Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I love listening to all the lefties clamoring for government to get out of their bedrooms, then supporting the government taking over their health care decisions by mandating they buy something under penalty of law....
These lefties are so full of shit.
I love listening to all the lefties clamoring for government to get out of their bedrooms, then supporting the government taking over their health care decisions by mandating they buy something under penalty of law....
These lefties are so full of shit.
Strawman fallacy.
I am a conservative who supports marriage equality for gays and who is opposed to my core to ObamaCare.
Nice try.
I would also prefer government get out of marriage as much as possible, which is not contradictory in any way toward marriage equality for gays. We ALL need to step away from the government's free lunch counter.
I find it interesting that the far right now argues that government should stay out of marriage, but they had no problem with government regulation of marriage until gays began demanding equal "regulation".
I find it interesting that the far right now argues that government should stay out of marriage, but they had no problem with government regulation of marriage until gays began demanding equal "regulation".
I find it interesting that the far right now argues that government should stay out of marriage, but they had no problem with government regulation of marriage until gays began demanding equal "regulation".
Different people have different opinions on not only the concept of gay marriage, but also how it should be implemented.
In my case I would vote for it if it went on the ballot, however I see no federal consitutional right to it, so using the federal courts is in my opinion, legislating from the bench.
It is an issue for the State legislatures to figure out.
I find it interesting that the far right now argues that government should stay out of marriage, but they had no problem with government regulation of marriage until gays began demanding equal "regulation".
Different people have different opinions on not only the concept of gay marriage, but also how it should be implemented.
In my case I would vote for it if it went on the ballot, however I see no federal consitutional right to it, so using the federal courts is in my opinion, legislating from the bench.
It is an issue for the State legislatures to figure out.
Nobody should be allowed to vote on what rights others are allowed to have
Different people have different opinions on not only the concept of gay marriage, but also how it should be implemented.
In my case I would vote for it if it went on the ballot, however I see no federal consitutional right to it, so using the federal courts is in my opinion, legislating from the bench.
It is an issue for the State legislatures to figure out.
Nobody should be allowed to vote on what rights others are allowed to have
Gay Marriage is not a right.
Nobody should be allowed to vote on what rights others are allowed to have
Gay Marriage is not a right.
14th amendment provides for equal protection under the law
You don't get to vote on who that protection applies to
Gay Marriage is not a right.
14th amendment provides for equal protection under the law
You don't get to vote on who that protection applies to
2nd amendment gives me the right to keep and bear arms, yet you seem perfectly OK to infringe on THAT right which is explicit.
Equal protection does not mean equal access, which is what you want it to mean.
If equal protection was invoidable I should be able to carry a firearm openly just like a policeman does.
14th amendment provides for equal protection under the law
You don't get to vote on who that protection applies to
2nd amendment gives me the right to keep and bear arms, yet you seem perfectly OK to infringe on THAT right which is explicit.
Equal protection does not mean equal access, which is what you want it to mean.
If equal protection was invoidable I should be able to carry a firearm openly just like a policeman does.
You might have a point if you were being denied the right to bear arms because of your race, sex, religion or sexual orientation
2nd amendment gives me the right to keep and bear arms, yet you seem perfectly OK to infringe on THAT right which is explicit.
Equal protection does not mean equal access, which is what you want it to mean.
If equal protection was invoidable I should be able to carry a firearm openly just like a policeman does.
You might have a point if you were being denied the right to bear arms because of your race, sex, religion or sexual orientation
I have a point in general, you just refuse to admit it. In fact, denying me a right for the simple reason that I am not a government actor or agent is EVEN WORSE than denying me for the reasons you listed.
There is nothing in the consitution about denying someone something due to sex or sexual orientation, except the right to vote.
How on Earth is the promotion of heterosexual marriage contracts not in the "common good"?
Do you think those in that 7.4% unemployment and the average Amercians give a crap about this?
only in the small worlds of the left is this important
their priorities for this country is warped...and they are RUNNING it folks
If it's not a priority then why not just legalize it everywhere and be done with it? Afterall, a majority of the public supports marriage equality.
He is a liberal after all.
Do you think those in that 7.4% unemployment and the average Amercians give a crap about this?
only in the small worlds of the left is this important
their priorities for this country is warped...and they are RUNNING it folks
If it's not a priority then why not just legalize it everywhere and be done with it? Afterall, a majority of the public supports marriage equality.
Indeed. Washington should just hand out contracts to consenting adults, not defining values for free people.
Christie should tell the Tea Party to fuck off. Romney's mistake was going too far right to win the primary. He was unable to come back to the middle so he could peel off centrists who don't necessarily believe that Jesus rode a dinosaur, or that a government bureaucrat should be posted at the foot of every bed making sure free people love each other correctly.
Welcome to the real party of big government
The dems have the market cornered now with govt in the bedrooms.
Well - on THIS issue - the Dems are getting government OUT of the bedroom. Only the far right want to regulate relationships.
But did you just post that sarcastically?
Relationships are personal interactions with no need to codify. Marriage is an invention of The State and codified. You should read about the Trial of Socrates. But you won't.
Next thing, maybe libs will sue to allow them to marry their right hand. Or left. Whatever
The dems have the market cornered now with govt in the bedrooms.
Well - on THIS issue - the Dems are getting government OUT of the bedroom. Only the far right want to regulate relationships.
But did you just post that sarcastically?
No one wants to regulate relationships.
Democrats want to regulate everyone's opinion of the relationships of others.
