Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Those people are nutjob conservatives. Don't you recall them all practically masturbating to the founders and the constitution during those videos? Or do you not consider libertarians conservatives?If you believe Democrats are against DUI checkpoints then you're a retard.Gun nut logic: DUI's still happen even with traffic stops. Therefore, traffic stops don't prevent DUI's.A) DUIs kill 50,000 people per year. More than Iraq and Afghan wars combined from 2002-present.
B) Gun violence kills about 30,000 people per year.
A) Cops try traffic checkpoints and minor traffic stops to attempt to locate and arrest possibly drunk drivers BEFORE a tragedy. LIBERALS bitch and whine and protest these preventive actions.
B) LIBERALS bitch and whine about the government needing to do something to prevent tragic gun deaths.
Hmmmmm. Anyone see the hypocrisy?
Minor traffic stops do lower DUI rates.
Checkpoints lower DUI rates.
Liberals protest both of them.
Stop and Frisk lowers the unlawful loose gun rate.
Minor traffic stops lower the unlawful loose gun rate.
Liberals protest both.
Do you see a trend?
THERE IS A PROVEN WAY to reduce the number of DUI drivers....AND the number of unlawfully carried guns....floating on our streets.
And liberals have protested those tactics and demonized the men and women who do it.
See the trend?
Stop and frisk is sooooo unconstitutional. Jefferson would slap you across the face for suggesting it to him.
Why did you ignore my gun statement?
Oh....so you haven't seen the countless videos of liberal cop hating douche bags showing their asses and being retards on DUI checkpoints???
You libs demonize the very tactics that get DUIs and illegal guns off the street. There are ways that work. And you all hate them.
Retard.
Liberals disapprove of Police States, and Dictators. I know, we're spoiling all your fun...If you believe Democrats are against DUI checkpoints then you're a retard.Gun nut logic: DUI's still happen even with traffic stops. Therefore, traffic stops don't prevent DUI's.A) DUIs kill 50,000 people per year. More than Iraq and Afghan wars combined from 2002-present.
B) Gun violence kills about 30,000 people per year.
A) Cops try traffic checkpoints and minor traffic stops to attempt to locate and arrest possibly drunk drivers BEFORE a tragedy. LIBERALS bitch and whine and protest these preventive actions.
B) LIBERALS bitch and whine about the government needing to do something to prevent tragic gun deaths.
Hmmmmm. Anyone see the hypocrisy?
Minor traffic stops do lower DUI rates.
Checkpoints lower DUI rates.
Liberals protest both of them.
Stop and Frisk lowers the unlawful loose gun rate.
Minor traffic stops lower the unlawful loose gun rate.
Liberals protest both.
Do you see a trend?
THERE IS A PROVEN WAY to reduce the number of DUI drivers....AND the number of unlawfully carried guns....floating on our streets.
And liberals have protested those tactics and demonized the men and women who do it.
See the trend?
Stop and frisk is sooooo unconstitutional. Jefferson would slap you across the face for suggesting it to him.
Why did you ignore my gun statement?
Oh....so you haven't seen the countless videos of liberal cop hating douche bags showing their asses and being retards on DUI checkpoints???
You libs demonize the very tactics that get DUIs and illegal guns off the street. There are ways that work. And you all hate them.
Fair enough.Those people are nutjob conservatives. Don't you recall them all practically masturbating to the founders and the constitution during those videos? Or do you not consider libertarians conservatives?If you believe Democrats are against DUI checkpoints then you're a retard.Gun nut logic: DUI's still happen even with traffic stops. Therefore, traffic stops don't prevent DUI's.
Minor traffic stops do lower DUI rates.
Checkpoints lower DUI rates.
Liberals protest both of them.
Stop and Frisk lowers the unlawful loose gun rate.
Minor traffic stops lower the unlawful loose gun rate.
Liberals protest both.
Do you see a trend?
THERE IS A PROVEN WAY to reduce the number of DUI drivers....AND the number of unlawfully carried guns....floating on our streets.
And liberals have protested those tactics and demonized the men and women who do it.
See the trend?
Stop and frisk is sooooo unconstitutional. Jefferson would slap you across the face for suggesting it to him.
Why did you ignore my gun statement?
Oh....so you haven't seen the countless videos of liberal cop hating douche bags showing their asses and being retards on DUI checkpoints???
You libs demonize the very tactics that get DUIs and illegal guns off the street. There are ways that work. And you all hate them.
Retard.
They're neither. You two stop trying to pin it on each other. Branch Paulinian nutbags are mentally ill people who detest both parties as much as they detest sane social policy, laws, courts, police, and civil society.
Liberals disapprove of Police States, and Dictators. I know, we're spoiling all your fun...If you believe Democrats are against DUI checkpoints then you're a retard.Gun nut logic: DUI's still happen even with traffic stops. Therefore, traffic stops don't prevent DUI's.A) DUIs kill 50,000 people per year. More than Iraq and Afghan wars combined from 2002-present.
B) Gun violence kills about 30,000 people per year.
A) Cops try traffic checkpoints and minor traffic stops to attempt to locate and arrest possibly drunk drivers BEFORE a tragedy. LIBERALS bitch and whine and protest these preventive actions.
B) LIBERALS bitch and whine about the government needing to do something to prevent tragic gun deaths.
Hmmmmm. Anyone see the hypocrisy?
Minor traffic stops do lower DUI rates.
Checkpoints lower DUI rates.
Liberals protest both of them.
Stop and Frisk lowers the unlawful loose gun rate.
Minor traffic stops lower the unlawful loose gun rate.
Liberals protest both.
Do you see a trend?
THERE IS A PROVEN WAY to reduce the number of DUI drivers....AND the number of unlawfully carried guns....floating on our streets.
And liberals have protested those tactics and demonized the men and women who do it.
See the trend?
Stop and frisk is sooooo unconstitutional. Jefferson would slap you across the face for suggesting it to him.
Why did you ignore my gun statement?
Oh....so you haven't seen the countless videos of liberal cop hating douche bags showing their asses and being retards on DUI checkpoints???
You libs demonize the very tactics that get DUIs and illegal guns off the street. There are ways that work. And you all hate them.
Let's ban Cars.Prolly another drunk driver playing on a cell phone. Such people are far more dangerous than a gun nut but liberals say ignore them.
Three Dead At OSU Homecoming Parade In Stillwater
oct 24 2015 STILLWATER, Oklahoma - We're told three people are dead and several others are hurt at the Oklahoma State University Homecoming Parade Saturday. A vehicle ran into the crowd causing the deaths and multiple injuries.
The Stillwater mayor has confirmed the three fatalities. The mayor reports two people are in critical condition and 27 have been taken to the hospital. Eight helicopters in all responded to the scene.
Witnesses tell News On 6 it was terrifying as a car crashed into parade watchers at high speed. The car was not part of the parade but was on Main before crashing into the crowd at the intersection with Hall of Fame. A police motorcycle unit was also hit, according to reports.
Liberals disapprove of Police States, and Dictators. I know, we're spoiling all your fun...If you believe Democrats are against DUI checkpoints then you're a retard.Gun nut logic: DUI's still happen even with traffic stops. Therefore, traffic stops don't prevent DUI's.A) DUIs kill 50,000 people per year. More than Iraq and Afghan wars combined from 2002-present.
B) Gun violence kills about 30,000 people per year.
A) Cops try traffic checkpoints and minor traffic stops to attempt to locate and arrest possibly drunk drivers BEFORE a tragedy. LIBERALS bitch and whine and protest these preventive actions.
B) LIBERALS bitch and whine about the government needing to do something to prevent tragic gun deaths.
Hmmmmm. Anyone see the hypocrisy?
Minor traffic stops do lower DUI rates.
Checkpoints lower DUI rates.
Liberals protest both of them.
Stop and Frisk lowers the unlawful loose gun rate.
Minor traffic stops lower the unlawful loose gun rate.
Liberals protest both.
Do you see a trend?
THERE IS A PROVEN WAY to reduce the number of DUI drivers....AND the number of unlawfully carried guns....floating on our streets.
And liberals have protested those tactics and demonized the men and women who do it.
See the trend?
Stop and frisk is sooooo unconstitutional. Jefferson would slap you across the face for suggesting it to him.
Why did you ignore my gun statement?
Oh....so you haven't seen the countless videos of liberal cop hating douche bags showing their asses and being retards on DUI checkpoints???
You libs demonize the very tactics that get DUIs and illegal guns off the street. There are ways that work. And you all hate them.
If you believe Democrats are against DUI checkpoints then you're a retard.Gun nut logic: DUI's still happen even with traffic stops. Therefore, traffic stops don't prevent DUI's.A) DUIs kill 50,000 people per year. More than Iraq and Afghan wars combined from 2002-present.
B) Gun violence kills about 30,000 people per year.
A) Cops try traffic checkpoints and minor traffic stops to attempt to locate and arrest possibly drunk drivers BEFORE a tragedy. LIBERALS bitch and whine and protest these preventive actions.
B) LIBERALS bitch and whine about the government needing to do something to prevent tragic gun deaths.
Hmmmmm. Anyone see the hypocrisy?
Minor traffic stops do lower DUI rates.
Checkpoints lower DUI rates.
Liberals protest both of them.
Stop and Frisk lowers the unlawful loose gun rate.
Minor traffic stops lower the unlawful loose gun rate.
Liberals protest both.
Do you see a trend?
THERE IS A PROVEN WAY to reduce the number of DUI drivers....AND the number of unlawfully carried guns....floating on our streets.
And liberals have protested those tactics and demonized the men and women who do it.
See the trend?
Stop and frisk is sooooo unconstitutional. Jefferson would slap you across the face for suggesting it to him.
Why did you ignore my gun statement?
I agree with you on "stop and frisk". It seems those who favor this tactic talk about "all the guns it takes off the streets" just like those who promote the "patriot" act talk about all the terrorists it will stop. But none of them talk about the Bill of Rights that clearly prohibits searches without a warrant or probable cause.
If you believe Democrats are against DUI checkpoints then you're a retard.Gun nut logic: DUI's still happen even with traffic stops. Therefore, traffic stops don't prevent DUI's.A) DUIs kill 50,000 people per year. More than Iraq and Afghan wars combined from 2002-present.
B) Gun violence kills about 30,000 people per year.
A) Cops try traffic checkpoints and minor traffic stops to attempt to locate and arrest possibly drunk drivers BEFORE a tragedy. LIBERALS bitch and whine and protest these preventive actions.
B) LIBERALS bitch and whine about the government needing to do something to prevent tragic gun deaths.
Hmmmmm. Anyone see the hypocrisy?
Minor traffic stops do lower DUI rates.
Checkpoints lower DUI rates.
Liberals protest both of them.
Stop and Frisk lowers the unlawful loose gun rate.
Minor traffic stops lower the unlawful loose gun rate.
Liberals protest both.
Do you see a trend?
THERE IS A PROVEN WAY to reduce the number of DUI drivers....AND the number of unlawfully carried guns....floating on our streets.
And liberals have protested those tactics and demonized the men and women who do it.
See the trend?
Stop and frisk is sooooo unconstitutional. Jefferson would slap you across the face for suggesting it to him.
Why did you ignore my gun statement?
I agree with you on "stop and frisk". It seems those who favor this tactic talk about "all the guns it takes off the streets" just like those who promote the "patriot" act talk about all the terrorists it will stop. But none of them talk about the Bill of Rights that clearly prohibits searches without a warrant or probable cause.
I only support lawful reasonable suspicion stops...and Terry Frisks if all the legal standards have been met. Mass random stops and pat downs aren't right. But lawful stops and lawful frisks? In very high crime areas I'm ok with it.
If you combine the many thousands of death and injury cases caused by alcohol, plus the health risks of alcohol use like cirhossis of liver, dementia etc., maybe alcohol should be the focus rather than guns. After all guns have saved far more people than they have harmed.
If you believe Democrats are against DUI checkpoints then you're a retard.Gun nut logic: DUI's still happen even with traffic stops. Therefore, traffic stops don't prevent DUI's.
Minor traffic stops do lower DUI rates.
Checkpoints lower DUI rates.
Liberals protest both of them.
Stop and Frisk lowers the unlawful loose gun rate.
Minor traffic stops lower the unlawful loose gun rate.
Liberals protest both.
Do you see a trend?
THERE IS A PROVEN WAY to reduce the number of DUI drivers....AND the number of unlawfully carried guns....floating on our streets.
And liberals have protested those tactics and demonized the men and women who do it.
See the trend?
Stop and frisk is sooooo unconstitutional. Jefferson would slap you across the face for suggesting it to him.
Why did you ignore my gun statement?
I agree with you on "stop and frisk". It seems those who favor this tactic talk about "all the guns it takes off the streets" just like those who promote the "patriot" act talk about all the terrorists it will stop. But none of them talk about the Bill of Rights that clearly prohibits searches without a warrant or probable cause.
I only support lawful reasonable suspicion stops...and Terry Frisks if all the legal standards have been met. Mass random stops and pat downs aren't right. But lawful stops and lawful frisks? In very high crime areas I'm ok with it.
I don't think that somebody walking "in a certain area" meets the standard of probable cause. The courts agree.
Unborn children have the right to life.Liberals celebrate that mass murder.But what about abortion?
So should conservatives. Mostly low-income Democrat types getting abortions. Fewer of those, isn't that what you guys want?
If they could think through a wet kleenex, they would see that.
GUNS KILL PEOPLE... isn't that what you RETARDS say? Why YES, YES IT IS... so USING YOUR LOGIC... WE MUST BAN CARS... BAN CARS, BAN CARS... WE MUST BAN CARS.Dope!What does DRUNK have to do with it?
If that person was stopped for a clear violation. But now we're getting away from "stop and frisk" which is the arbitrary pat down of people walking down the street. The courts keep pushing back against this. Arizona vs Gant was an important decision because police routinely searched the vehicles of anyone they arrested, whether there be probable cause or not. This is proof that our system of checks is working because police, by their very nature, will do anything they think to get away with in pursuit of a prosecution and they should. But they also need to be held in check when they go to far and render the 4th Amendment de facto void.If you believe Democrats are against DUI checkpoints then you're a retard.Minor traffic stops do lower DUI rates.
Checkpoints lower DUI rates.
Liberals protest both of them.
Stop and Frisk lowers the unlawful loose gun rate.
Minor traffic stops lower the unlawful loose gun rate.
Liberals protest both.
Do you see a trend?
THERE IS A PROVEN WAY to reduce the number of DUI drivers....AND the number of unlawfully carried guns....floating on our streets.
And liberals have protested those tactics and demonized the men and women who do it.
See the trend?
Stop and frisk is sooooo unconstitutional. Jefferson would slap you across the face for suggesting it to him.
Why did you ignore my gun statement?
I agree with you on "stop and frisk". It seems those who favor this tactic talk about "all the guns it takes off the streets" just like those who promote the "patriot" act talk about all the terrorists it will stop. But none of them talk about the Bill of Rights that clearly prohibits searches without a warrant or probable cause.
I only support lawful reasonable suspicion stops...and Terry Frisks if all the legal standards have been met. Mass random stops and pat downs aren't right. But lawful stops and lawful frisks? In very high crime areas I'm ok with it.
I don't think that somebody walking "in a certain area" meets the standard of probable cause. The courts agree.
I agree also. What I meant was...if you see a bulge in clothing that a person keeps touching and trying trying to hide...it's more suspicious in an area known for drugs and guns. While I agree that is NOT PC for a stop....it is reasonable for a pat down if the person is stopped for another clear violation.
Now you are arguing we should regulate guns like we do cars?GUNS KILL PEOPLE... isn't that what you RETARDS say? Why YES, YES IT IS... so USING YOUR LOGIC... WE MUST BAN CARS... BAN CARS, BAN CARS... WE MUST BAN CARS.
Yeah, it's STUPID, but I think I've made my point. You two faced shit for brains have just been exposed as the hypocritical, second amendment hating, gunphobic psychopaths that you are.
Go pound sand, twit.
A) DUIs kill 50,000 people per year. More than Iraq and Afghan wars combined from 2002-present.
Gun nut logic: DUI's still happen even with traffic stops. Therefore, traffic stops don't prevent DUI's.A) DUIs kill 50,000 people per year. More than Iraq and Afghan wars combined from 2002-present.
B) Gun violence kills about 30,000 people per year.
A) Cops try traffic checkpoints and minor traffic stops to attempt to locate and arrest possibly drunk drivers BEFORE a tragedy. LIBERALS bitch and whine and protest these preventive actions.
B) LIBERALS bitch and whine about the government needing to do something to prevent tragic gun deaths.
Hmmmmm. Anyone see the hypocrisy?
[
Stop and frisk is sooooo unconstitutional.
Are we Free?If you combine the many thousands of death and injury cases caused by alcohol, plus the health risks of alcohol use like cirhossis of liver, dementia etc., maybe alcohol should be the focus rather than guns. After all guns have saved far more people than they have harmed.
Funny how the potheads use the dangers of alcohol use as a justification for adding yet another legal product to cause people to be inebriated on the road. Completely illogical, but that's what people are when they smoke pot.
