CNN POLL: 75% Of Financial Experts Say Romney Victory Would Improve Markets...

[bripat9643]

the same guys who gave us the mess were in

If what we have now and coming down the pike is some indication, I long for that mess again.

I dont long for the times when the republicans gave these people free reign to fuck the entire worlds economy

Those are the times that we now call "the good ol days," you brain damaged git. Your DimoRAT heroes like Bawney Fwank are the ones who fuck the entire world's economy.

 

[occupied]

Romney's primary aim in business was to be successful. What businessman doesn't want to be successful? Romney is an industry that if you are very successful, you can become extraordinarily wealthy. He was very successful and became extraordinarily wealthy. But that's true not just in finance but in many other industries as well. The fastest way to become a billionaire today isn't on Wall Street, its in Silicon Valley.

The Left is getting all whiny and hysterical about what Romney did, but there is no evidence that private equity acts any worse than any other employer. This is an empirical fact. The rate of change of employment held by companies like Bain is no different than any other owner in the economy. Besides, what made Romney rich wasn't making money off companies like Ampad. It was finding and funding fast growing companies such as Staples. This is well known in the finance industry. During his tenure at Bain, the company did 270 deals. Less than 5% were liquidated.

The primary task of any business owner is not to create jobs. The primary task of a business owner is to create profits. If a business owner is successful, he will generally create jobs, but that is not why he exists. Creating jobs comes from successfully running a business. So understanding what a company needs to be profitable is the best way to create jobs over time. Creating an environment that fosters entrepreneurialism is the best way to create jobs over the long run. Romney understands this. Obama does not. This administration has been making it harder for companies, not easier.

The notion of counting how many jobs Bain created or asking what Romney did to create jobs is a silly one. The question is "Who knows best on what businesses need to grow and create jobs, Romney or Obama?" The answer should be obvious.

Democrats should remember that the closest thing to royalty this country has ever had are the Kennedys. How did the Kennedys make all their money so their kids could enter politics? Why, on Wall Street of course! Joe Kennedy was one of the big Wall Street operators of his time, and made money shorting stocks during the Great Depression.

That is really irrelevant until you remember one thing. In 1934, when FDR created the SEC, who did he first appoint as its Chairman? Joe Kennedy. Why? Because he knew Joe Kennedy knew how Wall Street thought. Kennedy had no experience regulating anything, but he knew what drove Wall Street, and he knew what was needed to fix the problems of the time.

Even if you buy into the false argument that Romney is nothing but a blood sucking corporate raider, because he comes from that world - just like the Wall Street operator Joe Kennedy - he still understands what drives business better than Obama.

Everyone knows what drives business, just not everyone sees 100% of business as 100% beneficial to society. Romney has become representative of the business practices that killed the golden goose. G+S used to have a saying that they were "long term greedy", that they were in investments to make money for the next 100 years. That generally wise model has been thrown in the trash. What we have now are companies willing to do anything, fair or foul, to avoid a minor drop in the stock price therefore sparking a major sell-off. I suppose we can blame that most fickle and heartless of groups, the stockholders, but every phenomena needs a symbol and Romney is it, like it or not.

THe whole world moves a lot faster than it used to. Consumer product life cycles are now measured in MONTHS not years. You want investors to lock into what? For how long?

Bain and Venture Capital is the solution to our Flat-Lined IPO situation.. Do yourself a favor and find a graph of Initial Public Offerings over the last 20 years. THERE is the problem. THe GIANTS are reigning supreme because regulation has made them untouchable. And it's the GOAL and vision of every Venture Group to knock those giants down.

The left is barking up the wrong tree and don't even stop to learn who's working to create NEW jobs. You know those nebulas where new stars form? That's what's missing right now. And sometimes that star chamber is a messy deal. But if that doesn't get fired again -- you're looking at a major decline of the US economy relative to the world. You better HOPE that Bain and others save your sorry asses from more of the same..

Do you think Romney would do anything about it? Not on your life. Also it is a failure of regulation that created too big to fail not regulation itself. Had a big bank gotten broke up and people jailed every so often then this crap would not happen, They bought themselves a government and most of a country (cheap) and Romney will owe them big time should he win.

 

[flacaltenn]

You want more jobs sent overseas by giant corps that face no new ideas or products?

Keep attacking Bain and folks who create the youngins' who knock them down.

Keep making Giant Multi-nationals safer from competition by increasing the regulation burden on start-ups.

THe record is abysmal. We can't lead a Global Economy with this chart the way it is and realizing that GROUPON is the best idea we have to offer lately...

 

[bripat9643]

and they are also the same assholes who fucked us

Repeating that over and over isn't going to fool anyone except the terminally gullible - liberal DimoRATs, in other words.

 

[occupied]

You want more jobs sent overseas by giant corps that face no new ideas or products?

Keep attacking Bain and folks who create the youngins' who knock them down.

Keep making Giant Multi-nationals safer from competition by increasing the regulation burden on start-ups.

THe record is abysmal. We can't lead a Global Economy with this chart the way it is and realizing that GROUPON is the best idea we have to offer lately...

I'm starting a toll bridge business in Brooklyn, want in on the ground floor? How the hell would the already fraud fraught IPO business be any better with less policing? If there were not a legion of crooks out there trying get people to give them money for bullshit then perhaps they would not need a bunch of evil rules to attempt to keep them in check. These regulations did not come out of nowhere, they were made for a reason.

 

[Wiseacre]

I'm very confident that Romney's election will prove to be better for the economy than Obama's. I wouldn't count on the good times circa the 90's, nobody can deliver that. But an improvement, yes.

 

[Moonglow]

What the hell do you think has been going on the last 3+ years?

Sheeeesh!

And Romney will be different how?

He won't look at free enterprise as the enemy.

But you hate freedom and free markets too, so you'll stay firmly in the Boiking camp.

yes the free market, where construction contractors hire cheap illegals to work where Americans once did. That free market? That was the condition under the W camp.

 

[francoHFW]

75% are also Pub dupes. LOL So, should the GOP be rewarded for their World depression and paralyzing gov't since 2/2010, so they can do it again? Feg the gd greedy racist a-holes...

 

[Moonglow]

That depends on the definition of "improve". If they feel free to inflate another empty bubble based on worthless paper that is hardly an improvement.

Only government can inflate credit and create a bubble. Only economic ignoramuses don't understand that.

hardly, shows how much you know about the history of American, depressions, recessions and panics created by speculating the real estate market. And the govt. does not control these markets, same with loans.

 

[clevergirl]

Boy, this one should send all the CNN (Communist News Network/Clinton News Network) sicophants into a tizzy.


A recent CNNMoney survey found that 75% of money managers and investment strategists believe a Mitt Romney victory would lift U.S. markets. The survey also found that "many are also hoping for the GOP to gain control of both the House and the Senate."

Leading up to the November elections, 80 percent of those surveyed agreed that the stock market will remain volatile and possibly get worse.

John Praveen, managing director and chief investment strategist for Prudential International Investments Advisers says investors are not sanguine about lawmakers' ability to keep America from driving off the fiscal cliff:

"In case investors are not sufficiently convinced that policy makers and politicians are up to the task of handling the fiscal cliff in a reasonably effective manner, financial markets are likely to again fall sharply, similar to the plunge around the debt ceiling debacle in 2011."

Chase Investment Counsel President Peter Tuz was more direct:

"At this point, I think markets would appreciate a clear Republican mandate. That provides the best chance for continued low tax rates. If investors see the likelihood of an Obama victory, coupled with Democrats retaining control of the Senate, they will react by taking advantage of the low tax rates that still exist, so a sell-off in markets would be a distinct possibility."

The sputtering U.S. economic recovery, the European debt crisis, the slowing of growth in China, the need to cut government spending, and the looming expiration of the Bush tax cuts were cited as troubling economic signs for America's financial future.

CNN POLL: 75% Of Financial Experts Say Romney Victory Would Improve Markets

Stability to the Market- gee what a concept.

 

[rdean]

Corporations are making record profits. How much more do they need? The problem is jobs here. People have no money. Without money, there is no demand. Without demand, no jobs. Econ 101.

Republicans and the Chamber of Commerce moved the jobs overseas and the wealth of the nation to the top 1%. It's not like it's a "secret". Duh! It's not the corporations that need help. Mitt's plan for the rest of the nation is "Less Police, less firemen and less teachers". In other words, "Less". How do we know? He fucking told us.

 

[Vel]

Corporations are making record profits. How much more do they need? The problem is jobs here. People have no money. Without money, there is no demand. Without demand, no jobs. Econ 101.

Republicans and the Chamber of Commerce moved the jobs overseas and the wealth of the nation to the top 1%. It's not like it's a "secret". Duh! It's not the corporations that need help. Mitt's plan for the rest of the nation is "Less Police, less firemen and less teachers". In other words, "Less". How do we know? He fucking told us.

Well Obama must have learned something because he took billions in stimulus money to create jobs overseas. How is it that you think it wrong that private companies outsource yet you're fine with Obama outsourcing American jobs? Especially ironic when you consider that we were suppose to approve the stimulus to stop unemployment from climbing to 8.0 Obama busted the ceiling on that one didn't he?

Obama.. OUTSOURCER in Chief.

 

[midcan5]

Seventy five percent of the same buffoons who brought America near the collapse of the entire economy and in some cases world wide. Only an idiot would believe the same nonsense repeated once more by the same idiots. Or maybe the clowns who post this stupidity, and cheer it on, as if it held some wild ass truth are not clowns but robots? Puppets of the right, they play you people like banjos. Maybe with Romney we can duplicate the GD? You think?

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/14/opinion/why-i-am-leaving-goldman-sachs.html

"To put the problem in the simplest terms, the interests of the client continue to be sidelined in the way the firm operates and thinks about making money. Goldman Sachs is one of the world’s largest and most important investment banks and it is too integral to global finance to continue to act this way. The firm has veered so far from the place I joined right out of college that I can no longer in good conscience say that I identify with what it stands for."

 

[flacaltenn]

You want more jobs sent overseas by giant corps that face no new ideas or products?

Keep attacking Bain and folks who create the youngins' who knock them down.

Keep making Giant Multi-nationals safer from competition by increasing the regulation burden on start-ups.

THe record is abysmal. We can't lead a Global Economy with this chart the way it is and realizing that GROUPON is the best idea we have to offer lately...

I'm starting a toll bridge business in Brooklyn, want in on the ground floor? How the hell would the already fraud fraught IPO business be any better with less policing? If there were not a legion of crooks out there trying get people to give them money for bullshit then perhaps they would not need a bunch of evil rules to attempt to keep them in check. These regulations did not come out of nowhere, they were made for a reason.

Sure --- my company helped developed the RF ID tags for the 1st automated bridge toll projects in California. My wife spent weeks on the Coronado Bridge getting the readers tested.

There's no fraud in IPOs other than the NEW concepts of limiting the distribution on opening day. These people are focused on getting thru it CLEANLY -- without a bunch of controversy. When your young Tech company has to have as many accountants, tax lawyers, and compliance officers as scientists and engineers --- SOMETHINGS very wrong. The costs of that army is skyrocketing and creating much higher "cash burn rates" at a time when you should be lean and efficient. The GIANT COMPANIES can afford that army. Start-ups can not..

No economic recovery and no future Global leadership for America if we don't fix that graph.. THAT'S what both parties ought to be focused on.. Not Green Jobs and shovels --- or even Tax policy...

 

[NYcarbineer]

What happened to the people who were telling us that the run up in the stock market under Obama wasn't anything to brag about because a higher market didn't necessarily mean things were getting better in the economy?

Now we're supposed to elect Romney so the market will go up?

unreal.

 

[Toro]

Everyone knows what drives business, just not everyone sees 100% of business as 100% beneficial to society. Romney has become representative of the business practices that killed the golden goose. G+S used to have a saying that they were "long term greedy", that they were in investments to make money for the next 100 years. That generally wise model has been thrown in the trash. What we have now are companies willing to do anything, fair or foul, to avoid a minor drop in the stock price therefore sparking a major sell-off. I suppose we can blame that most fickle and heartless of groups, the stockholders, but every phenomena needs a symbol and Romney is it, like it or not.

No, not everyone knows what drives business. Far from it. And I agree that everything business does is not beneficial to society. But that's not the point.

This election is about the economy. This mess is not Obama's fault but his response has been poor. Employment growth has been weaker than it should be and you have companies saying that they are not investing in this country because of uncertainty and regulations. This administration offers no long-term solution to the fiscal mess.

Obama attacks Romney in this manner because his own record is bad.

 

[Toro]

Corporations are making record profits. How much more do they need? The problem is jobs here. People have no money. Without money, there is no demand. Without demand, no jobs. Econ 101.

Republicans and the Chamber of Commerce moved the jobs overseas and the wealth of the nation to the top 1%. It's not like it's a "secret". Duh! It's not the corporations that need help. Mitt's plan for the rest of the nation is "Less Police, less firemen and less teachers". In other words, "Less". How do we know? He fucking told us.

Corporate leaders have said they are not investing in this country because of uncertainty and increased regulation. That's on your watch.

 

[Claudette]

Corporations are making record profits. How much more do they need? The problem is jobs here. People have no money. Without money, there is no demand. Without demand, no jobs. Econ 101.

Republicans and the Chamber of Commerce moved the jobs overseas and the wealth of the nation to the top 1%. It's not like it's a "secret". Duh! It's not the corporations that need help. Mitt's plan for the rest of the nation is "Less Police, less firemen and less teachers". In other words, "Less". How do we know? He fucking told us.

Corporate leaders have said they are not investing in this country because of uncertainty and increased regulation. That's on your watch.

Yup. Its on their watch and they don't want to hear it.

Barry has never held a real job in his entire life and know zilch about what makes business, who create jobs, run.

His policies have failed and he ain't smart enough to look back in history and copy the fuck out of what DID work during a recession.

Or perhaps his left wing ideology won't let him admitt that his policies suck.

Romney has good business sense and the know how to get the economy up and running.

Its gonna be all about the economy and jobs and in those areas Barry is toast.

I believe the pendulum is gonna swing the Reps in Nov. Just like it swung for the Dems in 2008.

 

[paulitician]

So according to the poll 75% of the people who do not manufacture or sell anything, but who make a lot of money off of shifting money around are saying that the guy who would allow them to raid financial institutions for profit like he did would improve the market by allowing them to crash companies for profit?

Well no fucking duh they want mitt. he will help them to sell america overseas. If I made my money off of ripping off the american middle class and poor i would say good shit about mittens also. It does not make it so.

Tell that to your Dear Leader and his 'Jobs Czar' GE CEO Jeffrey Immelt. Give em a call, see if you can get a meeting with em.

 

[paulitician]

Boy, this one should send all the CNN (Communist News Network/Clinton News Network) sicophants into a tizzy.


A recent CNNMoney survey found that 75% of money managers and investment strategists believe a Mitt Romney victory would lift U.S. markets. The survey also found that "many are also hoping for the GOP to gain control of both the House and the Senate."

Leading up to the November elections, 80 percent of those surveyed agreed that the stock market will remain volatile and possibly get worse.

John Praveen, managing director and chief investment strategist for Prudential International Investments Advisers says investors are not sanguine about lawmakers' ability to keep America from driving off the fiscal cliff:

"In case investors are not sufficiently convinced that policy makers and politicians are up to the task of handling the fiscal cliff in a reasonably effective manner, financial markets are likely to again fall sharply, similar to the plunge around the debt ceiling debacle in 2011."

Chase Investment Counsel President Peter Tuz was more direct:

"At this point, I think markets would appreciate a clear Republican mandate. That provides the best chance for continued low tax rates. If investors see the likelihood of an Obama victory, coupled with Democrats retaining control of the Senate, they will react by taking advantage of the low tax rates that still exist, so a sell-off in markets would be a distinct possibility."

The sputtering U.S. economic recovery, the European debt crisis, the slowing of growth in China, the need to cut government spending, and the looming expiration of the Bush tax cuts were cited as troubling economic signs for America's financial future.

CNN POLL: 75% Of Financial Experts Say Romney Victory Would Improve Markets

Rich guys working for, with, and around other rich guys essentially campaigning for a Romney win.

Big surprise.

Yes, this Poll must be very shocking to you CNN (Communist News Network/Clinton News Network) dunces. Your hysterical meltdowns are pretty hilarious.