Chief Justice Roberts admonishes both sides at Senate impeachment trial, after marathon session.....

[B. Kidd]

....erupts into shouting match!!!!

A marathon first day in the Senate impeachment trial against President Trump erupted into a shouting match well after midnight early Wednesday morning, as Trump's legal team unloaded on Democratic impeachment manager Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y. -- in an exchange that prompted a bleary-eyed Chief Justice John Roberts to sternly admonish both sides for misconduct in the chamber.

Nadler began the historic spat by speaking in support of the eighth amendment of the day proposed by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, after each of Schumer's previous attempted alterations to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's rules were rejected by a united Republican contingent by a vote of 53-47. The eighth amendment, issued as the clock struck midnight, was to issue a subpoena for former National Security Advisor John Bolton, who has reportedly described Trump's conduct as akin to a "drug deal."

Nader, who was overheard apparently planning to impeach Trump back in 2018, said it would be a "treacherous vote" and a "cover-up" for Republicans to reject the Bolton subpoena, claiming that "only guilty people try to hide evidence."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

------------

All the judge has to do is rule that the prosecutions case is baseless, without merit or any legitimate charge, unconstitutional on its face and run the 2 articles of impeachment through a shredder on national TV. But Roberts cant tell the difference between a tax and a fee so I seriously doubt he could find his own ass with both hands, a map, and a flashlight.

I liked the old days when they beat each other with canes until they pissed blood!

 

[iceberg]

....erupts into shouting match!!!!

A marathon first day in the Senate impeachment trial against President Trump erupted into a shouting match well after midnight early Wednesday morning, as Trump's legal team unloaded on Democratic impeachment manager Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y. -- in an exchange that prompted a bleary-eyed Chief Justice John Roberts to sternly admonish both sides for misconduct in the chamber.

Nadler began the historic spat by speaking in support of the eighth amendment of the day proposed by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, after each of Schumer's previous attempted alterations to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's rules were rejected by a united Republican contingent by a vote of 53-47. The eighth amendment, issued as the clock struck midnight, was to issue a subpoena for former National Security Advisor John Bolton, who has reportedly described Trump's conduct as akin to a "drug deal."

Nader, who was overheard apparently planning to impeach Trump back in 2018, said it would be a "treacherous vote" and a "cover-up" for Republicans to reject the Bolton subpoena, claiming that "only guilty people try to hide evidence."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

------------

All the judge has to do is rule that the prosecutions case is baseless, without merit or any legitimate charge, unconstitutional on its face and run the 2 articles of impeachment through a shredder on national TV. But Roberts cant tell the difference between a tax and a fee so I seriously doubt he could find his own ass with both hands, a map, and a flashlight.

Pat Cipollone lied, intentionally I infer.

So no witnesses or documents, he is guilty as crap. No defense of tramp. Nothing. Might as well call is an end right now, I would not waste my time with the republicans.

we'd all be better served if you'd not waste our time with this inane repetitive crap of TRUMP SUCKS over and over and over and over and over again.

 

[wamose]

What the hell happened to all that "overwhelming and irrefutable" evidence that Democrats voted for impeachment on?

McConnell is allowing NO witnesses or evidence. Keep up

Maybe Democrats should learn how to run an impeachment. If they did it right in the first place, like they were crowing they did, both sides could immediately sum up their cases and move to a vote. But the child like Democrat managers feel that crying and begging Republicans to do their job is their best way to delay the proceeding and muddy the water. Democrats can't run a simple investigation, how are we supposed to believe they could run our country? Short answer - they couldn't. It's time they get back to work now, especially the rookies who haven't done a damn thing since they were elected.

 

[Penelope]

I swear the republicans and trampers are idiots. You can't talk reason with them, they are too ignorant.

 

[Care4all]

....erupts into shouting match!!!!

A marathon first day in the Senate impeachment trial against President Trump erupted into a shouting match well after midnight early Wednesday morning, as Trump's legal team unloaded on Democratic impeachment manager Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y. -- in an exchange that prompted a bleary-eyed Chief Justice John Roberts to sternly admonish both sides for misconduct in the chamber.

Nadler began the historic spat by speaking in support of the eighth amendment of the day proposed by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, after each of Schumer's previous attempted alterations to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's rules were rejected by a united Republican contingent by a vote of 53-47. The eighth amendment, issued as the clock struck midnight, was to issue a subpoena for former National Security Advisor John Bolton, who has reportedly described Trump's conduct as akin to a "drug deal."

Nader, who was overheard apparently planning to impeach Trump back in 2018, said it would be a "treacherous vote" and a "cover-up" for Republicans to reject the Bolton subpoena, claiming that "only guilty people try to hide evidence."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

------------

All the judge has to do is rule that the prosecutions case is baseless, without merit or any legitimate charge, unconstitutional on its face and run the 2 articles of impeachment through a shredder on national TV. But Roberts cant tell the difference between a tax and a fee so I seriously doubt he could find his own ass with both hands, a map, and a flashlight.

Pat Cipollone lied, intentionally I infer.

So no witnesses or documents, he is guilty as crap. No defense of tramp. Nothing. Might as well call is an end right now, I would not waste my time with the republicans.

The House presented no witnesses and no evidence for their 2 non criminal Articles.

But loopy Iran Nan is still giddy that the Impeachment is forever! Here's a pen!

There were at least 10 witnesses in the house.

There were 35 people called, only ONE SUPPOSED WITNESS WHO SAID



Why are you so STUPID, AND make a fool of yourself with each left wing post?

good morning purge!

Tis you, that is misinformed, and the spreader of lies, not truth.... And much like the President you speak Lies, because it is your natural Language, your natural tongue.

 

[iceberg]

I swear the republicans and trampers are idiots. You can't talk reason with them, they are too ignorant.

you never try - you just do this whiney ass shit and pretend everyone is as bad as you need them to be.

try not being such a king kamaya-maya beyotch and i'll bet people respond differently. that or you're just a troll-bot.

my guess is door #2 - troll-bot-bitch.

 

[The Purge]

....erupts into shouting match!!!!

A marathon first day in the Senate impeachment trial against President Trump erupted into a shouting match well after midnight early Wednesday morning, as Trump's legal team unloaded on Democratic impeachment manager Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y. -- in an exchange that prompted a bleary-eyed Chief Justice John Roberts to sternly admonish both sides for misconduct in the chamber.

Nadler began the historic spat by speaking in support of the eighth amendment of the day proposed by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, after each of Schumer's previous attempted alterations to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's rules were rejected by a united Republican contingent by a vote of 53-47. The eighth amendment, issued as the clock struck midnight, was to issue a subpoena for former National Security Advisor John Bolton, who has reportedly described Trump's conduct as akin to a "drug deal."

Nader, who was overheard apparently planning to impeach Trump back in 2018, said it would be a "treacherous vote" and a "cover-up" for Republicans to reject the Bolton subpoena, claiming that "only guilty people try to hide evidence."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

------------

All the judge has to do is rule that the prosecutions case is baseless, without merit or any legitimate charge, unconstitutional on its face and run the 2 articles of impeachment through a shredder on national TV. But Roberts cant tell the difference between a tax and a fee so I seriously doubt he could find his own ass with both hands, a map, and a flashlight.

Pat Cipollone lied, intentionally I infer.

So no witnesses or documents, he is guilty as crap. No defense of tramp. Nothing. Might as well call is an end right now, I would not waste my time with the republicans.

The House presented no witnesses and no evidence for their 2 non criminal Articles.

But loopy Iran Nan is still giddy that the Impeachment is forever! Here's a pen!

There were at least 10 witnesses in the house.

There were 35 people called, only ONE SUPPOSED WITNESS WHO SAID



Why are you so STUPID, AND make a fool of yourself with each left wing post?

good morning purge!

Tis you, that is misinformed, and the spreader of lies, not truth.... And much like the President you speak Lies, because it is your natural Language, your natural tongue.

Which of your supposed truths would you like me to Blow up? The only one s that tell more lies than you do is....Penny, Leash, Candyporn, wrongwinger and perhaps 4 dozen other morons and mind dead liberals!

 

[The Purge]

Oh, BTW yesterday....

12 Senate votes yesterday 11 out of 12 were 53-47

Collins voted with the democrats once.....You would think that ass would go along with the program... Even Pierre Delicktoe (lolol) voted with the majority....Certainly sending a message to the party of INFANTICIDE!!!!!..NO CHANCE OF REMOVING OUR PRESIDENT WITH THEIR BULLSHIT!

 

[Penelope]

....erupts into shouting match!!!!

A marathon first day in the Senate impeachment trial against President Trump erupted into a shouting match well after midnight early Wednesday morning, as Trump's legal team unloaded on Democratic impeachment manager Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y. -- in an exchange that prompted a bleary-eyed Chief Justice John Roberts to sternly admonish both sides for misconduct in the chamber.

Nadler began the historic spat by speaking in support of the eighth amendment of the day proposed by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, after each of Schumer's previous attempted alterations to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's rules were rejected by a united Republican contingent by a vote of 53-47. The eighth amendment, issued as the clock struck midnight, was to issue a subpoena for former National Security Advisor John Bolton, who has reportedly described Trump's conduct as akin to a "drug deal."

Nader, who was overheard apparently planning to impeach Trump back in 2018, said it would be a "treacherous vote" and a "cover-up" for Republicans to reject the Bolton subpoena, claiming that "only guilty people try to hide evidence."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

------------

All the judge has to do is rule that the prosecutions case is baseless, without merit or any legitimate charge, unconstitutional on its face and run the 2 articles of impeachment through a shredder on national TV. But Roberts cant tell the difference between a tax and a fee so I seriously doubt he could find his own ass with both hands, a map, and a flashlight.

Pat Cipollone lied, intentionally I infer.

So no witnesses or documents, he is guilty as crap. No defense of tramp. Nothing. Might as well call is an end right now, I would not waste my time with the republicans.

The House presented no witnesses and no evidence for their 2 non criminal Articles.

But loopy Iran Nan is still giddy that the Impeachment is forever! Here's a pen!

There were at least 10 witnesses in the house.

There were 35 people called, only ONE SUPPOSED WITNESS WHO SAID



Why are you so STUPID, AND make a fool of yourself with each left wing post?

good morning purge!

Tis you, that is misinformed, and the spreader of lies, not truth.... And much like the President you speak Lies, because it is your natural Language, your natural tongue.

I know I will never try to reason with them again.

 

[hadit]

....erupts into shouting match!!!!

A marathon first day in the Senate impeachment trial against President Trump erupted into a shouting match well after midnight early Wednesday morning, as Trump's legal team unloaded on Democratic impeachment manager Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y. -- in an exchange that prompted a bleary-eyed Chief Justice John Roberts to sternly admonish both sides for misconduct in the chamber.

Nadler began the historic spat by speaking in support of the eighth amendment of the day proposed by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, after each of Schumer's previous attempted alterations to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's rules were rejected by a united Republican contingent by a vote of 53-47. The eighth amendment, issued as the clock struck midnight, was to issue a subpoena for former National Security Advisor John Bolton, who has reportedly described Trump's conduct as akin to a "drug deal."

Nader, who was overheard apparently planning to impeach Trump back in 2018, said it would be a "treacherous vote" and a "cover-up" for Republicans to reject the Bolton subpoena, claiming that "only guilty people try to hide evidence."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

------------

All the judge has to do is rule that the prosecutions case is baseless, without merit or any legitimate charge, unconstitutional on its face and run the 2 articles of impeachment through a shredder on national TV. But Roberts cant tell the difference between a tax and a fee so I seriously doubt he could find his own ass with both hands, a map, and a flashlight.

Roberts doesn't have a lot of power in this trial, so he really couldn't do that.

 

[hadit]

....erupts into shouting match!!!!

A marathon first day in the Senate impeachment trial against President Trump erupted into a shouting match well after midnight early Wednesday morning, as Trump's legal team unloaded on Democratic impeachment manager Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y. -- in an exchange that prompted a bleary-eyed Chief Justice John Roberts to sternly admonish both sides for misconduct in the chamber.

Nadler began the historic spat by speaking in support of the eighth amendment of the day proposed by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, after each of Schumer's previous attempted alterations to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's rules were rejected by a united Republican contingent by a vote of 53-47. The eighth amendment, issued as the clock struck midnight, was to issue a subpoena for former National Security Advisor John Bolton, who has reportedly described Trump's conduct as akin to a "drug deal."

Nader, who was overheard apparently planning to impeach Trump back in 2018, said it would be a "treacherous vote" and a "cover-up" for Republicans to reject the Bolton subpoena, claiming that "only guilty people try to hide evidence."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

------------

All the judge has to do is rule that the prosecutions case is baseless, without merit or any legitimate charge, unconstitutional on its face and run the 2 articles of impeachment through a shredder on national TV. But Roberts cant tell the difference between a tax and a fee so I seriously doubt he could find his own ass with both hands, a map, and a flashlight.

Pat Cipollone lied, intentionally I infer.

So no witnesses or documents, he is guilty as crap. No defense of tramp. Nothing. Might as well call is an end right now, I would not waste my time with the republicans.

The House presented no witnesses and no evidence for their 2 non criminal Articles.

But loopy Iran Nan is still giddy that the Impeachment is forever! Here's a pen!

There were at least 10 witnesses in the house.

Why would they have to testify all over again to the Senate? We already have their testimony, so unless you want the Senate Republicans to tear them apart, why can't their testimony just be reviewed?

Truth be told, you don't want that. You think somebody is hiding something that you think would be exposed by the Senate doing the House's job for them. The reality is, though, that if they allowed testimony, the Republicans would have a free hand to hammer home certain facts, like none of them testified that Trump demanded a QPQ.

 

[iceberg]

I swear the republicans and trampers are idiots. You can't talk reason with them, they are too ignorant.

you never try - you just do this whiney ass shit and pretend everyone is as bad as you need them to be.

try not being such a king kamaya-maya beyotch and i'll bet people respond differently. that or you're just a troll-bot.

my guess is door #2 - troll-bot-bitch.

You are not in reality.

not in your version, that's for sure.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Roberts is as "Deep State, Swamp Creature" as they get.
I'm thinking this is a bad omen from the start.
Hopefully, I'm wrong.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

I swear the republicans and trampers are idiots. You can't talk reason with them, they are too ignorant.

Look in the mirror. It's definitely NOT just Republicans.

 

[jwoodie]

A sham impeachment begets a quick dismissal.

Unless the Senate actually votes to acquit, couldn't these articles be resubmitted at a later date?

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

A sham impeachment begets a quick dismissal.

Unless the Senate actually votes to acquit, couldn't these articles be resubmitted at a later date?

Suffice it to say, American Communists will NEVER stop working to deny free elections and freely elected officials. No matter how they do it, by ANY means necessary.
I think the past two years (or more) has made this abundantly clear to all but the slow learners.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

....erupts into shouting match!!!!

A marathon first day in the Senate impeachment trial against President Trump erupted into a shouting match well after midnight early Wednesday morning, as Trump's legal team unloaded on Democratic impeachment manager Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y. -- in an exchange that prompted a bleary-eyed Chief Justice John Roberts to sternly admonish both sides for misconduct in the chamber.

Nadler began the historic spat by speaking in support of the eighth amendment of the day proposed by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, after each of Schumer's previous attempted alterations to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's rules were rejected by a united Republican contingent by a vote of 53-47. The eighth amendment, issued as the clock struck midnight, was to issue a subpoena for former National Security Advisor John Bolton, who has reportedly described Trump's conduct as akin to a "drug deal."

Nader, who was overheard apparently planning to impeach Trump back in 2018, said it would be a "treacherous vote" and a "cover-up" for Republicans to reject the Bolton subpoena, claiming that "only guilty people try to hide evidence."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

------------

All the judge has to do is rule that the prosecutions case is baseless, without merit or any legitimate charge, unconstitutional on its face and run the 2 articles of impeachment through a shredder on national TV. But Roberts cant tell the difference between a tax and a fee so I seriously doubt he could find his own ass with both hands, a map, and a flashlight.

This is a sham trial. Everyone knows it. Political theater.

 

[kyzr]

A sham impeachment begets a quick dismissal.

Unless the Senate actually votes to acquit, couldn't these articles be resubmitted at a later date?

If the Articles are dismissed with prejudice, they cannot be resubmitted.
Difference between dismissed with or without prejudice
In the formal legal world, a court case that is dismissed with prejudice means that it is dismissed permanently. A case dismissed with prejudice is over and done with, once and for all, and can't be brought back to court. A case dismissed without prejudice means the opposite. It's not dismissed forever.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

This is a sham trial. Everyone knows it. Political theater.

Irrelevant.

"ALL THAT IS REQUIRED FOR EVIL MEN TO PREVAIL IS FOR GOOD MEN TO DO NOTHING"

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

A sham impeachment begets a quick dismissal.

Unless the Senate actually votes to acquit, couldn't these articles be resubmitted at a later date?

If the Articles are dismissed with prejudice, they cannot be resubmitted.
Difference between dismissed with or without prejudice
In the formal legal world, a court case that is dismissed with prejudice means that it is dismissed permanently. A case dismissed with prejudice is over and done with, once and for all, and can't be brought back to court. A case dismissed without prejudice means the opposite. It's not dismissed forever.

This all assumes a law abiding, equal justice for all world.

That couldn't be further from what reality today is.

Pay attention.