism. Originally, the Marxist Left built its political program on the theory of class conflict. Marx believed that the primary characteristic of industrial societies was the imbalance of power between capitalists and workers. The solution to that imbalance, according to Marx, was revolution: the workers would eventually gain consciousness of their plight, seize the means of production, overthrow the capitalist class, and usher in a new socialist society.

During the 20th century, a number of regimes underwent Marxist-style revolutions, and each ended in disaster. Socialist governments in the Soviet Union, China, Cambodia, Cuba, and elsewhere racked up a body count of nearly 100 million of their own people. They are remembered for their gulags, show trials, executions, and mass starvations. In practice, Marx’s ideas unleashed man’s darkest brutalities.

By the mid-1960s, Marxist intellectuals in the West had begun to acknowledge these failures. They recoiled at revelations of Soviet atrocities and came to realize that workers’ revolutions would never occur in Western Europe or the United States, where there were large middle classes and rapidly improving standards of living. Americans in particular had never developed a sense of class consciousness or class division. Most Americans believed in the American dream—the idea that they could transcend their origins through education, hard work, and good citizenship.

But rather than abandon their Leftist political project, Marxist scholars in the West simply adapted their revolutionary theory to the social and racial unrest of the 1960s. Abandoning Marx’s economic dialectic of capitalists and workers, they substituted race for class and sought to create a revolutionary coalition of the dispossessed based on racial and ethnic categories.
...

Critical Race Theory: What It Is and How to Fight It

No longer simply an academic matter, critical race theory has become a tool of political power. To borrow a phrase from the Marxist theoretician Antonio Gramsci, it is fast achieving “cultural hegemony” in America’s public institutions. More and more, it is driving the vast machinery of the...

imprimis.hillsdale.edu

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
...
What is Critical Race Theory?

An outgrowth of the European Marxist school of critical theory, critical race theory is an academic movement which seeks to link racism, race, and power. Unlike the Civil Rights movement, which sought to work within the structures of American democracy, critical race theorists challenge the very foundations of the liberal order, such as rationalism, constitutional law, and legal reasoning. Critical race theorists argue that American social life, political structures, and economic systems are founded upon race, which (in their view) is a social construct.

Systemic racism, in the eyes of critical race theorists, stems from the dominance of race in American life. Critical race theorists and anti-racist advocates argue that, because race is a predominant part of American life, racism itself has become internalized into the American conscious. It is because of this, they argue, that there have been significantly different legal and economic outcomes between different racial groups.

What are the implications of Critical Race Theory?

Advocates of anti-racism and critical race theory use this focus on race to emphasize the importance of identity politics. ...
...

What is Critical Race Theory?

Critical Race Theory is not the traditional civil rights movement, which sought to provide equal opportunity and dignity without regard to race.

criticalrace.org

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
...
Critical race theory (CRT) is a movement that challenges the ability of conventional legal strategies to deliver social and economic justice and specifically calls for legal approaches that take into consideration race as a nexus of American life.

The movement champions many of the same concerns as the civil rights movement but places those concerns within a broader economic and historical context. It often elevates the equality principles of the Fourteenth Amendment above the liberty principles of the First Amendment.
...

Critical Race Theory

Critical race theory scholars have advocated for hate speech laws and have said there is no value to protecting such speech under the First Amendment.

mtsu.edu

What is so difficult to understand when we deal with equality. That means that every PERSON in the country is afforded the SAME opportunity. There should be no reference to race, gender, or anything else as that is counter to EQUALITY. Notice the first five letters. That means no affirmative action or any other program the elevates one group over another as that is the classic definition of RACISM. One group believing they are superior to or have more rights than another. SMH.

AA isn’t equality it is reparations for decades of systemic oppression

If that is the case, then the USA is at the bottom of the list of those nations that need to provide reparations for the centuries of "systemic oppression".
See chart and data above on whom was involved in making slaves available to be imported to the Western hemisphere, which other nations brought them and which other nations received the majority of such.

Haha, fine put them at the bottom of the list. I dont think where we sit on the list of comparisons matters in the least.

 

[Slade3200]

What are your thoughts about diversity BTW? Do you promote and support it?

Why would anyone think it’s necessary to “promote” or “support” diversity?
By promoting and supporting diversity aren’t you also promoting and supporting the exclusion of caucasians?
Greater diversity always means fewer whites...why would any sane white get behind such lunacy?

Well there you go. You asked a question in your OP and I think you just answered it. Thanks for playing!

 

[BrokeLoser]

What are your thoughts about diversity BTW? Do you promote and support it?

Why would anyone think it’s necessary to “promote” or “support” diversity?
By promoting and supporting diversity aren’t you also promoting and supporting the exclusion of caucasians?
Greater diversity always means fewer whites...why would any sane white get behind such lunacy?

Well there you go. You asked a question in your OP and I think you just answered it. Thanks for playing!

Answer my questions....
1.) Why would anyone think it’s necessary to “promote” or “support” diversity?
2.) By promoting and supporting diversity aren’t you also promoting and supporting the exclusion of caucasians?
3.) Greater diversity always means fewer whites...why would any sane white get behind such lunacy?

Why wouldn’t you simply allow organic diversity to take shape?

 

[BrokeLoser]

What are your thoughts about diversity BTW? Do you promote and support it?

Why would anyone think it’s necessary to “promote” or “support” diversity?
By promoting and supporting diversity aren’t you also promoting and supporting the exclusion of caucasians?
Greater diversity always means fewer whites...why would any sane white get behind such lunacy?

Well there you go. You asked a question in your OP and I think you just answered it. Thanks for playing!

Think about how fucking retarded you sound....You’re asking Caucasians to be excited about fucking themselves...”Hey whitey, promote and support fewer of you would you please...trust me, its a great idea...it FEELZ so good to support your own demise.”

 

[Slade3200]

What are your thoughts about diversity BTW? Do you promote and support it?

Why would anyone think it’s necessary to “promote” or “support” diversity?
By promoting and supporting diversity aren’t you also promoting and supporting the exclusion of caucasians?
Greater diversity always means fewer whites...why would any sane white get behind such lunacy?

Well there you go. You asked a question in your OP and I think you just answered it. Thanks for playing!

Answer my questions....
1.) Why would anyone think it’s necessary to “promote” or “support” diversity?
2.) By promoting and supporting diversity aren’t you also promoting and supporting the exclusion of caucasians?
3.) Greater diversity always means fewer whites...why would any sane white get behind such lunacy?

Why wouldn’t you simply allow organic diversity to take shape?

1. Love for fellow humans, exposure to different cultures and traditions.
2. Yes
3. Because there are plenty of whites who have ruled this country. Nothing wrong with sharing the wealth

I’m happy to allow organic diversity to take shape

 

[Slade3200]

What are your thoughts about diversity BTW? Do you promote and support it?

Why would anyone think it’s necessary to “promote” or “support” diversity?
By promoting and supporting diversity aren’t you also promoting and supporting the exclusion of caucasians?
Greater diversity always means fewer whites...why would any sane white get behind such lunacy?

Well there you go. You asked a question in your OP and I think you just answered it. Thanks for playing!

Think about how fucking retarded you sound....You’re asking Caucasians to be excited about fucking themselves...”Hey whitey, promote and support fewer of you would you please...trust me, its a great idea...it FEELZ so good to support your own demise.”

That’s your ignorance talking. I don’t see my demise coming from anything we are talking about. If you see yours then you are totally brainwashed

 

[BrokeLoser]

What are your thoughts about diversity BTW? Do you promote and support it?

Why would anyone think it’s necessary to “promote” or “support” diversity?
By promoting and supporting diversity aren’t you also promoting and supporting the exclusion of caucasians?
Greater diversity always means fewer whites...why would any sane white get behind such lunacy?

Well there you go. You asked a question in your OP and I think you just answered it. Thanks for playing!

Think about how fucking retarded you sound....You’re asking Caucasians to be excited about fucking themselves...”Hey whitey, promote and support fewer of you would you please...trust me, its a great idea...it FEELZ so good to support your own demise.”

That’s your ignorance talking. I don’t see my demise coming from anything we are talking about. If you see yours then you are totally brainwashed

Hold on, so celebrating fewer whites in congress isn’t celebrating whiteys smaller footprint in America?
Think once Tard.

 

[BrokeLoser]

What are your thoughts about diversity BTW? Do you promote and support it?

Why would anyone think it’s necessary to “promote” or “support” diversity?
By promoting and supporting diversity aren’t you also promoting and supporting the exclusion of caucasians?
Greater diversity always means fewer whites...why would any sane white get behind such lunacy?

Well there you go. You asked a question in your OP and I think you just answered it. Thanks for playing!

Answer my questions....
1.) Why would anyone think it’s necessary to “promote” or “support” diversity?
2.) By promoting and supporting diversity aren’t you also promoting and supporting the exclusion of caucasians?
3.) Greater diversity always means fewer whites...why would any sane white get behind such lunacy?

Why wouldn’t you simply allow organic diversity to take shape?

1. Love for fellow humans, exposure to different cultures and traditions.
2. Yes
3. Because there are plenty of whites who have ruled this country. Nothing wrong with sharing the wealth

I’m happy to allow organic diversity to take shape

Thats cool...so you’re just another woke white guilt whacko fully engaged in the woke contest?

 

[Slade3200]

What are your thoughts about diversity BTW? Do you promote and support it?

Why would anyone think it’s necessary to “promote” or “support” diversity?
By promoting and supporting diversity aren’t you also promoting and supporting the exclusion of caucasians?
Greater diversity always means fewer whites...why would any sane white get behind such lunacy?

Well there you go. You asked a question in your OP and I think you just answered it. Thanks for playing!

Think about how fucking retarded you sound....You’re asking Caucasians to be excited about fucking themselves...”Hey whitey, promote and support fewer of you would you please...trust me, its a great idea...it FEELZ so good to support your own demise.”

That’s your ignorance talking. I don’t see my demise coming from anything we are talking about. If you see yours then you are totally brainwashed

Hold on, so celebrating fewer whites in congress isn’t celebrating whiteys smaller footprint in America?
Think once Tard.

Haha, you have the dumbest spin on these issues. You’d dont think you’re making good arguments do you?! And you realize you are only reenforcing why minorities are repelled by you and your ilk

 

[Slade3200]

What are your thoughts about diversity BTW? Do you promote and support it?

Why would anyone think it’s necessary to “promote” or “support” diversity?
By promoting and supporting diversity aren’t you also promoting and supporting the exclusion of caucasians?
Greater diversity always means fewer whites...why would any sane white get behind such lunacy?

Well there you go. You asked a question in your OP and I think you just answered it. Thanks for playing!

Answer my questions....
1.) Why would anyone think it’s necessary to “promote” or “support” diversity?
2.) By promoting and supporting diversity aren’t you also promoting and supporting the exclusion of caucasians?
3.) Greater diversity always means fewer whites...why would any sane white get behind such lunacy?

Why wouldn’t you simply allow organic diversity to take shape?

1. Love for fellow humans, exposure to different cultures and traditions.
2. Yes
3. Because there are plenty of whites who have ruled this country. Nothing wrong with sharing the wealth

I’m happy to allow organic diversity to take shape

Thats cool...so you’re just another woke white guilt whacko fully engaged in the woke contest?

Yeah dude, I’m like totally woke and you are like totally asleep

 

[BrokeLoser]

The hate whitey mantra, their blatant support for speech suppression and fascism kinda changes things a bit...doesn’t it?

Do you think the Republicans fit that description better?

Far better.
Republicans invite all CITIZENS who want to fight to protect and preserve all things American.
They don’t speak of skin color..they don’t talk about how cool it is when there are fewer whites participating.

If their policies are so inviting to a diverse demographic then why aren’t they a diverse party? What are your thoughts about diversity BTW? Do you promote and support it?

That’s simple...Dems bait minorities in with free shit offerings and a promise to dethrone whitey...The GOP hasn’t stooped to that level YET.

Correct. The Dems have policies that support and attract minorities while Reps don’t. Now how about that question about diversity. Do you support it or not?

Diversity that happens organically is fine by me...Forced or engineered diversity / multiculturalism destroys.

Slade3200 why do you support father government FORCING Americans to foster illegal trespassers?
Thats weird isn’t it?

 

[Slade3200]

The hate whitey mantra, their blatant support for speech suppression and fascism kinda changes things a bit...doesn’t it?

Do you think the Republicans fit that description better?

Far better.
Republicans invite all CITIZENS who want to fight to protect and preserve all things American.
They don’t speak of skin color..they don’t talk about how cool it is when there are fewer whites participating.

If their policies are so inviting to a diverse demographic then why aren’t they a diverse party? What are your thoughts about diversity BTW? Do you promote and support it?

That’s simple...Dems bait minorities in with free shit offerings and a promise to dethrone whitey...The GOP hasn’t stooped to that level YET.

Correct. The Dems have policies that support and attract minorities while Reps don’t. Now how about that question about diversity. Do you support it or not?

Diversity that happens organically is fine by me...Forced or engineered diversity / multiculturalism destroys.

Slade3200 why do you support father government FORCING Americans to foster illegal trespassers?
Thats weird isn’t it?

Very weird… I wonder why you would think that?! I’m just a live and let live kinda guy

 

[DrLove]

Can the Dem Party really be viewed as the ‘big tent’, ‘inclusive’, ‘tolerant party’ these days?​

Yes - next question?

 

[Crepitus]

Can the Dem Party really be viewed as the ‘big tent’, ‘inclusive’, ‘tolerant party’ these days?​

Yes, and I love that it pisses you off so much.

 

[BrokeLoser]

The hate whitey mantra, their blatant support for speech suppression and fascism kinda changes things a bit...doesn’t it?

Do you think the Republicans fit that description better?

Far better.
Republicans invite all CITIZENS who want to fight to protect and preserve all things American.
They don’t speak of skin color..they don’t talk about how cool it is when there are fewer whites participating.

If their policies are so inviting to a diverse demographic then why aren’t they a diverse party? What are your thoughts about diversity BTW? Do you promote and support it?

That’s simple...Dems bait minorities in with free shit offerings and a promise to dethrone whitey...The GOP hasn’t stooped to that level YET.

Correct. The Dems have policies that support and attract minorities while Reps don’t. Now how about that question about diversity. Do you support it or not?

Diversity that happens organically is fine by me...Forced or engineered diversity / multiculturalism destroys.

Slade3200 why do you support father government FORCING Americans to foster illegal trespassers?
Thats weird isn’t it?

Very weird… I wonder why you would think that?! I’m just a live and let live kinda guy

Hahaha...sure you are.
Illegal trespassers break into your home and you offer them coffee and tea...right?
Because “live and let live”...right?

 

[Crepitus]

The hate whitey mantra, their blatant support for speech suppression and fascism kinda changes things a bit...doesn’t it?

The Democrat Party has always been the Party of Racism.

There has never been anything inclusive about racism.

Not in the Civil War era of the Democrat Party ....

Not in the KKK era of the Democrat Party ....

Not in the Jim Crow era of the Democrat Party ....

Not in the filabustering of the Civil Rights Act era of the Democrat Party ....

Not in the CRT era of the Democrat Party ....

The Democrat Party has NEVER been all inclusive.

You wish.