Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Like this inequality? An individual is disqualified for unemployment compensation benefits if the director finds that he or she left his or her most recent work voluntarily without good cause or that he or she has been discharged for misconduct connected with his or her most recent work.people equal…in their poverty and slavery to the state
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.That's equality before the law, not the equality of results that socialist have on their agenda
Equality isn't freedom, turd brain.
how’s that unequal? everyone is treated the same under the law. It applies to all that applyLike this inequality? An individual is disqualified for unemployment compensation benefits if the director finds that he or she left his or her most recent work voluntarily without good cause or that he or she has been discharged for misconduct connected with his or her most recent work.
More like this: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs."Like this: The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
What are you talking about? How is everyone treated the same under the law? The law is employment at the will of either party not just the wealthiest parties under our form of Capitalism.how’s that unequal? everyone is treated the same under the law. It applies to all that apply
how would it be equal to give people that get fired for poor behavior or leave a job on their own access to insurance for people that actually need it?
that would be grossly unfair…which in reality is what socialism is all about
“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”More like this: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs."
because even the wealthy can. be employed at will…not sure where it says any different.What are you talking about? How is everyone treated the same under the law? The law is employment at the will of either party not just the wealthiest parties under our form of Capitalism.
There can be no legal or moral prejudice for faithfully executing our own laws.
The point is, the Capitalist (as the wealthiest) is not sanctioned for lack of good cause; why is Labor (as the least wealthy)?because even the wealthy can. be employed at will…not sure where it says any different.
everyone can be employed on an at-will bases and can be fired for cause by their employer absent a contract. All races, all cases. That equality under the law.
you want the law to be different so that you can be get unemployment insurance claims for being fired for cause, or because you decided you not longer want to work…that’s not only insurance laws are written currently. That doesn’t mean the current law isn’t equally applicable. nobody of any class can get unemployed insurance for those reasons.
capitalist (the wealthy) can be fire for cause…happens all the time. Moreover, labor, the least wealth are generally capitalist too…i don’t know any that don’t want to enjoy the fruits of their labor any own private propertyThe point is, the Capitalist (as the wealthiest) is not sanctioned for lack of good cause; why is Labor (as the least wealthy)?
Right-wingers make it seem like they believe less in equality and more in classism.
Your apology for the Rich point?capitalist (the wealthy) can be fire for cause…happens all the time. Moreover, labor, the least wealth are generally capitalist too…i don’t know any that don’t want to enjoy the fruits of their labor any own private property
huh?Your apology for the Rich point?
“The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”
― Anatole France
By the way, is there such a thing as a motion for federal judicial review of procedural and substantive due process by a State Court?
How many choices did those voters have?1) they elected the people that created policies that made it more advantageous for businesses to do that.
I was merely documenting how I felt at the time. It could be for mere documentation purposes.huh?
If you want the Federal Court to hear your denial of UE insurance, you are going to have to go through the State process first.
If you want to sue the State because you believe the law violates your Due Process, in that it's unconstitutional, you need to bring action in Federal Court.
The MAGA virus shut down Main Street.2) that’s no surprise, Cuomo and Newsom shut down the businesses on Main Street…not the Amazons on the world that are publicly traded
The stock market has been on Federal Reserve life-support since 2008, and the richest ten percent of Americans own 90% of all US stocks. Telling productive workers to mind their investments during a lay-off makes me think you live in a bubble.Just because people are laid off, doesn’t mean people are buying and selling stocks and investing in the market…likely actually a good time to look at your investments when you are laid off.
The stock market has been on Federal Reserve life-support since 2008
Imho, the right is resurrecting political disinformation first seen during Reconstruction with the same intention of restricting the right of low-income voters to cast a meaningful ballot:We could have solved simple poverty on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States, yesterday but for the right-wing having a problem that the Poor may benefit under our form of Capitalism.
If Twitter had existed in 1933 Germany, would you have silenced Hitler?thats funny,,
I am on another thread right now with a moron with TDS saying trump needs to be silenced,,
Who came up with black codes, right-wingers."Racist opponents began to argue that African Americans were voting to redistribute the wealth of hardworking white taxpayers into their own pockets through government projects.
If Twitter had existed in 1933 Germany, would you have silenced Hitler?
