Compensating Negros For Slavery

[freemind]

OP just doesn't understand. So what, you waited until the slaves died and think the debt is wiped clean. Sorry, it doesn't work like that.

When are the Jews leaving Israel? Many of them weren't victims. So what's the difference?

How about the Indians? Are you advocating taking their land because they weren't smallpoxed? Why not? What's the difference?

How about France? They collected reparations from Haiti when the slaves were freed. Are you advocating they return that money? No?

Why not?

Who's going to pay the reparations for the hundreds of thousands of soldiers, most of whom were white, who died to gain them their freedom?

Why should they be paid anymore than soldiers that fought in any other war? Did the soilders that fought to beat the Germans get reparations for helping to free the Jews?

It was westwall who brought up compensating Northern soldiers who fought or died to free the slaves. Not me. The point I was getting at was that in any compensation made to negros, is there a value on what the North had to pay in terms of money and lives worth anything? If so, should that be deducted from any compensation to the negro descendants of slaves?

As for WW II, it wasn't about freeing the Jews. So I wouldn't expect the Jews to give compensation to those who fought for the Allies. But I am against the Jews receiving the compensation they do over the whole holocaust thing. Seeing how it was largely bullshit. Also, do you know what the Japanese pay their victims of WW II? Not a damn penny.

I know it was Westwall. Thats why I replied to him first. After noticing your post I then replied to you. No there is no value on what the North had to pay. Its like any other war that tax payers fund.

Wars cost money. Somebody had to pay. And there had to be value to what was paid. Also, what about the lives that were lost. I bet those lives had a great deal of value to those who lost them. And their family members. Or what about spending the rest of your life without legs. Those who lost them probably placed great value on them.

 

[westwall]

Seeing no one is alive from the war between the states then I would say no for any payment. If someone was still alive from that war, then yes, but seeing they are not, then no.

You dont have to be alive to be paid reparations. Its a debt owed to the surviving members of the person wronged. To be honest it shouldnt even be called reparations. It should be called back pay.

Alright, if they can find a child that was born from a slave or a grandchild from a slave then pay that person but if it five generations later, nope and sorry I will not change my opinion on this...

I'm not trying to get you to change your opinion. I'm just pointing out that it is not an opinion based in logic. Its not like you have the authority to do anything about it.

Well let me put it this way then and it will never happen and it is too late.

The government waited too long to right their wrong, and now those that should have gotten something are not here, and too many generations have passed to fix the wrong.

I doubt you know what you are talking about on this issue and no its never too late.

And you do? You have exhibited nothing of interest or value as regards this topic. You merely parrot that which has been stated before.

 

[Asclepias]

OP just doesn't understand. So what, you waited until the slaves died and think the debt is wiped clean. Sorry, it doesn't work like that.

When are the Jews leaving Israel? Many of them weren't victims. So what's the difference?

How about the Indians? Are you advocating taking their land because they weren't smallpoxed? Why not? What's the difference?

How about France? They collected reparations from Haiti when the slaves were freed. Are you advocating they return that money? No?

Why not?

Who's going to pay the reparations for the hundreds of thousands of soldiers, most of whom were white, who died to gain them their freedom?

Why should they be paid anymore than soldiers that fought in any other war? Did the soilders that fought to beat the Germans get reparations for helping to free the Jews?

It was westwall who brought up compensating Northern soldiers who fought or died to free the slaves. Not me. The point I was getting at was that in any compensation made to negros, is there a value on what the North had to pay in terms of money and lives worth anything? If so, should that be deducted from any compensation to the negro descendants of slaves?

As for WW II, it wasn't about freeing the Jews. So I wouldn't expect the Jews to give compensation to those who fought for the Allies. But I am against the Jews receiving the compensation they do over the whole holocaust thing. Seeing how it was largely bullshit. Also, do you know what the Japanese pay their victims of WW II? Not a damn penny.

I know it was Westwall. Thats why I replied to him first. After noticing your post I then replied to you. No there is no value on what the North had to pay. Its like any other war that tax payers fund.

Wars cost money. Somebody had to pay. And there had to be value to what was paid. Also, what about the lives that were lost. I bet those lives had a great deal of valu to those who lost them. And their family members. Or what about spending the rest of your life without legs. Those who lost them probably placed great value on them.

The war was already paid for. It was paid via taxes just like all wars are. What about the lives that were lost? None of that has anything to do with reparations.

 

[freemind]

Who's going to pay the reparations for the hundreds of thousands of soldiers, most of whom were white, who died to gain them their freedom?

Why should they be paid anymore than soldiers that fought in any other war? Did the soilders that fought to beat the Germans get reparations for helping to free the Jews?

It was westwall who brought up compensating Northern soldiers who fought or died to free the slaves. Not me. The point I was getting at was that in any compensation made to negros, is there a value on what the North had to pay in terms of money and lives worth anything? If so, should that be deducted from any compensation to the negro descendants of slaves?

As for WW II, it wasn't about freeing the Jews. So I wouldn't expect the Jews to give compensation to those who fought for the Allies. But I am against the Jews receiving the compensation they do over the whole holocaust thing. Seeing how it was largely bullshit. Also, do you know what the Japanese pay their victims of WW II? Not a damn penny.

I know it was Westwall. Thats why I replied to him first. After noticing your post I then replied to you. No there is no value on what the North had to pay. Its like any other war that tax payers fund.

Wars cost money. Somebody had to pay. And there had to be value to what was paid. Also, what about the lives that were lost. I bet those lives had a great deal of valu to those who lost them. And their family members. Or what about spending the rest of your life without legs. Those who lost them probably placed great value on them.

The war was already paid for. It was paid via taxes just like all wars are. What about the lives that were lost? None of that has anything to do with reparations.

And who paid the taxes. As for the rest, let me guess. Black lives matter. But White lives don't.

 

[westwall]

Who's going to pay the reparations for the hundreds of thousands of soldiers, most of whom were white, who died to gain them their freedom?

Why should they be paid anymore than soldiers that fought in any other war? Did the soilders that fought to beat the Germans get reparations for helping to free the Jews?

It was westwall who brought up compensating Northern soldiers who fought or died to free the slaves. Not me. The point I was getting at was that in any compensation made to negros, is there a value on what the North had to pay in terms of money and lives worth anything? If so, should that be deducted from any compensation to the negro descendants of slaves?

As for WW II, it wasn't about freeing the Jews. So I wouldn't expect the Jews to give compensation to those who fought for the Allies. But I am against the Jews receiving the compensation they do over the whole holocaust thing. Seeing how it was largely bullshit. Also, do you know what the Japanese pay their victims of WW II? Not a damn penny.

I know it was Westwall. Thats why I replied to him first. After noticing your post I then replied to you. No there is no value on what the North had to pay. Its like any other war that tax payers fund.

Wars cost money. Somebody had to pay. And there had to be value to what was paid. Also, what about the lives that were lost. I bet those lives had a great deal of valu to those who lost them. And their family members. Or what about spending the rest of your life without legs. Those who lost them probably placed great value on them.

The war was already paid for. It was paid via taxes just like all wars are. What about the lives that were lost? None of that has anything to do with reparations.

What do reparations have to do with reality?

 

[katsteve2012]

OP just doesn't understand. So what, you waited until the slaves died and think the debt is wiped clean. Sorry, it doesn't work like that.

When are the Jews leaving Israel? Many of them weren't victims. So what's the difference?

How about the Indians? Are you advocating taking their land because they weren't smallpoxed? Why not? What's the difference?

How about France? They collected reparations from Haiti when the slaves were freed. Are you advocating they return that money? No?

Why not?

Who's going to pay the reparations for the hundreds of thousands of soldiers, most of whom were white, who died to gain them their freedom?

Why should they be paid anymore than soldiers that fought in any other war? Did the soilders that fought to beat the Germans get reparations for helping to free the Jews?

It was westwall who brought up compensating Northern soldiers who fought or died to free the slaves. Not me. The point I was getting at was that in any compensation made to negros, is there a value on what the North had to pay in terms of money and lives worth anything? If so, should that be deducted from any compensation to the negro descendants of slaves?

As for WW II, it wasn't about freeing the Jews. So I wouldn't expect the Jews to give compensation to those who fought for the Allies. But I am against the Jews receiving the compensation they do over the whole holocaust thing. Seeing how it was largely bullshit. Also, do you know what the Japanese pay their victims of WW II? Not a damn penny.

The primary purpose of the Civil War being fought was NOT to free the slaves.

 

[American_Jihad]

I would think a FREE AIR TICKET to their African country of choice would be appropriate, after all their GREAT GREAT GREAT ancestor, was PROBABLY SOLD into slavery by another BLACK, and they got FREE TRANSPORTATION to America!

Now, NOT all blacks think this reparation thing is a good idea, but those from#BlackLiesMatter, and the followers of Jesse, Al, and Louie that want to could take advantage of this ONE WAY opportunity!

...

 

[katsteve2012]

Hey I broke It down piece by piece and not once did you say why all those groups deserved what they got but blacks should not get the same. Being mad and saying fuck them isn't an answer, sorry.

All you did was spout bullshit about the Jews, Indains and French. I tried to answer it the best that the questions allowed. But the point is that negros don't deserve anything. In fact, they should be compensating White people for being here.

"Indains"?

What are you? 10 years old or retarded? Or both?

How about you concentrate a little more on what I say rather than my spelling.

The second that you say something that makes even a shred of sense, I shall.

All you have to do is tell me something I said that you think makes no sense. If nothing I said makes a sherd of sense, that should be easy enough to do. Go for it. I am all ears.

It is not my responsibility to educate you or reform your ignorance, but in this case be careful of what you ask for.

You stated in an earlier post in this thread that almost all Hispanics are here illegally or are the decendents of illegal immigrants, which is an ignorant, misinformed statement on your part.

I personally grew up around and know many Hispanics here whose families go back multiple generations.

Furthermore if you believe in statistics look up what the ratio of illegal versus legal immigrant Hispanics here actually is.
You might learn something.

SMGDH.

 

[Asclepias]

Why should they be paid anymore than soldiers that fought in any other war? Did the soilders that fought to beat the Germans get reparations for helping to free the Jews?

It was westwall who brought up compensating Northern soldiers who fought or died to free the slaves. Not me. The point I was getting at was that in any compensation made to negros, is there a value on what the North had to pay in terms of money and lives worth anything? If so, should that be deducted from any compensation to the negro descendants of slaves?

As for WW II, it wasn't about freeing the Jews. So I wouldn't expect the Jews to give compensation to those who fought for the Allies. But I am against the Jews receiving the compensation they do over the whole holocaust thing. Seeing how it was largely bullshit. Also, do you know what the Japanese pay their victims of WW II? Not a damn penny.

I know it was Westwall. Thats why I replied to him first. After noticing your post I then replied to you. No there is no value on what the North had to pay. Its like any other war that tax payers fund.

Wars cost money. Somebody had to pay. And there had to be value to what was paid. Also, what about the lives that were lost. I bet those lives had a great deal of valu to those who lost them. And their family members. Or what about spending the rest of your life without legs. Those who lost them probably placed great value on them.

The war was already paid for. It was paid via taxes just like all wars are. What about the lives that were lost? None of that has anything to do with reparations.

And who paid the taxes. As for the rest, let me guess. Black lives matter. But White lives don't.

The tax payers paid the taxes with money they made exploiting enslaved Blacks. Yes Black lives matter. Stop whining about white lives. Your inbred ancestors should have thought about that before they started a civil war.

 

[Asclepias]

Why should they be paid anymore than soldiers that fought in any other war? Did the soilders that fought to beat the Germans get reparations for helping to free the Jews?

It was westwall who brought up compensating Northern soldiers who fought or died to free the slaves. Not me. The point I was getting at was that in any compensation made to negros, is there a value on what the North had to pay in terms of money and lives worth anything? If so, should that be deducted from any compensation to the negro descendants of slaves?

As for WW II, it wasn't about freeing the Jews. So I wouldn't expect the Jews to give compensation to those who fought for the Allies. But I am against the Jews receiving the compensation they do over the whole holocaust thing. Seeing how it was largely bullshit. Also, do you know what the Japanese pay their victims of WW II? Not a damn penny.

I know it was Westwall. Thats why I replied to him first. After noticing your post I then replied to you. No there is no value on what the North had to pay. Its like any other war that tax payers fund.

Wars cost money. Somebody had to pay. And there had to be value to what was paid. Also, what about the lives that were lost. I bet those lives had a great deal of valu to those who lost them. And their family members. Or what about spending the rest of your life without legs. Those who lost them probably placed great value on them.

The war was already paid for. It was paid via taxes just like all wars are. What about the lives that were lost? None of that has anything to do with reparations.

What do reparations have to do with reality?

Everything. Why do you ask?

 

[westwall]

It was westwall who brought up compensating Northern soldiers who fought or died to free the slaves. Not me. The point I was getting at was that in any compensation made to negros, is there a value on what the North had to pay in terms of money and lives worth anything? If so, should that be deducted from any compensation to the negro descendants of slaves?

As for WW II, it wasn't about freeing the Jews. So I wouldn't expect the Jews to give compensation to those who fought for the Allies. But I am against the Jews receiving the compensation they do over the whole holocaust thing. Seeing how it was largely bullshit. Also, do you know what the Japanese pay their victims of WW II? Not a damn penny.

I know it was Westwall. Thats why I replied to him first. After noticing your post I then replied to you. No there is no value on what the North had to pay. Its like any other war that tax payers fund.

Wars cost money. Somebody had to pay. And there had to be value to what was paid. Also, what about the lives that were lost. I bet those lives had a great deal of valu to those who lost them. And their family members. Or what about spending the rest of your life without legs. Those who lost them probably placed great value on them.

The war was already paid for. It was paid via taxes just like all wars are. What about the lives that were lost? None of that has anything to do with reparations.

What do reparations have to do with reality?

Everything. Why do you ask?

You still haven't showed us how people who were never slave owners, should be made to pay people who were never slaves, their hard earned money.

 

[Asclepias]

I know it was Westwall. Thats why I replied to him first. After noticing your post I then replied to you. No there is no value on what the North had to pay. Its like any other war that tax payers fund.

Wars cost money. Somebody had to pay. And there had to be value to what was paid. Also, what about the lives that were lost. I bet those lives had a great deal of valu to those who lost them. And their family members. Or what about spending the rest of your life without legs. Those who lost them probably placed great value on them.

The war was already paid for. It was paid via taxes just like all wars are. What about the lives that were lost? None of that has anything to do with reparations.

What do reparations have to do with reality?

Everything. Why do you ask?

You still haven't showed us how people who were never slave owners, should be made to pay people who were never slaves, their hard earned money.

The same way the descendants of the Japanese people that were interned received reparations. Tax money. Since Black people also pay taxes, everyone will be paying a little.

 

[westwall]

Wars cost money. Somebody had to pay. And there had to be value to what was paid. Also, what about the lives that were lost. I bet those lives had a great deal of valu to those who lost them. And their family members. Or what about spending the rest of your life without legs. Those who lost them probably placed great value on them.

The war was already paid for. It was paid via taxes just like all wars are. What about the lives that were lost? None of that has anything to do with reparations.

What do reparations have to do with reality?

Everything. Why do you ask?

You still haven't showed us how people who were never slave owners, should be made to pay people who were never slaves, their hard earned money.

The same way the descendants of the Japanese people that were interned received reparations. Tax money. Since Black people also pay taxes, everyone will be paying a little.

The Japanese who got the reparations were overwhelmingly STILL ALIVE or were their children who had suffered from the loss of property. And that was what the reparations were for, the property that was STOLEN from them. The people you wish to give money to were never enslaved, never suffered from slavery, and are SIX generations removed from those who did suffer....

 

[Asclepias]

The war was already paid for. It was paid via taxes just like all wars are. What about the lives that were lost? None of that has anything to do with reparations.

What do reparations have to do with reality?

Everything. Why do you ask?

You still haven't showed us how people who were never slave owners, should be made to pay people who were never slaves, their hard earned money.

The same way the descendants of the Japanese people that were interned received reparations. Tax money. Since Black people also pay taxes, everyone will be paying a little.

The Japanese who got the reparations were overwhelmingly STILL ALIVE or were their children who had suffered from the loss of property. And that was what the reparations were for, the property that was STOLEN from them. The people you wish to give money to were never enslaved, never suffered from slavery, and are SIX generations removed from those who did suffer....

Yeah but some of them were dead and their descendants got the reparations no matter how much you attempt to deflect from that fact.

Since you are not in charge of determining how many generations it goes back thats a null argument.

 

[westwall]

What do reparations have to do with reality?

Everything. Why do you ask?

You still haven't showed us how people who were never slave owners, should be made to pay people who were never slaves, their hard earned money.

The same way the descendants of the Japanese people that were interned received reparations. Tax money. Since Black people also pay taxes, everyone will be paying a little.

The Japanese who got the reparations were overwhelmingly STILL ALIVE or were their children who had suffered from the loss of property. And that was what the reparations were for, the property that was STOLEN from them. The people you wish to give money to were never enslaved, never suffered from slavery, and are SIX generations removed from those who did suffer....

Yeah but some of them were dead and their descendants got the reparations no matter how much you attempt to deflect from that fact.

Since you are not in charge of determining how many generations it goes back thats a null argument.

Yes, a very small percentage of them did. You are correct. But, they were direct descendants. You want to give people money for crimes that were committed against people who lived over 150 years ago, and no matter how much you try and deflect from that fact, it is a fact.

 

[freemind]

Why should they be paid anymore than soldiers that fought in any other war? Did the soilders that fought to beat the Germans get reparations for helping to free the Jews?

It was westwall who brought up compensating Northern soldiers who fought or died to free the slaves. Not me. The point I was getting at was that in any compensation made to negros, is there a value on what the North had to pay in terms of money and lives worth anything? If so, should that be deducted from any compensation to the negro descendants of slaves?

As for WW II, it wasn't about freeing the Jews. So I wouldn't expect the Jews to give compensation to those who fought for the Allies. But I am against the Jews receiving the compensation they do over the whole holocaust thing. Seeing how it was largely bullshit. Also, do you know what the Japanese pay their victims of WW II? Not a damn penny.

I know it was Westwall. Thats why I replied to him first. After noticing your post I then replied to you. No there is no value on what the North had to pay. Its like any other war that tax payers fund.

Wars cost money. Somebody had to pay. And there had to be value to what was paid. Also, what about the lives that were lost. I bet those lives had a great deal of valu to those who lost them. And their family members. Or what about spending the rest of your life without legs. Those who lost them probably placed great value on them.

The war was already paid for. It was paid via taxes just like all wars are. What about the lives that were lost? None of that has anything to do with reparations.

What do reparations have to do with reality?

Excuse me for butting in. But I don't know where you were going with this. The reality is that the North spent a lot of money, lost a lot of lives and had many more lives damaged by the war between the states. If money was to be given to negros for their ancestors having been slaves, those costs should be deducted from any such compensation. Also, what about the White Northern soldiers who were killed and never got a chance to have children. What were the lives of the White children who never got a chance to exist be worth. While the slaves were free to breed as many "whitie" haters as they wanted to.

 

[freemind]

OP just doesn't understand. So what, you waited until the slaves died and think the debt is wiped clean. Sorry, it doesn't work like that.

When are the Jews leaving Israel? Many of them weren't victims. So what's the difference?

How about the Indians? Are you advocating taking their land because they weren't smallpoxed? Why not? What's the difference?

How about France? They collected reparations from Haiti when the slaves were freed. Are you advocating they return that money? No?

Why not?

Who's going to pay the reparations for the hundreds of thousands of soldiers, most of whom were white, who died to gain them their freedom?

Why should they be paid anymore than soldiers that fought in any other war? Did the soilders that fought to beat the Germans get reparations for helping to free the Jews?

It was westwall who brought up compensating Northern soldiers who fought or died to free the slaves. Not me. The point I was getting at was that in any compensation made to negros, is there a value on what the North had to pay in terms of money and lives worth anything? If so, should that be deducted from any compensation to the negro descendants of slaves?

As for WW II, it wasn't about freeing the Jews. So I wouldn't expect the Jews to give compensation to those who fought for the Allies. But I am against the Jews receiving the compensation they do over the whole holocaust thing. Seeing how it was largely bullshit. Also, do you know what the Japanese pay their victims of WW II? Not a damn penny.

The primary purpose of the Civil War being fought was NOT to free the slaves.

You have to be high. The continued existence of slavery was the whole reason for the Civil War. If slavery was ended, that means the slaves would have no longer been slaves. So even though freeing the slaves may not have been the primary objective, it boiled down to the same thing. Also, new states were going to be formed. Which of course turned out to be the case. Those new states were unlikely to be slave states. Which means that slavery would have eventually been voted out of existance. Instead of having that happen, the Confederate states decided to succeed.

 

[freemind]

All you did was spout bullshit about the Jews, Indains and French. I tried to answer it the best that the questions allowed. But the point is that negros don't deserve anything. In fact, they should be compensating White people for being here.

"Indains"?

What are you? 10 years old or retarded? Or both?

How about you concentrate a little more on what I say rather than my spelling.

The second that you say something that makes even a shred of sense, I shall.

All you have to do is tell me something I said that you think makes no sense. If nothing I said makes a sherd of sense, that should be easy enough to do. Go for it. I am all ears.

It is not my responsibility to educate you or reform your ignorance, but in this case be careful of what you ask for.

You stated in an earlier post in this thread that almost all Hispanics are here illegally or are the decendents of illegal immigrants, which is an ignorant, misinformed statement on your part.

I personally grew up around and know many Hispanics here whose families go back multiple generations.

Furthermore if you believe in statistics look up what the ratio of illegal versus legal immigrant Hispanics here actually is.
You might learn something.

SMGDH.

Allow me to educate you. There were some of mexican descent living in places like Calfornia, Texas, New Mexico, etc. But for the most part, mexicans were to be found in mexico. That's just how things work. In the days of the wild west, there wasn't really much of anything to draw mexicans into the wilderness of the west. Only when White people started making a comfortable life for themselves did the mexican parasites start coming here in larger numbers to "share" in what White people had done for their own kind. When overpopulating illegal invader scab scum mexicans try to "share" what White people had created for themselves, that is an illegal action. Whether or not it was officially labeled as illegal by the law.

Next, you say that you grew up around Hispicknicks. Sounds like a case of the Stockholm Syndrome to me. Also, what you did as a child doesn't matter. The fact is that you have to grow up. Another point is that you don't need to fool all the people all of the time. All you need to do is fool just enough of the people for just long enough. Unfortunately, for people like you, you apparently enjoy being fooled.

Next, it doesn't really matter to me how many mexicans came here legally or how many came here illegally. The point is they ALL need to go! As for the illegal ones, I heard one person suggest sending them back across the border using catapults. Though he would spare some of the children part of the flight back and use them for skeet! He also suggested sending them back over the border through wood chippers. They definately wouldn't come back after that. Like the spick who a few months ago shot some White woman in San Francisco just for the hell of it. He had been deported 5 times!

 

[freemind]

It was westwall who brought up compensating Northern soldiers who fought or died to free the slaves. Not me. The point I was getting at was that in any compensation made to negros, is there a value on what the North had to pay in terms of money and lives worth anything? If so, should that be deducted from any compensation to the negro descendants of slaves?

As for WW II, it wasn't about freeing the Jews. So I wouldn't expect the Jews to give compensation to those who fought for the Allies. But I am against the Jews receiving the compensation they do over the whole holocaust thing. Seeing how it was largely bullshit. Also, do you know what the Japanese pay their victims of WW II? Not a damn penny.

I know it was Westwall. Thats why I replied to him first. After noticing your post I then replied to you. No there is no value on what the North had to pay. Its like any other war that tax payers fund.

Wars cost money. Somebody had to pay. And there had to be value to what was paid. Also, what about the lives that were lost. I bet those lives had a great deal of valu to those who lost them. And their family members. Or what about spending the rest of your life without legs. Those who lost them probably placed great value on them.

The war was already paid for. It was paid via taxes just like all wars are. What about the lives that were lost? None of that has anything to do with reparations.

And who paid the taxes. As for the rest, let me guess. Black lives matter. But White lives don't.

The tax payers paid the taxes with money they made exploiting enslaved Blacks. Yes Black lives matter. Stop whining about white lives. Your inbred ancestors should have thought about that before they started a civil war.

Oh. Southern slave owners paid for the Norths war effort. I would ask you how that was supposed to work. But I'm not interested. Also, I have a little information for you. The number of slaves in the U.S. was pretty small compared to the number of White people who lived here. If slaves had never been brought to the U.S. at all, it wouldn't have made a whole hell a lot of difference to the U.S. economy. Next, White lives matter a hell of a lot more than negro lives. Also, my ancestors were Northerners. Unless you're saying that the North should have allowed the Confederate states to succeed. That is a different debate.

 

[freemind]

What do reparations have to do with reality?

Everything. Why do you ask?

You still haven't showed us how people who were never slave owners, should be made to pay people who were never slaves, their hard earned money.

The same way the descendants of the Japanese people that were interned received reparations. Tax money. Since Black people also pay taxes, everyone will be paying a little.

Excuse me for butting in. But you say that the passage of generations doesn't matter. How about trying this on for size. The U.S. declares that negros having been brought here was an illegal act. To nullify that illegal act, the U.S. ships most of its negros back to Africa. Whether they want to go or not. Because their ancestors having been brought here was an illegal act.







The Japanese who got the reparations were overwhelmingly STILL ALIVE or were their children who had suffered from the loss of property. And that was what the reparations were for, the property that was STOLEN from them. The people you wish to give money to were never enslaved, never suffered from slavery, and are SIX generations removed from those who did suffer....

Yeah but some of them were dead and their descendants got the reparations no matter how much you attempt to deflect from that fact.

Since you are not in charge of determining how many generations it goes back thats a null argument.