Comrade Trump Jr. compares Syrian Refugees to Skittles

Jim, why not tell the TRUTH in the title of your thread? He actually compared these violent terrorists coming in to POISONOUS skittles....that's a big piece you intentionally left out.

Oh shut up.....Even the Skittles manufacturer has denounced this slime ball brat. Time for you to grow up, too.


Skittles are candy. Refugees are people. We don’t feel it’s an appropriate analogy. We will respectively refrain from further commentary, as anything we say could be misinterpreted as marketing,” Chicago-based Wrigley Americas said in a statement provided by Denise Young, vice president of corporate affairs.
Skittles maker Wrigley offers up best reply to Donald Trump Jr.’s refugee tweet

In other words, Junior is as dumb as his old man...
 
Who should we load into cattlecars next? Mormons? Fundamentalist Amish?

Only people I've seen loaded into Cattle Cars are people that leftist states exterminated, and no one is talking about doing anything to those goat fuckers beyond keeping them out of our country.


How do people as stupid as you survive this long? You would have died under a sink years ago if the Drano didn't have a child resistant lid on it.


lol @ Nazis being "leftist." You remarking on anyone's intelligence is like Huckabee preaching fitness.
 
Jim, why not tell the TRUTH in the title of your thread? He actually compared these violent terrorists coming in to POISONOUS skittles....that's a big piece you intentionally left out.

Oh shut up.....Even the Skittles manufacturer has denounced this slime ball brat. Time for you to grow up, too.


Skittles are candy. Refugees are people. We don’t feel it’s an appropriate analogy. We will respectively refrain from further commentary, as anything we say could be misinterpreted as marketing,” Chicago-based Wrigley Americas said in a statement provided by Denise Young, vice president of corporate affairs.
Skittles maker Wrigley offers up best reply to Donald Trump Jr.’s refugee tweet

In other words, Junior is as dumb as his old man...
No, in other words you should misrepresent what someone says in order to have something to attack.
 
If you had a roomful of people who wanted guns, and you knew that one of them planned to commit murder with that gun,

would you give them all guns anyway?
TRULY Stupid question....you would give everyone a gun EXCEPT the person you KNEW planned to commit murder.

Of course you don't just GIVE anyone a gun. Laws must be obeyed, background checks have to be completed, and a waiting period must be upheld. Of course you knew that. In your scenario, if you discover one wants to commit murder with the weapon of course you don't sell them the gun...and you report them to the police.

Next....

You don't know which one.
That's why you have background checks....

And what do you mean 'you don't know which one'... Then how do you know one wants to commit murder? Who / what is your source of this info? How credible is it / are they? What is their proof? How reliable is that evidence? etc....

How does Ratboy Trump know who the terrorists are in a group of Syrian refugees?

It's just the Muslim ones......
 
How does Ratboy Trump know who the terrorists are in a group of Syrian refugees?

1 candidate, based on Terrorist Experts, knows there are potential terrorists in the group of 'refugees' they want to bring in but does not give a damn that the 'vetting' process is broken for now and that by brining in refugees they would potentially be endangering national security and / or American lives.

1 candidate is aware of the same thing but believes that all immigration of 'refugees' from war-torn, Islamic Extremist-infested America-hating regions be suspended until the vetting process can be improved. In the meantime that candidate suggests creating other locations, closer to refugees' own countries, where they can be housed and cared for much easier, cheaper, and with less potential to risk for the US.

Which plan is in the best interest of the United States and for the safety and security of this nation and our citizens?

If you are honest you will admit option B, the second one, is the obvious answer.

WHY TAKE UN-NECESSARY CHANCES?

Hillary did that as Secretary of State and got 4 Americans killed.

Why have loopholes in the background check laws for gun buying?

What if we impose strict vetting on refugees, but leave a couple loopholes open? Fair enough?
 
If you had a roomful of people who wanted guns, and you knew that one of them planned to commit murder with that gun,

would you give them all guns anyway?
TRULY Stupid question....you would give everyone a gun EXCEPT the person you KNEW planned to commit murder.

Of course you don't just GIVE anyone a gun. Laws must be obeyed, background checks have to be completed, and a waiting period must be upheld. Of course you knew that. In your scenario, if you discover one wants to commit murder with the weapon of course you don't sell them the gun...and you report them to the police.

Next....

You don't know which one.
That's why you have background checks....

And what do you mean 'you don't know which one'... Then how do you know one wants to commit murder? Who / what is your source of this info? How credible is it / are they? What is their proof? How reliable is that evidence? etc....

How does Ratboy Trump know who the terrorists are in a group of Syrian refugees?

It's just the Muslim ones......

Lock up Dr. Oz!
 
Why have loopholes in the background check laws for gun buying?
What loopholes?

Private sales, you asshole.

How do you propose regulating private sales, asshole? If John wants to sell his 12-gauge to his cousin, is he going to have to file paperwork with the Federal Government, pay for a back ground check, and make his cousin wait for a period of time? How are you going to enforce it?

Does OBAMA fall under this, since it was HE who authorized the sale / give-away of thousands of guns and grenades to Mexican Drug cartels, resulting in the deaths of over 500 people - 4 Americans? Or is the govt, as always, above the law? (So far they have been - no one punished for Fas and Furious, which is STILL on-going as Barry runs out the clock).
 
Why have loopholes in the background check laws for gun buying?
What loopholes?

Private sales, you asshole.

How do you propose regulating private sales, asshole? If John wants to sell his 12-gauge to his cousin, is he going to have to file paperwork with the Federal Government, pay for a back ground check, and make his cousin wait for a period of time? How are you going to enforce it?

Does OBAMA fall under this, since it was HE who authorized the sale / give-away of thousands of guns and grenades to Mexican Drug cartels, resulting in the deaths of over 500 people - 4 Americans? Or is the govt, as always, above the law? (So far they have been - no one punished for Fas and Furious, which is STILL on-going as Barry runs out the clock).

What happens when John sells his 1994 Ford pickup to his cousin?
 
Jim, why not tell the TRUTH in the title of your thread? He actually compared these violent terrorists coming in to POISONOUS skittles....that's a big piece you intentionally left out.

Oh shut up.....Even the Skittles manufacturer has denounced this slime ball brat. Time for you to grow up, too.


Skittles are candy. Refugees are people. We don’t feel it’s an appropriate analogy. We will respectively refrain from further commentary, as anything we say could be misinterpreted as marketing,” Chicago-based Wrigley Americas said in a statement provided by Denise Young, vice president of corporate affairs.
Skittles maker Wrigley offers up best reply to Donald Trump Jr.’s refugee tweet

In other words, Junior is as dumb as his old man...
No, in other words you should misrepresent what someone says in order to have something to attack.

LIAR! He was comparing the Syrian refugees with Skittles. If you don't believe that, you are brain dead or a Trumpette.
 
What happens when John sells his 1994 Ford pickup to his cousin?
1. What does that have to do with Guns?
2. Guns and vehicles are different.
3. I have to pay annual taxes and registration on my vehicle, not my weapons. If it was required I could much more easily hide my weapon without the government knowing than I could my car.
4. John's cousin is a lousy driver and would only wreck the truck within a week.

:p
 
Pretty lame Clinton Bootlicker faux outrage. Pathetic. Movin on...
So that is what you call someone pointing out that a lib lied in order to create a false narrative to attack rather than post what was actually said?!

Ok..'nuff said.
 
Jim, why not tell the TRUTH in the title of your thread? He actually compared these violent terrorists coming in to POISONOUS skittles....that's a big piece you intentionally left out.

Oh shut up.....Even the Skittles manufacturer has denounced this slime ball brat. Time for you to grow up, too.


Skittles are candy. Refugees are people. We don’t feel it’s an appropriate analogy. We will respectively refrain from further commentary, as anything we say could be misinterpreted as marketing,” Chicago-based Wrigley Americas said in a statement provided by Denise Young, vice president of corporate affairs.
Skittles maker Wrigley offers up best reply to Donald Trump Jr.’s refugee tweet

In other words, Junior is as dumb as his old man...
No, in other words you should misrepresent what someone says in order to have something to attack.

LIAR! He was comparing the Syrian refugees with Skittles. If you don't believe that, you are brain dead or a Trumpette.
No he wasn't. He was citing an analogy. If he were comparing refugees to skittles he would have said regugees are comparable to skittles.

Instead, he used an analogy. AN analogy is like a ratio. Now...here me out....

1 is to 10 is like 100,000 is to 1,000,000. It is not saying that 1 is like 100,000 and it is not saying 10 is like 1,000,000....it is saying the ratio between the items on each side are analogous.

So what his ad said was whereas a bowl of skittles seems dangerous....if 3 out of the hundreds were poisonous, then the entire bowl is something to be concerned about.

While, whereas thousands of refugees may not be dangerous, if a small handful AMONGST them are, then we need to be concerned about the entire group.

It really isn't hard to understand. I assume you just don't want to.
 
Skittles Issues Terse Response to Trump Jr. Refugee Tweet

Just another spoiled rich kid. I am sure dad is very proud of Comrade Junior for such a sick analogy,,,



CswRrhoW8AEo4Xy.jpg



.

Better to let them all die than to risk a few bad ones getting through

Similar logic to why we wouldn't accept the Jews in 1939
The Jews in Europe were reknown for terrorism?
 
Why have loopholes in the background check laws for gun buying?
What loopholes?

Private sales, you asshole.

How do you propose regulating private sales, asshole? If John wants to sell his 12-gauge to his cousin, is he going to have to file paperwork with the Federal Government, pay for a back ground check, and make his cousin wait for a period of time? How are you going to enforce it?

Does OBAMA fall under this, since it was HE who authorized the sale / give-away of thousands of guns and grenades to Mexican Drug cartels, resulting in the deaths of over 500 people - 4 Americans? Or is the govt, as always, above the law? (So far they have been - no one punished for Fas and Furious, which is STILL on-going as Barry runs out the clock).

They manage to do it in other countries.

You enforce it when you bust a felon with a gun and find out he bought it from an individual who didn't do a background check. Then you jail the seller.
 

Forum List

Back
Top