Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He was obviously going to win on appeal and the state under Keith Ellison will of course call a retrial, so not much has changed.Derek Chauvin Juror Brandon Mitchell's Participation In D.C. March Could Help Appeal, Legal Experts Say
A picture of a juror in the Derek Chauvin trial posted on social media has some legal experts saying it could help in an appeal.minnesota.cbslocal.com
man looks like appeal time.
Thanks to Waters telling the Jury they’ll burn, loot and murder unless they say guilty along with this juror who lied, you better hope there’s a retrial. One day soon the roles will be reversed in the courtroom.1. There will be NO retrial.
2. BLM has no doubt notified the Administration that it will not tolerate a retrial. And when BLM speaks, all liberals jump to attention.
3. Besides, a retrial would result in the same decision, for the jury will again be "diverse," thus assuring a "guilty" on every charge.
4. With the COVID tragedy & the 2020 election already dividing our nation, the powers-that-be simply will not allow a retrial, which would result in unprecedented violence. After all, Nancy has already proclaimed Mr. Floyd to be our greatest martyr.
Derek Chauvin Juror Brandon Mitchell's Participation In D.C. March Could Help Appeal, Legal Experts Say
A picture of a juror in the Derek Chauvin trial posted on social media has some legal experts saying it could help in an appeal.minnesota.cbslocal.com
man looks like appeal time.
wow...sounds like the libs are doing all they can to ensure that this guy gets offDerek Chauvin Juror Brandon Mitchell's Participation In D.C. March Could Help Appeal, Legal Experts Say
A picture of a juror in the Derek Chauvin trial posted on social media has some legal experts saying it could help in an appeal.minnesota.cbslocal.com
man looks like appeal time.
they can’t bring new ones related to this event.A retrial may occur, and Chauvin will be convicted on all the old charges and all of the new added ones.
The DAs will try.they can’t bring new ones related to this event.A retrial may occur, and Chauvin will be convicted on all the old charges and all of the new added ones.
to violate the law? wow...The DAs will try.they can’t bring new ones related to this event.A retrial may occur, and Chauvin will be convicted on all the old charges and all of the new added ones.
It's not a violation of the Judge buys their legal argument.to violate the law? wow...The DAs will try.they can’t bring new ones related to this event.A retrial may occur, and Chauvin will be convicted on all the old charges and all of the new added ones.
there is no legal legal argument to violate double jeapardy that way.It's not a violation of the Judge buys their legal argument.to violate the law? wow...The DAs will try.they can’t bring new ones related to this event.A retrial may occur, and Chauvin will be convicted on all the old charges and all of the new added ones.
There is no double jeopardy if the verdict is thrown out and a retrial ordered.there is no legal legal argument to violate double jeapardy that way.It's not a violation of the Judge buys their legal argument.to violate the law? wow...The DAs will try.they can’t bring new ones related to this event.A retrial may occur, and Chauvin will be convicted on all the old charges and all of the new added ones.
what other charges would they bring and why didn’t they bring them already anyway??
haha sure there. the law doesn’t allow the govt to go back and bring more charges if they get a verdict over turned on a appeal.There is no double jeopardy if the verdict is thrown out and a retrial ordered.there is no legal legal argument to violate double jeapardy that way.It's not a violation of the Judge buys their legal argument.to violate the law? wow...The DAs will try.they can’t bring new ones related to this event.A retrial may occur, and Chauvin will be convicted on all the old charges and all of the new added ones.
what other charges would they bring and why didn’t they bring them already anyway??
study up, please, and re-read abovehaha sure there. the law doesn’t allow the govt to go back and bring more charges if they get a verdict over turned on a appeal.There is no double jeopardy if the verdict is thrown out and a retrial ordered.there is no legal legal argument to violate double jeapardy that way.It's not a violation of the Judge buys their legal argument.to violate the law? wow...The DAs will try.they can’t bring new ones related to this event.A retrial may occur, and Chauvin will be convicted on all the old charges and all of the new added ones.
what other charges would they bring and why didn’t they bring them already anyway??
They can only proceed on the charges that they got convictions on in the first case A retrial is ordered...not a re indictment