Concept of White Privilege is Racist

There is no fallacy in that opinion. Just because YOU don't want to believe it doesn't male this a fallacy.
There is no evidence to sustain the opinion thus it is a fallacy.

Well actually there is plenty of evidence as Peggy McIntosh pointed out.
All of it has been debunked.

None of it has been debunked. White privilege exists you just refuse to accept it because you live in a lie whereby you tell yourself that whites are losing out.


Says the black woman dismissing the experiences of white people.

I am not dismissing the experiences of whites to state that whites have been the beneficiaries of racist policy. The facts show it. That's why you can't produce any evidence of a national policy against whites in any of the areas I asked yoy to.
 
.White privilege is real. Real enough to be made up by whites, What you don't believe doesn't erase it's existence.
`
People believe in many different things. As I said, it only is real for those who choose to believe it. I try use language that brings people together, not drive them apart, which is why I completely reject it.

Well the language you thinks brings people together drives them apart because of your refusal to respect the experiences of others.


Says the black person that thinks she knows what white people think.

I'm a man Correll, And I know that whites have benefitted from 241 years of American history t hat includes racism and racial preferences for whites.


So, it's cool for a black man to dismiss the experiences of whites, but not the other way around.


Got it.


I knew that it would be different, because, you know, reasons.
 
A Princeton study about college admissions by race is not any evidence of a national policy of racial discrimination by whites in all the areas I asked you to show. Hell. that study didn't even show discrimination against whites in admission to ivy league schools. You can't prove any such thing and you know it. That's why you linger in here where you can get the similarly stupid to cosign your lies.


It showed hard numbers about the level of discrimination caused by the various policies and programs of discrimination.


Black skin is worth, what was it? 300 sat points I believe.


That is race based discrimination, and the fact that it is cloaked in "diversity" and/or "anti-discrimination" rhetoric does not change that.


YOur lies are not believed by anyone. NOt even yourself.


YOu support racist discrimination and policy.

It showed nothing of the sort. .



Sure it did, and you know it.

Produce the evidence you have been asked to produce. That 1989 study did not produce shit. In fact somce the study was actually done in 1989:

Study: anti-black hiring discrimination is as prevalent today as it was in 1989

Americans are as racist as they were back in the late 1980s — at least in one crucial area: jobs.

A new study, by researchers at Northwestern University, Harvard, and the Institute for Social Research in Norway, looked at every available field experiment on hiring discrimination from 1989 through 2015. The researchers found that anti-black racism in hiring is unchanged since at least 1989, while anti-Latino racism may have decreased modestly.

They looked at two kinds of experiments: résumé and in-person audits. In the first, researchers send out résumés with similar levels of education, experience, and so on, but the names differ so some résumés have a stereotypically black or Latino name and the others have a stereotypically white name. In the second, applicants go in-person to apply for a job; they each share similar qualifications, but some are white while others are black or brown.

In total, the researchers produced 24 studies with 30 estimates of discrimination for black and Latino Americans, collectively representing more than 54,000 applications submitted for more than 25,000 positions.

They concluded that, on average, “white applicants receive 36% more callbacks than equally qualified African Americans” while “[w]hite applicants receive on average 24% more callbacks than Latinos.”

Study: anti-black hiring discrimination is as prevalent today as it was in 1989

It's time you learned a hard lesson. And the more you argue the worse it's going to get for you.


Sorry, considering your dishonesty with the studies I've posted in the past, you don't have the credibility for me to look at your studies.


Besides, I know that anything I say that is not a mea culpa will just be dismissed by you.

You can't produce the evidence. Just admit it. It is a lie to say that whites are being discriminated against.
 
There is no evidence to sustain the opinion thus it is a fallacy.

Well actually there is plenty of evidence as Peggy McIntosh pointed out.
All of it has been debunked.

None of it has been debunked. White privilege exists you just refuse to accept it because you live in a lie whereby you tell yourself that whites are losing out.


Says the black woman dismissing the experiences of white people.

I am not dismissing the experiences of whites to state that whites have been the beneficiaries of racist policy. The facts show it. That's why you can't produce any evidence of a national policy against whites in any of the areas I asked yoy to.

LOL!!!


You are willing to accept the experiences of whites as long as they tell you what you want to hear?


Wow. FOr a lefty, that's a pretty open mind.


For an actual thinking person with a brain, not so much.
 
It showed hard numbers about the level of discrimination caused by the various policies and programs of discrimination.


Black skin is worth, what was it? 300 sat points I believe.


That is race based discrimination, and the fact that it is cloaked in "diversity" and/or "anti-discrimination" rhetoric does not change that.


YOur lies are not believed by anyone. NOt even yourself.


YOu support racist discrimination and policy.

It showed nothing of the sort. .



Sure it did, and you know it.

Produce the evidence you have been asked to produce. That 1989 study did not produce shit. In fact somce the study was actually done in 1989:

Study: anti-black hiring discrimination is as prevalent today as it was in 1989

Americans are as racist as they were back in the late 1980s — at least in one crucial area: jobs.

A new study, by researchers at Northwestern University, Harvard, and the Institute for Social Research in Norway, looked at every available field experiment on hiring discrimination from 1989 through 2015. The researchers found that anti-black racism in hiring is unchanged since at least 1989, while anti-Latino racism may have decreased modestly.

They looked at two kinds of experiments: résumé and in-person audits. In the first, researchers send out résumés with similar levels of education, experience, and so on, but the names differ so some résumés have a stereotypically black or Latino name and the others have a stereotypically white name. In the second, applicants go in-person to apply for a job; they each share similar qualifications, but some are white while others are black or brown.

In total, the researchers produced 24 studies with 30 estimates of discrimination for black and Latino Americans, collectively representing more than 54,000 applications submitted for more than 25,000 positions.

They concluded that, on average, “white applicants receive 36% more callbacks than equally qualified African Americans” while “[w]hite applicants receive on average 24% more callbacks than Latinos.”

Study: anti-black hiring discrimination is as prevalent today as it was in 1989

It's time you learned a hard lesson. And the more you argue the worse it's going to get for you.


Sorry, considering your dishonesty with the studies I've posted in the past, you don't have the credibility for me to look at your studies.


Besides, I know that anything I say that is not a mea culpa will just be dismissed by you.

You can't produce the evidence. Just admit it. It is a lie to say that whites are being discriminated against.



I produced it plenty of times. You are just either a liar or dumb as a stick. If not both.
 
.White privilege is real. Real enough to be made up by whites, What you don't believe doesn't erase it's existence.
`
People believe in many different things. As I said, it only is real for those who choose to believe it. I try use language that brings people together, not drive them apart, which is why I completely reject it.

Well the language you thinks brings people together drives them apart because of your refusal to respect the experiences of others.


Says the black person that thinks she knows what white people think.

I'm a man Correll, And I know that whites have benefitted from 241 years of American history t hat includes racism and racial preferences for whites.


So, it's cool for a black man to dismiss the experiences of whites, but not the other way around.


Got it.


I knew that it would be different, because, you know, reasons.

Who has dismissed the experience of whites? The only experience being dismissed is your imagination.
 
`
People believe in many different things. As I said, it only is real for those who choose to believe it. I try use language that brings people together, not drive them apart, which is why I completely reject it.

Well the language you thinks brings people together drives them apart because of your refusal to respect the experiences of others.


Says the black person that thinks she knows what white people think.

I'm a man Correll, And I know that whites have benefitted from 241 years of American history t hat includes racism and racial preferences for whites.


So, it's cool for a black man to dismiss the experiences of whites, but not the other way around.


Got it.


I knew that it would be different, because, you know, reasons.

Who has dismissed the experience of whites? The only experience being dismissed is your imagination.

You have, all the time.

YOu did just now, with Wind.
 
Well actually there is plenty of evidence as Peggy McIntosh pointed out.
All of it has been debunked.

None of it has been debunked. White privilege exists you just refuse to accept it because you live in a lie whereby you tell yourself that whites are losing out.


Says the black woman dismissing the experiences of white people.

I am not dismissing the experiences of whites to state that whites have been the beneficiaries of racist policy. The facts show it. That's why you can't produce any evidence of a national policy against whites in any of the areas I asked yoy to.

LOL!!!


You are willing to accept the experiences of whites as long as they tell you what you want to hear?


Wow. FOr a lefty, that's a pretty open mind.


For an actual thinking person with a brain, not so much.

Produce the evidence if that national policy of racial discrimination against whites in the areas I asked you to.

Or shut up.
 
Well the language you thinks brings people together drives them apart because of your refusal to respect the experiences of others.


Says the black person that thinks she knows what white people think.

I'm a man Correll, And I know that whites have benefitted from 241 years of American history t hat includes racism and racial preferences for whites.


So, it's cool for a black man to dismiss the experiences of whites, but not the other way around.


Got it.


I knew that it would be different, because, you know, reasons.

Who has dismissed the experience of whites? The only experience being dismissed is your imagination.

You have, all the time.

YOu did just now, with Wind.

Produce the evidence of a national policy of discrimination against whites in the areas I asked you so that I can better understand he experiences of whites big mouth.
 
Not it did not. Furthermore it was a study that was done akmost years ago. There is overt policy of discrimination against whites. In that study even the majority of all admitted in 1989 were white. You cannot be the majority of anything and claim racial discrimination. You don't seem to get that.



YOu can certainly be the majority despite discrimination.

That you cannot understand that simple fact is astounding.

Well given the fact I am black and know that if there are 10 employees on a job and 9 are black, that a black person cannot claim racial discrimination. If 7 out of 10 students in a college are black, blacks cannot claim racial discrimination. So if whites can claim racial discrimination when an overwhelming number of whites are employed on a job or admitted into college then you have shown an example of white privilege.


Sure they can, if they can show that the one non black person was given the job, not because of his qualifications, but because of his non black skin.

Actually they can't. Because blacks can't just get jobs only because they are black. ....


Sure they do, I've seen it personally.


Some company or department starts wanting to be more diverse for whatever reason, including fear of being sued, and suddenly actual qualifications take a back seat to skin color.

It is illegal to discriminate because of race. So if you work in a company that in 2017 has never hired a person of color, scared of getting sued then you are working for a company that is probably breaking the law. .Better qualified people of color have been passed over for years for stupid whites to get jobs, admissions and promotions. Stop crying white boy.
 
Last edited:
Well the language you thinks brings people together drives them apart because of your refusal to respect the experiences of others.
`
I see things much differently than you. For starters, I'm not part of the far left. Also, I generally NEVER hear that term except on the internet where it has become a meme. Among the academics I know, use of that term is considered politically destructive. But if it makes you feel good, go for it. No one is stopping you.
 
.White privilege is real. Real enough to be made up by whites, What you don't believe doesn't erase it's existence.
`
People believe in many different things. As I said, it only is real for those who choose to believe it. I try use language that brings people together, not drive them apart, which is why I completely reject it.

Well the language you thinks brings people together drives them apart because of your refusal to respect the experiences of others.


Says the black person that thinks she knows what white people think.

I'm a man Correll, And I know that whites have benefitted from 241 years of American history t hat includes racism and racial preferences for whites.
Correll is a hard core racist whom I had to put on Ignore. His message has become more filthy over the years.
 
Well the language you thinks brings people together drives them apart because of your refusal to respect the experiences of others.
`
I see things much differently than you. For starters, I'm not part of the far left. Also, I generally NEVER hear that term except on the internet where it has become a meme. Among the academics I know, use of that term is considered politically destructive. But if it makes you feel good, go for it. No one is stopping you.

I doesn't make me feel anything. I did not need a white female PROFESSOR telling me how whites get to do things we as blacks don't. And you don't have to be [art of the far left t understand the truth. And I don't know what kind of academics you know since again this term was coined by a white female college professor. That's about as academic as it gets. I'm sure you would not dispute the use of the term if it was applied to males which she did also.
 
.White privilege is real. Real enough to be made up by whites, What you don't believe doesn't erase it's existence.
`
People believe in many different things. As I said, it only is real for those who choose to believe it. I try use language that brings people together, not drive them apart, which is why I completely reject it.

Well the language you thinks brings people together drives them apart because of your refusal to respect the experiences of others.


Says the black person that thinks she knows what white people think.

I'm a man Correll, And I know that whites have benefitted from 241 years of American history t hat includes racism and racial preferences for whites.
Correll is a hard core racist whom I had to put on Ignore. His message has become more filthy over the years.

Yeah I experienced his ignorance on anther thread I started. He can obly repeat the same lie time after time and when asked by anyone to produce evidence he can't . For some reason he thinks a 1989 study about admission into ivy league schools is evidence of a nation wide pattern of discrimination against whites in all areas when that study doesn't even shows evidence of discrimination against whites once you read it.
 
I already did. You pretended to be too stupid to understand it.

A Princeton study about college admissions by race is not any evidence of a national policy of racial discrimination by whites in all the areas I asked you to show. Hell. that study didn't even show discrimination against whites in admission to ivy league schools. You can't prove any such thing and you know it. That's why you linger in here where you can get the similarly stupid to cosign your lies.


It showed hard numbers about the level of discrimination caused by the various policies and programs of discrimination.


Black skin is worth, what was it? 300 sat points I believe.


That is race based discrimination, and the fact that it is cloaked in "diversity" and/or "anti-discrimination" rhetoric does not change that.


YOur lies are not believed by anyone. NOt even yourself.


YOu support racist discrimination and policy.

It showed nothing of the sort. .



Sure it did, and you know it.

Produce the evidence you have been asked to produce. That 1989 study did not produce shit. In fact somce the study was actually done in 1989:

Study: anti-black hiring discrimination is as prevalent today as it was in 1989

Americans are as racist as they were back in the late 1980s — at least in one crucial area: jobs.

A new study, by researchers at Northwestern University, Harvard, and the Institute for Social Research in Norway, looked at every available field experiment on hiring discrimination from 1989 through 2015. The researchers found that anti-black racism in hiring is unchanged since at least 1989, while anti-Latino racism may have decreased modestly.

They looked at two kinds of experiments: résumé and in-person audits. In the first, researchers send out résumés with similar levels of education, experience, and so on, but the names differ so some résumés have a stereotypically black or Latino name and the others have a stereotypically white name. In the second, applicants go in-person to apply for a job; they each share similar qualifications, but some are white while others are black or brown.

In total, the researchers produced 24 studies with 30 estimates of discrimination for black and Latino Americans, collectively representing more than 54,000 applications submitted for more than 25,000 positions.

They concluded that, on average, “white applicants receive 36% more callbacks than equally qualified African Americans” while “[w]hite applicants receive on average 24% more callbacks than Latinos.”

Study: anti-black hiring discrimination is as prevalent today as it was in 1989

It's time you learned a hard lesson. And the more you argue the worse it's going to get for you.
Lol! All your studies are biased far left attempt to justify a preconceived conclusion! Lol.
 
`
People believe in many different things. As I said, it only is real for those who choose to believe it. I try use language that brings people together, not drive them apart, which is why I completely reject it.

Well the language you thinks brings people together drives them apart because of your refusal to respect the experiences of others.


Says the black person that thinks she knows what white people think.

I'm a man Correll, And I know that whites have benefitted from 241 years of American history t hat includes racism and racial preferences for whites.
Correll is a hard core racist whom I had to put on Ignore. His message has become more filthy over the years.

Yeah I experienced his ignorance on anther thread I started. He can obly repeat the same lie time after time and when asked by anyone to produce evidence he can't . For some reason he thinks a 1989 study about admission into ivy league schools is evidence of a nation wide pattern of discrimination against whites in all areas when that study doesn't even shows evidence of discrimination against whites once you read it.
Your picture is of Operation Pink lady. Racism is dead in 2017.
 
A Princeton study about college admissions by race is not any evidence of a national policy of racial discrimination by whites in all the areas I asked you to show. Hell. that study didn't even show discrimination against whites in admission to ivy league schools. You can't prove any such thing and you know it. That's why you linger in here where you can get the similarly stupid to cosign your lies.


It showed hard numbers about the level of discrimination caused by the various policies and programs of discrimination.


Black skin is worth, what was it? 300 sat points I believe.


That is race based discrimination, and the fact that it is cloaked in "diversity" and/or "anti-discrimination" rhetoric does not change that.


YOur lies are not believed by anyone. NOt even yourself.


YOu support racist discrimination and policy.

It showed nothing of the sort. .



Sure it did, and you know it.

Produce the evidence you have been asked to produce. That 1989 study did not produce shit. In fact somce the study was actually done in 1989:

Study: anti-black hiring discrimination is as prevalent today as it was in 1989

Americans are as racist as they were back in the late 1980s — at least in one crucial area: jobs.

A new study, by researchers at Northwestern University, Harvard, and the Institute for Social Research in Norway, looked at every available field experiment on hiring discrimination from 1989 through 2015. The researchers found that anti-black racism in hiring is unchanged since at least 1989, while anti-Latino racism may have decreased modestly.

They looked at two kinds of experiments: résumé and in-person audits. In the first, researchers send out résumés with similar levels of education, experience, and so on, but the names differ so some résumés have a stereotypically black or Latino name and the others have a stereotypically white name. In the second, applicants go in-person to apply for a job; they each share similar qualifications, but some are white while others are black or brown.

In total, the researchers produced 24 studies with 30 estimates of discrimination for black and Latino Americans, collectively representing more than 54,000 applications submitted for more than 25,000 positions.

They concluded that, on average, “white applicants receive 36% more callbacks than equally qualified African Americans” while “[w]hite applicants receive on average 24% more callbacks than Latinos.”

Study: anti-black hiring discrimination is as prevalent today as it was in 1989

It's time you learned a hard lesson. And the more you argue the worse it's going to get for you.
Lol! All your studies are biased far left attempt to justify a preconceived conclusion! Lol.

Nah. The truth is what it is. Racism has not died and whites are not the ones being discriminated against.
 
Well the language you thinks brings people together drives them apart because of your refusal to respect the experiences of others.


Says the black person that thinks she knows what white people think.

I'm a man Correll, And I know that whites have benefitted from 241 years of American history t hat includes racism and racial preferences for whites.
Correll is a hard core racist whom I had to put on Ignore. His message has become more filthy over the years.

Yeah I experienced his ignorance on anther thread I started. He can obly repeat the same lie time after time and when asked by anyone to produce evidence he can't . For some reason he thinks a 1989 study about admission into ivy league schools is evidence of a nation wide pattern of discrimination against whites in all areas when that study doesn't even shows evidence of discrimination against whites once you read it.
Your picture is of Operation Pink lady. This group is the biggest bunch of idiots in politics.

So then why don't YOU shows us the national policy of racial discrimination against whites in the legal process, criminal justice, education, housing, employment, wages and wealth.
 
.White privilege is real. Real enough to be made up by whites, What you don't believe doesn't erase it's existence.
`
People believe in many different things. As I said, it only is real for those who choose to believe it. I try use language that brings people together, not drive them apart, which is why I completely reject it.

Well the language you thinks brings people together drives them apart because of your refusal to respect the experiences of others.


Says the black person that thinks she knows what white people think.

I'm a man Correll, And I know that whites have benefitted from 241 years of American history t hat includes racism and racial preferences for whites.
Wrong. History has shown that a bunch of liberal kooks from New England have done more harm than good to this country.
 
Says the black person that thinks she knows what white people think.

I'm a man Correll, And I know that whites have benefitted from 241 years of American history t hat includes racism and racial preferences for whites.
Correll is a hard core racist whom I had to put on Ignore. His message has become more filthy over the years.

Yeah I experienced his ignorance on anther thread I started. He can obly repeat the same lie time after time and when asked by anyone to produce evidence he can't . For some reason he thinks a 1989 study about admission into ivy league schools is evidence of a nation wide pattern of discrimination against whites in all areas when that study doesn't even shows evidence of discrimination against whites once you read it.
Your picture is of Operation Pink lady. This group is the biggest bunch of idiots in politics.

So then why don't YOU shows us the national policy of racial discrimination against whites in the legal process, criminal justice, education, housing, employment, wages and wealth.
Democrats in state legislatures and in Congress make the racist laws. Liberal media propaganda supports these policies. The truth is different.
{{meta.pageTitle}}
 

Forum List

Back
Top