jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 139,180
- 29,134
getting someone who is your friend does not validate any document. The good old boy club, come on in and have a drink and we'll publish your paper. here's all you need to say.........global warming is man made and hottest eva......funny stuff, has zip on INTEGRITY. Zero.......I'm pretty sure getting your paper pubsihed as the lead paper in PNAS isnt being 'laughed out the door'.Well it certainly was a fiasco. Mann reminds me of the Month Python Black Knight that refuses to admit failure even after all his limbs have been hacked off.
The fiasco is that Manns original findings have been confirmed, expanded upon, and verified a half dozen times, and MBH 98 rightly stands as pioneering work in the field of paleoclimatology.
But guys like you pretend his proxy methods and findings were 'failure', even though almost no one in the paleoclimatology community would remotely agree.
I have fought this battle a hundred times over the last five years. It's boring now. You guys simply ignore the moral and scientific lapses of Mann. He is as fake as the Nobel Prize certificate he hangs in his office.
Well, it's a losing battle.
But Mann is irrelevant. Multiple studies have confirmed those findings with better and more comprehensive data, going back much farther.
But logic and reason don't seem to make a difference to some.
Wrong! Mann's crap is garbage and those who have tried to "verify" have been laughed out the door because they make the same mistakes he did.. Improper methods and all.. Repeating epic failure is not verifying the outcome...
But then again, you are probably someone who doesnt understand what that means, or what PNAS is.