Clinton (D) vs. Cruz (R) polling: National, key battlegrounds

[Dot Com]

75% of women will vote to see the first woman potus.

So you don't think very much of women, do you

Why dont you have one credible woman to nominate? You guys clearly think very little of women.

Who is "you guys?"

You people.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

75% of women will vote to see the first woman potus.

So you don't think very much of women, do you

Why dont you have one credible woman to nominate? You guys clearly think very little of women.

Who is "you guys?"

You people.

Who is "you people?"

 

[Mertex]

 

[Mad Scientist]

"I'm REAL excited about the dumpy, old white woman!"

Said no one. Ever.

 

[Mertex]

Clinton either won't win her primary or run at all.

Do you know something we don't? If Hillary is the only candidate, there won't be a primary......

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Clinton either won't win her primary or run at all.

Do you know something we don't? If Hillary is the only candidate, there won't be a primary......

She won't be and yes, there would still be a primary.

 

[sealybobo]

75% of women will vote to see the first woman potus.

So you don't think very much of women, do you

Why dont you have one credible woman to nominate? You guys clearly think very little of women.

Who is "you guys?"

Gop'ers

 

[sealybobo]

Fo

Clinton either won't win her primary or run at all.

Do you know something we don't? If Hillary is the only candidate, there won't be a primary......

For Shits and giggles we'll have one. Especially giggles if biden runs. He'll molest hillary and elizabeth warren on stage.

 

[sealybobo]

Clinton either won't win her primary or run at all.

Do you know something we don't? If Hillary is the only candidate, there won't be a primary......

She won't be and yes, there would still be a primary.

Will you leave usmb if you're wrong? Or like ted Nugent will you be dead or in jail if she wins? Lol.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

75% of women will vote to see the first woman potus.

So you don't think very much of women, do you

Why dont you have one credible woman to nominate? You guys clearly think very little of women.

Who is "you guys?"

Gop'ers

I have only voted Republican for president one time and that was in 2004. Out of the current crop of GOP candidates the only one I'd support at this point for certain is Rand Paul. I would definitely not support Cruz, Bush, or Christie.

That aside, why does it matter whether any party nominates a woman or not? Shouldn't the most qualified people be nominated regardless of what they look like, you know, the very philosophy "you guys" claim to believe in yet rarely ever practice?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Will you leave usmb if you're wrong?

Why would I do that?

Or like ted Nugent will you be dead or in jail if she wins? Lol.

What difference does it make if Hillary wins or any of the Republican candidates win? Aside from Paul, nobody running will do what it takes to turn our country around, so we're screwed regardless be it Hillary, Jeb, Cruz, who ever. You seem to suffer from the delusion that everybody else is as partisan a lemming as you, but many of us out there aren't. We see the reality and don't lie to ourselves to feel better.

 

[sealybobo]

Will you leave usmb if you're wrong?

Why would I do that?

Or like ted Nugent will you be dead or in jail if she wins? Lol.

What difference does it make if Hillary wins or any of the Republican candidates win? Aside from Paul, nobody running will do what it takes to turn our country around, so we're screwed regardless be it Hillary, Jeb, Cruz, who ever. You seem to suffer from the delusion that everybody else is as partisan a lemming as you, but many of us out there aren't. We see the reality and don't lie to ourselves to feel better.

Ron Paul voters are 1% of the voters. Your cult isnt catching on. Its not that we dont get it. Aside from 5 liberal talking points libertarians suck. More tea baggers than libertarians. Why can't they win seats?

 

[auditor0007]

Of the 283 polls and 1025 matchups to-date, Hillary vs. various specific GOP contenders, I have sorted out the Hillary vs. Cruz matchups, nationally and in Ohio, North Carolina, Virginia and Florida and simply made screenshots:

View attachment 38300 View attachment 38301 View attachment 38302

Nationally, that makes for 22 Hillary-Cruz match-ups to date and Cruz has never gotten closer than being 10 points behind Hillary. He is losing to Hillary nationally by a massive landslide margin.

In Florida:

View attachment 38303

In Florida, out of 19 polls, 6 Hillary-Cruz match-ups - in a state with a sizable Cuban-latino population- , the closest he has come has been 11 points behind Hillary. In fact, in 3 of those 6 polls, he is behind by 20 points or more. In all of my life, I have not witnessed a Democrat polling 26 points ahead of a Republican in Florida, ever. It has been a narrow single-digit win state now for 6 full cycles. The latest poll has him 23 points behind Hillary. This are unusual numbers for Republicans to have to look at...

In North Carolina:

View attachment 38304

In North Carolina, out of 19 polls, there have been 7 Hillary-Cruz matchups, and the closest he has come has been 4 points behind Hillary. That makes the state competitive, but Hillary is doing decidedly better here than Obama did in polling in either 2008 or 2012. Alone the fact that no GOPer can "put away" North Carolina is a very bad sign for them.

In Ohio, the QUINTESSENTIAL battleground state, the state that no GOPer since Lincoln has lost and yet, still won the national election:

View attachment 38305
9 Ohio polls, three Hillary-vs-Cruz matchups and the closest Cruz comes is -14 behind Hillary. Now, those polls are somewhat old, so I suspect that after his announcement, we will see some heaving polling in all four of the battlegrounds I am presenting in this thread, esp. Ohio.

In Virginia, where Ted Cruz is announcing his candidacy TODAY:

View attachment 38306

17 Virginia polls, 3 Clinton vs. Cruz matchups, and the closest that Cruz comes to Hillary is from 10 points behind, just like in Florida, just like nationally. Just as in the case of Ohio, these polls are all somewhat old, so I expect fresh battleground polling very shortly.

But the long and short of it is that in ALL national matchups, all Florida, North Carolina, Ohio and Virginia matchups, Cruz is behind Clinton, and considerably at that. He has his work cut out for him.

Now, for those who want to naysay this, I say: here, now you have a baseline. If polling in the next weeks shows the results to be much closer or even shows Cruz winning some, then you can hoop and holler, because you have a baseline to compare it with, thanks to me.

But if after his announcement, nothing changes, then I would submit to you that Cruz has a real problem on his hands.

Don't worry, I will be reporting future polls just as energetically as these.

Why those four battleground states? Well, because without them, you cannot win the White House these days. These days, you need at least two of the four to win, and if you are winning, you are likely to win at least three of the four.

In 2000 and 2004, Bush won all four of them, currently worth 75 electoral votes. In 2008, Obama won all four of them. In 2012, he won 3 of 4 of them and North Carolina, which Romney picked-up for the GOP, was the second closest race of the night.

So, it's no surprise to me that Cruz has picked Virginia to be his launch-point for 2016. Were he to get the GOP nomination, he will need Virginia solidily in his column to be able to combat the so-called "blue wall".

AceRothstein Derideo_Te Mertex Luddly Neddite Grandma guno

Anyone who wants on the electoral polling call-list, just hit me up in convo...

Honestly, I'm not sure that Cruz would be Hillary in Texas.

 

[sealybobo]

Of the 283 polls and 1025 matchups to-date, Hillary vs. various specific GOP contenders, I have sorted out the Hillary vs. Cruz matchups, nationally and in Ohio, North Carolina, Virginia and Florida and simply made screenshots:

View attachment 38300 View attachment 38301 View attachment 38302

Nationally, that makes for 22 Hillary-Cruz match-ups to date and Cruz has never gotten closer than being 10 points behind Hillary. He is losing to Hillary nationally by a massive landslide margin.

In Florida:

View attachment 38303

In Florida, out of 19 polls, 6 Hillary-Cruz match-ups - in a state with a sizable Cuban-latino population- , the closest he has come has been 11 points behind Hillary. In fact, in 3 of those 6 polls, he is behind by 20 points or more. In all of my life, I have not witnessed a Democrat polling 26 points ahead of a Republican in Florida, ever. It has been a narrow single-digit win state now for 6 full cycles. The latest poll has him 23 points behind Hillary. This are unusual numbers for Republicans to have to look at...

In North Carolina:

View attachment 38304

In North Carolina, out of 19 polls, there have been 7 Hillary-Cruz matchups, and the closest he has come has been 4 points behind Hillary. That makes the state competitive, but Hillary is doing decidedly better here than Obama did in polling in either 2008 or 2012. Alone the fact that no GOPer can "put away" North Carolina is a very bad sign for them.

In Ohio, the QUINTESSENTIAL battleground state, the state that no GOPer since Lincoln has lost and yet, still won the national election:

View attachment 38305
9 Ohio polls, three Hillary-vs-Cruz matchups and the closest Cruz comes is -14 behind Hillary. Now, those polls are somewhat old, so I suspect that after his announcement, we will see some heaving polling in all four of the battlegrounds I am presenting in this thread, esp. Ohio.

In Virginia, where Ted Cruz is announcing his candidacy TODAY:

View attachment 38306

17 Virginia polls, 3 Clinton vs. Cruz matchups, and the closest that Cruz comes to Hillary is from 10 points behind, just like in Florida, just like nationally. Just as in the case of Ohio, these polls are all somewhat old, so I expect fresh battleground polling very shortly.

But the long and short of it is that in ALL national matchups, all Florida, North Carolina, Ohio and Virginia matchups, Cruz is behind Clinton, and considerably at that. He has his work cut out for him.

Now, for those who want to naysay this, I say: here, now you have a baseline. If polling in the next weeks shows the results to be much closer or even shows Cruz winning some, then you can hoop and holler, because you have a baseline to compare it with, thanks to me.

But if after his announcement, nothing changes, then I would submit to you that Cruz has a real problem on his hands.

Don't worry, I will be reporting future polls just as energetically as these.

Why those four battleground states? Well, because without them, you cannot win the White House these days. These days, you need at least two of the four to win, and if you are winning, you are likely to win at least three of the four.

In 2000 and 2004, Bush won all four of them, currently worth 75 electoral votes. In 2008, Obama won all four of them. In 2012, he won 3 of 4 of them and North Carolina, which Romney picked-up for the GOP, was the second closest race of the night.

So, it's no surprise to me that Cruz has picked Virginia to be his launch-point for 2016. Were he to get the GOP nomination, he will need Virginia solidily in his column to be able to combat the so-called "blue wall".

AceRothstein Derideo_Te Mertex Luddly Neddite Grandma guno

Anyone who wants on the electoral polling call-list, just hit me up in convo...

Honestly, I'm not sure that Cruz would be Hillary in Texas.

He's a creepy guy. He doesnt stand a chance.

Did you hear his little speech? Imagine him as president. Lol

 

[rightwinger]

Of the 283 polls and 1025 matchups to-date, Hillary vs. various specific GOP contenders, I have sorted out the Hillary vs. Cruz matchups, nationally and in Ohio, North Carolina, Virginia and Florida and simply made screenshots:

View attachment 38300 View attachment 38301 View attachment 38302

Nationally, that makes for 22 Hillary-Cruz match-ups to date and Cruz has never gotten closer than being 10 points behind Hillary. He is losing to Hillary nationally by a massive landslide margin.

In Florida:

View attachment 38303

In Florida, out of 19 polls, 6 Hillary-Cruz match-ups - in a state with a sizable Cuban-latino population- , the closest he has come has been 11 points behind Hillary. In fact, in 3 of those 6 polls, he is behind by 20 points or more. In all of my life, I have not witnessed a Democrat polling 26 points ahead of a Republican in Florida, ever. It has been a narrow single-digit win state now for 6 full cycles. The latest poll has him 23 points behind Hillary. This are unusual numbers for Republicans to have to look at...

In North Carolina:

View attachment 38304

In North Carolina, out of 19 polls, there have been 7 Hillary-Cruz matchups, and the closest he has come has been 4 points behind Hillary. That makes the state competitive, but Hillary is doing decidedly better here than Obama did in polling in either 2008 or 2012. Alone the fact that no GOPer can "put away" North Carolina is a very bad sign for them.

In Ohio, the QUINTESSENTIAL battleground state, the state that no GOPer since Lincoln has lost and yet, still won the national election:

View attachment 38305
9 Ohio polls, three Hillary-vs-Cruz matchups and the closest Cruz comes is -14 behind Hillary. Now, those polls are somewhat old, so I suspect that after his announcement, we will see some heaving polling in all four of the battlegrounds I am presenting in this thread, esp. Ohio.

In Virginia, where Ted Cruz is announcing his candidacy TODAY:

View attachment 38306

17 Virginia polls, 3 Clinton vs. Cruz matchups, and the closest that Cruz comes to Hillary is from 10 points behind, just like in Florida, just like nationally. Just as in the case of Ohio, these polls are all somewhat old, so I expect fresh battleground polling very shortly.

But the long and short of it is that in ALL national matchups, all Florida, North Carolina, Ohio and Virginia matchups, Cruz is behind Clinton, and considerably at that. He has his work cut out for him.

Now, for those who want to naysay this, I say: here, now you have a baseline. If polling in the next weeks shows the results to be much closer or even shows Cruz winning some, then you can hoop and holler, because you have a baseline to compare it with, thanks to me.

But if after his announcement, nothing changes, then I would submit to you that Cruz has a real problem on his hands.

Don't worry, I will be reporting future polls just as energetically as these.

Why those four battleground states? Well, because without them, you cannot win the White House these days. These days, you need at least two of the four to win, and if you are winning, you are likely to win at least three of the four.

In 2000 and 2004, Bush won all four of them, currently worth 75 electoral votes. In 2008, Obama won all four of them. In 2012, he won 3 of 4 of them and North Carolina, which Romney picked-up for the GOP, was the second closest race of the night.

So, it's no surprise to me that Cruz has picked Virginia to be his launch-point for 2016. Were he to get the GOP nomination, he will need Virginia solidily in his column to be able to combat the so-called "blue wall".

AceRothstein Derideo_Te Mertex Luddly Neddite Grandma guno

Anyone who wants on the electoral polling call-list, just hit me up in convo...

Honestly, I'm not sure that Cruz would be Hillary in Texas.

He's a creepy guy. He doesnt stand a chance.

Did you hear his little speech? Imagine him as president. Lol

Damn.....imagine this guy with nukes

 

[Statistikhengst]

Of the 283 polls and 1025 matchups to-date, Hillary vs. various specific GOP contenders, I have sorted out the Hillary vs. Cruz matchups, nationally and in Ohio, North Carolina, Virginia and Florida and simply made screenshots:

View attachment 38300 View attachment 38301 View attachment 38302

Nationally, that makes for 22 Hillary-Cruz match-ups to date and Cruz has never gotten closer than being 10 points behind Hillary. He is losing to Hillary nationally by a massive landslide margin.

In Florida:

View attachment 38303

In Florida, out of 19 polls, 6 Hillary-Cruz match-ups - in a state with a sizable Cuban-latino population- , the closest he has come has been 11 points behind Hillary. In fact, in 3 of those 6 polls, he is behind by 20 points or more. In all of my life, I have not witnessed a Democrat polling 26 points ahead of a Republican in Florida, ever. It has been a narrow single-digit win state now for 6 full cycles. The latest poll has him 23 points behind Hillary. This are unusual numbers for Republicans to have to look at...

In North Carolina:

View attachment 38304

In North Carolina, out of 19 polls, there have been 7 Hillary-Cruz matchups, and the closest he has come has been 4 points behind Hillary. That makes the state competitive, but Hillary is doing decidedly better here than Obama did in polling in either 2008 or 2012. Alone the fact that no GOPer can "put away" North Carolina is a very bad sign for them.

In Ohio, the QUINTESSENTIAL battleground state, the state that no GOPer since Lincoln has lost and yet, still won the national election:

View attachment 38305
9 Ohio polls, three Hillary-vs-Cruz matchups and the closest Cruz comes is -14 behind Hillary. Now, those polls are somewhat old, so I suspect that after his announcement, we will see some heaving polling in all four of the battlegrounds I am presenting in this thread, esp. Ohio.

In Virginia, where Ted Cruz is announcing his candidacy TODAY:

View attachment 38306

17 Virginia polls, 3 Clinton vs. Cruz matchups, and the closest that Cruz comes to Hillary is from 10 points behind, just like in Florida, just like nationally. Just as in the case of Ohio, these polls are all somewhat old, so I expect fresh battleground polling very shortly.

But the long and short of it is that in ALL national matchups, all Florida, North Carolina, Ohio and Virginia matchups, Cruz is behind Clinton, and considerably at that. He has his work cut out for him.

Now, for those who want to naysay this, I say: here, now you have a baseline. If polling in the next weeks shows the results to be much closer or even shows Cruz winning some, then you can hoop and holler, because you have a baseline to compare it with, thanks to me.

But if after his announcement, nothing changes, then I would submit to you that Cruz has a real problem on his hands.

Don't worry, I will be reporting future polls just as energetically as these.

Why those four battleground states? Well, because without them, you cannot win the White House these days. These days, you need at least two of the four to win, and if you are winning, you are likely to win at least three of the four.

In 2000 and 2004, Bush won all four of them, currently worth 75 electoral votes. In 2008, Obama won all four of them. In 2012, he won 3 of 4 of them and North Carolina, which Romney picked-up for the GOP, was the second closest race of the night.

So, it's no surprise to me that Cruz has picked Virginia to be his launch-point for 2016. Were he to get the GOP nomination, he will need Virginia solidily in his column to be able to combat the so-called "blue wall".

AceRothstein Derideo_Te Mertex Luddly Neddite Grandma guno

Anyone who wants on the electoral polling call-list, just hit me up in convo...

Honestly, I'm not sure that Cruz would be Hillary in Texas.

There have only been four polls of TEXAS to date, and they are all a little old now, but Cruz was pitted against Clinton in three of them and won by +3, +5 and +7 in a state that is supposed to be a double-digit GOP state.

 

[auditor0007]

Of the 283 polls and 1025 matchups to-date, Hillary vs. various specific GOP contenders, I have sorted out the Hillary vs. Cruz matchups, nationally and in Ohio, North Carolina, Virginia and Florida and simply made screenshots:

View attachment 38300 View attachment 38301 View attachment 38302

Nationally, that makes for 22 Hillary-Cruz match-ups to date and Cruz has never gotten closer than being 10 points behind Hillary. He is losing to Hillary nationally by a massive landslide margin.

In Florida:

View attachment 38303

In Florida, out of 19 polls, 6 Hillary-Cruz match-ups - in a state with a sizable Cuban-latino population- , the closest he has come has been 11 points behind Hillary. In fact, in 3 of those 6 polls, he is behind by 20 points or more. In all of my life, I have not witnessed a Democrat polling 26 points ahead of a Republican in Florida, ever. It has been a narrow single-digit win state now for 6 full cycles. The latest poll has him 23 points behind Hillary. This are unusual numbers for Republicans to have to look at...

In North Carolina:

View attachment 38304

In North Carolina, out of 19 polls, there have been 7 Hillary-Cruz matchups, and the closest he has come has been 4 points behind Hillary. That makes the state competitive, but Hillary is doing decidedly better here than Obama did in polling in either 2008 or 2012. Alone the fact that no GOPer can "put away" North Carolina is a very bad sign for them.

In Ohio, the QUINTESSENTIAL battleground state, the state that no GOPer since Lincoln has lost and yet, still won the national election:

View attachment 38305
9 Ohio polls, three Hillary-vs-Cruz matchups and the closest Cruz comes is -14 behind Hillary. Now, those polls are somewhat old, so I suspect that after his announcement, we will see some heaving polling in all four of the battlegrounds I am presenting in this thread, esp. Ohio.

In Virginia, where Ted Cruz is announcing his candidacy TODAY:

View attachment 38306

17 Virginia polls, 3 Clinton vs. Cruz matchups, and the closest that Cruz comes to Hillary is from 10 points behind, just like in Florida, just like nationally. Just as in the case of Ohio, these polls are all somewhat old, so I expect fresh battleground polling very shortly.

But the long and short of it is that in ALL national matchups, all Florida, North Carolina, Ohio and Virginia matchups, Cruz is behind Clinton, and considerably at that. He has his work cut out for him.

Now, for those who want to naysay this, I say: here, now you have a baseline. If polling in the next weeks shows the results to be much closer or even shows Cruz winning some, then you can hoop and holler, because you have a baseline to compare it with, thanks to me.

But if after his announcement, nothing changes, then I would submit to you that Cruz has a real problem on his hands.

Don't worry, I will be reporting future polls just as energetically as these.

Why those four battleground states? Well, because without them, you cannot win the White House these days. These days, you need at least two of the four to win, and if you are winning, you are likely to win at least three of the four.

In 2000 and 2004, Bush won all four of them, currently worth 75 electoral votes. In 2008, Obama won all four of them. In 2012, he won 3 of 4 of them and North Carolina, which Romney picked-up for the GOP, was the second closest race of the night.

So, it's no surprise to me that Cruz has picked Virginia to be his launch-point for 2016. Were he to get the GOP nomination, he will need Virginia solidily in his column to be able to combat the so-called "blue wall".

AceRothstein Derideo_Te Mertex Luddly Neddite Grandma guno

Anyone who wants on the electoral polling call-list, just hit me up in convo...

Honestly, I'm not sure that Cruz would be Hillary in Texas.

There have only been four polls of TEXAS to date, and they are all a little old now, but Cruz was pitted against Clinton in three of them and won by +3, +5 and +7 in a state that is supposed to be a double-digit GOP state.

Put Julian Castro on the ticket with Hillary and she probably wins Texas. It would at least become extremely competitive forcing Cruz or any Republican candidate to spend a great deal of time and money just trying to hold a state that should easily be Republican.

 

[JoeMoma]

75% of women will vote to see the first woman potus.

So you don't think very much of women, do you

Why dont you have one credible woman to nominate? You guys clearly think very little of women.

Hillary Clinton is not a credible woman, but she is likely to win the democrat nomination anyway.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Put Julian Castro on the ticket with Hillary and she probably wins Texas.

 

[Mertex]

Clinton either won't win her primary or run at all.

Do you know something we don't? If Hillary is the only candidate, there won't be a primary......

She won't be and yes, there would still be a primary.

It's looking like there is no one to challenge Hillary.....if so, there won't be a need for one.


For many Democrats, the hope is neither. As far as they are concerned, any primary opponent, from Joe Biden to Jim Webb, would ultimately suck up time and energy away from a Clinton candidacy.

No one interviewed for this article thinks that particular lightning will strike twice—Clinton’s lead in polls this time is too great, top fundraisers are this time lining up behind her, and there is a sense among the party’s rank-and-file that 2016 is her time.

“Everybody thinks you benefit from a primary, but if it drains your resources, if it takes a long time, it pushes you away from where you want to be for a general election,” said Bob Shrum, who helped mastermind both Al Gore’s and John Kerry’s White House runs. “The great thing about not having a primary is that you still go out and run and spend money and you can really set the stage for a general election.”
Does Team Hillary Want a Democratic Challenge - The Daily Beast