Nutz
Gold Member
- Feb 27, 2014
- 14,814
- 1,810
- 265
- Banned
- #21
I'm confused. I see threads in protected forums with the terms "Teaper" "Teabagger" and "Fundy" included in the title...when there is absolutely no connection in the OP or any subsequent posts to the tea party or fundamentalist Christians.
Shouldn't the random attachment of the terms "teaper" "tea bagger" and "fundy" to any negative current event (with no corroborating evidence that there is a connection to Tea Party or fundamentalism provided) wouldn't the teaper/fundie/bagger threads qualify, if not as fodder for the badlands, as a conspiracy theory? Because the associations are truly random and completely without merit. The posters admit, always, "I'm sure he's/she's/they're teapers" which is an admission that there is no evidence that it's so...yet these offensive, inflammatory, and patently untrue thread titles linger on..and on...and on.....
Teaper is roughly on a par with Libtard.. We have no "stylebook" on USMB anymore. Used to be about 3 or 5 banned words. Hard to ban words that are included on hits in the Top 40 or allowed on basic Cable.
Quit attacking Teaper. It is not an offensive term in anyway! It is short for Tea Partier. Like any noun, it can be modified with an adjective. You people may take offense to those adjectives...but TEAPER is an innocent word. Tea Partier - Teaper.