Capitalism is NOT Democratic: Democracy is NOT Capitalist

How many choices did those voters have?
D1zG77TX0AANECk.jpg

Corporate Democrats told their base to vote Republican if they didn't like NAFTA; someone would have to be the very definition of gullible to believe corporate capitalism's compatible with democracy.
It depends how many people are running for office.

What is "corporate capitalism" and how is it different then capitalism? and what's a "corporate democrat?"

yeah NAFTA wasn't a great deal for the US, glad Trump got rid of it and a better deal.
 
The stock market has been on Federal Reserve life-support since 2008, and the richest ten percent of Americans own 90% of all US stocks. Telling productive workers to mind their investments during a lay-off makes me think you live in a bubble.
The wealthiest 10% of Americans own a record 89% of all U.S. stocks
why woudn't they mind their stocks and investments? They aren't all that productive if they are laid off....they are actually the opposite.....so that's why they should be spending their time wisely, like managing their investments....IRA, 401Ks, pensions, are all investments worth managing
 
Not the point. They should be doing a capital fine job since they are getting paid under our form of Capitalism.



i don’t disagree. Everyone should do fine work at the job they are paid to do!

if not they’ll end up like you trying to get UE insurance and being denied

but you bring up a good point, the opposite of your post…in a socialist system people don’t or aren’t expected to do a fine job, since they have no incentatives to
 
i don’t disagree. Everyone should do fine work at the job they are paid to do!

if not they’ll end up like you trying to get UE insurance and being denied

but you bring up a good point, the opposite of your post…in a socialist system people don’t or aren’t expected to do a fine job, since they have no incentatives to
I posted this on AVVO to real practicing attorneys to see if they can be more than overpaid process servers:

Why is requiring Cause in an at-will employment State for unemployment compensation not considered patently unConstitutional?

I am waiting on procedural and substantive answers not just their subjectivity.
 
I posted this on AVVO to real practicing attorneys to see if they can be more than overpaid process servers:

Why is requiring Cause in an at-will employment State for unemployment compensation not considered patently unConstitutional?

I am waiting on procedural and substantive answers not just their subjectivity.
Good luck with finding the answer that you want.
 
I just got a response from the Court. They showed me my lack of high numbers and plenty of practice regarding legal procedure, not legal substance.

Those attorneys on AVVO are proving my point regarding seeming to be nothing but overpaid process servers who probably knew that was All it was to begin with. I got it right the first time even though I am on the left.

Please let it be known by this presents that those attorneys who may believe I libeled or slandered them are welcome to come here, use their real name, and debate me about it or forever lose their Cause and Standing regarding suing me over this topic in the future.
 
Last edited:
I just got a response from the Court. They showed me my lack of high numbers and plenty of practice regarding legal procedure, not legal substance.

Those attorneys on AVVO are proving my point regarding seeming to be nothing but overpaid process servers who probably knew that was All it was to begin with. I got it right the first time even though I am on the left.

Please let it be known by this presents that those attorneys who may believe I libeled or slandered them are welcome to come here, use their real name, and debate me about it or forever lose their Cause and Standing regarding suing me over this topic in the future.
1) sorry what did the Court say?
2) So the AVVO lawyers showed you, you were wrong? and you won't accept their response...gotcha..
 
1) sorry what did the Court say?
2) So the AVVO lawyers showed you, you were wrong? and you won't accept their response...gotcha..
I inferred they implied I simply have low numbers and limited practice with legal procedure.

Why do you assume your conclusion? Are you on the clueless and Causeless right-wing who should not be trusted with public office?

Vote blue not red!
 
I have zero "faith" in the market. I just prefer freedom. Plus I think trying to run an economy "democratically" is fucking stupid. We don't need to apply your precious majority rule to every goddamned thing
I never claimed we did.

We do have to decide if political democracy can exist without economic democracy.

Where does freedom from debt factor into your world view?

Yanis Varoufakis posits a twin peaks paradox currently threatening western democracies.

A mountain of debt throwing its shadow over the entire world that nearly everyone recognizes and its twin which many ignore: "A mountain of idle cash belonging to rich savers and to corporations, too terrified to invest it into productive activities that can generate incomes from which you can extinguish the mountains of debts and...produce all those things humanity desperately needs, like green energy."

CommonLit | Capitalism Will Eat Democracy — Unless We Speak Up
 
I inferred they implied I simply have low numbers and limited practice with legal procedure.

Why do you assume your conclusion? Are you on the clueless and Causeless right-wing who should not be trusted with public office?

Vote blue not red!
1) low numbers of what? What did the court rule?
2) i made the logical conclusion based on your replies to post on this thread and others on the topic. Assumed you acted the same way on other websites
 
It was a procedural issue, not a substantive issue. The public sector is more responsible for Procedural issues since they are the ones creating them.

Unfortunately, I also have to spend some time creating an appeal to that decision; due to substantive issues presented by the lack of faithful execution of the law.
 
I never claimed we did.
You want the economy to be run "democratically". That covers pretty much everything.

We do have to decide if political democracy can exist without economic democracy.
Political democracy can't exist without a free market. That's part of what is causing the US to unravel.

Where does freedom from debt factor into your world view?
In general, I think avoiding debt is great advice.
 
"Economic democracy is another term for communisms.
economic-democracy-the-cooperative-alternative.jpg

Economic Democracy

"Economic Democracy is a philosophy and school of thought that is closely related to and overlaps with libertarian socailism, particulary mutualism.

"Economic Democracy argues that capitalism fails to meet its stated goals, which can only be fixed through abolishing various economic hierarchies (notably in the workplace and finance) and creating democratic economic organisations.

"This is to be done with the creation of co-operatives (mainly worker, consumer and financial) financial reform, legal reintroduction of the commons and universal basic income."
 

Forum List

Back
Top