Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Apples and atom bombs.The wedding cake was one that came to mind. Curt Schilling a few years back was another though I can understand taking issue with Schilling's language at that time.
Hate can be strong emotion no doubt.The government took no action against Shilling. I didn't support forcing anyone to bake a cake. I couldn't understand the reasoning of the baker but hate is a strong emotion.
Your post is clear example of an idiot-gram.Idiot. Your post is a clear example of a double-edged sword.
"Hate" is a projection by the left...Nobody needs to hate a porcupine, to not want them in your house.Hate can be strong emotion no doubt.
In a political sense yes. I was responding to the word itself, not political ramifications."Hate" is a projection by the left...Nobody needs to hate a porcupine, to not want them in your house.
Very true and for whatever its worth both sides are guilty of going too far in that regard.For many, politics is everything.
And I'm more into linguistics and semantics than politics....That's why it's so easy for me to parse out the limpness of the lame recriminations you State worshipers sling around, at anyone who stands in the way of your cult.For many, politics is everything.
I've noted ever since the ruling that it was the correct ruling. That the government has no business going after either individuals or a business because of what they have to say. So tell me, why should a governor be able to attack a business simply because that business has a business model the governor disagrees with?
This is the same thing the lawsuit was brought over in the first place. A group created a movie that showed Hillary in a negative light and some wanted the government to be able to shut them down.
What could be more un-American than that?
When the Supreme Court in 2010 handed down its ruling on Citizens United v. FEC, Democrats were scandalized. Then-President Barack Obama warned it would "open the floodgates" to corporations influencing politics by diminishing restrictions on corporate speech.
But now, as Disney v. DeSantis has become an actual legal battle — with the Walt Disney Corporation suing the Florida governor for retaliating against it after CEO Bob Iger criticized DeSantis' policies — the political roles have reversed. Liberals remain scandalized (albeit for different reasons) but now seek the protections the Citizens United ruling offers.
The Supreme Court's Citizens United decision was a pain in the neck for Democrats. Now, it could be used to their advantage in the Disney v. DeSantis feud.
I made them, and you're too much of a fucking lightweight to address them....Not the least of which is that NOBODY is entitled to special carve-outs from the rules and laws, that every other business is required to adhere to...Therefore the Citizen's United ruling doesn't come close to applying here.When you start making points, I'll address them.
I made them, and you're too much of a fucking lightweight to address them....Not the least of which is that NOBODY is entitled to special carve-outs from the rules and laws, that every other business is required to adhere to...Therefore the Citizen's United ruling doesn't come close to applying here.
Maybe you should look up, then contrast and compare, the very real differences between the words "rights" and "privileges".
Whatever you fancy my "claims" are, I enjoy seeing authoritarians being manhandled by American democracy.
View attachment 781290
.............................................................View attachment 781293View attachment 781295
If you addressed them, then you did so poorly and with specious reasoning..I already addressed all your points in the thread. When you come up with something original or want to address what I already said, I will consider your post.
I made them, and you're too much of a fucking lightweight to address them....Not the least of which is that NOBODY is entitled to special carve-outs from the rules and laws, that every other business is required to adhere to...Therefore the Citizen's United ruling doesn't come close to applying here.
Maybe you should look up, then contrast and compare, the very real differences between the words "rights" and "privileges".
1. There are limits to free speech, especially when they conflict with parental or religious rights. Who said "I know obsenity when I see it"? Obsenity is not guaranteed free speech is it? You still can't say Carlin's (7) or so words on TV without bleeps can you? Why not? Censorship is NOT "attacking".It also guarantees the freedom of speech, yet Disney is being attacked by the Govt for using theirs.
I am not saying agree with it, but according to your own words all that is needed for the Govt to act is for a majority of voters to want them to do it.
There are many ways to attack a company.
At least you openly admit that Florida is attacking Disney for political reasons finally.
