Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't blame me if the quote function is too high a hurdle for your towering intellect. Your whole thesis is an ad hominem attack, you sniveling about it is ironic.You didn't neglect to capitalize a letter, retard. That wasn't for you. Are you that stupid that you need to be told that? I was obviously aiming that one at Stephanie.
You said I was "ejaculating hate from my blow hole", which is just.....retarded. So fucking retarded.
It's RWNJ morons like you and Stephanie and all the RWNJ's on this forum that forced me out of the Republican party because I don't think in lockstep with morons like you, who demand I walk in lockstep or you go on the attack, even if I agree with you on 7 or 8 things out of 10. It's just not enough for you assholes. I have to agree with you 110% of the time or I'm "worse than ISIS".
I had stupid RWNJs in my own family who felt I was "suspect" because I wouldn't go on ad hominem attacks against all things THEY hated.
Why is being an independent thinker so "suspect" to the retarded conservatives of today? Because politics is THEIR religion, not mine. And because I'm not "religious" enough of a conservative, I was bloody sick and tired of being in a party that resented my vote.
I am directly part of the reason why the Republican party has won the popular vote only once in the last 6 tries in a presidential election. Because you fucks don't listen. And you no longer see gray. Everything is black or white.
"You decided socialism would benefit you" reveals how much of an idiot you are to presume that that had anything to do with my thought process on leaving the Republican party. If you're an actual thinking person and not a fucking tool, you understand what socialism is, how it works and what its limits are, just like anything else. The proof you're not a tool or a child or an imbecile is that you weigh complicated matters instead of taking a word like socialism and then using it as a baseless ad hominem attack.
OpinionEditorials.com – Liberalism is a Psychology - Beltt
A liberal (or a leftist; I use the terms interchangeably), is a person who only cares about politics to the extent that doing so makes him or her feel good, or avoid feeling bad, due both to external and internal factors. Their motivations can include things like a desire to feel intelligent, moral, noble, or unique, as well as a desire for peer acceptance or reverence, and aversion to being ostracized, among many other things.
It is the political activism itself that interests them, in that it makes them feel good about themselves for a number of reasons. The particular cause they fight for is relevant only insofar as different causes stroke different emotional needs (moral superiority, intellectual superiority, group acceptance, aversion to emotional trauma, etc).
As I said, liberalism is a psychology, not an ideology. And as such, it’s unreasonable to expect it to be limited to a person’s politics; it should show through to many different aspects of a person’s life, and it does. Liberals tend to dominate fields like academia, the news and entertainment media, and the legal professions, and they populate the elite social circles, all because they’re so concerned with their egos
The Rhino's are the Democrats of the time of Kennedy. Liberal have gone far left since then.OpinionEditorials.com – Liberalism is a Psychology - Beltt
A liberal (or a leftist; I use the terms interchangeably), is a person who only cares about politics to the extent that doing so makes him or her feel good, or avoid feeling bad, due both to external and internal factors. Their motivations can include things like a desire to feel intelligent, moral, noble, or unique, as well as a desire for peer acceptance or reverence, and aversion to being ostracized, among many other things.
It is the political activism itself that interests them, in that it makes them feel good about themselves for a number of reasons. The particular cause they fight for is relevant only insofar as different causes stroke different emotional needs (moral superiority, intellectual superiority, group acceptance, aversion to emotional trauma, etc).
As I said, liberalism is a psychology, not an ideology. And as such, it’s unreasonable to expect it to be limited to a person’s politics; it should show through to many different aspects of a person’s life, and it does. Liberals tend to dominate fields like academia, the news and entertainment media, and the legal professions, and they populate the elite social circles, all because they’re so concerned with their egos
Succinctly put. And to a large degree, I concur.
Now what the author says can be found amongst conservative devotees as well, but, imo, far more prevalent amongst leftist activists and posters. Especially contained in this quote: “Their motivations can include things like a desire to feel intelligent, moral, noble, or unique, as well as a desire for peer acceptance or reverence, and aversion to being ostracized, among many other things.”
So on a related matter, I know how many are opposed to bringing religion into politics. So that most often needs to be avoided if a candidate wants to win some office. But for voters like me… the only reason I am politically motivated is for moral purposes, i.e. save this nation from being destroyed by outside demonic forces (Islamic terrorism, communism, etc.) and to save this nation from being destroyed within (cultural and moral decay). And in those two matters, I cannot see how anyone can vote for a democrat presidential candidate, at least since Kennedy?
Oh...so you "evolved". That's nice. You had core conservative principles but now you realize it was further down the cutting edge of societal evolution? Horseshit!He was never a Republican. It's a common tactic from the left. Nobody flip flops like that, he wants us to believe the party left conservatives when the truth is the left has moved way way left.(but I do give you credit for attempting a defense in this thread weighed against your party)
Evolving is not flip-flopping, moron.
Republicans have LOST 5 out of the last 6 popular votes in presidential elections. Republicans still do well in their gerrymandered districts in off years thanks to a younger liberal base of ignorant people who are more apt to be inclined to not like politics very much. Off-year election laziness from liberals and moderates who work a lot and have a whole host of other interests, simply aren't as in-tune with the minutia of politics the way right-wingers are.
I have already put all the evidence forward in this thread.
If can only be due to stupidity or a total lack of reading comprehension for you or any other RWNJ on this thread if you don't understand the plain evidence I have shown.
I was never an extreme person. I was not brought up on lefts and rights; just right and wrong. If you do not have an extreme on any matter involving politics, you can not be a Republican today. Republicans demand that I think of complicated concepts like socialism and reduce those concepts to a simple-minded word like "evil" when in fact, facts show that socialism is the reason we pulled ourselves out of the Great Depression and also the reason why we fucking killed it in WWII, the last war we ever won.
OpinionEditorials.com – Liberalism is a Psychology - Beltt
A liberal (or a leftist; I use the terms interchangeably), is a person who only cares about politics to the extent that doing so makes him or her feel good, or avoid feeling bad, due both to external and internal factors. Their motivations can include things like a desire to feel intelligent, moral, noble, or unique, as well as a desire for peer acceptance or reverence, and aversion to being ostracized, among many other things.
It is the political activism itself that interests them, in that it makes them feel good about themselves for a number of reasons. The particular cause they fight for is relevant only insofar as different causes stroke different emotional needs (moral superiority, intellectual superiority, group acceptance, aversion to emotional trauma, etc).
As I said, liberalism is a psychology, not an ideology. And as such, it’s unreasonable to expect it to be limited to a person’s politics; it should show through to many different aspects of a person’s life, and it does. Liberals tend to dominate fields like academia, the news and entertainment media, and the legal professions, and they populate the elite social circles, all because they’re so concerned with their egos
The Rhino's are the Democrats of the time of Kennedy. Liberal have gone far left since then.OpinionEditorials.com – Liberalism is a Psychology - Beltt
A liberal (or a leftist; I use the terms interchangeably), is a person who only cares about politics to the extent that doing so makes him or her feel good, or avoid feeling bad, due both to external and internal factors. Their motivations can include things like a desire to feel intelligent, moral, noble, or unique, as well as a desire for peer acceptance or reverence, and aversion to being ostracized, among many other things.
It is the political activism itself that interests them, in that it makes them feel good about themselves for a number of reasons. The particular cause they fight for is relevant only insofar as different causes stroke different emotional needs (moral superiority, intellectual superiority, group acceptance, aversion to emotional trauma, etc).
As I said, liberalism is a psychology, not an ideology. And as such, it’s unreasonable to expect it to be limited to a person’s politics; it should show through to many different aspects of a person’s life, and it does. Liberals tend to dominate fields like academia, the news and entertainment media, and the legal professions, and they populate the elite social circles, all because they’re so concerned with their egos
Succinctly put. And to a large degree, I concur.
Now what the author says can be found amongst conservative devotees as well, but, imo, far more prevalent amongst leftist activists and posters. Especially contained in this quote: “Their motivations can include things like a desire to feel intelligent, moral, noble, or unique, as well as a desire for peer acceptance or reverence, and aversion to being ostracized, among many other things.”
So on a related matter, I know how many are opposed to bringing religion into politics. So that most often needs to be avoided if a candidate wants to win some office. But for voters like me… the only reason I am politically motivated is for moral purposes, i.e. save this nation from being destroyed by outside demonic forces (Islamic terrorism, communism, etc.) and to save this nation from being destroyed within (cultural and moral decay). And in those two matters, I cannot see how anyone can vote for a democrat presidential candidate, at least since Kennedy?
If we quoted much of what JFK said back in the day they would denounce him as a Tea Party Radical.
I see, libs don't call names.According to the OP's stupid article (in the habitat of a RWNJ, they can not think for themselves so they copy 'n paste everything directly from their demagoguing overlords) expressing one's right to free speech through protest is "vicious".
Want to know what's really vicious? Conformity, which is exactly what the RWNJ demands. You MUST conform to their narrow-minded shit-talking parade or else.
At least in the Democratic tent, I don't get called names for pushing for raising revenue some and reducing spending some in order to balance the budget. Balancing the budget is actually something the liberal creature cares about. I didn't know this until I left the bubble of ignorance that exists on the right, way up on what Jon Stewart calls "Bullshit Mountain". I don't get called names for disagreeing on any number of things. Their tent is actually not very uniform at all. It is the opposite of the conservative ideal of conformity, that's for sure. Seems they have dozens upon dozens of special interests while in my Republican days you were either in the religious right or the business/establishment right. That's it. Two wings. Democrats have like 38 wings.
Since I've spent 20 years in one tent and then the following 10 years in the other, I think I have more authority to talk about "liberals" than the know-nothing RWNJs who began this thread and started piling on their stupid, thoughtless rhetoric.
In my Republican days, I saw my party move away from actually helping veterans to just paying lip-service to veterans while they cut VA funding and actually tried cutting funds to 9/11 first responders about a decade ago now. All in order to give more and more to those who don't need it. Seems that socialism is only good enough for the rich if you're a Republican these days, just no one else, and therein lies the hypocrisy at the core of that party today.
The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness
It is a government everywhere doing everything for everyone.
The liberal motto is “In Government We Trust.”
To rescue the people from their troubled lives, the agenda recommends
denial of personal responsibility, encourages self-pity and other-
pity, fosters government dependency, promotes sexual indulgence,
rationalizes violence, excuses financial obligation, justifies theft,
ignores rudeness, prescribes complaining and blaming, denigrates
marriage and the family, legalizes all abortion, defies religious and
social tradition, declares inequality unjust, and rebels against the
duties of citizenship.
They are poor, weak, sick, wronged, cheated, oppressed,
disenfranchised, exploited and victimized. They bear no
responsibility for their problems.
None of their agonies are attributable to faults or failings of their
own: not to poor choices, bad habits, faulty judgment, wishful thinking,
lack of ambition, low frustration tolerance, mental illness or
defects in character.
None of the victims’ plight is caused by failure to plan for the
future or learn from experience.
I see, libs don't call names.According to the OP's stupid article (in the habitat of a RWNJ, they can not think for themselves so they copy 'n paste everything directly from their demagoguing overlords) expressing one's right to free speech through protest is "vicious".
Want to know what's really vicious? Conformity, which is exactly what the RWNJ demands. You MUST conform to their narrow-minded shit-talking parade or else.
At least in the Democratic tent, I don't get called names for pushing for raising revenue some and reducing spending some in order to balance the budget. Balancing the budget is actually something the liberal creature cares about. I didn't know this until I left the bubble of ignorance that exists on the right, way up on what Jon Stewart calls "Bullshit Mountain". I don't get called names for disagreeing on any number of things. Their tent is actually not very uniform at all. It is the opposite of the conservative ideal of conformity, that's for sure. Seems they have dozens upon dozens of special interests while in my Republican days you were either in the religious right or the business/establishment right. That's it. Two wings. Democrats have like 38 wings.
Since I've spent 20 years in one tent and then the following 10 years in the other, I think I have more authority to talk about "liberals" than the know-nothing RWNJs who began this thread and started piling on their stupid, thoughtless rhetoric.
In my Republican days, I saw my party move away from actually helping veterans to just paying lip-service to veterans while they cut VA funding and actually tried cutting funds to 9/11 first responders about a decade ago now. All in order to give more and more to those who don't need it. Seems that socialism is only good enough for the rich if you're a Republican these days, just no one else, and therein lies the hypocrisy at the core of that party today.
LOL.
Which lib cares about balancing the budget? Talk about Bullshit Mountain! But since you get your news from comedy shows it explains why you're a lib.
Starting a sentence without capitalizing the first letter makes you appear uneducated.
I was a Republican for most of my life until the past decade.
When Republicans stood for actual "Individual Responsibility" and promoted their vision of healthcare with the Individual Mandate, I stood with them.
When Republicans in 2000 understood the best way to expand the party's tent was to work out a comprehensive immigration plan called The Dream Act, I stood with Republicans.
When Republicans stood for laws that prevent late-term abortions except in the cases where the mother's life is in danger, I stood with Republicans.
When Republicans stood firmly against nation building, which was entrenched in the party just 15 years ago, I stood with Republicans.
When Republicans stood for fast-tracking a president's authority to get domestic drilling and fracking going at a quicker pace, I stood with Republicans.
So tell me again how it is that I am "worse than ISIS" and "in a state of rage" and "ejaculating hate from my blow hole" for supporting longstanding conservative ideals that have been totally thrown by the wayside by fucking internet trolls who say I'm worse than ISIS?
Could it be you have invested too much of your time and worries into politics, period?
Did you think being a republican was going to get you to heaven or turn your family into honorable altruistic citizens?
I am suggesting your motivations are misplaced. (You can correct me.)
I am also suggesting you traded in Bush and his one huge gaffe (invading Iraq) for aligning yourself with phonies and secular scoundrels (the dem party).
(but I do give you credit for attempting a defense in this thread weighed against your party)
I don't know what it is. but this sums it up fairly well. Remember how they (the left/democrat supporters) wailed about how the Tea Party were supposedly so rude. and this was at their own home town, town hall meetings. It had nothing to do with them, but.
Snip:
Have you ever noticed how crazy the left goes over politics and how incredibly vicious they can be? A new column from David Gelernter of the Weekly Standard seeks to explain this phenomenon.
For many on the left, politics is a form of religion:
What Explains the Vicious Left?
When politics becomes a religion, nonbelievers must be punished.
The asymmetry of modern politics is clear to every conservative; painfully clear to several Yale undergraduates who asked me about it recently. Leftists, they pointed out, are hostile, nasty, and seem to have no concept of a civil conversation. Why? Because they are winning? Losing? Are natural-born bullies? And how can this dangerous mood be changed?
It’s not just a question of civility versus rudeness—which of course is no small thing in itself. The deeper problem is that the left seems to have lost its taste for democracy.
Naturally there are exceptions to the modern trend, benign leftists and nasty rightists. (Trump is a special case: see below.) The trend itself is partly explained by the Obama sneer; presidents have enormous influence.
FDR’s bouncy, feisty smile, Reagan’s geniality, Clinton’s one-of-the-boys grin, W’s good-natured earnestness are part of history; and Obama’s real “legacy” (aside from worldwide crisis) is that bitter sneer. His rudeness to political opponents has made a rotten political climate much worse. But the left’s growing reputation for belligerent intolerance transcends Obama.
Read it all here.
What else can we expect from Democrats who booed God at their last national convention?
all of it here:
COLUMN: The Left Becomes Vicious Because POLITICS IS THEIR RELIGION - Progressives Today
You call me an idiot and retarded? This post PROVES you're a liar! You outed yourself. Clinton got drug into balancing the budget kicking and screaming. It was those evil Republicans in congress that did it. You know, Newt's contract with America in '94. Look it up.I see, libs don't call names.According to the OP's stupid article (in the habitat of a RWNJ, they can not think for themselves so they copy 'n paste everything directly from their demagoguing overlords) expressing one's right to free speech through protest is "vicious".
Want to know what's really vicious? Conformity, which is exactly what the RWNJ demands. You MUST conform to their narrow-minded shit-talking parade or else.
At least in the Democratic tent, I don't get called names for pushing for raising revenue some and reducing spending some in order to balance the budget. Balancing the budget is actually something the liberal creature cares about. I didn't know this until I left the bubble of ignorance that exists on the right, way up on what Jon Stewart calls "Bullshit Mountain". I don't get called names for disagreeing on any number of things. Their tent is actually not very uniform at all. It is the opposite of the conservative ideal of conformity, that's for sure. Seems they have dozens upon dozens of special interests while in my Republican days you were either in the religious right or the business/establishment right. That's it. Two wings. Democrats have like 38 wings.
Since I've spent 20 years in one tent and then the following 10 years in the other, I think I have more authority to talk about "liberals" than the know-nothing RWNJs who began this thread and started piling on their stupid, thoughtless rhetoric.
In my Republican days, I saw my party move away from actually helping veterans to just paying lip-service to veterans while they cut VA funding and actually tried cutting funds to 9/11 first responders about a decade ago now. All in order to give more and more to those who don't need it. Seems that socialism is only good enough for the rich if you're a Republican these days, just no one else, and therein lies the hypocrisy at the core of that party today.
LOL.
Which lib cares about balancing the budget? Talk about Bullshit Mountain! But since you get your news from comedy shows it explains why you're a lib.
Which lib cares about balancing the budget? Are you fucking retarded? Clinton started paying down the debt, idiot! And which president inherited $1.5 trillion yearly deficits and reduced them by more than two-thirds? A liberal.
Speaks to how stupid you and the Republican party have become that it takes a liberal to do your own job for you nowadays.
If a Republican president had achieved this feat over the last 7 years, you'd be singing a different tune, but of course you can't give any credit to President Obama since politics is your religion, not thoughtfulness or thinking or facts.
Yeah, they were quite literal I'm sure.I've seen conservatives on this board call for the 'deportation' and then beheading of all democrats. With another insisting that all Obama voters should be summarily executed with a bullet in the head.
And neither were being metaphorical or sarcastic. They were quite literal. I asked.
Its its *liberals* that you're concerned with.
The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness
It is a government everywhere doing everything for everyone.
The liberal motto is “In Government We Trust.”
To rescue the people from their troubled lives, the agenda recommends
denial of personal responsibility, encourages self-pity and other-
pity, fosters government dependency, promotes sexual indulgence,
rationalizes violence, excuses financial obligation, justifies theft,
ignores rudeness, prescribes complaining and blaming, denigrates
marriage and the family, legalizes all abortion, defies religious and
social tradition, declares inequality unjust, and rebels against the
duties of citizenship.
They are poor, weak, sick, wronged, cheated, oppressed,
disenfranchised, exploited and victimized. They bear no
responsibility for their problems.
None of their agonies are attributable to faults or failings of their
own: not to poor choices, bad habits, faulty judgment, wishful thinking,
lack of ambition, low frustration tolerance, mental illness or
defects in character.
None of the victims’ plight is caused by failure to plan for the
future or learn from experience.
Your post is another example of RWNJ stupidity. Totally baseless assertions not grounded in any evidence, which is why you cited no evidence.
Please explain how it is the red states are takers while the blue states are almost all responsible for subsidizing the takers that are the red states.
I'm not holding my breath for an answer, because idiots like you are limited to copy & pasting crap from RWNJ websites that people like you worship because politics is your religion.
I don't know what it is. but this sums it up fairly well. Remember how they (the left/democrat supporters) wailed about how the Tea Party were supposedly so rude. and this was at their own home town, town hall meetings. It had nothing to do with them, but.
Snip:
Have you ever noticed how crazy the left goes over politics and how incredibly vicious they can be? A new column from David Gelernter of the Weekly Standard seeks to explain this phenomenon.
For many on the left, politics is a form of religion:
What Explains the Vicious Left?
When politics becomes a religion, nonbelievers must be punished.
The asymmetry of modern politics is clear to every conservative; painfully clear to several Yale undergraduates who asked me about it recently. Leftists, they pointed out, are hostile, nasty, and seem to have no concept of a civil conversation. Why? Because they are winning? Losing? Are natural-born bullies? And how can this dangerous mood be changed?
It’s not just a question of civility versus rudeness—which of course is no small thing in itself. The deeper problem is that the left seems to have lost its taste for democracy.
Naturally there are exceptions to the modern trend, benign leftists and nasty rightists. (Trump is a special case: see below.) The trend itself is partly explained by the Obama sneer; presidents have enormous influence.
FDR’s bouncy, feisty smile, Reagan’s geniality, Clinton’s one-of-the-boys grin, W’s good-natured earnestness are part of history; and Obama’s real “legacy” (aside from worldwide crisis) is that bitter sneer. His rudeness to political opponents has made a rotten political climate much worse. But the left’s growing reputation for belligerent intolerance transcends Obama.
Read it all here.
What else can we expect from Democrats who booed God at their last national convention?
all of it here:
COLUMN: The Left Becomes Vicious Because POLITICS IS THEIR RELIGION - Progressives Today
I've seen conservatives on this board call for the 'deportation' and then beheading of all democrats. With another insisting that all Obama voters should be summarily executed with a bullet in the head.
And neither were being metaphorical or sarcastic. They were quite literal. I asked.
Its its *liberals* that you're concerned with.
yep, they don't worship a God, so they worship these snake politicians instead. or environmentalist and now they've latched onto Scientist. It's just sad to meOnce religion and politics become one and the same, a non believer is not only a heretic but a traitor as well. Which explains the liberals here.
Lol, uneducated? Tell me, are you on your way to the nearest safe zone? That's what you consider educated?It`s not satire, it`s someone who has a much higher IQ than the room temperature IQs of RWNJ`s. Did you notice that he uses his own words and doesn`t search the looney conservative websites for material to steal?We must be very quiet as we enter the familiar habitat of the RWNJ (Right Wing Nut Job). The RWNJ can most easily be found on the internet, overtaking day and night most political forums and comments sections. The RWNJ may also be found close to the nearest AM radio wavelength, which emits knee-jerk attacks of ad hominem proportions, soothing to the RWNJ, and they are also found in recliners and on couches, worshipping at the shrine of Fox News--by far the most watched cable news--where they learn important social skills like attacking all others who do not smell like a RWNJ.
As we look deeper within the habitat of the RWNJ, we may observe their most clever skill, which is found deep inside the insecurity of a RWNJ, which then manifests itself as a defense mechanism; the projection of their own faults onto all other creatures who are not RWNJs as a way of being able to avoid having to face that politics really is THEIR only religion.
If politics were the religion of the left, they'd win off-year elections. Turnout would be up and the RWNJ would always lose because as we know, the more creatures who vote, the more it is revealed that the RWNJ is vastly outnumbered.
So how is it the RWNJ dominates online political forums and comments sections? Do they have jobs? And why is that the RWNJ only ever speaks in the same copy 'n paste talking points? Is the RWNJ capable of independent thought?
Family, work and good times are the religion of liberals and most all other creatures, which is why they are mostly not wasting their time here like the RWNJ does, because for the RWNJ, politics is their religion.
HAHAHAHAHAHA That's satire, right?
We must be very quiet as we enter the familiar habitat of the RWNJ (Right Wing Nut Job). The RWNJ can most easily be found on the internet, overtaking day and night most political forums and comments sections. The RWNJ may also be found close to the nearest AM radio wavelength, which emits knee-jerk attacks of ad hominem proportions, soothing to the RWNJ, and they are also found in recliners and on couches, worshipping at the shrine of Fox News--by far the most watched cable news--where they learn important social skills like attacking all others who do not smell like a RWNJ.
As we look deeper within the habitat of the RWNJ, we may observe their most clever skill, which is found deep inside the insecurity of a RWNJ, which then manifests itself as a defense mechanism; the projection of their own faults onto all other creatures who are not RWNJs as a way of being able to avoid having to face that politics really is THEIR only religion.
If politics were the religion of the left, they'd win off-year elections. Turnout would be up and the RWNJ would always lose because as we know, the more creatures who vote, the more it is revealed that the RWNJ is vastly outnumbered.
So how is it the RWNJ dominates online political forums and comments sections? Do they have jobs? And why is that the RWNJ only ever speaks in the same copy 'n paste talking points? Is the RWNJ capable of independent thought?
Family, work and good times are the religion of liberals and most all other creatures, which is why they are mostly not wasting their time here like the RWNJ does, because for the RWNJ, politics is their religion.
HAHAHAHAHAHA That's satire, right?
Starting a sentence without capitalizing the first letter makes you appear uneducated.
I was a Republican for most of my life until the past decade.
When Republicans stood for actual "Individual Responsibility" and promoted their vision of healthcare with the Individual Mandate, I stood with them.
When Republicans in 2000 understood the best way to expand the party's tent was to work out a comprehensive immigration plan called The Dream Act, I stood with Republicans.
When Republicans stood for laws that prevent late-term abortions except in the cases where the mother's life is in danger, I stood with Republicans.
When Republicans stood firmly against nation building, which was entrenched in the party just 15 years ago, I stood with Republicans.
When Republicans stood for fast-tracking a president's authority to get domestic drilling and fracking going at a quicker pace, I stood with Republicans.
So tell me again how it is that I am "worse than ISIS" and "in a state of rage" and "ejaculating hate from my blow hole" for supporting longstanding conservative ideals that have been totally thrown by the wayside by fucking internet trolls who say I'm worse than ISIS?
Could it be you have invested too much of your time and worries into politics, period?
Did you think being a republican was going to get you to heaven or turn your family into honorable altruistic citizens?
I am suggesting your motivations are misplaced. (You can correct me.)
I am also suggesting you traded in Bush and his one huge gaffe (invading Iraq) for aligning yourself with phonies and secular scoundrels (the dem party).
(but I do give you credit for attempting a defense in this thread weighed against your party)
this thread has nothing to do about any party. it's about the people who becomes like cult member's to a party.
I don't know what it is. but this sums it up fairly well. Remember how they (the left/democrat supporters) wailed about how the Tea Party were supposedly so rude. and this was at their own home town, town hall meetings. It had nothing to do with them, but.
Snip:
Have you ever noticed how crazy the left goes over politics and how incredibly vicious they can be? A new column from David Gelernter of the Weekly Standard seeks to explain this phenomenon.
For many on the left, politics is a form of religion:
What Explains the Vicious Left?
When politics becomes a religion, nonbelievers must be punished.
The asymmetry of modern politics is clear to every conservative; painfully clear to several Yale undergraduates who asked me about it recently. Leftists, they pointed out, are hostile, nasty, and seem to have no concept of a civil conversation. Why? Because they are winning? Losing? Are natural-born bullies? And how can this dangerous mood be changed?
It’s not just a question of civility versus rudeness—which of course is no small thing in itself. The deeper problem is that the left seems to have lost its taste for democracy.
Naturally there are exceptions to the modern trend, benign leftists and nasty rightists. (Trump is a special case: see below.) The trend itself is partly explained by the Obama sneer; presidents have enormous influence.
FDR’s bouncy, feisty smile, Reagan’s geniality, Clinton’s one-of-the-boys grin, W’s good-natured earnestness are part of history; and Obama’s real “legacy” (aside from worldwide crisis) is that bitter sneer. His rudeness to political opponents has made a rotten political climate much worse. But the left’s growing reputation for belligerent intolerance transcends Obama.
Read it all here.
What else can we expect from Democrats who booed God at their last national convention?
all of it here:
COLUMN: The Left Becomes Vicious Because POLITICS IS THEIR RELIGION - Progressives Today
I've seen conservatives on this board call for the 'deportation' and then beheading of all democrats. With another insisting that all Obama voters should be summarily executed with a bullet in the head.
And neither were being metaphorical or sarcastic. They were quite literal. I asked.
Its its *liberals* that you're concerned with.
More proof that the far left religion is the most dangerous religion in the world!
that's another typical trait of a liberal. they believe they are THE ONE.
I don't know what it is. but this sums it up fairly well. Remember how they (the left/democrat supporters) wailed about how the Tea Party were supposedly so rude. and this was at their own home town, town hall meetings. It had nothing to do with them, but.
Snip:
Have you ever noticed how crazy the left goes over politics and how incredibly vicious they can be? A new column from David Gelernter of the Weekly Standard seeks to explain this phenomenon.
For many on the left, politics is a form of religion:
What Explains the Vicious Left?
When politics becomes a religion, nonbelievers must be punished.
The asymmetry of modern politics is clear to every conservative; painfully clear to several Yale undergraduates who asked me about it recently. Leftists, they pointed out, are hostile, nasty, and seem to have no concept of a civil conversation. Why? Because they are winning? Losing? Are natural-born bullies? And how can this dangerous mood be changed?
It’s not just a question of civility versus rudeness—which of course is no small thing in itself. The deeper problem is that the left seems to have lost its taste for democracy.
Naturally there are exceptions to the modern trend, benign leftists and nasty rightists. (Trump is a special case: see below.) The trend itself is partly explained by the Obama sneer; presidents have enormous influence.
FDR’s bouncy, feisty smile, Reagan’s geniality, Clinton’s one-of-the-boys grin, W’s good-natured earnestness are part of history; and Obama’s real “legacy” (aside from worldwide crisis) is that bitter sneer. His rudeness to political opponents has made a rotten political climate much worse. But the left’s growing reputation for belligerent intolerance transcends Obama.
Read it all here.
What else can we expect from Democrats who booed God at their last national convention?
all of it here:
COLUMN: The Left Becomes Vicious Because POLITICS IS THEIR RELIGION - Progressives Today
I've seen conservatives on this board call for the 'deportation' and then beheading of all democrats. With another insisting that all Obama voters should be summarily executed with a bullet in the head.
And neither were being metaphorical or sarcastic. They were quite literal. I asked.
Its its *liberals* that you're concerned with.
More proof that the far left religion is the most dangerous religion in the world!
He's seen, he's the one. he knows all.
