Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AGAIN, he had something to say so he said it. When he got done, he was happy to answer the question.He had a point to make and he MADE ITI loved Ted Cruz and his fake outrage
He is asked a question about his position on raising the debt limit.....a substantive question
He responds in outrage over how the moderators were not asking substantive questions....Rehearsed?
When in doubt...attack the media
Red meat to conservatives
When in doubt....attack the candidates with stupid left wing talking points and lies
Red meat to libtardians.
What is your position on raising the debt limit?.......is a left wing talking point?
He had a point to make and he MADE ITI loved Ted Cruz and his fake outrage
He is asked a question about his position on raising the debt limit.....a substantive question
He responds in outrage over how the moderators were not asking substantive questions....Rehearsed?
When in doubt...attack the media
Red meat to conservatives
When in doubt....attack the candidates with stupid left wing talking points and lies
Red meat to libtardians.
What is your position on raising the debt limit?.......is a left wing talking point?
I just hope this FINALLY opens more peoples eyes to this awful disgusting lamestream media in this country. These are debates for you to pick a President of our country and they go and turn it into some grade school nonsense. shun all these leftwing Lamestream medias. get your political news off site on the Internet that you feel isn't BIASED or as it seems off Fox news. you've made it the number ones news station for years now.
Yea, im sure Cruz was scared of that question, dummy..He had a point to make and he MADE ITI loved Ted Cruz and his fake outrage
He is asked a question about his position on raising the debt limit.....a substantive question
He responds in outrage over how the moderators were not asking substantive questions....Rehearsed?
When in doubt...attack the media
Red meat to conservatives
Didn't see him answer
Cruz is being overshadowed by Trump who plays the same game as Cruz only does it better
Cruz came in with a chip on his shoulder to score points by attacking the media
Hint to Ted Cruz.....if you are asked a dumb question you are justified in attacking the question. He was asked a question on the debt limit....answere the freak'n question
Cruz said what needed to be said at that point in the "debate". All of the previous questions had been set ups or dem talking points aimed at either denigrating one candidate or trying to get them to attack each other. But they didn't fall for the media bullshit this time, they all called them on it.
The GOP candidates looked qualified and intelligent, the media looked just plain stupid.
No, you can't read. They put it on his web site, it wasn't his words. You see, words mean things.One of the moderators accurately stated that Trump said Rubio was Zuckerberg's personal senator and then when challenged she apologized, why? It's on his campaign website?
Immigration Reform
"Hispanic and female workers in Silicon Valley who have been passed over in favor of the H-1B program. Mark Zuckerberg’s personal Senator, Marco Rubio, has a bill to triple H-1Bs that would decimate women and minorities."
There was absolutely no follow up at all.
The Dems love this stuff, but I think the networks are doing the electorate a disservice by going for the drama instead of the meat.
I don't understand what was the point of questions because candidates in large part didn't answer them.
It was actually hilarious, just look at the answers given for the price gouging on pharmaceuticals... Carson went talking about regulation on small business...
They got a question and figured which canned answer was anywhere close and repeated that... At points it was embarrassing, if I was moderator I would have asked them to answer a question.
Saying that some of the answers were just funny... Flortina tax plan on one page (get serious), Trump (the economy is just going to float on air), Carson ($1.1Trillion deficit is his fiscal plan), Rubio (can't leave inside his own means after getting a $1 million)....
I think the RWers here want CNBC just to ignore all of these major flaws and let them repeat stump speeches...
I don't understand what was the point of questions because candidates in large part didn't answer them.
It was actually hilarious, just look at the answers given for the price gouging on pharmaceuticals... Carson went talking about regulation on small business...
They got a question and figured which canned answer was anywhere close and repeated that... At points it was embarrassing, if I was moderator I would have asked them to answer a question.
Saying that some of the answers were just funny... Flortina tax plan on one page (get serious), Trump (the economy is just going to float on air), Carson ($1.1Trillion deficit is his fiscal plan), Rubio (can't leave inside his own means after getting a $1 million)....
I think the RWers here want CNBC just to ignore all of these major flaws and let them repeat stump speeches...
I don't understand what was the point of questions because candidates in large part didn't answer them.
It was actually hilarious, just look at the answers given for the price gouging on pharmaceuticals... Carson went talking about regulation on small business...
They got a question and figured which canned answer was anywhere close and repeated that... At points it was embarrassing, if I was moderator I would have asked them to answer a question.
Saying that some of the answers were just funny... Flortina tax plan on one page (get serious), Trump (the economy is just going to float on air), Carson ($1.1Trillion deficit is his fiscal plan), Rubio (can't leave inside his own means after getting a $1 million)....
I think the RWers here want CNBC just to ignore all of these major flaws and let them repeat stump speeches...
CNBC did ask substantive probing questions on the candidates tax proposals
The candidates whiffed on each of them
No, you can't read. They put it on his web site, it wasn't his words. You see, words mean things.One of the moderators accurately stated that Trump said Rubio was Zuckerberg's personal senator and then when challenged she apologized, why? It's on his campaign website?
Immigration Reform
"Hispanic and female workers in Silicon Valley who have been passed over in favor of the H-1B program. Mark Zuckerberg’s personal Senator, Marco Rubio, has a bill to triple H-1Bs that would decimate women and minorities."
There was absolutely no follow up at all.
We're talking about the GOP debate, not the Democratic debate.The biggest 'revelations' from last night's debate are that extreme Liberal bias in the media is alive and well AND that CNBC's faux 'journalists' and last night's debate 'moderators' are little more than 'pooh-throwing monkeys'!
(LINK: http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article...s-who-allowed-cnbc-moderate-debate-should-be_)
“CNBC could have saved themselves and the Republican Party a lot of money by hiring actual monkeys to fling their pooh at the candidates. This was a disgrace.”
- Erick Erickson of Red State
------------------
“CNBC's should be embarrassed for their pitiful display of partisan liberal media bias and apologize to the GOP candidates and the American people."
- Media Research Center President Brent Bozell.
------------------
"After 15 minutes it was clear that this was not a debate, but a verbal shooting gallery set up by CNBC, with the targets the Republican candidates and the shooters their biased antagonists from the press,” said Meese.
“Ted Cruz accurately described what was going on,” he said. “Whoever selected the ‘moderators’ should be FIRED and the RNC leaders who allowed it should be condemned.”
-------------------
The biggest reaction came from the audience after Ted Cruz 'skewered' CNBC 'moderator' Carl Quintanilla for his un-professional, inappropriate question and hammered the liberal media moderators for their, by comparison, 'love-fest' questioning of Hillary in debates.
-- Pollster Frank Luntz sent out a Tweet: “Ted Cruz's focus group dials hits 98 with his attack on media bias. That's the highest score we've ever measured. EVER.”
The focus group's reaction and that so MANY Americans as seen so far after this debate proves CNBC did nothing more than embarrass themselves, embarrass the profession of true journalism, and reveal that extreme liberal bias is alive and well in the media...and the American people (not the left wing partisans who saw nothing wrong with what happened last night) are fed up with it!
Way to go, CNBC! Here's to you, you 'pooh-flinging monkeys'!
It is their fault so many of the candidate are really bad?
?I don't understand what was the point of questions because candidates in large part didn't answer them.
It was actually hilarious, just look at the answers given for the price gouging on pharmaceuticals... Carson went talking about regulation on small business...
They got a question and figured which canned answer was anywhere close and repeated that... At points it was embarrassing, if I was moderator I would have asked them to answer a question.
Saying that some of the answers were just funny... Flortina tax plan on one page (get serious), Trump (the economy is just going to float on air), Carson ($1.1Trillion deficit is his fiscal plan), Rubio (can't leave inside his own means after getting a $1 million)....
I think the RWers here want CNBC just to ignore all of these major flaws and let them repeat stump speeches...
CNBC did ask substantive probing questions on the candidates tax proposals
The candidates whiffed on each of them
Do you have TV service in your cave? They each gave a good summary of their tax ideas. What exactly is hillary's tax plan? other than raise taxes on everyone and confiscate guns.
?I don't understand what was the point of questions because candidates in large part didn't answer them.
It was actually hilarious, just look at the answers given for the price gouging on pharmaceuticals... Carson went talking about regulation on small business...
They got a question and figured which canned answer was anywhere close and repeated that... At points it was embarrassing, if I was moderator I would have asked them to answer a question.
Saying that some of the answers were just funny... Flortina tax plan on one page (get serious), Trump (the economy is just going to float on air), Carson ($1.1Trillion deficit is his fiscal plan), Rubio (can't leave inside his own means after getting a $1 million)....
I think the RWers here want CNBC just to ignore all of these major flaws and let them repeat stump speeches...
CNBC did ask substantive probing questions on the candidates tax proposals
The candidates whiffed on each of them
Do you have TV service in your cave? They each gave a good summary of their tax ideas. What exactly is hillary's tax plan? other than raise taxes on everyone and confiscate guns.
They were asked about he trillion dollar plus deficits their tax proposals cause and each responded with denials. Republicans throw around "Tax cuts for everyone" and then complain about Democratic debt
Imagine believing that media bias against conservatives is a huge problem in America but that black people just imagine there’s still racism. Is that some crazy Right wing Booger drool shit or what...
I loved Ted Cruz and his fake outrage
He is asked a question about his position on raising the debt limit.....a substantive question
He responds in outrage over how the moderators were not asking substantive questions....Rehearsed?
