Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If by "Russians" you mean a bunch of gutless, do-nothing, Jesus Nazis, then yes. The GOP are a bunch of Russians.Interesting perspective you have: You label the Dems as "commies" but just remember; the GOP are the Russians.
The Dems are commies. That is a FACT.
As we all know, Trump & the GOP have a 'Russia' problem which the severity of has yet to be determined
Russia: The 'cloud' over the White House
Ah, so now that your Kavanaugh onslaught failed you're defaulting back to Russia! Russia! Russia! now?
If by "Russians" you mean a bunch of gutless, do-nothing, Jesus Nazis, then yes. The GOP are a bunch of Russians.Interesting perspective you have: You label the Dems as "commies" but just remember; the GOP are the Russians.
The Dems are commies. That is a FACT.
As we all know, Trump & the GOP have a 'Russia' problem which the severity of has yet to be determined
Russia: The 'cloud' over the White House
Ah, so now that your Kavanaugh onslaught failed you're defaulting back to Russia! Russia! Russia! now?
member Bootney Lee Farnsworth brought the concept of "commies" into the conversation.
As we all know Trump has a 'Russia' problem & those Russians are still commies.
People also believe the 'cold war' is over.
How in Hell did the GOP get anyone to fall for that crap?
Post #5 was not made by a judge.Nice...but what does that have to do with Chief Justice Roberts' request?
He's doing it as a formality. Nobody with their sanity still intact are taking these infantile hissy fits seriously.
The request by Roberts is IMO a formality that won't result in any 'real' action against Kavanaugh.
With 'no content' & 'trolling' posts such as post #5 it is obvious that some do not take judicial formality as reality.
So, you're a law student slagging professors. Your opinion comes across as nothing more than sour grapes.
Pretty sure the pro-Kavanaugh folks aren't the ones with sour grapes.
WATCH: Protesters Try To Claw Supreme Court Doors Open During Kavanaugh’s Swearing In
More than 2,400 law professors have determined that Kavanaugh has “displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for any court.” Former Justice Stevens, in remarks to retirees in Boca Raton, Fla, declared that Kavanaugh’s statements on September 27 revealed prejudices that would make it impossible for him to do the court’s work.
Too bad that:
- The Senate Judiciary hearings and all statements made therein were not a court of law and were not deciding any legal court case, therefore "judicial temperament" was both irrelevant and meaningless at that time.
- If Judge Stevens, a partisan, wants to declare Kavanaugh prejudiced and impossible for him to do his job, then let him first start with Ruth Ginsberg who has called the president a fake! Where is the outrage there?
You claim judicial temperament is irrelevant and meaningless in a Supreme Court confirmation hearing? I've seen lots of dumb right wing remarks, but that's about the dumbest I have ever seen.
Chief Justice Roberts Requests Tenth Circuit To Investigate Kavanaugh Ethics Questions
While the Republican leadership celebrates the seating of Brett Kavanaugh as a Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roberts yesterday requested the Tenth Circuit to review more than twelve ethics complaints that have been made against Kavanaugh. The complaints concern Kavanaugh’s behavior at the Senate Judiciary Committee on September 27.
Judge Henderson dismissed some of the complaints made against Judge Kavanaugh as frivolous. But she concluded that more than a dozen complaints were substantive enough to warrant investigation by an impartial panel and that they should not be handled by Judge Kavanaugh’s fellow judges in the D.C. Circuit. She referred them to Chief Justice Roberts, who has now referred them to the 10th Circuit.
The complaints were not made without legal basis. More than 2,400 law professors have determined that Kavanaugh has “displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for any court.”
Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens also stated that Judge Kavanaugh has demonstrated bias and is “not fit for the Supreme Court.” Former Justice Stevens, in remarks to retirees in Boca Raton, Fla, declared that Kavanaugh’s statements on September 27 revealed prejudices that would make it impossible for him to do the court’s work. “They suggest that he has demonstrated a potential bias involving enough potential litigants before the court that he would not be able to perform his full responsibilities.”
The fact that you don't think Sotomayor was is hilarious...The SCOTUS is now blatantly partisan, as well as the process of getting them on the Court.
Glad that's out the way.
Thanks Trump!
If by "Russians" you mean a bunch of gutless, do-nothing, Jesus Nazis, then yes. The GOP are a bunch of Russians.Interesting perspective you have: You label the Dems as "commies" but just remember; the GOP are the Russians.
The Dems are commies. That is a FACT.
As we all know, Trump & the GOP have a 'Russia' problem which the severity of has yet to be determined
Russia: The 'cloud' over the White House
The White House chef is serving salad with Russian Dressing today!
Yes. It was sent directly from Putin along with a thank you note to Trump for all his help. It also had a list of Trump's assignments for the coming week.
Keep up the lunacy!
Trump 2020 thanks you.
nothing can happen - the WH wanted an investigation that showed nothing and got one.
theeeeeeeeeeeee end
If by "Russians" you mean a bunch of gutless, do-nothing, Jesus Nazis, then yes. The GOP are a bunch of Russians.
The Dems are commies. That is a FACT.
As we all know, Trump & the GOP have a 'Russia' problem which the severity of has yet to be determined
Russia: The 'cloud' over the White House
The White House chef is serving salad with Russian Dressing today!
Yes. It was sent directly from Putin along with a thank you note to Trump for all his help. It also had a list of Trump's assignments for the coming week.
Keep up the lunacy!
Trump 2020 thanks you.
Great bumper sticker. You should go with that.
View attachment 221956
If by "Russians" you mean a bunch of gutless, do-nothing, Jesus Nazis, then yes. The GOP are a bunch of Russians.
The Dems are commies. That is a FACT.
As we all know, Trump & the GOP have a 'Russia' problem which the severity of has yet to be determined
Russia: The 'cloud' over the White House
The White House chef is serving salad with Russian Dressing today!
Yes. It was sent directly from Putin along with a thank you note to Trump for all his help. It also had a list of Trump's assignments for the coming week.
Keep up the lunacy!
Trump 2020 thanks you.
Great bumper sticker. You should go with that.
View attachment 221956
More than 2,400 law professors have determined that Kavanaugh has “displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for any court.” Former Justice Stevens, in remarks to retirees in Boca Raton, Fla, declared that Kavanaugh’s statements on September 27 revealed prejudices that would make it impossible for him to do the court’s work.
Too bad that:
- The Senate Judiciary hearings and all statements made therein were not a court of law and were not deciding any legal court case, therefore "judicial temperament" was both irrelevant and meaningless at that time.
- If Judge Stevens, a partisan, wants to declare Kavanaugh prejudiced and impossible for him to do his job, then let him first start with Ruth Ginsberg who has called the president a fake! Where is the outrage there?
You claim judicial temperament is irrelevant and meaningless in a Supreme Court confirmation hearing? I've seen lots of dumb right wing remarks, but that's about the dumbest I have ever seen.
No yours. For one thing, Kavanaugh's already proven judicial temperament in his TWENTY-SIX fucking years as a US Circuit judge and elsewhere! Second of all, the hearings were NOT a judicial process, much less one where Brett was being charged with deciding a judicial case. THIRD: he was addressing UNFOUNDED CHARGES OF RAPE, DRUGGING WOMEN, LASCIVIOUS BEHAVIOR AND SEXUAL ASSAULT while his wife and family were being attacked and threatened. See post 22. How should he respond? I think he comported himself beautifully --- far better than I bet any liberal judge would handle it. Of course, the GOP would never treat any judge so.
More than 2,400 law professors have determined that Kavanaugh has “displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for any court.” Former Justice Stevens, in remarks to retirees in Boca Raton, Fla, declared that Kavanaugh’s statements on September 27 revealed prejudices that would make it impossible for him to do the court’s work.
Too bad that:
- The Senate Judiciary hearings and all statements made therein were not a court of law and were not deciding any legal court case, therefore "judicial temperament" was both irrelevant and meaningless at that time.
- If Judge Stevens, a partisan, wants to declare Kavanaugh prejudiced and impossible for him to do his job, then let him first start with Ruth Ginsberg who has called the president a fake! Where is the outrage there?
You claim judicial temperament is irrelevant and meaningless in a Supreme Court confirmation hearing? I've seen lots of dumb right wing remarks, but that's about the dumbest I have ever seen.
No yours. For one thing, Kavanaugh's already proven judicial temperament in his TWENTY-SIX fucking years as a US Circuit judge and elsewhere! Second of all, the hearings were NOT a judicial process, much less one where Brett was being charged with deciding a judicial case. THIRD: he was addressing UNFOUNDED CHARGES OF RAPE, DRUGGING WOMEN, LASCIVIOUS BEHAVIOR AND SEXUAL ASSAULT while his wife and family were being attacked and threatened. See post 22. How should he respond? I think he comported himself beautifully --- far better than I bet any liberal judge would handle it. Of course, the GOP would never treat any judge so.
He should have responded as a mature adult. Not a petulant spoiled child.
As we all know, Trump & the GOP have a 'Russia' problem which the severity of has yet to be determined
Russia: The 'cloud' over the White House
The White House chef is serving salad with Russian Dressing today!
Yes. It was sent directly from Putin along with a thank you note to Trump for all his help. It also had a list of Trump's assignments for the coming week.
Keep up the lunacy!
Trump 2020 thanks you.
Great bumper sticker. You should go with that.
View attachment 221956
It's so reassuring to know that the Moonbats don't realize that their lunacy drives people to support Trump. Keep up keeping on!
Roberts wants to simply clear up the BS lies made against Kav so every time the Leftards bring it up they look like even bigger fascist liars.Chief Justice Roberts Requests Tenth Circuit To Investigate Kavanaugh Ethics Questions
While the Republican leadership celebrates the seating of Brett Kavanaugh as a Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roberts yesterday requested the Tenth Circuit to review more than twelve ethics complaints that have been made against Kavanaugh. The complaints concern Kavanaugh’s behavior at the Senate Judiciary Committee on September 27.
Judge Henderson dismissed some of the complaints made against Judge Kavanaugh as frivolous. But she concluded that more than a dozen complaints were substantive enough to warrant investigation by an impartial panel and that they should not be handled by Judge Kavanaugh’s fellow judges in the D.C. Circuit. She referred them to Chief Justice Roberts, who has now referred them to the 10th Circuit.
The complaints were not made without legal basis. More than 2,400 law professors have determined that Kavanaugh has “displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for any court.”
Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens also stated that Judge Kavanaugh has demonstrated bias and is “not fit for the Supreme Court.” Former Justice Stevens, in remarks to retirees in Boca Raton, Fla, declared that Kavanaugh’s statements on September 27 revealed prejudices that would make it impossible for him to do the court’s work. “They suggest that he has demonstrated a potential bias involving enough potential litigants before the court that he would not be able to perform his full responsibilities.”
As we all know, Trump & the GOP have a 'Russia' problem which the severity of has yet to be determined
Russia: The 'cloud' over the White House
The White House chef is serving salad with Russian Dressing today!
Yes. It was sent directly from Putin along with a thank you note to Trump for all his help. It also had a list of Trump's assignments for the coming week.
Keep up the lunacy!
Trump 2020 thanks you.
Great bumper sticker. You should go with that.
View attachment 221956
Shut up and give us a better alternative! You can't! Trump may be a wild man but I love his antics for how they drive you nuts. But at least he is getting good stuff done left and right. That's all that matters.
The White House chef is serving salad with Russian Dressing today!
Yes. It was sent directly from Putin along with a thank you note to Trump for all his help. It also had a list of Trump's assignments for the coming week.
Keep up the lunacy!
Trump 2020 thanks you.
Great bumper sticker. You should go with that.
View attachment 221956
It's so reassuring to know that the Moonbats don't realize that their lunacy drives people to support Trump. Keep up keeping on!
Trump's base will support him no matter what. Fortunately, that base hasn't grown since his election. Still about a third of the country.
What a bunch of bullshit.The complaints were not made without legal basis. More than 2,400 law professors have determined that Kavanaugh has “displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for any court.”
Law professors are a bunch of useless hacks that can't cut it in private practice, and can hardly be considered experts on judicial temperament. I would like to hear from other judges, justices, or practicing lawyers.
Many of them would be practicing lawyers and judges.What a bunch of bullshit.The complaints were not made without legal basis. More than 2,400 law professors have determined that Kavanaugh has “displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for any court.”
Law professors are a bunch of useless hacks that can't cut it in private practice, and can hardly be considered experts on judicial temperament. I would like to hear from other judges, justices, or practicing lawyers.
What a bunch of bullshit.The complaints were not made without legal basis. More than 2,400 law professors have determined that Kavanaugh has “displayed a lack of judicial temperament that would be disqualifying for any court.”
Law professors are a bunch of useless hacks that can't cut it in private practice, and can hardly be considered experts on judicial temperament. I would like to hear from other judges, justices, or practicing lawyers.
This is 100% true, I’m an L2, most of my profs couldn’t handle being normal lawyers...so they opted to “teach”. The few profs I’ve had who had who are either still practicing or have a lot of experience often talk about how the other profs teach a bunch of BS, and do not know what they are talking about (in a nicer way than that obviously). They often have a lot of SMH moments when another student says “professor such and such said this though.” Not all are hacks, but most are and the popular talking point they have going around these days is how the founder were idiots or didn’t realize what a mistake they made when making the constitution so hard to change (which they did so on purpose for people just like them).
So, you're a law student slagging professors. Your opinion comes across as nothing more than sour grapes.
