Colorado baker told to bake that cake


His defence is the ridiculous religous freedom one that he used to deny a gay couple a cake a few yesrs ago. What does the bible say about trannys ?

It seems that a common link in these bigot cases is well funded extremist laawyers. These bigots never refuse cakes for adulterers or criminals or people who eat shellfish.

They make me sick to my stomach.
The Bible condem homosexuality along with any form of deviance. Maybe you should actually read it, you might then know what you are talking about. Retard.
 
Fascism might be the best definition when a small business is targeted for destruction by the government sponsored radical left. They couldn't leave it alone when the bakery won a supreme court decision based on his religious beliefs. He was immediately targeted by the same law firm that demanded that he make a devil worship cake. When he won that case he was targeted again by the same law firm that demanded that he bake a sex-change "trans" cake that offended his religious beliefs.
 
Fascism might be the best definition when a small business is targeted for destruction by the government sponsored radical left. They couldn't leave it alone when the bakery won a supreme court decision based on his religious beliefs. He was immediately targeted by the same law firm that demanded that he make a devil worship cake. When he won that case he was targeted again by the same law firm that demanded that he bake a sex-change "trans" cake that offended his religious beliefs.
It's about submission. You will submit or we will destroy you. That's the left.
 
It's about submission. You will submit or we will destroy you.
That's the religiofascist right.
we need to protect the beliefs of religious conservatives, but now we’re also being asked to protect religious conservatives who want to have dinner at a restaurant whose owners’ and staff members’ beliefs don’t align with theirs, and don’t want to serve them because they think they’re hateful monsters.

Basically, they don’t want to have to bake the cake, but they want to be able to eat it, too.
 
Last edited:
They said the same of the same sex cake case. Didn’t end that way Joe. He just doesn’t offer the product.

Oh, and Joe, Murder is not nearly the same as not offering a product for sale.

Uh, actually, the only thing SCOTUS did with the same sex case was say that they should have taken his belief in sky pixies into account. They did not strike down public accommedation laws.

He really doesn't have a leg to stand on with the Tranny Cake, because he agreed to make the cake until he was told who it was for.

You really should read the law before commenting then.

Obergfell made same sex marriage legal Timmy. Not gay marriage. Gays have married as long as marriage existed. They just had to marry gays of the opposite sex.

Same sex does not discriminate based on sexuality. That would be against the law.
Why would you marry someone you aren't sexually interested in?
 
"The Bible condem homosexuality along with any form of deviance."

Well, yeah.....the Bible does in some parts offer a rather skeptical view of homosexuality.....male / male, or even female / female.

But remember, this is the same Bible that approves of your neighbors stoning to death your daughter for fooling around ( ;))...with the cute neighbor boy.
(Deuteronomy 22:21)

So, if the Bible is to be followed on homosexuals and and/or spunky teenage girls.....then maybe you wanna remove any rocks from the front yard. Hate to see little EmilyAnn beaned-to-death by that pair of azzh*le neighbors you never liked anyway.

But then....the Bible is the 'Word of God'.....so you can't choose which of his words you will obey and which to ignore. No?
 
Bad law when someone's rights are violated. So you support forced labor. I think that's unconstitutional. Better check that out.

Except it's not "forced labor". He will be paid for his services.
If he can't in good conscience do the work that he offered to do, then he should find something else to do for a living.
the constitution only prevents Congress from oppressing your religion. Religion is not a license to break other laws.

We would not be having this discussion if the baker was a homophobic atheist who just doesn't like the queers.
We would not be having a discussion if someone claimed that his religion prevented him from baking a cake for an interracial marriage.
 
Works for me.

When you are privileged, equality can seem like oppression.
Of course forced submission works for you. Privilege and rights have nothing to do with it. You also have yet to prove that the queer couple had bought products from the baker previously. That makes you a liar.
 
Nope.....this is a free country, unlike Britain......the Freedom of Religion is why our Founders left your tiny island. If adulterors had a party, he wouldn't bake a cake for that either, you dumb shit.

Fascists like you turn my stomach.....the death, chaos and ruin you create just never stops.

DickTiny, protecting the privileges of entitled white people.

This isn't a issue of freedom, it's a issue of a dispute between two parties in commerce.
 
Well, yeah.....the Bible does in some parts offer a rather skeptical view of homosexuality.....male / male, or even female / female.

But remember, this is the same Bible that approves of your neighbors stoning to death your daughter for fooling around ( ;))...with the cute neighbor boy.

So, if the Bible is to be followed on homosexuals.....then maybe you wanna remove any rocks from the front yard. Hate to see little EmilyAnn beaned-to-death by that pair of azzh*le neighbors you never liked anyway.

But then....the Bible is the 'Word of God'.....so you can't choose which of his words you will obey and which to ignore. No?
Tell me which Christian church is stoning people. You obviously don't understand the difference between old and new Testaments.
 
Of course forced submission works for you. Privilege and rights have nothing to do with it. You also have yet to prove that the queer couple had bought products from the baker previously. That makes you a liar.
You have yet to prove they went shop to shop to find a Christian baker, which is what you claimed.
I pointed out that the mother complained.. well, she knew who to complain to, didn't she?
 
You have yet to prove they went shop to shop to find a Christian baker, which is what you claimed.
I pointed out that the mother complained.. well, she knew who to complain to, didn't she?
Everyone knows the baker was targeted. You're a liar.
 
You obviously don't understand the difference between old and new Testaments.
They ain't both the word of God?

Did one old-timey God get dated? Get replaced? Fired? Re-purposed?
Ain't God forever, always, then, now, and in the future?

Or are you saying your particular edition of God is the new v.2.0 of the first model......and now only his word is the word of God?

ps....got any updates on when God v.3.0 is scheduled for release?
 

Forum List

Back
Top