COLUMN: The Left Becomes Vicious Because POLITICS IS THEIR RELIGION

[SassyIrishLass]

Starting a sentence without capitalizing the first letter makes you appear uneducated.

I was a Republican for most of my life until the past decade.

When Republicans stood for actual "Individual Responsibility" and promoted their vision of healthcare with the Individual Mandate, I stood with them.

When Republicans in 2000 understood the best way to expand the party's tent was to work out a comprehensive immigration plan called The Dream Act, I stood with Republicans.

When Republicans stood for laws that prevent late-term abortions except in the cases where the mother's life is in danger, I stood with Republicans.

When Republicans stood firmly against nation building, which was entrenched in the party just 15 years ago, I stood with Republicans.

When Republicans stood for fast-tracking a president's authority to get domestic drilling and fracking going at a quicker pace, I stood with Republicans.

So tell me again how it is that I am "worse than ISIS" and "in a state of rage" and "ejaculating hate from my blow hole" because I still support ALL of those things?

I assume you are responding to me in part since you are quoting some of my words there. When did I neglect to capitalize a letter? And why throw out the accusation I'm uneducated, then respond to the post anyway? I'm not a Republican, I'm a conservative. I didn't say you were worse than ISIS, you got mixed up and saw a general threat.

If you truly stood by those things but now pull hard for socialism you either didn't know what you were doing, had a breakdown or decided socialism would benefit you most at this point in your life.

There it is...THAT

 

[Stephanie]

Starting a sentence without capitalizing the first letter makes you appear uneducated.

I was a Republican for most of my life until the past decade.

When Republicans stood for actual "Individual Responsibility" and promoted their vision of healthcare with the Individual Mandate, I stood with them.

When Republicans in 2000 understood the best way to expand the party's tent was to work out a comprehensive immigration plan called The Dream Act, I stood with Republicans.

When Republicans stood for laws that prevent late-term abortions except in the cases where the mother's life is in danger, I stood with Republicans.

When Republicans stood firmly against nation building, which was entrenched in the party just 15 years ago, I stood with Republicans.

When Republicans stood for fast-tracking a president's authority to get domestic drilling and fracking going at a quicker pace, I stood with Republicans.

So tell me again how it is that I am "worse than ISIS" and "in a state of rage" and "ejaculating hate from my blow hole" because I still support ALL of those things?

I assume you are responding to me in part since you are quoting some of my words there. When did I neglect to capitalize a letter? And why throw out the accusation I'm uneducated, then respond to the post anyway? I'm not a Republican, I'm a conservative. I didn't say you were worse than ISIS, you got mixed up and saw a general threat.

If you truly stood by those things but now pull hard for socialism you either didn't know what you were doing, had a breakdown or decided socialism would benefit you most at this point in your life.

You know they're a liberal when they go to attacking someone's spelling, grammar, etc and their education. That's what they do when they don't have anything else. and it again proves the article right about them. Instead of sitting down, they just go and dig themselves a deeper hole. they get so ugly and nasty all over some article.

 

[turzovka]

Starting a sentence without capitalizing the first letter makes you appear uneducated.

I was a Republican for most of my life until the past decade.

When Republicans stood for actual "Individual Responsibility" and promoted their vision of healthcare with the Individual Mandate, I stood with them.

When Republicans in 2000 understood the best way to expand the party's tent was to work out a comprehensive immigration plan called The Dream Act, I stood with Republicans.

When Republicans stood for laws that prevent late-term abortions except in the cases where the mother's life is in danger, I stood with Republicans.

When Republicans stood firmly against nation building, which was entrenched in the party just 15 years ago, I stood with Republicans.

When Republicans stood for fast-tracking a president's authority to get domestic drilling and fracking going at a quicker pace, I stood with Republicans.

So tell me again how it is that I am "worse than ISIS" and "in a state of rage" and "ejaculating hate from my blow hole" for supporting longstanding conservative ideals that have been totally thrown by the wayside by fucking internet trolls who say I'm worse than ISIS?

Could it be you have invested too much of your time and worries into politics, period?

Did you think being a republican was going to get you to heaven or turn your family into honorable altruistic citizens?

I am suggesting your motivations are misplaced. (You can correct me.)

I am also suggesting you traded in Bush and his one huge gaffe (invading Iraq) for aligning yourself with phonies and secular scoundrels (the dem party).

(but I do give you credit for attempting a defense in this thread weighed against your party)

 

[Iceweasel]

(but I do give you credit for attempting a defense in this thread weighed against your party)

He was never a Republican. It's a common tactic from the left. Nobody flip flops like that, he wants us to believe the party left conservatives when the truth is the left has moved way way left.

 

[Interpol]

You didn't neglect to capitalize a letter, retard. That wasn't for you. Are you that stupid that you need to be told that? I was obviously aiming that one at Stephanie.

You said I was "ejaculating hate from my blow hole", which is just.....retarded. So fucking retarded.

It's RWNJ morons like you and Stephanie and all the RWNJ's on this forum that forced me out of the Republican party because I don't think in lockstep with morons like you, who demand I walk in lockstep or you go on the attack, even if I agree with you on 7 or 8 things out of 10. It's just not enough for you assholes. I have to agree with you 110% of the time or I'm "worse than ISIS".

I had stupid RWNJs in my own family who felt I was "suspect" because I wouldn't go on ad hominem attacks against all things THEY hated.

Why is being an independent thinker so "suspect" to the retarded conservatives of today? Because politics is THEIR religion, not mine. And because I'm not "religious" enough of a conservative, I was bloody sick and tired of being in a party that resented my vote.

I am directly part of the reason why the Republican party has won the popular vote only once in the last 6 tries in a presidential election. Because you fucks don't listen. And you no longer see gray. Everything is black or white.

"You decided socialism would benefit you" reveals how much of an idiot you are to presume that that had anything to do with my thought process on leaving the Republican party. If you're an actual thinking person and not a fucking tool, you understand what socialism is, how it works and what its limits are, just like anything else. The proof you're not a tool or a child or an imbecile is that you weigh complicated matters instead of taking a word like socialism and then using it as a baseless ad hominem attack.

 

[BlueGin]

Yes the far left religion is the most dangerous on religion on the planet.

It makes ISIS look tame in comparison..

Just look at Obama for proof and the (cult like) followers of the Progressive/ democrat party

Yes! They will vote for Hilary knowing that she will lie to them about everything!

The biggest joke in the world was all those that voted for "hope and change" and got worse than Bush!

What's sad is they still haven't figured out they got worse. They believe the BS being spewed to them by Obungles and the media

They don't believe it. They just don't want the duped masses to catch on and vote differently next election.

 

[Interpol]

(but I do give you credit for attempting a defense in this thread weighed against your party)

He was never a Republican. It's a common tactic from the left. Nobody flip flops like that, he wants us to believe the party left conservatives when the truth is the left has moved way way left.

Evolving is not flip-flopping, moron.

Republicans have LOST 5 out of the last 6 popular votes in presidential elections. Republicans still do well in their gerrymandered districts in off years thanks to a younger liberal base of ignorant people who are more apt to be inclined to not like politics very much. Off-year election laziness from liberals and moderates who work a lot and have a whole host of other interests, simply aren't as in-tune with the minutia of politics the way right-wingers are.

I have already put all the evidence forward in this thread.

If can only be due to stupidity or a total lack of reading comprehension for you or any other RWNJ on this thread if you don't understand the plain evidence I have shown.

I was never an extreme person. I was not brought up on lefts and rights; just right and wrong. If you do not have an extreme on any matter involving politics, you can not be a Republican today. Republicans demand that I think of complicated concepts like socialism and reduce those concepts to a simple-minded word like "evil" when in fact, facts show that socialism is the reason we pulled ourselves out of the Great Depression and also the reason why we fucking killed it in WWII, the last war we ever won.

 

[BlueGin]

Starting a sentence without capitalizing the first letter makes you appear uneducated.

I was a Republican for most of my life until the past decade.

When Republicans stood for actual "Individual Responsibility" and promoted their vision of healthcare with the Individual Mandate, I stood with them.

When Republicans in 2000 understood the best way to expand the party's tent was to work out a comprehensive immigration plan called The Dream Act, I stood with Republicans.

When Republicans stood for laws that prevent late-term abortions except in the cases where the mother's life is in danger, I stood with Republicans.

When Republicans stood firmly against nation building, which was entrenched in the party just 15 years ago, I stood with Republicans.

When Republicans stood for fast-tracking a president's authority to get domestic drilling and fracking going at a quicker pace, I stood with Republicans.

So tell me again how it is that I am "worse than ISIS" and "in a state of rage" and "ejaculating hate from my blow hole" because I still support ALL of those things?

I assume you are responding to me in part since you are quoting some of my words there. When did I neglect to capitalize a letter? And why throw out the accusation I'm uneducated, then respond to the post anyway? I'm not a Republican, I'm a conservative. I didn't say you were worse than ISIS, you got mixed up and saw a general threat.

If you truly stood by those things but now pull hard for socialism you either didn't know what you were doing, had a breakdown or decided socialism would benefit you most at this point in your life.

You know they're a liberal when they go to attacking someone's spelling, grammar, etc and their education. That's what they do when they don't have anything else. and it again proves the article right about them. Instead of sitting down, they just go and dig themselves a deeper hole. they get so ugly and nasty all over some article.

They don't know what they stand for. They just blindly memorize the talking points and pithy bumper stickers the DNC feeds them. They can't debate current events... So naturally spelling is the go to for them.

 

[dannyboys]

We must be very quiet as we enter the familiar habitat of the RWNJ (Right Wing Nut Job). The RWNJ can most easily be found on the internet, overtaking day and night most political forums and comments sections. The RWNJ may also be found close to the nearest AM radio wavelength, which emits knee-jerk attacks of ad hominem proportions (like those above), which are soothing to the RWNJ, and they are also found in recliners and on couches, worshipping at the shrine of Fox News--by far the most watched cable news--where they learn important social skills like attacking all others who do not smell like a RWNJ.

As we look deeper within the habitat of the RWNJ, we may observe their most clever skill, which is found deep inside the insecurity of a RWNJ, which then manifests itself as a defense mechanism; the projection of their own faults onto all other creatures who are not RWNJs as a way of being able to avoid having to face that politics really is THEIR only religion.

If politics were the religion of the left, they'd win off-year elections. Turnout would be up and the RWNJ would always lose because as we know, the more creatures who vote, the more it is revealed that the RWNJ is vastly outnumbered.

So how is it the RWNJ dominates online political forums and comments sections? Do they have jobs? And why is it that the RWNJ only ever speaks in the same copy 'n paste talking points? Is the RWNJ capable of independent thought?

Family, work and good times are the religion of liberals and most all other creatures, which is why they are mostly not wasting their time here like the RWNJ does, because for the RWNJ, politics is their religion.

Like you're not here "wasting your time" right asshole?

 

[dannyboys]

(but I do give you credit for attempting a defense in this thread weighed against your party)

He was never a Republican. It's a common tactic from the left. Nobody flip flops like that, he wants us to believe the party left conservatives when the truth is the left has moved way way left.

Evolving is not flip-flopping, moron.

Republicans have LOST 5 out of the last 6 popular votes in presidential elections. Republicans still do well in their gerrymandered districts in off years thanks to a younger liberal base of ignorant people who are more apt to be inclined to not like politics very much. Off-year election laziness from liberals and moderates who work a lot and have a whole host of other interests, simply aren't as in-tune with the minutia of politics the way right-wingers are.

I have already put all the evidence forward in this thread.

If can only be due to stupidity or a total lack of reading comprehension for you or any other RWNJ on this thread if you don't understand the plain evidence I have shown.

I was never an extreme person. I was not brought up on lefts and rights; just right and wrong. If you do not have an extreme on any matter involving politics, you can not be a Republican today. Republicans demand that I think of complicated concepts like socialism and reduce those concepts to a simple-minded word like "evil" when in fact, facts show that socialism is the reason we pulled ourselves out of the Great Depression and also the reason why we fucking killed it in WWII, the last war we ever won.

So to get this straight you are admitting the "young Liberal base" are "ignorant and not interested in politics much".
Then you say these Liberals are "lazy" and not as "tuned in to the "minutia of politics the way right-wingers are".
So who are the "stupid" ones and who are "tuned in to politics" again?
Thanks for making the Right's point about Liberals. We appreciate it.

 

[turzovka]

I am directly part of the reason why the Republican party has won the popular vote only once in the last 6 tries in a presidential election. Because you fucks don't listen. And you no longer see gray. Everything is black or white.

>>"I am directly part of the reason why the Republican party has won the popular vote only once in the last 6 tries in a presidential election. Because you fucks don't listen. And you no longer see gray. Everything is black or white."<<

Because a few like you went against the republican party in presidential elections for your reasons is a very minor factor in why republicans lose the popular vote. Almost negligible.

Republicans lose because blacks vote democrat en masse. Because poor people vote democrat en masse. Because females are heavily influenced by particular issues, or at least, a perception of an issue only. Republicans lose because democrats make too many promises to blacks and minorities and poor people with money the govt does not have, much more than republicans do. And finally, republicans lose because the mainstream media is hugely in favor of leftist positions and see to it that they influence the public accordingly. The dishonest media sickens me.

 

[mdk]

A short summary for those too lazy to read the article: My side good, your side bad.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

A short summary for those too lazy to read the article: My side good, your side bad.

Isn't that what every thread is about?

 

[Katzndogz]

Once religion and politics become one and the same, a non believer is not only a heretic but a traitor as well. Which explains the liberals here.

 

[BULLDOG]

We must be very quiet as we enter the familiar habitat of the RWNJ (Right Wing Nut Job). The RWNJ can most easily be found on the internet, overtaking day and night most political forums and comments sections. The RWNJ may also be found close to the nearest AM radio wavelength, which emits knee-jerk attacks of ad hominem proportions (like those above), which are soothing to the RWNJ, and they are also found in recliners and on couches, worshipping at the shrine of Fox News--by far the most watched cable news--where they learn important social skills like attacking all others who do not smell like a RWNJ.

As we look deeper within the habitat of the RWNJ, we may observe their most clever skill, which is found deep inside the insecurity of a RWNJ, which then manifests itself as a defense mechanism; the projection of their own faults onto all other creatures who are not RWNJs as a way of being able to avoid having to face that politics really is THEIR only religion.

If politics were the religion of the left, they'd win off-year elections. Turnout would be up and the RWNJ would always lose because as we know, the more creatures who vote, the more it is revealed that the RWNJ is vastly outnumbered.

So how is it the RWNJ dominates online political forums and comments sections? Do they have jobs? And why is it that the RWNJ only ever speaks in the same copy 'n paste talking points? Is the RWNJ capable of independent thought?

Family, work and good times are the religion of liberals and most all other creatures, which is why they are mostly not wasting their time here like the RWNJ does, because for the RWNJ, politics is their religion.

The main thing to remember about the RWNJ is that everything they do is based in fear. They fear the loss of the special treatment they have always enjoyed. They fear what might happen if people not exactly like them receive the rights they have always deserved. They fear just walking the streets without being armed. It's sad to see so many cowards who don't know that the world really is a good place and all they have to do is scrape up the courage to enjoy it. They never will though. I pity them.

 

[turzovka]

A short summary for those too lazy to read the article: My side good, your side bad.

Isn't that what every thread is about?

Yes, perhaps it is.

But... we have a bad side, too?

: )

 

[eagle1462010]

OpinionEditorials.com – Liberalism is a Psychology - Beltt

A liberal (or a leftist; I use the terms interchangeably), is a person who only cares about politics to the extent that doing so makes him or her feel good, or avoid feeling bad, due both to external and internal factors. Their motivations can include things like a desire to feel intelligent, moral, noble, or unique, as well as a desire for peer acceptance or reverence, and aversion to being ostracized, among many other things.

It is the political activism itself that interests them, in that it makes them feel good about themselves for a number of reasons. The particular cause they fight for is relevant only insofar as different causes stroke different emotional needs (moral superiority, intellectual superiority, group acceptance, aversion to emotional trauma, etc).

As I said, liberalism is a psychology, not an ideology. And as such, it’s unreasonable to expect it to be limited to a person’s politics; it should show through to many different aspects of a person’s life, and it does. Liberals tend to dominate fields like academia, the news and entertainment media, and the legal professions, and they populate the elite social circles, all because they’re so concerned with their egos

 

[mdk]

A short summary for those too lazy to read the article: My side good, your side bad.

Isn't that what every thread is about?

Gosh, that's a little depressing. I might have to watch a short video of frolicking and/or fainting goats to life my spirits.

 

[Interpol]

According to the OP's stupid article (in the habitat of a RWNJ, they can not think for themselves so they copy 'n paste everything directly from their demagoguing overlords) expressing one's right to free speech through protest is "vicious".

Want to know what's really vicious? Conformity, which is exactly what the RWNJ demands. You MUST conform to their narrow-minded shit-talking parade or else.

At least in the Democratic tent, I don't get called names for pushing for raising revenue some and reducing spending some in order to balance the budget. Balancing the budget is actually something the liberal creature cares about. I didn't know this until I left the bubble of ignorance that exists on the right, way up on what Jon Stewart calls "Bullshit Mountain". I don't get called names for disagreeing on any number of things. Their tent is actually not very uniform at all. It is the opposite of the conservative ideal of conformity, that's for sure. Seems they have dozens upon dozens of special interests while in my Republican days you were either in the religious right or the business/establishment right. That's it. Two wings. Democrats have like 38 wings.

Since I've spent 20 years in one tent and then the following 10 years in the other, I think I have more authority to talk about "liberals" than the know-nothing RWNJs who began this thread and started piling on their stupid, thoughtless rhetoric.

In my Republican days, I saw my party move away from actually helping veterans to just paying lip-service to veterans while they cut VA funding and actually tried cutting funds to 9/11 first responders about a decade ago now. All in order to give more and more to those who don't need it. Seems that socialism is only good enough for the rich if you're a Republican these days, just no one else, and therein lies the hypocrisy at the core of that party today.

 

[Fang]

I agree with the OP. It's bizarre how nasty Liberals get when confronted with an opposing opinion. They can't stop at merely winning a debate and getting a law past, they want to tear you down.