Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not really. Deplorable southerners used provisions in the 13th Amendment that allowed for slavery of criminals as motivation for vagrancy laws that saw many newly freed blacks back working those same farms. I'm not defending the deplorable northern whites who went along with Jim crow and segregation, there's plenty of deplorable to go around.But all that changed after the war when the carpetbaggers took over, right?
Why are you coming with these pussy arguments? The Confederates absolutely fought and died to protect slavery. Just because they saw blacks as socially inferior doesn't mean they didn't see them as valuable personal property.I agree
Most whites in both armies looked down on black people as inferior
Which means slaves were not worth dying over
White sharecroppers had no vested interest in the slave economy
They were quite poor, owned no slaves, and lived almost 100% off the land they farmed
Republicans we must accept responsibility for the horseshit spread today by the Democrats. We had a chance to own the teachers union. We had a chance to purchase the Media. We had chances to own the film industry. WE in short allowed them to modify history to favor Democrats.That's a load of leftwing horseshit.
wwsg.com
Because it is history and helped shape this country. Taking history away is another way to destroy a country,Confederate Memorial at Arlington will be removed despite GOP opposition
Though dozens of congressional Republicans protested the move, the Army says it will begin work in coming days
View attachment 873988
The U.S. Army intends to remove a Confederate memorial from Arlington National Cemetery next week as part of its ongoing work to rid Defense Department property of divisive rebel imagery, defying dozens of congressional Republicans who have vociferously protested the move.
Why would Republicans object to the removal of Confederate monuments if the Confederates were Democrats???
Like the guy in the WH?But they were still white
Lowlife white trash were still higher in the social order than the most skilled slave.
Worth fighting for
With all of the problems we have in the country right now...removing statues and renaming schools and streets is akin to putting a few band aids on someone that's just been savagely attacked with a machete! The nation is bleeding to death and the left is worried about this shit! It's embarrassing...Watching Republicans get infuriated over the removal of statues of Democrats doesn't stop being amusing.
Bullshit. We are tired of the lies told by Goats. The South had to fight or die at First Manassas.Why are you coming with these pussy arguments? The Confederates absolutely fought and died to protect slavery. Just because they saw blacks as socially inferior doesn't mean they didn't see them as valuable personal property.
Republicans we must accept responsibility for the horseshit spread today by the Democrats. We had a chance to own the teachers union. We had a chance to purchase the Media. We had chances to own the film industry. WE in short allowed them to modify history to favor Democrats.
I urge all Republicans to watch a speaker by the name of Patrick Bet David who lays it all out.
Patrick Bet-David - Worldwide Speakers Group
Patrick’s unique life experiences of escaping war-torn Iran, serving in the US Army, managing investments as a financial adviser and becoming a serial entrepreneur gives him a different approach to leadership and business than other industry experts.
Arlington National Cemetery is where heroes are buried, patriots who made the ultimate sacrifice to defend America from its enemies, such as the treasonous war criminals from the South who defended slavery in their treasonous, lawless rebellion and insurrection to destroy the United States.Lincoln committed treason by making war on sovereign states of the union. He had no authority to use the military to "preserve the union." If a state doesn't want to belong to the union any longer, that's its right.
It seems that the guy on the radio, Michael Savage who wrote the book Liberalism is a Mental Disorder hit the nail on it's head.Synthoholic thinks the government can tell people who they can sell their property to.
Taking responsibility means that to you?Just more fuckup victimhood bob.
No because the sale was between the Dutch and the Arabs. You managed to shit your diaper again. (Folks, I ended with that diaper remark only due to how he answered to the poster he talked to.) He is trying to shit us. Presidents are not in charge when a firm is owned by the Dutch and the other owned by the Arabs.Presidents are in charge of protecting national security and national interests.
Wingnuts have been telling us for decades that American security depends on American energy. Trump could have stopped this sale, just like he stopped this one:
Trump blocks Broadcom-Qualcomm deal, citing national security concerns
President Donald Trump killed Broadcom's proposed buyout of Qualcomm on Monday, citing national security concerns.www.cnbc.com
Hmmm....what is different about Saudi Arabia? That's the $2 BILLION dollar question, right Jared Kushner?
You truly resent that America can be made Great. So sorry you believe what the Ds tell you to believe. I believe your cure is to depart the Democrats.Better tell MAGA-world
There are two arguments about the South.True.
Not true. Most people do not know recent history, let alone ...
But slavery was the primary issue with SC first state to secede. They wrote official documents on it. And the one state right that drove the war -- the state right to owning slaves, slavery.
Okay, but you're deaf dumb blind to Abe.There are two arguments about the South.
Why did they secede is Argument A. To the argument A, secede, they wanted to keep workers for minimum costs and not see them take off.
Why did Abe invade is Argument B. Abe invaded the South at Manassas VA in order to conquer them. His pithy excuse is they must be slaves of the Union or die by cannon fire. And he picked killing them using cannons.
Just more junk from you Bob.It seems that the guy on the radio, Michael Savage who wrote the book Liberalism is a Mental Disorder hit the nail on it's head.
And this has been researched.
It has been claimed that left-wingers or liberals (US sense) tend to more often suffer from mental illness than right-wingers or conservatives. This potential link was investigated using the General Social Survey cumulative cross-sectional dataset (1972-2018). A search of the available variables resulted in 5 items measuring one's own mental illness (e.g., ”Do you have any emotional or mental disability?”). All of these items were weakly associated with left-wing political ideology as measured by self-report, with especially high rates seen for the “extremely liberal” group. These results mostly held up in regressions that adjusted for age, sex, and race. For the variable with the most data (n = 11,338), the difference in the mental illness measure between “extremely liberal” and “extremely conservative” was 0.39 d. Temporal analysis showed that the relationship between mental illness, happiness, and political ideology has existed in the GSS data since the 1970s and still existed in the 2010s. Within-study meta-analysis of all the results found that extreme liberals had a 150% increased rate of mental illness compared to moderates. The finding of increased mental illness among left-wingers is congruent with numerous findings based on related constructs, such as positive relationships between conservatism, religiousness and health in general.
Loading…
www.researchgate.net
The Republican House passed only 22 bills this year, and they were things like naming post offices.With all of the problems we have in the country right now...removing statues and renaming schools and streets is akin to putting a few band aids on someone that's just been savagely attacked with a machete! The nation is bleeding to death and the left is worried about this shit! It's embarrassing...
Wrong.
Monuments to treasonous war criminals and defenders of slavery have no place among true American heroes and patriots – Democrats correctly understand these facts.
Republicans are once again on the wrong side of the issues and the wrong side of history in their defense of the indefensible.
I took a pledge awhile back to not feed the trolls, argue with idiots, or engage in other exercises in futility. I violate that so much LOL.It's becoming clear that this poster has never done any comprehensive study of the history.
Best to leave them to their own devices, some people prefer ignorance.
