Pogo
Diamond Member
- Dec 7, 2012
- 123,708
- 22,748
Why would the FCC have no jurisdiction? They are using bandwidth that is carried over the airwaves which have long been said to belong to the public and thus are regulated by the gubberment. The FCC also regulates communications carried over telephone lines. It doesn't matter how you choose to slice the loaf, the FCC does have jurisdiction the likex of ghese assholes.So you're saying that they are meerly a private business enterprise and as such do NOT enjoy the protection the 1st amendment affords legitimate press? I just want to be clear that we have all the proper rules in place before we play this game. Also as a private enterpise they are clearly covered by and nmust operated under existing antitrust laws and regulations. They may also be covered under the rules and regulations administered by the FCC.it is censorshipWhat is it then?No. Not at all. Don't be retarded.
If a publisher refuses to publish your book you go to a publisher who will.
If a website deletes your posts you go to a website that will allow them.
Nobody is burning your internet posts.
Yeah. Private websites censor things sometimes. You're on what that does it. It's not the same as the government eradicating information that they deem harmful.
Fecesbook is in NO way the fucking "press". It's a fucking graffiti wall. Don't be absurd.
Further the FCC has no jurisdiction. And even in those areas (broadcasting) where it does have jurisdiction it has none over content. Nor should it.
Once again --- the FCC does not regulate content, and never has.