Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well that's childish and stupid. Go debate the global scientific community. Publish your research. I defer to them. So it is them you need to convince. Though i doubt they will take a Google cowboy and a few awkward sentences written in crayon very seriously. But that's your problem.I'd rather send you an invite for a bull ring discussion. It'll be fun.
Are you scared?Well that's childish and stupid. Go debate the global scientific community. Publish your research. I defer to them. So it is them you need to convince. Though i doubt they will take a Google cowboy and a few awkward sentences written in crayon very seriously. But that's your problem.
You are a troll all of your posts are mocking posts....Oh look, he's not even smart enough to know when he is being mocked...
Historically, higher levels of carbon in the atmosphere followed a warming period as the EARTH again cooled off as evidenced by the ICE CORE samples. Perma FRost and Ice store carbon, and they release it during warmer periods which builds up right before the EARTH again cools off. I think you should be more worried that we getting ready to enter our long overdue Ice age. Texas is again cooling---less deserty with more rain....Florida feels cooler this year............and we again cycled from warmer to cooler weather.According to this study, it appears that the present CO2 level is the highest it has been since the Miocene.
Skip Nav Destination
RESEARCH ARTICLE| MAY 29, 2020
A 23 m.y. record of low atmospheric CO2
Ying Cui;
Brian A. Schubert;
A. Hope Jahren
Geology (2020) 48 (9): 888–892.
A 23 m.y. record of low atmospheric CO2 | Geology | GeoScienceWorld
Article history
Abstract
Current atmospheric CO2 concentration is known to be higher than it has been during the past ∼800 k.y. of Earth history, based on direct measurement of CO2 within ice cores. A comparison to the more ancient past is complicated by a deficit of CO2 proxies that may be applied across very long spans of geologic time. Here, we present a new CO2 record across the past 23 m.y. of Earth history based on the δ13C value of terrestrial C3 plant remains, using a method applicable to the entire ∼400 m.y. history of C3 photosynthesis on land. Across the past 23 m.y., CO2 likely ranged between ∼230 ppmv and 350 ppmv (68% confidence interval: ∼170–540 ppm). CO2 was found to be highest during the early and middle Miocene and likely below present-day levels during the middle Pliocene (84th percentile: ∼400 ppmv). These data suggest present-day CO2 (412 ppmv) exceeds the highest levels that Earth experienced at least since the Miocene, further highlighting the present-day disruption of long-established CO2 trends within Earth’s atmosphere.
A 23 m.y. record of low atmospheric CO2 | Geology | GeoScienceWorld
pubs.geoscienceworld.org
Again...Historically, higher levels of carbon in the atmosphere followed a warming period as the EARTH again cooled off as evidenced by the ICE CORE samples. Perma FRost and Ice store carbon, and they release it during warmer periods which builds up right before the EARTH again cools off. I think you should be more worried that we getting ready to enter our long overdue Ice age. Texas is again cooling---less deserty with more rain....Florida feels cooler this year............and we again cycled from warmer to cooler weather.
It's harder to survive in cold climates.....you may be wishing that the carbon had warmed us here shortly.
You have struck the nail firmly on its head.You are a troll all of your posts are mocking posts....
CO2 level highest in 23 million years
Correct. Prior to the industrial revolution CO2 was a proxy for temperature. CO2 would correlate with temperature and sea level. Post industrial revolution CO2 correlates with emissions but not temperature and sea level.The above picture shows temperature leading the CO² levels...not the other way around.
Coal is by far the cheapest and most abundant...Only because of using coal to generate the electricity for processing aluminum. The electricity doesn't care whether it is produced by coal, wind, or solar. It will still produce electricity. And wind and solar both produce electricity at a lower cost than coal. So much so that some steel mills are now using solar;
Opinion | The Steel Mill That Helped Build the American West Goes Green (Published 2019)
Wind and solar power will replace coal at a Colorado furnace.www.nytimes.com
Peer reviewed!!Now Frankie Boi, what the fuck would you, a kisser of the orange ass, know about honesty? And the article is from a peer reviewed journal, not from a dumb ass like Carlson or Hannity.
Well, it is Third World CO2, it just isn't as strong as American CO2.So American CO2 is more dangerous that Chinese CO2.....hmmkay
We've reduced our CO2, China has increased theirs. Please chain yourself to their Embasdy in protest
Are you scared?
When uneducated slobs sit around and pretend they have outsmarted the global scientific community? Definitely.You are a troll all of your posts are mocking posts....
"Content"
What are you babbling about-----the carbon pimpers are paid off to spew their lies which is why they habitual get snagged lying and falsifying data. It is also why they don't have envidence and base their supposed assumptions on a computer model that repeatedly gets its predictions wrong."Content"
Debating climate change requires climate scientists. You goobers are passing notes in homeroom compared to that. Let ding invite a climate scientist into the bullring.
LOL Still repeating that stupid lie. Your bunch has been predicting a big cooldown for years. So here we are in a La Nina, and it is very warm. In fact, this year will probably be in the top ten for warmth.What are you babbling about-----the carbon pimpers are paid off to spew their lies which is why they habitual get snagged lying and falsifying data. It is also why they don't have envidence and base their supposed assumptions on a computer model that repeatedly gets its predictions wrong.
Some of us, don't need someone to think or try to manipulate us, we are quite capable of looking at the evidence and coming to the logical conclusion instead of the UN's, CHINA's, paid off scientists (who btw often aren't even specialists in climate but other fields) and others making money off their lies.
No one is convinced that climate change is a world ending calamity like you alarmist cultists like to believe."Content"
Debating climate change requires climate scientists. You goobers are passing notes in homeroom compared to that. Let ding invite a climate scientist into the bullring.
