Can We Agree?

[Timmy]

Hats off to ever this young lady was. Bravo

-Geaux
------------------

This was written by an unnamed 21 yr. old female who gets it. It's her future she's worried about and this is how she feels about the social welfare big government state that she's being forced to live in! These solutions are just common sense in her opinion.

PUT ME IN CHARGE . . ..

Put me in charge of food stamps no cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho's, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. If you want steak and frozen pizza, then get a job.


Put me in charge of Medicaid. Then, we'll test recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine. If you want to use drugs, alcohol, or smoke, then get a job.


Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military barracks? You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. Your "home" will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your own place.


In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a "government" job. It may be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we find for you. We will sell your 22-inch rims and low profile tires and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the "common good."


Before you write that I've violated someone's rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules. Before you say that this would be "demeaning" and ruin their "self-esteem," consider that it wasn't that long ago that taking someone else's money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self-esteem.


If we are expected to pay for other people's mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices.


AND While you are on Gov't subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes, that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov't welfare check . If you want to vote, then get a job .

Excellent. There may yet be hope for American youth.

Nazi youth maybe !

Perhaps you could explain how permitting those on the public dole the honor of working for it, and for the reinstatement of their privilege to vote follows Nazi thought.

Well first off 1/2 of that shit would be unconstitutional ! Then there's the racist part. Then there's the parts that logistically wouldnt work .

 

[Timmy]

So, we don't have an actual source for a letter. Say it isn't so.

You can bet it was written by some lazy welfare queen the likes of our own Templar Kormac b

Notice how it punishes disabled vets and elderly who worked their whole lives.

My elderly (near 90) Mom has paid 20% in tax on capital gains against part of her life's work and savings to the government these last two years.

Who's doing the punishing, you say?

20% on the "gains". What'd she gain and what'd she pay ?

 

[Geaux4it]

Hats off to ever this young lady was. Bravo

-Geaux
------------------

This was written by an unnamed 21 yr. old female who gets it. It's her future she's worried about and this is how she feels about the social welfare big government state that she's being forced to live in! These solutions are just common sense in her opinion.

PUT ME IN CHARGE . . ..

Put me in charge of food stamps no cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho's, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. If you want steak and frozen pizza, then get a job.


Put me in charge of Medicaid. Then, we'll test recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine. If you want to use drugs, alcohol, or smoke, then get a job.


Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military barracks? You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. Your "home" will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your own place.


In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a "government" job. It may be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we find for you. We will sell your 22-inch rims and low profile tires and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the "common good."


Before you write that I've violated someone's rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules. Before you say that this would be "demeaning" and ruin their "self-esteem," consider that it wasn't that long ago that taking someone else's money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self-esteem.


If we are expected to pay for other people's mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices.


AND While you are on Gov't subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes, that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov't welfare check . If you want to vote, then get a job .

Excellent. There may yet be hope for American youth.

Nazi youth maybe !

Perhaps you could explain how permitting those on the public dole the honor of working for it, and for the reinstatement of their privilege to vote follows Nazi thought.

Well first off 1/2 of that shit would be unconstitutional ! Then there's the racist part. Then there's the parts that logistically wouldnt work .

Hog wash. Then we kill the program. Open soup lines and tent cities.

-Geaux

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Hats off to ever this young lady was. Bravo

-Geaux
------------------

This was written by an unnamed 21 yr. old female who gets it. It's her future she's worried about and this is how she feels about the social welfare big government state that she's being forced to live in! These solutions are just common sense in her opinion.

PUT ME IN CHARGE . . ..

Put me in charge of food stamps no cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho's, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. If you want steak and frozen pizza, then get a job.


Put me in charge of Medicaid. Then, we'll test recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine. If you want to use drugs, alcohol, or smoke, then get a job.


Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military barracks? You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. Your "home" will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your own place.


In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a "government" job. It may be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we find for you. We will sell your 22-inch rims and low profile tires and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the "common good."


Before you write that I've violated someone's rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules. Before you say that this would be "demeaning" and ruin their "self-esteem," consider that it wasn't that long ago that taking someone else's money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self-esteem.


If we are expected to pay for other people's mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices.


AND While you are on Gov't subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes, that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov't welfare check . If you want to vote, then get a job .

Excellent. There may yet be hope for American youth.

Nazi youth maybe !

Perhaps you could explain how permitting those on the public dole the honor of working for it, and for the reinstatement of their privilege to vote follows Nazi thought.

Well first off 1/2 of that shit would be unconstitutional ! Then there's the racist part. Then there's the parts that logistically wouldnt work .

None of it is unconstitutional, nor racist. What would not work logistically?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

So, we don't have an actual source for a letter. Say it isn't so.

You can bet it was written by some lazy welfare queen the likes of our own Templar Kormac b

Notice how it punishes disabled vets and elderly who worked their whole lives.

My elderly (near 90) Mom has paid 20% in tax on capital gains against part of her life's work and savings to the government these last two years.

Who's doing the punishing, you say?

20% on the "gains". What'd she gain and what'd she pay ?

Paid roughly 100K against a gain of roughly 500K. Sale of stock.

 

[Auld Phart]

Hats off to ever this young lady was. Bravo

-Geaux
------------------

This was written by an unnamed 21 yr. old female who gets it. It's her future she's worried about and this is how she feels about the social welfare big government state that she's being forced to live in! These solutions are just common sense in her opinion.

PUT ME IN CHARGE . . ..

Put me in charge of food stamps no cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho's, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. If you want steak and frozen pizza, then get a job.


Put me in charge of Medicaid. Then, we'll test recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine. If you want to use drugs, alcohol, or smoke, then get a job.


Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military barracks? You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. Your "home" will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your own place.


In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a "government" job. It may be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we find for you. We will sell your 22-inch rims and low profile tires and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the "common good."


Before you write that I've violated someone's rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules. Before you say that this would be "demeaning" and ruin their "self-esteem," consider that it wasn't that long ago that taking someone else's money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self-esteem.


If we are expected to pay for other people's mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices.


AND While you are on Gov't subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes, that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov't welfare check . If you want to vote, then get a job .

Excellent. There may yet be hope for American youth.

Nazi youth maybe !

Perhaps you could explain how permitting those on the public dole the honor of working for it, and for the reinstatement of their privilege to vote follows Nazi thought.

Well first off 1/2 of that shit would be unconstitutional ! Then there's the racist part. Then there's the parts that logistically wouldnt work .

None of it is unconstitutional, nor racist. What would not work logistically?

Laughed my ass off when he posted some of it was racist.

 

[Timmy]

Excellent. There may yet be hope for American youth.

Nazi youth maybe !

Perhaps you could explain how permitting those on the public dole the honor of working for it, and for the reinstatement of their privilege to vote follows Nazi thought.

Well first off 1/2 of that shit would be unconstitutional ! Then there's the racist part. Then there's the parts that logistically wouldnt work .

None of it is unconstitutional, nor racist. What would not work logistically?

Laughed my ass off when he posted some of it was racist.

Oh the "20 inch rims" line was typical dog whistle shit .

 

[Luddly Neddite]

So, we don't have an actual source for a letter. Say it isn't so.

You can bet it was written by some lazy welfare queen the likes of our own Templar Kormac b

Notice how it punishes disabled vets and elderly who worked their whole lives.

My elderly (near 90) Mom has paid 20% in tax on capital gains against part of her life's work and savings to the government these last two years.

Who's doing the punishing, you say?

20% on the "gains". What'd she gain and what'd she pay ?

And how is representative of every veteran, disabled and/or senior?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Auld Phart]

Nazi youth maybe !

Perhaps you could explain how permitting those on the public dole the honor of working for it, and for the reinstatement of their privilege to vote follows Nazi thought.

Well first off 1/2 of that shit would be unconstitutional ! Then there's the racist part. Then there's the parts that logistically wouldnt work .

None of it is unconstitutional, nor racist. What would not work logistically?

Laughed my ass off when he posted some of it was racist.

Oh the "20 inch rims" line was typical dog whistle shit .

Right, because only minorities buy them and put them on their cars.

 

[Timmy]

So, we don't have an actual source for a letter. Say it isn't so.

You can bet it was written by some lazy welfare queen the likes of our own Templar Kormac b

Notice how it punishes disabled vets and elderly who worked their whole lives.

My elderly (near 90) Mom has paid 20% in tax on capital gains against part of her life's work and savings to the government these last two years.

Who's doing the punishing, you say?

20% on the "gains". What'd she gain and what'd she pay ?

Paid roughly 100K against a gain of roughly 500K. Sale of stock.

Damn! Grandmas doing pretty good!

 

[Timmy]

Hats off to ever this young lady was. Bravo

-Geaux
------------------

This was written by an unnamed 21 yr. old female who gets it. It's her future she's worried about and this is how she feels about the social welfare big government state that she's being forced to live in! These solutions are just common sense in her opinion.

PUT ME IN CHARGE . . ..

Put me in charge of food stamps no cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho's, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. If you want steak and frozen pizza, then get a job.


Put me in charge of Medicaid. Then, we'll test recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine. If you want to use drugs, alcohol, or smoke, then get a job.


Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military barracks? You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. Your "home" will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your own place.


In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a "government" job. It may be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we find for you. We will sell your 22-inch rims and low profile tires and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the "common good."


Before you write that I've violated someone's rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules. Before you say that this would be "demeaning" and ruin their "self-esteem," consider that it wasn't that long ago that taking someone else's money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self-esteem.


If we are expected to pay for other people's mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices.


AND While you are on Gov't subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes, that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov't welfare check . If you want to vote, then get a job .

Excellent. There may yet be hope for American youth.

Nazi youth maybe !

Perhaps you could explain how permitting those on the public dole the honor of working for it, and for the reinstatement of their privilege to vote follows Nazi thought.

Well first off 1/2 of that shit would be unconstitutional ! Then there's the racist part. Then there's the parts that logistically wouldnt work .

None of it is unconstitutional, nor racist. What would not work logistically?

You don't think it's unconstitutional to deny someone the right to vote because they are on bennies ?

Why not say "no guns if you get benefits " ? Sell your Guns ! No, we get "rims".

 

[Timmy]

Perhaps you could explain how permitting those on the public dole the honor of working for it, and for the reinstatement of their privilege to vote follows Nazi thought.

Well first off 1/2 of that shit would be unconstitutional ! Then there's the racist part. Then there's the parts that logistically wouldnt work .

None of it is unconstitutional, nor racist. What would not work logistically?

Laughed my ass off when he posted some of it was racist.

Oh the "20 inch rims" line was typical dog whistle shit .

Right, because only minorities buy them and put them on their cars.

You ain't gonna admit that was the implication ?

 

[Luddly Neddite]

It's well documented that red states and RWs are the recipients of the most welfare.

It's also fact that children and the elderly receive the most food stamps.

Disabled vets, thanks to W and Repubs make up a large percentage of homeless and govt assist recipients.

Women raising children alone because of deadbeat dads receive assistance.

Walmart and other mega-wealthy corps pay slave wages while teaching their employees to get welfare.

Do the RWNJ traitors take any of these facts into consideration?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Auld Phart]

Well first off 1/2 of that shit would be unconstitutional ! Then there's the racist part. Then there's the parts that logistically wouldnt work .

None of it is unconstitutional, nor racist. What would not work logistically?

Laughed my ass off when he posted some of it was racist.

Oh the "20 inch rims" line was typical dog whistle shit .

Right, because only minorities buy them and put them on their cars.

You ain't gonna admit that was the implication ?

Are you sure it was?

Oh, right...

to a dim, everything is racist.

Don't like Obamas policies?

you're racist.

Dont' like his nominees?

you're racist.

Dont' like chocolate ice cream?

You're racist.

any idea how boring that gets?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Excellent. There may yet be hope for American youth.

Nazi youth maybe !

Perhaps you could explain how permitting those on the public dole the honor of working for it, and for the reinstatement of their privilege to vote follows Nazi thought.

Well first off 1/2 of that shit would be unconstitutional ! Then there's the racist part. Then there's the parts that logistically wouldnt work .

None of it is unconstitutional, nor racist. What would not work logistically?

You don't think it's unconstitutional to deny someone the right to vote because they are on bennies ?

Why not say "no guns if you get benefits " ? Sell your Guns ! No, we get "rims".

There is no "right to vote".

 

[Geaux4it]

Excellent. There may yet be hope for American youth.

Nazi youth maybe !

Perhaps you could explain how permitting those on the public dole the honor of working for it, and for the reinstatement of their privilege to vote follows Nazi thought.

Well first off 1/2 of that shit would be unconstitutional ! Then there's the racist part. Then there's the parts that logistically wouldnt work .

None of it is unconstitutional, nor racist. What would not work logistically?

You don't think it's unconstitutional to deny someone the right to vote because they are on bennies ?

Why not say "no guns if you get benefits " ? Sell your Guns ! No, we get "rims".

We deny convicted felons the right to vote. It can be done

-Geaux

 

[Care4all]

She's clueless, mouthing soundbites from all the right wing sites, with no thought of her own....

Honestly, anybody can do that.....

 

[Timmy]

Nazi youth maybe !

Perhaps you could explain how permitting those on the public dole the honor of working for it, and for the reinstatement of their privilege to vote follows Nazi thought.

Well first off 1/2 of that shit would be unconstitutional ! Then there's the racist part. Then there's the parts that logistically wouldnt work .

None of it is unconstitutional, nor racist. What would not work logistically?

You don't think it's unconstitutional to deny someone the right to vote because they are on bennies ?

Why not say "no guns if you get benefits " ? Sell your Guns ! No, we get "rims".

There is no "right to vote".

Try reading the constitution . There's other stuff after the 2nd amendment .

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Perhaps you could explain how permitting those on the public dole the honor of working for it, and for the reinstatement of their privilege to vote follows Nazi thought.

Well first off 1/2 of that shit would be unconstitutional ! Then there's the racist part. Then there's the parts that logistically wouldnt work .

None of it is unconstitutional, nor racist. What would not work logistically?

You don't think it's unconstitutional to deny someone the right to vote because they are on bennies ?

Why not say "no guns if you get benefits " ? Sell your Guns ! No, we get "rims".

There is no "right to vote".

Try reading the constitution . There's other stuff after the 2nd amendment .

Read it a zillion times. I carry a copy around with me to bitch slap the stupid with it.

 

[Timmy]

Nazi youth maybe !

Perhaps you could explain how permitting those on the public dole the honor of working for it, and for the reinstatement of their privilege to vote follows Nazi thought.

Well first off 1/2 of that shit would be unconstitutional ! Then there's the racist part. Then there's the parts that logistically wouldnt work .

None of it is unconstitutional, nor racist. What would not work logistically?

You don't think it's unconstitutional to deny someone the right to vote because they are on bennies ?

Why not say "no guns if you get benefits " ? Sell your Guns ! No, we get "rims".

We deny convicted felons the right to vote. It can be done

-Geaux

Cause they are felons ! They can't own guns either .

Here's some of the gems after the 2nd amendment . Not that conservatives care .

19th:
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.

Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.