Charges filed in shooting of Kansas City teen who rang wrong doorbell

look on the bright side of the rittenhouse deal,,

he killed a pedo a wife beater and a crazy man that was in and out of nut houses and radical communist,,,
.

And DAMN! He showed us the quickest, surest, fastest way to make about a pound and a half of ground biceps.

iu


.
 
So, why did he have a gun?
On what bases would it of been removed? It's not like he was a felon. At this point, I don't know if there was a history mental decline to show the gun should be taken away. Not much has been released about the defendant. I do imagine defense counsel will be looking into his mental capacity.
 
You mean this part of the law...

A person may, subject to the provisions of subsection 2 of this section, use physical force upon another person when and to the extent he or she reasonably believes such force to be necessary to defend himself or herself or a third person from what he or she reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful force by such other person.

There was no reason for him to believe there was imminent use of unlawful force by the kid he shot,

He does have to prove that he was acting in self-defense.

"There was no reason for him to believe there was imminent use of unlawful force by the kid he shot,"


I don't agree with that at all. He shouldn't have shot, but there was every reason for his concern.
 
The Missouri man who shot a teenager who rang the wrong doorbell while trying to pick up his younger brothers was charged Monday with two felony counts, officials said.

A white man in his 80s, Andrew Lester, has been charged with two crimes in the April 13 shooting of Ralph Yarl, 16, who is Black: assault in the first degree and armed criminal action, Clay County Prosecuting Attorney Zachary Thompson said Monday.

He is 84, according to police documents. Earlier, authorities had given Lester’s age as 85.

An arrest warrant was issued for Lester, who is not in custody, Thompson said, adding that he didn't know where Lester was.

Lester's bond was set at $200,000, Thompson said.

So wait, they have a $200,000 bond set for an 85 year old man for shooting some strange kid in self defense who entered his home unannounced and unauthorized?
 


Wonder if anyone makes the connection between the democrats running this country in the WH, the BLM riots of 2020 they supported and endorsed, and the fact now our country is literally falling apart?

Maybe what we need is a new president whom inspires confidence in our future for our people?
 
From his perspective, at 9:30 PM it's pretty late for an 85 year old, and he looks out the window and sees an unfamiliar black male ringing his doorbell.
Not saying he should have shot, but I can certainly understand why he's afraid.
I thought it was 10;30 but the same applies,,
 
Generally, self defense will not work for shooting someone who knocks on your door, especially if that "threat" has fallen to the ground - aka stopped - and you shoot them again.

Works for the police all of the time who after a suspect has been hit and fallen to the ground unmoving, shoot him another 15 times until they run out of bullets.
 
Saved his life from the danger he got himself into, in no small part because he went into that situation thinking his gun would protect him from physical threats, which it did. It also got him into legal and financial trouble, and made him a social pariah to millions of people who otherwise wouldn't have known or cared who he was.

Considering it's his family who now have to look after his financial security indefinitely and have no doubt faced harassment, I wonder how they feel about the quality of his decisions.

'Saved his life from the danger he got himself into' because of a AR-15 strapped to his chest. Ah. And the girl who wears the mini-skirt into the bar deserves to be raped eh?
 
As usual, Jack is spouting off with another one of his utterly worthless and irrelevant posts offering nothing of actual insightful value himself, just doing the prog thing of commenting how bad OTHER people are.


That is you in a word, Jack.
And the second worthless alt-right twat of a whack-a-mole pops up. :auiqs.jpg:
 
No, this is a consequence of a nation where guns are freely available

That's odd, Jack, as guns have ALWAYS been freely available, far more so than today, and gun violence was never a problem until starting about 20 years ago with the advent of real far left liberal progressivism.

Put another way, all the braindead burned out freaks and hippies of the Haight-Ashbury Era have grown up and are now running the world with their warped socialistic idealism.

In other words, the more people like YOU get their way, the more this country turns into as violent shithole.
 
Well, getting rid of guns is out of the question and most people don't support it....


But gettin rid of blacks or at least making a large part of society feel that something can be done specifically to blacks is still a very strong motivating factor in conservative politics...so I see a new version of Jim Crow laws on the horizon....as long as a Republican isn't too afraid to fight for it....because hinting at stats and posting memes like this -- without finishing the thought by talking about policies specifically designed to target blacks -- is cowardly...

View attachment 777466
What you are proposing is a separate, Black nation. At the moment, most Blacks do not want this. If they ever do, patriots should support their right to have one -- as they should for any national grouping. The specifics of it would be very messy but that's how humans make their history.

In the meantime, we have to live together. All patriots, of whatever color, need to support strong measures against all criminals, of whatever color, including against petty crimes, which is how serious criminals get their start.

We need to support School Choice, which will separate the disruptive, incorrigible ones from the salvagable ones.

The coming collapse of America will root out old political loyalties. A lot of people who have voted Democrat all their lives, will see the practical, bloody results of the Democrats' pro-criminal policies. We can wina lot of these people over. But not if we say, "Only whites allowed." That's a criminally suicidal policy.
 

Forum List

Back
Top