daveman
Diamond Member
Why is it not a solution? Why don't you want people to be able to defend themselves against criminals?Nonsense.It's so insanely simple.What do you suggest we do to stop the shootings?There is no ultimate solve all solution. The goal is to lower the number of people a nut can kill because guns aren’t going away.Why would it be better to limit the ability to kill to eight people in lieu of nine people or twenty people? Some otherwise logical people seem to get fascinated by the number of people killed, versus the fact that people are killed.
Children are killed, all over this country, at school, on the way to school, or on the way home from school, every day, and few seem to notice. So, what is the magic number of dead people that causes so much concern? It is obviously not the deaths, it is the numbers of deaths that creates the concern.
You’re talking about a completely different problem. Why people kill. I’m just trying to lower the number of people they can kill. I wish none of us could get a ten round clip because they don’t make them.
And my Ruger bushmaster only holds 4. And you have to do the thing each time to unload the spent cartridge and put another in the chamber. I couldn’t do the kind of damage the Vegas shooter did. Or the guys on the movie heat with their assault weapons. That was based on a real case. Those weapons shouldn’t be available.
Solve the crazy male problem first then I’ll consider letting anyone own and carry a gun.
So, you are content to suffer shootings, as long as the body count is low? How liberal of you.
LET PEOPLE CARRY WEAPONS TO DEFEND THEMSELVES AND OTHERS.
No one is preventing anyone from carrying weapons.
Otherwise, this is no solution.
Disclaimer: I know why you don't. I want to know if YOU know why you don't.