Dot Com
Nullius in verba
good postI disagree.
The world is changing, social attitudes are changing, markets are changing.
as a business you adapt or die.
They did not adapt.
And I have yet to have explained in any reasonable terms how baking a cake for someone is against anyone's religious convictions.
If a gay couple wanted a birthday cake for their adopted kid would they have been refused by this bakery?
If a gay couple came in holding hands to buy a cupcake would they have been refused?
If this was about marriage then don't Christian churches refuse to recognize civil marriage?
If two atheists came in and wanted a wedding cake would they have been refused because they weren't really getting married and were going to be living in sin?
This was about bigotry and nothing more and quite frankly I don't care if bigots suffer because of their bigotry.
Well, if you believe it is okay to intentionally and with malice of forethought destroy somebody's business because they hold a view you don't share, I think you might be part of the problem here.
Boycotting bigots should not be attached to the language used for first degree murder.
As I said if these bigots were consistent in their refusals to serve anyone who they believed lived a life that they felt was against their religious beliefs I might have more sympathy for them.
But that is obviously not the case here now is it?
They were happy to take other peoples money who were living in sin according to their religion weren't they?
Hypocritical bigots are even worse than run of the mill bigots.