skookerasbil
Platinum Member
Whose brain would Barry borrow?? LOL
Lady.........you are the shit!!! And damn if I didnt just see your sig pic and say to myself, "I KNEW SHE WAS A BABE!!!"
![rock :rock: :rock:](/styles/smilies/rock.gif)
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Whose brain would Barry borrow?? LOL
HELL NO !!!the idiot that libtards voted into office will get trounced !!
HELL NO !!!the idiot that libtards voted into office will get trounced !!
Does Newt have any money yet?
HELL NO !!!the idiot that libtards voted into office will get trounced !!
If it's a Thursday night in the fall of 2012, and there's a televised debate featuring Obama's vapid, market researched sound bites vs Romney's vapid market researched sound bites, I'll be watching Monday Night Football highlights.
At least with Newt, you stand a chance of actually learning something.
How to successfully cheat on your spouse.
HELL NO !!!the idiot that libtards voted into office will get trounced !!
Really now.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1y04g6OPLnQ]Obama Dismantles Republican Caucus Part 1 of 7 - YouTube[/ame]
He kicked ass when he went head to head with the Republican caucus.
Or creatively commit ethics violations.
MoreNewt Gingrich has been cleared!!
Remember the uproar regarding Newt's "ethics violations?" People can refresh their memory by reading an article I wrote in 1997 about these charges. In brief, David Bonior brought 75 ethics charges against Newt, 74 which were found to have no merit whatsoever (and people say that Ken Starr is on a "witch hunt?"). The last charge, whether Newt funded his college class "Renewing American Civilization" properly, was too complicated a tax issue for the committee to investigate on its own, so they brought in an outside tax expert to investigate. Two charges arose out of this investigation.
The first 'charge' from the ethics committee is that he "may have" violated tax law by using tax-deductible contributions from nonprofit organizations to teach an allegedly partisan college course.
The second 'charge' from the committee is that, in the course of the investigation, Newt provided false information to the committee. And what was this "false information?" Newt testified that the above contributions were in fact made by those organizations to "Renewing American Civilization." He filed papers that stated the very same thing. This is never a fact that anyone was trying to hide. But one paper filed with the committee stated that those groups did not make the contributions. For this, there was an uproar about Newt's ethics, and he was fined.
HELL NO !!!the idiot that libtards voted into office will get trounced !!
Really now.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1y04g6OPLnQ]Obama Dismantles Republican Caucus Part 1 of 7 - YouTube[/ame]
He kicked ass when he went head to head with the Republican caucus.
Hey numbskull ...the vote in the full House on the ethics charge (which he plea bargained down to 1) was 395 to 28.Or creatively commit ethics violations.
Are these the 'ethics violations' you refer too?
MoreNewt Gingrich has been cleared!!
Remember the uproar regarding Newt's "ethics violations?" People can refresh their memory by reading an article I wrote in 1997 about these charges. In brief, David Bonior brought 75 ethics charges against Newt, 74 which were found to have no merit whatsoever (and people say that Ken Starr is on a "witch hunt?"). The last charge, whether Newt funded his college class "Renewing American Civilization" properly, was too complicated a tax issue for the committee to investigate on its own, so they brought in an outside tax expert to investigate. Two charges arose out of this investigation.
The first 'charge' from the ethics committee is that he "may have" violated tax law by using tax-deductible contributions from nonprofit organizations to teach an allegedly partisan college course.
The second 'charge' from the committee is that, in the course of the investigation, Newt provided false information to the committee. And what was this "false information?" Newt testified that the above contributions were in fact made by those organizations to "Renewing American Civilization." He filed papers that stated the very same thing. This is never a fact that anyone was trying to hide. But one paper filed with the committee stated that those groups did not make the contributions. For this, there was an uproar about Newt's ethics, and he was fined.
Newt Gingrich Cleared - Now How About a Refund?
David Bonier made it his full time job in the House of Representatives to fabricate ethics violations against Newt. Bonier, facing certain defeat for re-election in 2002, stepped down as the second highest ranking Democrat in the House to run for Governor and lost. He was honored by the Democratic Socialists of America in December 2008.
He brought shame on the House, and a whopping 395 to 28 vote is good evidence of that.
That's pretty hilarious. An overwhelming bipartisan vote against Newt, and you thought is was just to "shut them up."He brought shame on the House, and a whopping 395 to 28 vote is good evidence of that.
I can think of a lot of things that bring shame on the house. Like the fact that it spends more than it takes in, for instance.
But please, this was petty complaint #85 where they found a technical violation, and they voted on it to shut them up..
Which they never should have done.
The problem with Beltway Republicans is that deep down, they think they can work with Democrats.
That's pretty hilarious. An overwhelming bipartisan vote against Newt, and you thought is was just to "shut them up."He brought shame on the House, and a whopping 395 to 28 vote is good evidence of that.
I can think of a lot of things that bring shame on the house. Like the fact that it spends more than it takes in, for instance.
But please, this was petty complaint #85 where they found a technical violation, and they voted on it to shut them up..
Which they never should have done.
The problem with Beltway Republicans is that deep down, they think they can work with Democrats.
A little technicality, eh?
You didn't read the report, did you?