Capitalism is NOT Democratic: Democracy is NOT Capitalist

economic-democracy-the-cooperative-alternative.jpg

Economic Democracy

"Economic Democracy is a philosophy and school of thought that is closely related to and overlaps with libertarian socailism, particulary mutualism.

"Economic Democracy argues that capitalism fails to meet its stated goals, which can only be fixed through abolishing various economic hierarchies (notably in the workplace and finance) and creating democratic economic organisations.

"This is to be done with the creation of co-operatives (mainly worker, consumer and financial) financial reform, legal reintroduction of the commons and universal basic income."
The term "libertarian socialism" is an oxymoron
 
Please let it be known by this presents that those attorneys who may believe I libeled or slandered them are welcome to come here, use their real name, and debate me about it or forever lose their Cause and Standing regarding suing me over this topic in the future.
That might be kind of hilarious.
 
I believe the FBI got a bad rap for allegedly being "unprofessional" and someone getting fired just before retirement.

Apparently, I may need to find surgeons at law since mere doctors at law seem to have nothing but fallacy instead of Any better solutions (at law).
1) huh?
2) a surgeon is a doctor....just fyi. You are going to have to dig deep to find some with, not just a law degree, but a law licence willing to actually believe what you do.

What's sad here, and I'm glad you used the medical metaphor....if you came into a doctor's office and told the doctor you have cancer, and the doctor listened to you, then examined you...and came back and said, no you don't have cancer...it's just a rash...here's some cream. You come across as the type of guy, that would argue with the doctor, go to other doctors, and when all the other doctors told you the same thing, you'd continue to disagree....that's what you are doing here with this flawed argument of yours
 
1) huh?
2) a surgeon is a doctor....just fyi. You are going to have to dig deep to find some with, not just a law degree, but a law licence willing to actually believe what you do.

What's sad here, and I'm glad you used the medical metaphor....if you came into a doctor's office and told the doctor you have cancer, and the doctor listened to you, then examined you...and came back and said, no you don't have cancer...it's just a rash...here's some cream. You come across as the type of guy, that would argue with the doctor, go to other doctors, and when all the other doctors told you the same thing, you'd continue to disagree....that's what you are doing here with this flawed argument of yours
It is why I am not on the right-wing and resort to the fewest fallacies nor false analogies.

Right-wingers cannot be trusted with public office.

Vote blue not red!
 
I am still waiting on a substantive response from doctors at law.

Why is requiring Cause in an at-will employment State for unemployment compensation not considered patently unConstitutional?​


Doctors at law may feel free to post their legal opinions without any fear of sanction from me.

(I am not qualified to practice law in any State. I merely argue legal theory and politics, from an economics perspective.)
 
Last edited:
Perhaps, but that is just You guessing and assuming that conclusion. (why do you still have your job)?
No, it's literally what you said..."I don't. I am just guessing and stereotyping right-wingers on this site."

I don't have to make any assumptions or guesses there.
 

Forum List

Back
Top