danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Jan 24, 2015
- 73,961
- 5,055
If Twitter had existed in 1933 Germany, would you have silenced Hitler?
Upgrading infrastructure would have been better than a world war.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If Twitter had existed in 1933 Germany, would you have silenced Hitler?
If Twitter had existed in 1933 Germany, would you have silenced Hitler?
It depends how many people are running for office.How many choices did those voters have?
Corporate Democrats told their base to vote Republican if they didn't like NAFTA; someone would have to be the very definition of gullible to believe corporate capitalism's compatible with democracy.
who's getting paid? folks working at the Court? I would hope so. Why wouldn't they be getting paid?I was merely documenting how I felt at the time. It could be for mere documentation purposes.
They are "getting Paid" to do their job.
Nah, actually that was Dem Govs lockdowns. Nobody made Gavin do that.The MAGA virus shut down Main Street.
See what happens when you elect a malignant narcissist with a room temperature IQ as your POTUS?
Trump campaign rallies led to more than 30,000 coronavirus cases, Stanford researchers say
why woudn't they mind their stocks and investments? They aren't all that productive if they are laid off....they are actually the opposite.....so that's why they should be spending their time wisely, like managing their investments....IRA, 401Ks, pensions, are all investments worth managingThe stock market has been on Federal Reserve life-support since 2008, and the richest ten percent of Americans own 90% of all US stocks. Telling productive workers to mind their investments during a lay-off makes me think you live in a bubble.
The wealthiest 10% of Americans own a record 89% of all U.S. stocks
Not the point. They should be doing a capital fine job since they are getting paid under our form of Capitalism.who's getting paid? folks working at the Court? I would hope so. Why wouldn't they be getting paid?
Not the point. They should be doing a capital fine job since they are getting paid under our form of Capitalism.
I posted this on AVVO to real practicing attorneys to see if they can be more than overpaid process servers:i don’t disagree. Everyone should do fine work at the job they are paid to do!
if not they’ll end up like you trying to get UE insurance and being denied
but you bring up a good point, the opposite of your post…in a socialist system people don’t or aren’t expected to do a fine job, since they have no incentatives to
Good luck with finding the answer that you want.I posted this on AVVO to real practicing attorneys to see if they can be more than overpaid process servers:
Why is requiring Cause in an at-will employment State for unemployment compensation not considered patently unConstitutional?
I am waiting on procedural and substantive answers not just their subjectivity.
1) sorry what did the Court say?I just got a response from the Court. They showed me my lack of high numbers and plenty of practice regarding legal procedure, not legal substance.
Those attorneys on AVVO are proving my point regarding seeming to be nothing but overpaid process servers who probably knew that was All it was to begin with. I got it right the first time even though I am on the left.
Please let it be known by this presents that those attorneys who may believe I libeled or slandered them are welcome to come here, use their real name, and debate me about it or forever lose their Cause and Standing regarding suing me over this topic in the future.
I inferred they implied I simply have low numbers and limited practice with legal procedure.1) sorry what did the Court say?
2) So the AVVO lawyers showed you, you were wrong? and you won't accept their response...gotcha..
I never claimed we did.I have zero "faith" in the market. I just prefer freedom. Plus I think trying to run an economy "democratically" is fucking stupid. We don't need to apply your precious majority rule to every goddamned thing
1) low numbers of what? What did the court rule?I inferred they implied I simply have low numbers and limited practice with legal procedure.
Why do you assume your conclusion? Are you on the clueless and Causeless right-wing who should not be trusted with public office?
Vote blue not red!
You want the economy to be run "democratically". That covers pretty much everything.I never claimed we did.
Political democracy can't exist without a free market. That's part of what is causing the US to unravel.We do have to decide if political democracy can exist without economic democracy.
In general, I think avoiding debt is great advice.Where does freedom from debt factor into your world view?
Did you vote for Don the Con?i didn’t vote for the clintons
"Economic democracy is another term for communisms.
Anyone concerned about corruption would not support Biden or Trump, Twit.Biden is the most corrupt POTUS in history, moron.