Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is sad when Republicans have to go back 150 years to find a time when they supported blacksDo you Democrats ever think you will stop trying to snuff out History of Democrats and people of color? Slavery, Civil War, Jim Crowe, Margaret Sanger, Johnson 200 Year Plan. You Democrats own that.
All ancient history
LBJ did great for our country. Civil Rights, Medicare, Medicaid
Ancient American history is fine for republicans until you are black and talking about it. Then all of a sudden that same republican running their mouths off like ol lefty here were not around then and are not responsible.
Define “supported blacks”. You mean like Republican policies that drive down Black Unemployment or Democrat policies that increase Black participation in welfare?
Name any Republican legislation that helps poor and working people more than it helps the wealthy
Inept Republican Presidents in the 1920s....Harding, Coolidge and HooverHarding was one of our worst Presidents
Trump is considered very similar to Harding in being poorly suited for the job
President Harding was actually a Tremendous President.
Beat back tax rates, transitioned America successfully into a peacetime economy. Automobiles, radios and other appliances increased exponentially during the Harding Administration. While Europe was wallowing in economic despair, America was roaring through the 1920's. The 20's were the birth of the American Middle Class, it was when most Americans got their first cars and radios.
Led us in to the Great Depression
How did President Harding's policies or Normalcy, growth, low taxes, low unemployment "cause" the Great Depression?
Low government regulation led to unrestricted speculation
An economic bubble that was bound to burst
The Great Depression was a global event, not restricted to America. And the micromanagement of the American economy by FDR did nothing to help. America had double digit unemployment all the way until 1941, it took Hirohito pulling a Pearl Harbor job on us in Hawaii to reduce unemployment to acceptable levels.
Inept Republican Presidents in the 1920s....Harding, Coolidge and HooverPresident Harding was actually a Tremendous President.
Beat back tax rates, transitioned America successfully into a peacetime economy. Automobiles, radios and other appliances increased exponentially during the Harding Administration. While Europe was wallowing in economic despair, America was roaring through the 1920's. The 20's were the birth of the American Middle Class, it was when most Americans got their first cars and radios.
Led us in to the Great Depression
How did President Harding's policies or Normalcy, growth, low taxes, low unemployment "cause" the Great Depression?
Low government regulation led to unrestricted speculation
An economic bubble that was bound to burst
The Great Depression was a global event, not restricted to America. And the micromanagement of the American economy by FDR did nothing to help. America had double digit unemployment all the way until 1941, it took Hirohito pulling a Pearl Harbor job on us in Hawaii to reduce unemployment to acceptable levels.
It spread from the US.
Yes, it did take a while for FDR to fix the Great Republican Depression
It is sad when Republicans have to go back 150 years to find a time when they supported blacksDo you Democrats ever think you will stop trying to snuff out History of Democrats and people of color? Slavery, Civil War, Jim Crowe, Margaret Sanger, Johnson 200 Year Plan. You Democrats own that.
All ancient history
LBJ did great for our country. Civil Rights, Medicare, Medicaid
Ancient American history is fine for republicans until you are black and talking about it. Then all of a sudden that same republican running their mouths off like ol lefty here were not around then and are not responsible.
Define “supported blacks”. You mean like Republican policies that drive down Black Unemployment or Democrat policies that increase Black participation in welfare?
Name any Republican legislation that helps poor and working people more than it helps the wealthy
Inept Republican Presidents in the 1920s....Harding, Coolidge and Hoover
Led us in to the Great Depression
How did President Harding's policies or Normalcy, growth, low taxes, low unemployment "cause" the Great Depression?
Low government regulation led to unrestricted speculation
An economic bubble that was bound to burst
The Great Depression was a global event, not restricted to America. And the micromanagement of the American economy by FDR did nothing to help. America had double digit unemployment all the way until 1941, it took Hirohito pulling a Pearl Harbor job on us in Hawaii to reduce unemployment to acceptable levels.
It spread from the US.
Yes, it did take a while for FDR to fix the Great Republican Depression
FDR didn't fix anything, the depression continued right up to WWII
YesIt is sad when Republicans have to go back 150 years to find a time when they supported blacksAll ancient history
LBJ did great for our country. Civil Rights, Medicare, Medicaid
Ancient American history is fine for republicans until you are black and talking about it. Then all of a sudden that same republican running their mouths off like ol lefty here were not around then and are not responsible.
Define “supported blacks”. You mean like Republican policies that drive down Black Unemployment or Democrat policies that increase Black participation in welfare?
Name any Republican legislation that helps poor and working people more than it helps the wealthy
Your measure of success is only if legislation helps the poor more than it helps the wealthy??
It is sad when Republicans have to go back 150 years to find a time when they supported blacksAll ancient history
LBJ did great for our country. Civil Rights, Medicare, Medicaid
Ancient American history is fine for republicans until you are black and talking about it. Then all of a sudden that same republican running their mouths off like ol lefty here were not around then and are not responsible.
Define “supported blacks”. You mean like Republican policies that drive down Black Unemployment or Democrat policies that increase Black participation in welfare?
Name any Republican legislation that helps poor and working people more than it helps the wealthy
Your measure of success is only if legislation helps the poor more than it helps the wealthy??
YesIt is sad when Republicans have to go back 150 years to find a time when they supported blacksAncient American history is fine for republicans until you are black and talking about it. Then all of a sudden that same republican running their mouths off like ol lefty here were not around then and are not responsible.
Define “supported blacks”. You mean like Republican policies that drive down Black Unemployment or Democrat policies that increase Black participation in welfare?
Name any Republican legislation that helps poor and working people more than it helps the wealthy
Your measure of success is only if legislation helps the poor more than it helps the wealthy??
Trickle down is a GOP scam
How did President Harding's policies or Normalcy, growth, low taxes, low unemployment "cause" the Great Depression?
Low government regulation led to unrestricted speculation
An economic bubble that was bound to burst
The Great Depression was a global event, not restricted to America. And the micromanagement of the American economy by FDR did nothing to help. America had double digit unemployment all the way until 1941, it took Hirohito pulling a Pearl Harbor job on us in Hawaii to reduce unemployment to acceptable levels.
It spread from the US.
Yes, it did take a while for FDR to fix the Great Republican Depression
FDR didn't fix anything, the depression continued right up to WWII
Hoover spent three years using Republican “let it fix itself” and the Depression only got worse
Yes...paying your fair shareYesIt is sad when Republicans have to go back 150 years to find a time when they supported blacks
Define “supported blacks”. You mean like Republican policies that drive down Black Unemployment or Democrat policies that increase Black participation in welfare?
Name any Republican legislation that helps poor and working people more than it helps the wealthy
Your measure of success is only if legislation helps the poor more than it helps the wealthy??
Trickle down is a GOP scam
No. The biggest scam is the mantra of “paying your fair share” from Democrats while Liberals in Washington run up the tab and refuse to discuss spending cuts.
Yes...paying your fair shareYesDefine “supported blacks”. You mean like Republican policies that drive down Black Unemployment or Democrat policies that increase Black participation in welfare?
Name any Republican legislation that helps poor and working people more than it helps the wealthy
Your measure of success is only if legislation helps the poor more than it helps the wealthy??
Trickle down is a GOP scam
No. The biggest scam is the mantra of “paying your fair share” from Democrats while Liberals in Washington run up the tab and refuse to discuss spending cuts.
You gotta go where the money is
Overwhelmingly, the money in our society resides in a few wealthy rather than the masses of people
It’s not a case of taking away that money from the super wealthyYes...paying your fair shareYesName any Republican legislation that helps poor and working people more than it helps the wealthy
Your measure of success is only if legislation helps the poor more than it helps the wealthy??
Trickle down is a GOP scam
No. The biggest scam is the mantra of “paying your fair share” from Democrats while Liberals in Washington run up the tab and refuse to discuss spending cuts.
You gotta go where the money is
Overwhelmingly, the money in our society resides in a few wealthy rather than the masses of people
You completely ignore egregious spending and spending cuts. Name a thriving economy where the money resides with the masses? Hell, name any economy where the money resides with the masses?
It’s not a case of taking away that money from the super wealthyYes...paying your fair shareYesYour measure of success is only if legislation helps the poor more than it helps the wealthy??
Trickle down is a GOP scam
No. The biggest scam is the mantra of “paying your fair share” from Democrats while Liberals in Washington run up the tab and refuse to discuss spending cuts.
You gotta go where the money is
Overwhelmingly, the money in our society resides in a few wealthy rather than the masses of people
You completely ignore egregious spending and spending cuts. Name a thriving economy where the money resides with the masses? Hell, name any economy where the money resides with the masses?
It is a case of expecting them to support the society from which they benefit so greatly
If you are going to tax, you gotta go where the money is
Sure there is a consensusIt’s not a case of taking away that money from the super wealthyYes...paying your fair shareYes
Trickle down is a GOP scam
No. The biggest scam is the mantra of “paying your fair share” from Democrats while Liberals in Washington run up the tab and refuse to discuss spending cuts.
You gotta go where the money is
Overwhelmingly, the money in our society resides in a few wealthy rather than the masses of people
You completely ignore egregious spending and spending cuts. Name a thriving economy where the money resides with the masses? Hell, name any economy where the money resides with the masses?
It is a case of expecting them to support the society from which they benefit so greatly
If you are going to tax, you gotta go where the money is
OK. There in lies the true argument and the differences. There is no consensus for “supporting the society” and what that means.
Sure there is a consensusIt’s not a case of taking away that money from the super wealthyYes...paying your fair shareNo. The biggest scam is the mantra of “paying your fair share” from Democrats while Liberals in Washington run up the tab and refuse to discuss spending cuts.
You gotta go where the money is
Overwhelmingly, the money in our society resides in a few wealthy rather than the masses of people
You completely ignore egregious spending and spending cuts. Name a thriving economy where the money resides with the masses? Hell, name any economy where the money resides with the masses?
It is a case of expecting them to support the society from which they benefit so greatly
If you are going to tax, you gotta go where the money is
OK. There in lies the true argument and the differences. There is no consensus for “supporting the society” and what that means.
Right now, it is at $4 trillion dollars
The wealthy should bear the brunt of it
YesSure there is a consensusIt’s not a case of taking away that money from the super wealthyYes...paying your fair share
You gotta go where the money is
Overwhelmingly, the money in our society resides in a few wealthy rather than the masses of people
You completely ignore egregious spending and spending cuts. Name a thriving economy where the money resides with the masses? Hell, name any economy where the money resides with the masses?
It is a case of expecting them to support the society from which they benefit so greatly
If you are going to tax, you gotta go where the money is
OK. There in lies the true argument and the differences. There is no consensus for “supporting the society” and what that means.
Right now, it is at $4 trillion dollars
The wealthy should bear the brunt of it
Again, no talk of cutting. You are SIMPLY asking the people who already pay most of it to pay more. Further, you are assuming that all $4T is equally essential.
Sure there is a consensusIt’s not a case of taking away that money from the super wealthyYes...paying your fair shareNo. The biggest scam is the mantra of “paying your fair share” from Democrats while Liberals in Washington run up the tab and refuse to discuss spending cuts.
You gotta go where the money is
Overwhelmingly, the money in our society resides in a few wealthy rather than the masses of people
You completely ignore egregious spending and spending cuts. Name a thriving economy where the money resides with the masses? Hell, name any economy where the money resides with the masses?
It is a case of expecting them to support the society from which they benefit so greatly
If you are going to tax, you gotta go where the money is
OK. There in lies the true argument and the differences. There is no consensus for “supporting the society” and what that means.
Right now, it is at $4 trillion dollars
The wealthy should bear the brunt of it
YesSure there is a consensusIt’s not a case of taking away that money from the super wealthyYou completely ignore egregious spending and spending cuts. Name a thriving economy where the money resides with the masses? Hell, name any economy where the money resides with the masses?
It is a case of expecting them to support the society from which they benefit so greatly
If you are going to tax, you gotta go where the money is
OK. There in lies the true argument and the differences. There is no consensus for “supporting the society” and what that means.
Right now, it is at $4 trillion dollars
The wealthy should bear the brunt of it
Again, no talk of cutting. You are SIMPLY asking the people who already pay most of it to pay more. Further, you are assuming that all $4T is equally essential.
I am asking them to contribute to our society at rates they used to pay
Supply Side/ Trickle Down does not work
YesSure there is a consensusIt’s not a case of taking away that money from the super wealthyYou completely ignore egregious spending and spending cuts. Name a thriving economy where the money resides with the masses? Hell, name any economy where the money resides with the masses?
It is a case of expecting them to support the society from which they benefit so greatly
If you are going to tax, you gotta go where the money is
OK. There in lies the true argument and the differences. There is no consensus for “supporting the society” and what that means.
Right now, it is at $4 trillion dollars
The wealthy should bear the brunt of it
Again, no talk of cutting. You are SIMPLY asking the people who already pay most of it to pay more. Further, you are assuming that all $4T is equally essential.
I am asking them to contribute to our society at rates they used to pay
Supply Side/ Trickle Down does not work
YesSure there is a consensusIt’s not a case of taking away that money from the super wealthy
It is a case of expecting them to support the society from which they benefit so greatly
If you are going to tax, you gotta go where the money is
OK. There in lies the true argument and the differences. There is no consensus for “supporting the society” and what that means.
Right now, it is at $4 trillion dollars
The wealthy should bear the brunt of it
Again, no talk of cutting. You are SIMPLY asking the people who already pay most of it to pay more. Further, you are assuming that all $4T is equally essential.
I am asking them to contribute to our society at rates they used to pay
Supply Side/ Trickle Down does not work
Why don't New York, California and other liberal hot spots raise their taxes on their own citizens?
They can show how well it works out for them, how high taxes attracts jobs and improves the economy
