LoneLaugher
Diamond Member
when there is enough circumstantial evidence to warrant an IG investigation, putting the individual on "leave" is standard operating procedure.
If an officer shoots a suspect and there is reason to believe the shooting may not have been warranted, the officer is put on leave to avoid another incident...just in case the findings are legit.
The same holds true for the IRS.
If someone is being investigated for "wrong doing" in the IRS, he oir she should immediately stop what he or she is doing.
Your defense of how this was handled is absurd.
How many more people were unfairly targeted while they were investigating?
Do you know when the practice of flagging nutjob groups was stopped.....and when the IG investigation was begun? Let me guess......you have no idea.
Check that out.
Stop with the childish insults and debate like an adult.
We have a very serious situation here and if you insist on turning a eye to it, it can happen again.
Whether the act of flagging particular groups stopped or not is irrelevant. The fact that it happened is the issue, and whoever may have been doing it should have been immediately releived of their responsibilities until the investigation was completed.
Investigations are not done to "stop" the practice. They are performed to find out WHO participated in it and IF it happened.
If a child claims a teacher inappropriately touched him or her, it is likely that teacher would stop immediately. But the teacher is releived of his or her responsibilities unitl AFTER the investigation is completed.
Toss out your insults and "nut job" comments and I will not respond.
You object to my calling Tea Party groups nutjobs? Sorry. How about telling me when the practice was stopped in relation to when the investigation began. Thanks.