Comey's Testimony Proves....

Clinton LIED:
- She declared nothing she sent or received ever contained classified markings -- LIE (Doing so proves 'Intent')

- She lied by declaring she turned over all work-related e-mails -- LIE
--- "On her claim that she turned over all work-related emails, Comey said, “No, we found work-related emails, thousands that were not returned.”

She lied about having only 1 device - she had multiple -- LIE

Hillary, described y her own staff as 'technology challenged', was described as 'not sophistcated enough' to understand 'classified markings'
--- "Comey indeed said there is a question over whether Clinton was “sophisticated enough” to know at the time what a particular classified marking signified."

Liar, deceiver, incompetent law-breaker who put national security at risk because she's too stupid to understand the concept of 'classified' and classified markings....

...Just who we need as President.


Comey calls Clinton email use ‘definition of carelessness’ at Hill hearing, defends FBI | Fox News
well I guess comey was wrong in your mind ...why don't you take his job then prosecute for him ... I mean you have all the answers and evidence that he, a professional republican prosecutor, couldn't fine ... do it for him you have all the so-called proof
 
Last edited:
He proved Hillary DID send and receive documents marked classified at the time but suggested she was 'too unsophisticated (STUPID) too understand' ...
the documents in question, yesterday in the hearing, were said to be missed mark ... Comey had a puzzled look on his face yesterday when that was revealed yesterday .. probably thinking he misspoke ... they said they weren't supposed to be marked as classified ... now what oh wise one with all the answers on how to convicted Hillary ... think of something else??? I know your republicans leaders are trying their damnedest to come up with something else ... that they too will lose on ...
 
Last edited:
Of course the sad thing is that Hillary LIED to the very people who are defending her...and they don't care.
she said what she believed ... that fact that you need to brand her as a liar is all you got ... she stands by what she said ... no if the little (C) was over look by her in three emails doesn't make her careless in my opinion ... and does make her a person who was lying under oath ... at the time she was getting more emails that one could totally control ... it happens ... what she was saying is she never sent classified emails usually classified emails say at the top of the page "top secret"t or "classified" ... the emails in question had the (C) in the information that she was to read ... now, I can see even myself missing that once in a while ... we are talking .0001 percent of her emails that she made a error on ... her not seeing the (C) doesn't make her a liar .. it says she was over whelmed getting emails from all over ... thats what it say ... for you to imply she is a liar is wishful thinking on your part...
 
He proved Hillary DID send and receive documents marked classified at the time but suggested she was 'too unsophisticated (STUPID) too understand' ...

Or that the things were not clearly marked or a reasonable person wouldn't consider repeating a New York Times story about drone strikes in Pakistan everyone knew was going on as "really classified".

You see, the real problem was that once you got this nonsense in front of a jury, enpanelled from DC, they'd laugh you out of court.
 
He proved Hillary DID send and receive documents marked classified at the time but suggested she was 'too unsophisticated (STUPID) too understand' ...

Or that the things were not clearly marked or a reasonable person wouldn't consider repeating a New York Times story about drone strikes in Pakistan everyone knew was going on as "really classified".

You see, the real problem was that once you got this nonsense in front of a jury, enpanelled from DC, they'd laugh you out of court.
Nope...he said documents were marked 'TS' & 'S'.....trying to say 'maybe not CLEARLY marked' is desperately grasping at straws'.

She signed a legally binding security letter declaring she was fully aware of the laws andconcepts of classified and handling classified. Comey pointed out, in the end, she new and ignored all that or she was just too 'unsophisticated' (stupid) to understand.
 
He proved Hillary DID send and receive documents marked classified at the time but suggested she was 'too unsophisticated (STUPID) too understand' ...

Or that the things were not clearly marked or a reasonable person wouldn't consider repeating a New York Times story about drone strikes in Pakistan everyone knew was going on as "really classified".

You see, the real problem was that once you got this nonsense in front of a jury, enpanelled from DC, they'd laugh you out of court.
Nope...he said documents were marked 'TS' & 'S'.....trying to say 'maybe not CLEARLY marked' is desperately grasping at straws'.

She signed a legally binding security letter declaring she was fully aware of the laws andconcepts of classified and handling classified. Comey pointed out, in the end, she new and ignored all that or she was just too 'unsophisticated' (stupid) to understand.
my understand was these emails had a (C) not TS AND S ... during his hearing they found out that these emails were mis-marked they weren't classified ... all bets are off
 
BS.

Comey stated Hillary did NOT turn over all documents required by law - thats a 'slam-dunk' violation of the FOIA and Federal Records Act. The State Dept obviously thinks so because they re-opened the case regarding her e-mails.

Comey stated she lied...that's perjury.

Comey stated she had an unauthorized unencrypted server and multiple unencrypted devices...violations of multiple laws to include the espionage act.
 
Nope...he said documents were marked 'TS' & 'S'.....trying to say 'maybe not CLEARLY marked' is desperately grasping at straws'.

She signed a legally binding security letter declaring she was fully aware of the laws andconcepts of classified and handling classified. Comey pointed out, in the end, she new and ignored all that or she was just too 'unsophisticated' (stupid) to understand.

Or no one really cared because it's done all the time and no one is ever prosecuted for it. But I know you are unhappy the Comey Claus didn't bring you that shiny new bike.

You lost, dude. Deal with it.
 
BS.

Comey stated Hillary did NOT turn over all documents required by law - thats a 'slam-dunk' violation of the FOIA and Federal Records Act. The State Dept obviously thinks so because they re-opened the case regarding her e-mails.

Comey stated she lied...that's perjury.

Comey stated she had an unauthorized unencrypted server and multiple unencrypted devices...violations of multiple laws to include the espionage act.
.
no its not ...guess again loser... Comey said that it's for him to say ... so it is you thats the liar guess again fool
 
Nope...he said documents were marked 'TS' & 'S'.....trying to say 'maybe not CLEARLY marked' is desperately grasping at straws'.

She signed a legally binding security letter declaring she was fully aware of the laws andconcepts of classified and handling classified. Comey pointed out, in the end, she new and ignored all that or she was just too 'unsophisticated' (stupid) to understand.

Or no one really cared because it's done all the time and no one is ever prosecuted for it. But I know you are unhappy the Comey Claus didn't bring you that shiny new bike.

You lost, dude. Deal with it.
easyt65 out right lied ... when asked did hillary Lie Comey's answer was not to the FBi ... they ask how about the benghazi hearing ... his answer was that wasn't for him to determine.... the ass hole easyt65 on these boards will say anything that justify their post ... especially easyt65 he's the biggest liar on these boards ... I caught him/her lying time and time again
 
BS.

Comey stated Hillary did NOT turn over all documents required by law - thats a 'slam-dunk' violation of the FOIA and Federal Records Act. The State Dept obviously thinks so because they re-opened the case regarding her e-mails.

Comey stated she lied...that's perjury.

Comey stated she had an unauthorized unencrypted server and multiple unencrypted devices...violations of multiple laws to include the espionage act.
.
no its not ...guess again loser... Comey said that it's for him to say ... so it is you thats the liar guess again fool
Comey said it was not for him to say in a lot of things...but he said them just the same.
 
He proved Hillary DID send and receive documents marked classified at the time but suggested she was 'too unsophisticated (STUPID) too understand' ...

Or that the things were not clearly marked or a reasonable person wouldn't consider repeating a New York Times story about drone strikes in Pakistan everyone knew was going on as "really classified".

You see, the real problem was that once you got this nonsense in front of a jury, enpanelled from DC, they'd laugh you out of court.
Nope...he said documents were marked 'TS' & 'S'.....trying to say 'maybe not CLEARLY marked' is desperately grasping at straws'.

She signed a legally binding security letter declaring she was fully aware of the laws andconcepts of classified and handling classified. Comey pointed out, in the end, she new and ignored all that or she was just too 'unsophisticated' (stupid) to understand.

Wrong.
 
BS.

Comey stated Hillary did NOT turn over all documents required by law - thats a 'slam-dunk' violation of the FOIA and Federal Records Act. The State Dept obviously thinks so because they re-opened the case regarding her e-mails.

Comey stated she lied...that's perjury.

Comey stated she had an unauthorized unencrypted server and multiple unencrypted devices...violations of multiple laws to include the espionage act.
.
no its not ...guess again loser... Comey said that it's for him to say ... so it is you thats the liar guess again fool
Comey said it was not for him to say in a lot of things...but he said them just the same.
when he said it was not for him to say thats what it means he can't make a judgement on something he has no knowledge on ... you claimed that Comey said "Comey stated she lied...that's perjury".... he never made that statement and like I said to you, you are a liar ... you will make states of your opinion and call it truthful ... you clearly said she lied and comey agreed ... this was a out right lie on your part ... thats why I said you can't be taken serious ... you have a hatred towards Hillary and all DEMS/liberals ... you will lie to make your post sound truthful when it clearly is not, nor have they ever been
 
BS.

Comey stated Hillary did NOT turn over all documents required by law - thats a 'slam-dunk' violation of the FOIA and Federal Records Act. The State Dept obviously thinks so because they re-opened the case regarding her e-mails.

Comey stated she lied...that's perjury.

Comey stated she had an unauthorized unencrypted server and multiple unencrypted devices...violations of multiple laws to include the espionage act.
you do realize you can't be taken serious with this statement ... you claimed Comey said she lied .... he never made no such statement ... now you want Us to believe that he said hillary didn't turn over all of her documents ... can you show us a section in his testimony where he made such of statement ... cause right know you've been branded a hillary hater and a liar to justify your hate
 
BS.

Comey stated Hillary did NOT turn over all documents required by law - thats a 'slam-dunk' violation of the FOIA and Federal Records Act. The State Dept obviously thinks so because they re-opened the case regarding her e-mails.

Comey stated she lied...that's perjury.

Comey stated she had an unauthorized unencrypted server and multiple unencrypted devices...violations of multiple laws to include the espionage act.
.
no its not ...guess again loser... Comey said that it's for him to say ... so it is you thats the liar guess again fool
Comey said it was not for him to say in a lot of things...but he said them just the same.
P.S he said that because he had no evidence other wise ... you come here and make the claim thats she lied and comey said so .... thats a lie and you can't stand that fact ...
 
Clinton LIED:
- She declared nothing she sent or received ever contained classified markings -- LIE (Doing so proves 'Intent')

- She lied by declaring she turned over all work-related e-mails -- LIE
--- "On her claim that she turned over all work-related emails, Comey said, “No, we found work-related emails, thousands that were not returned.”

She lied about having only 1 device - she had multiple -- LIE

Hillary, described y her own staff as 'technology challenged', was described as 'not sophistcated enough' to understand 'classified markings'
--- "Comey indeed said there is a question over whether Clinton was “sophisticated enough” to know at the time what a particular classified marking signified."

Liar, deceiver, incompetent law-breaker who put national security at risk because she's too stupid to understand the concept of 'classified' and classified markings....

...Just who we need as President.


Comey calls Clinton email use ‘definition of carelessness’ at Hill hearing, defends FBI | Fox News
He's under the thumb of Barry and the clintons... Lol
 
look on the bright side ... you'll get to slobber "intent" for the next decade.

Then why did Patraeus get convicted? He did nothing she didn't do and she did more of everything he did do than he did. He only gave secret information to one person, she did to everyone who had access to her server
 
Then why did Patraeus get convicted? He did nothing she didn't do and she did more of everything he did do than he did. He only gave secret information to one person, she did to everyone who had access to her server

Well, no, you see she didn't give access to her server, and there's no evidence that any hacked into her e-mail. There's no evidence that even if they did, they got anything that was particularly valuable.

You mean that "confidential memo" that we were doing drone strikes in Pakistan that everyone knows we are doing, but we deny so that the Pakistanis don't have to admit they are cooperating with us? Exactly who are we keeping that a secret from?
 

Forum List

Back
Top