Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
of course? How can you prove it? Show an experiment that shows that adding CO2 changes temperatures. Just one, please, since you can write this statement. Just one factual experiment. Please!I made no such claim, CO2 is used to keep things cool, this thread is specifically about the Industrial use of CO2. The example I used was in the industrial production of Bread. CO2 is used as Cryogenic. That means extremely cold.So what, if you could take your head out of the sand, you would realize that the people who live in cities could not grow their own food.Ahhh, Facts hurt, huh Crick?
Crick, Industry is used to manufacture our food, how about telling us how we can eat without Industry?
Yes, CO2 cools things, even in our atmosphere, of course there is Crick's unproven theory with zero experiments, but still, Crick, your idea that we could feed the planet without industry is pure nonsense.
You could always grow your friggin own. People do it every day.
Get it, the world needs industry to supply food. We are speaking of something a little bigger than what one individual can do, we are speaking of what is needed today, to supply food to people who live in cities.
Now if you are speaking of me individually, that I could grow my own food on the 168 acres I sit on, I would have to tell you that you are ignorant. I can not grow my own food, I work supplying you with ELECTRICITY so I am not home in the spring, I have a job that you depend on, unless of course you found a magic way to supply your needs of electricity, without any industry.
Of course, we need modern ways to produce our food, but that's not what this thread is about. You made a silly claim about CO2 supposedly cooling our environment. That was wrong, and you should just admit you read some little bit of information and took the wrong conclusion from it. We've all done that, but only an idiot would just keep defending an indefensible post after all the corrections you have received. This is why people laugh at right wingers and say they are dumb. Grow up and quit embarrassing yourself.
Anyhow, if you think its too hot you could sit on a block of CO2, they sell it as DRY ICE!
The only people that laugh at us, are idiots, morons, political hacks, you are no different than those people in the past who laughed and made fun of black people. You are the same person that called black people dumb. You see, your type never goes away, they just find something new to hate. Bigots never disappear, as you prove. The OP is clearly about CO2 being used in industry because its cold.
So political you are, so full of ideology, so stupid and foolish, you did not even take the time to read the OP, saying something good about CO2 must be stopped at all costs yes? Too bad you can't still hang people from under the cover of a White Sheet. I believe you would.
Fact is, CO2 is some super cold stuff.
OK. Then you say this thread is only about the fact that CO2 is sometimes used to cool things. Perhaps I was thrown off by your statement
From what I read in the threads, people are actually arguing you can use CO2 to heat the earth, and they claim they know Science, they even claim Scientists support their bizarre ideas.
Of course CO2 has an effect on raising the temperature of the earth. Only an idiot would say differently. I can't see any problem with your claim that it is sometimes used for small scale cooling as well.
of course? How can you prove it? Show an experiment that shows that adding CO2 changes temperatures. Just one, please, since you can write this statement. Just one factual experiment. Please!I made no such claim, CO2 is used to keep things cool, this thread is specifically about the Industrial use of CO2. The example I used was in the industrial production of Bread. CO2 is used as Cryogenic. That means extremely cold.So what, if you could take your head out of the sand, you would realize that the people who live in cities could not grow their own food.You could always grow your friggin own. People do it every day.
Get it, the world needs industry to supply food. We are speaking of something a little bigger than what one individual can do, we are speaking of what is needed today, to supply food to people who live in cities.
Now if you are speaking of me individually, that I could grow my own food on the 168 acres I sit on, I would have to tell you that you are ignorant. I can not grow my own food, I work supplying you with ELECTRICITY so I am not home in the spring, I have a job that you depend on, unless of course you found a magic way to supply your needs of electricity, without any industry.
Of course, we need modern ways to produce our food, but that's not what this thread is about. You made a silly claim about CO2 supposedly cooling our environment. That was wrong, and you should just admit you read some little bit of information and took the wrong conclusion from it. We've all done that, but only an idiot would just keep defending an indefensible post after all the corrections you have received. This is why people laugh at right wingers and say they are dumb. Grow up and quit embarrassing yourself.
Anyhow, if you think its too hot you could sit on a block of CO2, they sell it as DRY ICE!
The only people that laugh at us, are idiots, morons, political hacks, you are no different than those people in the past who laughed and made fun of black people. You are the same person that called black people dumb. You see, your type never goes away, they just find something new to hate. Bigots never disappear, as you prove. The OP is clearly about CO2 being used in industry because its cold.
So political you are, so full of ideology, so stupid and foolish, you did not even take the time to read the OP, saying something good about CO2 must be stopped at all costs yes? Too bad you can't still hang people from under the cover of a White Sheet. I believe you would.
Fact is, CO2 is some super cold stuff.
OK. Then you say this thread is only about the fact that CO2 is sometimes used to cool things. Perhaps I was thrown off by your statement
From what I read in the threads, people are actually arguing you can use CO2 to heat the earth, and they claim they know Science, they even claim Scientists support their bizarre ideas.
Of course CO2 has an effect on raising the temperature of the earth. Only an idiot would say differently. I can't see any problem with your claim that it is sometimes used for small scale cooling as well.
What is the purpose of the military, to be climate experts, or security experts? What a stupid statement to use as an argument. It is obvious you can't prove it. Can you? Just admit you can't prove it and move forward. Don't give me stupid that is hearsay of something never proven.of course? How can you prove it? Show an experiment that shows that adding CO2 changes temperatures. Just one, please, since you can write this statement. Just one factual experiment. Please!I made no such claim, CO2 is used to keep things cool, this thread is specifically about the Industrial use of CO2. The example I used was in the industrial production of Bread. CO2 is used as Cryogenic. That means extremely cold.So what, if you could take your head out of the sand, you would realize that the people who live in cities could not grow their own food.
Get it, the world needs industry to supply food. We are speaking of something a little bigger than what one individual can do, we are speaking of what is needed today, to supply food to people who live in cities.
Now if you are speaking of me individually, that I could grow my own food on the 168 acres I sit on, I would have to tell you that you are ignorant. I can not grow my own food, I work supplying you with ELECTRICITY so I am not home in the spring, I have a job that you depend on, unless of course you found a magic way to supply your needs of electricity, without any industry.
Of course, we need modern ways to produce our food, but that's not what this thread is about. You made a silly claim about CO2 supposedly cooling our environment. That was wrong, and you should just admit you read some little bit of information and took the wrong conclusion from it. We've all done that, but only an idiot would just keep defending an indefensible post after all the corrections you have received. This is why people laugh at right wingers and say they are dumb. Grow up and quit embarrassing yourself.
Anyhow, if you think its too hot you could sit on a block of CO2, they sell it as DRY ICE!
The only people that laugh at us, are idiots, morons, political hacks, you are no different than those people in the past who laughed and made fun of black people. You are the same person that called black people dumb. You see, your type never goes away, they just find something new to hate. Bigots never disappear, as you prove. The OP is clearly about CO2 being used in industry because its cold.
So political you are, so full of ideology, so stupid and foolish, you did not even take the time to read the OP, saying something good about CO2 must be stopped at all costs yes? Too bad you can't still hang people from under the cover of a White Sheet. I believe you would.
Fact is, CO2 is some super cold stuff.
OK. Then you say this thread is only about the fact that CO2 is sometimes used to cool things. Perhaps I was thrown off by your statement
From what I read in the threads, people are actually arguing you can use CO2 to heat the earth, and they claim they know Science, they even claim Scientists support their bizarre ideas.
Of course CO2 has an effect on raising the temperature of the earth. Only an idiot would say differently. I can't see any problem with your claim that it is sometimes used for small scale cooling as well.
Well, I expect a teabagger as yourself will just claim Obama ordered NASA to publish this, but the sane world will accept it as credible.
Climate Change Vital Signs of the Planet Evidence
All branches of the military as well as most of the rest of the world have accepted it as fact, even though many of the countries haven't done anything about it yet. Sadly a few people, like you, are stuck with a flat earth mentality, and refuse to accept reality.
You know what? If you had any smarts, you'd delete the duplicate posts you keep posting. But, eh, that's too simple for you. See you have no proof. Bulldog, just remember that.
I made no such claim, CO2 is used to keep things cool, this thread is specifically about the Industrial use of CO2. The example I used was in the industrial production of Bread. CO2 is used as Cryogenic. That means extremely cold.
Actually, it is liquid nitrogen which is used as cryogenic because it is so much colder. Nitrogen is the most common element in our atmosphere. The problem I have with your argument is the failure to understand the nature of elements and compounds in general. Yes, CO2 can be used to cool things, just as nitrogen, freon, oxygen or just plain old air. This does not mean these elements or compounds once released into the atmosphere, are out there continuing to make things cool. Their state changes, carbon dioxide becomes a gas at a certain temperature.
The argument for climate change is centered around the effects of increased CO2 in the atmosphere, which does contribute to the greenhouse effect. However, we need the greenhouse effect, without it there would be no life on earth. It enables our relative air pressure and temperature. The fear of the warmers is that CO2 is causing too much of the greenhouse effect.
CO2 in the atmosphere, which does contribute to the greenhouse effect.
maybe
most likely not
CO2 is a great conductor of heat
if you are looking for the great blanket in the atmosphere
that keeps us warm look at the poor conductors great insulators
like nitrogen and H2O for example
of course? How can you prove it? Show an experiment that shows that adding CO2 changes temperatures. Just one, please, since you can write this statement. Just one factual experiment. Please!I made no such claim, CO2 is used to keep things cool, this thread is specifically about the Industrial use of CO2. The example I used was in the industrial production of Bread. CO2 is used as Cryogenic. That means extremely cold.So what, if you could take your head out of the sand, you would realize that the people who live in cities could not grow their own food.You could always grow your friggin own. People do it every day.
Get it, the world needs industry to supply food. We are speaking of something a little bigger than what one individual can do, we are speaking of what is needed today, to supply food to people who live in cities.
Now if you are speaking of me individually, that I could grow my own food on the 168 acres I sit on, I would have to tell you that you are ignorant. I can not grow my own food, I work supplying you with ELECTRICITY so I am not home in the spring, I have a job that you depend on, unless of course you found a magic way to supply your needs of electricity, without any industry.
Of course, we need modern ways to produce our food, but that's not what this thread is about. You made a silly claim about CO2 supposedly cooling our environment. That was wrong, and you should just admit you read some little bit of information and took the wrong conclusion from it. We've all done that, but only an idiot would just keep defending an indefensible post after all the corrections you have received. This is why people laugh at right wingers and say they are dumb. Grow up and quit embarrassing yourself.
Anyhow, if you think its too hot you could sit on a block of CO2, they sell it as DRY ICE!
The only people that laugh at us, are idiots, morons, political hacks, you are no different than those people in the past who laughed and made fun of black people. You are the same person that called black people dumb. You see, your type never goes away, they just find something new to hate. Bigots never disappear, as you prove. The OP is clearly about CO2 being used in industry because its cold.
So political you are, so full of ideology, so stupid and foolish, you did not even take the time to read the OP, saying something good about CO2 must be stopped at all costs yes? Too bad you can't still hang people from under the cover of a White Sheet. I believe you would.
Fact is, CO2 is some super cold stuff.
OK. Then you say this thread is only about the fact that CO2 is sometimes used to cool things. Perhaps I was thrown off by your statement
From what I read in the threads, people are actually arguing you can use CO2 to heat the earth, and they claim they know Science, they even claim Scientists support their bizarre ideas.
Of course CO2 has an effect on raising the temperature of the earth. Only an idiot would say differently. I can't see any problem with your claim that it is sometimes used for small scale cooling as well.
of course? How can you prove it? Show an experiment that shows that adding CO2 changes temperatures. Just one, please, since you can write this statement. Just one factual experiment. Please!I made no such claim, CO2 is used to keep things cool, this thread is specifically about the Industrial use of CO2. The example I used was in the industrial production of Bread. CO2 is used as Cryogenic. That means extremely cold.So what, if you could take your head out of the sand, you would realize that the people who live in cities could not grow their own food.
Get it, the world needs industry to supply food. We are speaking of something a little bigger than what one individual can do, we are speaking of what is needed today, to supply food to people who live in cities.
Now if you are speaking of me individually, that I could grow my own food on the 168 acres I sit on, I would have to tell you that you are ignorant. I can not grow my own food, I work supplying you with ELECTRICITY so I am not home in the spring, I have a job that you depend on, unless of course you found a magic way to supply your needs of electricity, without any industry.
Of course, we need modern ways to produce our food, but that's not what this thread is about. You made a silly claim about CO2 supposedly cooling our environment. That was wrong, and you should just admit you read some little bit of information and took the wrong conclusion from it. We've all done that, but only an idiot would just keep defending an indefensible post after all the corrections you have received. This is why people laugh at right wingers and say they are dumb. Grow up and quit embarrassing yourself.
Anyhow, if you think its too hot you could sit on a block of CO2, they sell it as DRY ICE!
The only people that laugh at us, are idiots, morons, political hacks, you are no different than those people in the past who laughed and made fun of black people. You are the same person that called black people dumb. You see, your type never goes away, they just find something new to hate. Bigots never disappear, as you prove. The OP is clearly about CO2 being used in industry because its cold.
So political you are, so full of ideology, so stupid and foolish, you did not even take the time to read the OP, saying something good about CO2 must be stopped at all costs yes? Too bad you can't still hang people from under the cover of a White Sheet. I believe you would.
Fact is, CO2 is some super cold stuff.
OK. Then you say this thread is only about the fact that CO2 is sometimes used to cool things. Perhaps I was thrown off by your statement
From what I read in the threads, people are actually arguing you can use CO2 to heat the earth, and they claim they know Science, they even claim Scientists support their bizarre ideas.
Of course CO2 has an effect on raising the temperature of the earth. Only an idiot would say differently. I can't see any problem with your claim that it is sometimes used for small scale cooling as well.
No problem.
of course? How can you prove it? Show an experiment that shows that adding CO2 changes temperatures. Just one, please, since you can write this statement. Just one factual experiment. Please!I made no such claim, CO2 is used to keep things cool, this thread is specifically about the Industrial use of CO2. The example I used was in the industrial production of Bread. CO2 is used as Cryogenic. That means extremely cold.Of course, we need modern ways to produce our food, but that's not what this thread is about. You made a silly claim about CO2 supposedly cooling our environment. That was wrong, and you should just admit you read some little bit of information and took the wrong conclusion from it. We've all done that, but only an idiot would just keep defending an indefensible post after all the corrections you have received. This is why people laugh at right wingers and say they are dumb. Grow up and quit embarrassing yourself.
Anyhow, if you think its too hot you could sit on a block of CO2, they sell it as DRY ICE!
The only people that laugh at us, are idiots, morons, political hacks, you are no different than those people in the past who laughed and made fun of black people. You are the same person that called black people dumb. You see, your type never goes away, they just find something new to hate. Bigots never disappear, as you prove. The OP is clearly about CO2 being used in industry because its cold.
So political you are, so full of ideology, so stupid and foolish, you did not even take the time to read the OP, saying something good about CO2 must be stopped at all costs yes? Too bad you can't still hang people from under the cover of a White Sheet. I believe you would.
Fact is, CO2 is some super cold stuff.
OK. Then you say this thread is only about the fact that CO2 is sometimes used to cool things. Perhaps I was thrown off by your statement
From what I read in the threads, people are actually arguing you can use CO2 to heat the earth, and they claim they know Science, they even claim Scientists support their bizarre ideas.
Of course CO2 has an effect on raising the temperature of the earth. Only an idiot would say differently. I can't see any problem with your claim that it is sometimes used for small scale cooling as well.
No problem.
hahahahahaahahahahahhaha. I'm not wasting my time with this one. the one, the one that has been requested, is the one that proves adding CO2 changes temperatures. Not filling a bottle up and then saying it's a greenhouse gas.
Again, Herr Koch, 1901.
of course? How can you prove it? Show an experiment that shows that adding CO2 changes temperatures. Just one, please, since you can write this statement. Just one factual experiment. Please!I made no such claim, CO2 is used to keep things cool, this thread is specifically about the Industrial use of CO2. The example I used was in the industrial production of Bread. CO2 is used as Cryogenic. That means extremely cold.
Anyhow, if you think its too hot you could sit on a block of CO2, they sell it as DRY ICE!
The only people that laugh at us, are idiots, morons, political hacks, you are no different than those people in the past who laughed and made fun of black people. You are the same person that called black people dumb. You see, your type never goes away, they just find something new to hate. Bigots never disappear, as you prove. The OP is clearly about CO2 being used in industry because its cold.
So political you are, so full of ideology, so stupid and foolish, you did not even take the time to read the OP, saying something good about CO2 must be stopped at all costs yes? Too bad you can't still hang people from under the cover of a White Sheet. I believe you would.
Fact is, CO2 is some super cold stuff.
OK. Then you say this thread is only about the fact that CO2 is sometimes used to cool things. Perhaps I was thrown off by your statement
From what I read in the threads, people are actually arguing you can use CO2 to heat the earth, and they claim they know Science, they even claim Scientists support their bizarre ideas.
Of course CO2 has an effect on raising the temperature of the earth. Only an idiot would say differently. I can't see any problem with your claim that it is sometimes used for small scale cooling as well.
No problem.
hahahahahaahahahahahhaha. I'm not wasting my time with this one. the one, the one that has been requested, is the one that proves adding CO2 changes temperatures. Not filling a bottle up and then saying it's a greenhouse gas.
Again, Herr Koch, 1901.
The question was whether CO2 changes temperatures. Did you not see the temperature change in the bottle that contained the CO2? Crick got it right. You people are morons, hands down.
of course? How can you prove it? Show an experiment that shows that adding CO2 changes temperatures. Just one, please, since you can write this statement. Just one factual experiment. Please!OK. Then you say this thread is only about the fact that CO2 is sometimes used to cool things. Perhaps I was thrown off by your statement
Of course CO2 has an effect on raising the temperature of the earth. Only an idiot would say differently. I can't see any problem with your claim that it is sometimes used for small scale cooling as well.
No problem.
hahahahahaahahahahahhaha. I'm not wasting my time with this one. the one, the one that has been requested, is the one that proves adding CO2 changes temperatures. Not filling a bottle up and then saying it's a greenhouse gas.
Again, Herr Koch, 1901.
The question was whether CO2 changes temperatures. Did you not see the temperature change in the bottle that contained the CO2? Crick got it right. You people are morons, hands down.
that isn't the question or the argument. CO2 is logarithmic. And the potential is greatest at the first 20 PPM after that, not so much. So any added CO2 will not increase temperature. So, show that experiment. The one that shows that adding CO2 to existing control makes a difference in temperature. You won't be able to, because it doesn't. herr Koch 1901!!!!
of course? How can you prove it? Show an experiment that shows that adding CO2 changes temperatures. Just one, please, since you can write this statement. Just one factual experiment. Please!
No problem.
hahahahahaahahahahahhaha. I'm not wasting my time with this one. the one, the one that has been requested, is the one that proves adding CO2 changes temperatures. Not filling a bottle up and then saying it's a greenhouse gas.
Again, Herr Koch, 1901.
The question was whether CO2 changes temperatures. Did you not see the temperature change in the bottle that contained the CO2? Crick got it right. You people are morons, hands down.
that isn't the question or the argument. CO2 is logarithmic. And the potential is greatest at the first 20 PPM after that, not so much. So any added CO2 will not increase temperature. So, show that experiment. The one that shows that adding CO2 to existing control makes a difference in temperature. You won't be able to, because it doesn't. herr Koch 1901!!!!
I take it you failed to read Crick's post on Koch. That would explain why you continue to cite his flawed work in your argument.
No problem.
hahahahahaahahahahahhaha. I'm not wasting my time with this one. the one, the one that has been requested, is the one that proves adding CO2 changes temperatures. Not filling a bottle up and then saying it's a greenhouse gas.
Again, Herr Koch, 1901.
The question was whether CO2 changes temperatures. Did you not see the temperature change in the bottle that contained the CO2? Crick got it right. You people are morons, hands down.
that isn't the question or the argument. CO2 is logarithmic. And the potential is greatest at the first 20 PPM after that, not so much. So any added CO2 will not increase temperature. So, show that experiment. The one that shows that adding CO2 to existing control makes a difference in temperature. You won't be able to, because it doesn't. herr Koch 1901!!!!
I take it you failed to read Crick's post on Koch. That would explain why you continue to cite his flawed work in your argument.
yes, I read it, I also asked him to disprove it with an experiment that disproves Koch's experiment. it's easy to just say it isn't valid, but then provide one that is. See, his experiment was done with the options that was asked of him. So his test is therefore not invalid. So, just provide the one that does what he was doing proving added CO2 to temperatures. Just one!!!!!
he did validate it!!!!!!!! prove his test wrong if you don't like the results. That would mean a test that shows adding CO2 does indeed change temperature. Sorry fail!!!!yes, I read it, I also asked him to disprove it with an experiment that disproves Koch's experiment. it's easy to just say it isn't valid, but then provide one that is. See, his experiment was done with the options that was asked of him. So his test is therefore not invalid. So, just provide the one that does what he was doing proving added CO2 to temperatures. Just one!!!!!that isn't the question or the argument. CO2 is logarithmic. And the potential is greatest at the first 20 PPM after that, not so much. So any added CO2 will not increase temperature. So, show that experiment. The one that shows that adding CO2 to existing control makes a difference in temperature. You won't be able to, because it doesn't. herr Koch 1901!!!!hahahahahaahahahahahhaha. I'm not wasting my time with this one. the one, the one that has been requested, is the one that proves adding CO2 changes temperatures. Not filling a bottle up and then saying it's a greenhouse gas.
Again, Herr Koch, 1901.
The question was whether CO2 changes temperatures. Did you not see the temperature change in the bottle that contained the CO2? Crick got it right. You people are morons, hands down.
I take it you failed to read Crick's post on Koch. That would explain why you continue to cite his flawed work in your argument.
No one has to disprove Koch's claims. It was for him to validate them. He didn't do that. And no one has since.
he did validate it!!!!!!!! prove his test wrong if you don't like the results. That would mean a test that shows adding CO2 does indeed change temperature. Sorry fail!!!!yes, I read it, I also asked him to disprove it with an experiment that disproves Koch's experiment. it's easy to just say it isn't valid, but then provide one that is. See, his experiment was done with the options that was asked of him. So his test is therefore not invalid. So, just provide the one that does what he was doing proving added CO2 to temperatures. Just one!!!!!that isn't the question or the argument. CO2 is logarithmic. And the potential is greatest at the first 20 PPM after that, not so much. So any added CO2 will not increase temperature. So, show that experiment. The one that shows that adding CO2 to existing control makes a difference in temperature. You won't be able to, because it doesn't. herr Koch 1901!!!!The question was whether CO2 changes temperatures. Did you not see the temperature change in the bottle that contained the CO2? Crick got it right. You people are morons, hands down.
I take it you failed to read Crick's post on Koch. That would explain why you continue to cite his flawed work in your argument.
No one has to disprove Koch's claims. It was for him to validate them. He didn't do that. And no one has since.
The assistant ("Herr J. Koch," otherwise unrecorded in history) put in rather less of the gas in total than would be found in a column of air reaching to the top of the atmosphere. The assistant reported that the amount of radiation that got through the tube scarcely changed when he cut the quantity of gas back by a third. Apparently it took only a trace of the gas to "saturate" the absorption — that is, in the bands of the spectrum where CO2 blocked radiation, it did it so thoroughly that more gas could make little (7*)
Angstrom
Still more (8)
These measurements and arguments had fatal flaws. Herr Koch had reported to Ångström that the absorption had not been reduced by more than 0.4% when he lowered the pressure, but a modern calculation shows that the absorption would have decreased about 1% — like many a researcher, the assistant was over confident about his degree of precision.(9*) But even if he had seen the1% shift, Ångström would have thought this an insignificant perturbation. He failed to understand that the logic of the experiment was altogether false.
again, that means absolutely nothing. So again, someone merely stating it is not evidence man!!! Angstrom doesn't just get to make a statement like I said. Man up and post the one that disproves him!!!!he did validate it!!!!!!!! prove his test wrong if you don't like the results. That would mean a test that shows adding CO2 does indeed change temperature. Sorry fail!!!!yes, I read it, I also asked him to disprove it with an experiment that disproves Koch's experiment. it's easy to just say it isn't valid, but then provide one that is. See, his experiment was done with the options that was asked of him. So his test is therefore not invalid. So, just provide the one that does what he was doing proving added CO2 to temperatures. Just one!!!!!that isn't the question or the argument. CO2 is logarithmic. And the potential is greatest at the first 20 PPM after that, not so much. So any added CO2 will not increase temperature. So, show that experiment. The one that shows that adding CO2 to existing control makes a difference in temperature. You won't be able to, because it doesn't. herr Koch 1901!!!!
I take it you failed to read Crick's post on Koch. That would explain why you continue to cite his flawed work in your argument.
No one has to disprove Koch's claims. It was for him to validate them. He didn't do that. And no one has since.
No sir he did not. This has been pointed out to you on numerous occasions. What's more, repeatedly demanding test results that also have been given to you on numerous occasions is insane. The fact that you are in denial is meaningless to the issue of global warming, which, I assure you is very real, and has a significant human-induced component.
The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect
The assistant ("Herr J. Koch," otherwise unrecorded in history) put in rather less of the gas in total than would be found in a column of air reaching to the top of the atmosphere. The assistant reported that the amount of radiation that got through the tube scarcely changed when he cut the quantity of gas back by a third. Apparently it took only a trace of the gas to "saturate" the absorption — that is, in the bands of the spectrum where CO2 blocked radiation, it did it so thoroughly that more gas could make little (7*)
Angstrom
Still more (8)
These measurements and arguments had fatal flaws. Herr Koch had reported to Ångström that the absorption had not been reduced by more than 0.4% when he lowered the pressure, but a modern calculation shows that the absorption would have decreased about 1% — like many a researcher, the assistant was over confident about his degree of precision.(9*) But even if he had seen the1% shift, Ångström would have thought this an insignificant perturbation. He failed to understand that the logic of the experiment was altogether false.
Sorry, YOU fail, and on every level.
You made the claim that farms do not provide food to people, you made the claim that people in cities can grow their own food and do not need farms.Oh my, you did not get a brain? You believe Manhattan or Los Angeles can and do grow all the food they need? You believe this is possible?So what, if you could take your head out of the sand, you would realize that the people who live in cities could not grow their own food.Ahhh, Facts hurt, huh Crick?
Crick, Industry is used to manufacture our food, how about telling us how we can eat without Industry?
Yes, CO2 cools things, even in our atmosphere, of course there is Crick's unproven theory with zero experiments, but still, Crick, your idea that we could feed the planet without industry is pure nonsense.
You could always grow your friggin own. People do it every day.
Get it, the world needs industry to supply food. We are speaking of something a little bigger than what one individual can do, we are speaking of what is needed today, to supply food to people who live in cities.
Now if you are speaking of me individually, that I could grow my own food on the 168 acres I sit on, I would have to tell you that you are ignorant. I can not grow my own food, I work supplying you with ELECTRICITY so I am not home in the spring, I have a job that you depend on, unless of course you found a magic way to supply your needs of electricity, without any industry.
Oh dear. You didn't get the memo? Many people in cities DO grow their own food. And have for quite a while. I never said that they are independent of the market. Industrial farms, particularly in the Midwest, grow primarily feed grains, such as corn fodder, the bulk of which is nearly indigestible to the animals for which they were intended, but does fatten them up for the market rather nicely right before it burns a hole in their guts and they die horrible deaths. And the bottom line is, after all, the primary goal of your industrial farms, not feeding the world.
What part of "I never said that they are independent of the market" escaped your notice?
CO2 is a great conductor of heat
No, CO2 has a lower heat conductivity than air, nitrogen or water vapor.
Air -- 0.024 W/m*K
Nitrogen -- 0.024 W/m*K
Water Vapor -- 0.016 W/m*K
CO2 -- 0.0146 W/m*K
Thermal Conductivity of some common Materials and Gases
but CO2 is used to Cool things
but CO2 is used to Cool things
Liquid CO2, dear chap.
Your stupidity is about the same as claiming boiling water won't burn you because ice is cold.
