Confederate statue removed from historic North Carolina courthouse

[Polishprince]

Nape. The George Wallace who was actually active in politics.

"I am having nothing to do with this so-called civil rights bill. The liberal left-wingers have passed it. Now let them employ some pinknik social engineers in Washington, D.C., to figure out what to do with it."

But your quote from much later in his life is an inspiring reminder that people can change. Thanks for that.

The Civil Right Act of 1964 was a violation of the 10th Amendment and interfered with private businesses. Liberals like to hold-up the biggest piece of shit Amendment passed by the radical Republicans after the war...the 14th. Most abused Amendment of the Constitution. 13th and 15th are fine. Bill of Rights over time has been selectively incorporated to the states. 14th is moot. Court didn’t need the 14th to do this.

The Republicans of the period immediately after (and before) the War WERE the Liberals, Dumbass.

Lincoln was one of the biggest liberals of his day.
That is why the south seceded

Lincoln never advocated for Socialized Medicine or recognizing men in dresses as "broads".

What makes you think he was a lib? In actuality, Honest Abe- the proto-ditto-head, wanted to get black people off of the Democrat plantations.

You continue to dig the earth of cluelessness with a post-hole digger. Going all the way to China?

Liberalism has NOTHING to do with "Socialize Medicine"or "recognizing men in dresses as "broads", whatever that means.

Liberalism has very much to do with Abolition. You might have got a clue about that from the line "all men are created equal". Then again I believe you were the same asshat that tried to get away with characterizing the Birmingham church bomber as a "Liberal", of which he would be the antithesis.

Further, I'm afraid there was no such thing as "the Democrat plantations". Obviously no one needed a political party to run a plantation, let alone one that wasn't even in existence until the 1830s, but also the Democrat domination of the "Solid South" didn't even begin until AFTER that War. Curses, Linear Time strikes again.

Liberalism is against abolition. I don't know if remember Dr. Ben Carson back during the 2016 campaign comparing Obamacare with slavery. Getting rid of the ACA is the modern moral equivalent of the abolitionist movement. Leading ministers railed against slavery back in the early to mid 19th century, same today with Socialized Medicine where leading theologians like John Hagee and Robert Jeffress preach against it.

 

[Pogo]

This George Wallace?

Nape. The George Wallace who was actually active in politics.

"I am having nothing to do with this so-called civil rights bill. The liberal left-wingers have passed it. Now let them employ some pinknik social engineers in Washington, D.C., to figure out what to do with it."

But your quote from much later in his life is an inspiring reminder that people can change. Thanks for that.

The Civil Right Act of 1964 was a violation of the 10th Amendment and interfered with private businesses. Liberals like to hold-up the biggest piece of shit Amendment passed by the radical Republicans after the war...the 14th. Most abused Amendment of the Constitution. 13th and 15th are fine. Bill of Rights over time has been selectively incorporated to the states. 14th is moot. Court didn’t need the 14th to do this.

The Republicans of the period immediately after (and before) the War WERE the Liberals, Dumbass.

Lincoln was one of the biggest liberals of his day.
That is why the south seceded

Rather a dumbass move as it turns out.

As has so many times been the case, the "Haves" railroading their states into something the "Have Nots" wanted no part of. The moneyed élite drove all that. Around this region it was very unpopular as there was no slave economy around here. East Tennessee would have seceded from the secession like northwest Virginia did, but for the fact that there were more Union troops in northwest Virginia and more Confederate troops in Tennessee. Once it snowballed pockets of resistance sprang up in Texas, Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama and northwest Georgia around Chattanooga. And of course tons of deserters.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

This George Wallace?

Nape. The George Wallace who was actually active in politics.

"I am having nothing to do with this so-called civil rights bill. The liberal left-wingers have passed it. Now let them employ some pinknik social engineers in Washington, D.C., to figure out what to do with it."

But your quote from much later in his life is an inspiring reminder that people can change. Thanks for that.

The Civil Right Act of 1964 was a violation of the 10th Amendment and interfered with private businesses. Liberals like to hold-up the biggest piece of shit Amendment passed by the radical Republicans after the war...the 14th. Most abused Amendment of the Constitution. 13th and 15th are fine. Bill of Rights over time has been selectively incorporated to the states. 14th is moot. Court didn’t need the 14th to do this.

The Republicans of the period immediately after (and before) the War WERE the Liberals, Dumbass.

Lincoln was one of the biggest liberals of his day.
That is why the south seceded

If he could see what society looks like now...he would never had did what he did.

This land mass would be much better off if euros "had never did what they did".

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

The Civil Right Act of 1964 was a violation of the 10th Amendment and interfered with private businesses. Liberals like to hold-up the biggest piece of shit Amendment passed by the radical Republicans after the war...the 14th. Most abused Amendment of the Constitution. 13th and 15th are fine. Bill of Rights over time has been selectively incorporated to the states. 14th is moot. Court didn’t need the 14th to do this.

The Republicans of the period immediately after (and before) the War WERE the Liberals, Dumbass.

Lincoln was one of the biggest liberals of his day.
That is why the south seceded

Lincoln never advocated for Socialized Medicine or recognizing men in dresses as "broads".

What makes you think he was a lib? In actuality, Honest Abe- the proto-ditto-head, wanted to get black people off of the Democrat plantations.

You continue to dig the earth of cluelessness with a post-hole digger. Going all the way to China?

Liberalism has NOTHING to do with "Socialize Medicine"or "recognizing men in dresses as "broads", whatever that means.

Liberalism has very much to do with Abolition. You might have got a clue about that from the line "all men are created equal". Then again I believe you were the same asshat that tried to get away with characterizing the Birmingham church bomber as a "Liberal", of which he would be the antithesis.

Further, I'm afraid there was no such thing as "the Democrat plantations". Obviously no one needed a political party to run a plantation, let alone one that wasn't even in existence until the 1830s, but also the Democrat domination of the "Solid South" didn't even begin until AFTER that War. Curses, Linear Time strikes again.

Liberalism is against abolition. I don't know if remember Dr. Ben Carson back during the 2016 campaign comparing Obamacare with slavery. Getting rid of the ACA is the modern moral equivalent of the abolitionist movement. Leading ministers railed against slavery back in the early to mid 19th century, same today with Socialized Medicine where leading theologians like John Hagee and Robert Jeffress preach against it.

Pfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffft, bwa ha ha ha ha ha. Yes of course, human beings must be cucked to an employer for the right to exist.

 

[Bush92]

Nape. The George Wallace who was actually active in politics.

"I am having nothing to do with this so-called civil rights bill. The liberal left-wingers have passed it. Now let them employ some pinknik social engineers in Washington, D.C., to figure out what to do with it."

But your quote from much later in his life is an inspiring reminder that people can change. Thanks for that.

The Civil Right Act of 1964 was a violation of the 10th Amendment and interfered with private businesses. Liberals like to hold-up the biggest piece of shit Amendment passed by the radical Republicans after the war...the 14th. Most abused Amendment of the Constitution. 13th and 15th are fine. Bill of Rights over time has been selectively incorporated to the states. 14th is moot. Court didn’t need the 14th to do this.

The Republicans of the period immediately after (and before) the War WERE the Liberals, Dumbass.

Lincoln was one of the biggest liberals of his day.
That is why the south seceded

If he could see what society looks like now...he would never had did what he did.

This land mass would be much better off if euros "had never did what they did".

Built this nation. Wrote the Constitution. Freed the slaves. Won two world wars and passed Civil Rights Act of 1964 and put a man on the Moon. Yep...white people are so bad.

 

[Pogo]

The Civil Right Act of 1964 was a violation of the 10th Amendment and interfered with private businesses. Liberals like to hold-up the biggest piece of shit Amendment passed by the radical Republicans after the war...the 14th. Most abused Amendment of the Constitution. 13th and 15th are fine. Bill of Rights over time has been selectively incorporated to the states. 14th is moot. Court didn’t need the 14th to do this.

The Republicans of the period immediately after (and before) the War WERE the Liberals, Dumbass.

Lincoln was one of the biggest liberals of his day.
That is why the south seceded

Lincoln never advocated for Socialized Medicine or recognizing men in dresses as "broads".

What makes you think he was a lib? In actuality, Honest Abe- the proto-ditto-head, wanted to get black people off of the Democrat plantations.

You continue to dig the earth of cluelessness with a post-hole digger. Going all the way to China?

Liberalism has NOTHING to do with "Socialize Medicine"or "recognizing men in dresses as "broads", whatever that means.

Liberalism has very much to do with Abolition. You might have got a clue about that from the line "all men are created equal". Then again I believe you were the same asshat that tried to get away with characterizing the Birmingham church bomber as a "Liberal", of which he would be the antithesis.

Further, I'm afraid there was no such thing as "the Democrat plantations". Obviously no one needed a political party to run a plantation, let alone one that wasn't even in existence until the 1830s, but also the Democrat domination of the "Solid South" didn't even begin until AFTER that War. Curses, Linear Time strikes again.

Liberalism is against abolition. I don't know if remember Dr. Ben Carson back during the 2016 campaign comparing Obamacare with slavery. Getting rid of the ACA is the modern moral equivalent of the abolitionist movement. Leading ministers railed against slavery back in the early to mid 19th century, same today with Socialized Medicine where leading theologians like John Hagee and Robert Jeffress preach against it.

Abolition *IS* Liberalism. The whole essence of "all men are created equal". I told you before, you have NO clue what you're babbling about incoherently. Liberalism and the noble experiment threw off the idea that an authoritarian King and Clergy should run things, said fuck that and put the people in charge of themselves. That was the whole POINT.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

The Civil Right Act of 1964 was a violation of the 10th Amendment and interfered with private businesses. Liberals like to hold-up the biggest piece of shit Amendment passed by the radical Republicans after the war...the 14th. Most abused Amendment of the Constitution. 13th and 15th are fine. Bill of Rights over time has been selectively incorporated to the states. 14th is moot. Court didn’t need the 14th to do this.

The Republicans of the period immediately after (and before) the War WERE the Liberals, Dumbass.

Lincoln was one of the biggest liberals of his day.
That is why the south seceded

If he could see what society looks like now...he would never had did what he did.

This land mass would be much better off if euros "had never did what they did".

Built this nation. Wrote the Constitution. Freed the slaves. Won two world wars and passed Civil Rights Act of 1964 and put a man on the Moon. Yep...white people are so bad.

Slaves built this nation, the white house and the nation's seed wealth.

 

[Pogo]

The Civil Right Act of 1964 was a violation of the 10th Amendment and interfered with private businesses. Liberals like to hold-up the biggest piece of shit Amendment passed by the radical Republicans after the war...the 14th. Most abused Amendment of the Constitution. 13th and 15th are fine. Bill of Rights over time has been selectively incorporated to the states. 14th is moot. Court didn’t need the 14th to do this.

The Republicans of the period immediately after (and before) the War WERE the Liberals, Dumbass.

Lincoln was one of the biggest liberals of his day.
That is why the south seceded

If he could see what society looks like now...he would never had did what he did.

This land mass would be much better off if euros "had never did what they did".

Built this nation. Wrote the Constitution. Freed the slaves. Won two world wars and passed Civil Rights Act of 1964 and put a man on the Moon. Yep...white people are so bad.

Up until your last line where you had to insert colors were none existed --- you were describing Liberals. Great timing.

 

[Bush92]

The Republicans of the period immediately after (and before) the War WERE the Liberals, Dumbass.

Lincoln was one of the biggest liberals of his day.
That is why the south seceded

Lincoln never advocated for Socialized Medicine or recognizing men in dresses as "broads".

What makes you think he was a lib? In actuality, Honest Abe- the proto-ditto-head, wanted to get black people off of the Democrat plantations.

You continue to dig the earth of cluelessness with a post-hole digger. Going all the way to China?

Liberalism has NOTHING to do with "Socialize Medicine"or "recognizing men in dresses as "broads", whatever that means.

Liberalism has very much to do with Abolition. You might have got a clue about that from the line "all men are created equal". Then again I believe you were the same asshat that tried to get away with characterizing the Birmingham church bomber as a "Liberal", of which he would be the antithesis.

Further, I'm afraid there was no such thing as "the Democrat plantations". Obviously no one needed a political party to run a plantation, let alone one that wasn't even in existence until the 1830s, but also the Democrat domination of the "Solid South" didn't even begin until AFTER that War. Curses, Linear Time strikes again.

Liberalism is against abolition. I don't know if remember Dr. Ben Carson back during the 2016 campaign comparing Obamacare with slavery. Getting rid of the ACA is the modern moral equivalent of the abolitionist movement. Leading ministers railed against slavery back in the early to mid 19th century, same today with Socialized Medicine where leading theologians like John Hagee and Robert Jeffress preach against it.

Abolition *IS* Liberalism. The whole essence of "all men are created equal". I told you before, you have NO clue what you're babbling about incoherently. Liberalism and the noble experiment threw off the idea that an authoritarian King and Clergy should run things, said fuck that and put the people in charge of themselves. That was the whole POINT.

Liberals believe men are unequal. They need poverty and government dependency in order for their politics of victimology to exist.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

The Republicans of the period immediately after (and before) the War WERE the Liberals, Dumbass.

Lincoln was one of the biggest liberals of his day.
That is why the south seceded

Lincoln never advocated for Socialized Medicine or recognizing men in dresses as "broads".

What makes you think he was a lib? In actuality, Honest Abe- the proto-ditto-head, wanted to get black people off of the Democrat plantations.

You continue to dig the earth of cluelessness with a post-hole digger. Going all the way to China?

Liberalism has NOTHING to do with "Socialize Medicine"or "recognizing men in dresses as "broads", whatever that means.

Liberalism has very much to do with Abolition. You might have got a clue about that from the line "all men are created equal". Then again I believe you were the same asshat that tried to get away with characterizing the Birmingham church bomber as a "Liberal", of which he would be the antithesis.

Further, I'm afraid there was no such thing as "the Democrat plantations". Obviously no one needed a political party to run a plantation, let alone one that wasn't even in existence until the 1830s, but also the Democrat domination of the "Solid South" didn't even begin until AFTER that War. Curses, Linear Time strikes again.

Liberalism is against abolition. I don't know if remember Dr. Ben Carson back during the 2016 campaign comparing Obamacare with slavery. Getting rid of the ACA is the modern moral equivalent of the abolitionist movement. Leading ministers railed against slavery back in the early to mid 19th century, same today with Socialized Medicine where leading theologians like John Hagee and Robert Jeffress preach against it.

Abolition *IS* Liberalism. The whole essence of "all men are created equal". I told you before, you have NO clue what you're babbling about incoherently. Liberalism and the noble experiment threw off the idea that an authoritarian King and Clergy should run things, said fuck that and put the people in charge of themselves. That was the whole POINT.

Let us recall that those who blathered on about "all men are created equal" were genocidal slavers who envisioned a system in which only white male aristocrats had any representation at all.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

Lincoln was one of the biggest liberals of his day.
That is why the south seceded

Lincoln never advocated for Socialized Medicine or recognizing men in dresses as "broads".

What makes you think he was a lib? In actuality, Honest Abe- the proto-ditto-head, wanted to get black people off of the Democrat plantations.

You continue to dig the earth of cluelessness with a post-hole digger. Going all the way to China?

Liberalism has NOTHING to do with "Socialize Medicine"or "recognizing men in dresses as "broads", whatever that means.

Liberalism has very much to do with Abolition. You might have got a clue about that from the line "all men are created equal". Then again I believe you were the same asshat that tried to get away with characterizing the Birmingham church bomber as a "Liberal", of which he would be the antithesis.

Further, I'm afraid there was no such thing as "the Democrat plantations". Obviously no one needed a political party to run a plantation, let alone one that wasn't even in existence until the 1830s, but also the Democrat domination of the "Solid South" didn't even begin until AFTER that War. Curses, Linear Time strikes again.

Liberalism is against abolition. I don't know if remember Dr. Ben Carson back during the 2016 campaign comparing Obamacare with slavery. Getting rid of the ACA is the modern moral equivalent of the abolitionist movement. Leading ministers railed against slavery back in the early to mid 19th century, same today with Socialized Medicine where leading theologians like John Hagee and Robert Jeffress preach against it.

Abolition *IS* Liberalism. The whole essence of "all men are created equal". I told you before, you have NO clue what you're babbling about incoherently. Liberalism and the noble experiment threw off the idea that an authoritarian King and Clergy should run things, said fuck that and put the people in charge of themselves. That was the whole POINT.

Liberals believe men are unequal. They need poverty and government dependency in order for their politics of victimology to exist.

To bail out Wall Street with socialism?

 

[Pogo]

Lincoln was one of the biggest liberals of his day.
That is why the south seceded

Lincoln never advocated for Socialized Medicine or recognizing men in dresses as "broads".

What makes you think he was a lib? In actuality, Honest Abe- the proto-ditto-head, wanted to get black people off of the Democrat plantations.

You continue to dig the earth of cluelessness with a post-hole digger. Going all the way to China?

Liberalism has NOTHING to do with "Socialize Medicine"or "recognizing men in dresses as "broads", whatever that means.

Liberalism has very much to do with Abolition. You might have got a clue about that from the line "all men are created equal". Then again I believe you were the same asshat that tried to get away with characterizing the Birmingham church bomber as a "Liberal", of which he would be the antithesis.

Further, I'm afraid there was no such thing as "the Democrat plantations". Obviously no one needed a political party to run a plantation, let alone one that wasn't even in existence until the 1830s, but also the Democrat domination of the "Solid South" didn't even begin until AFTER that War. Curses, Linear Time strikes again.

Liberalism is against abolition. I don't know if remember Dr. Ben Carson back during the 2016 campaign comparing Obamacare with slavery. Getting rid of the ACA is the modern moral equivalent of the abolitionist movement. Leading ministers railed against slavery back in the early to mid 19th century, same today with Socialized Medicine where leading theologians like John Hagee and Robert Jeffress preach against it.

Abolition *IS* Liberalism. The whole essence of "all men are created equal". I told you before, you have NO clue what you're babbling about incoherently. Liberalism and the noble experiment threw off the idea that an authoritarian King and Clergy should run things, said fuck that and put the people in charge of themselves. That was the whole POINT.

Liberals believe men are unequal. They need poverty and government dependency in order for their politics of victimology to exist.

Yuh huh. That's why they wrote the direct opposite of that in the D of I. Fucking brilliant.

I think I already pointed out you're a moron, you don't need to confirm.

 

[Pogo]

Lincoln was one of the biggest liberals of his day.
That is why the south seceded

Lincoln never advocated for Socialized Medicine or recognizing men in dresses as "broads".

What makes you think he was a lib? In actuality, Honest Abe- the proto-ditto-head, wanted to get black people off of the Democrat plantations.

You continue to dig the earth of cluelessness with a post-hole digger. Going all the way to China?

Liberalism has NOTHING to do with "Socialize Medicine"or "recognizing men in dresses as "broads", whatever that means.

Liberalism has very much to do with Abolition. You might have got a clue about that from the line "all men are created equal". Then again I believe you were the same asshat that tried to get away with characterizing the Birmingham church bomber as a "Liberal", of which he would be the antithesis.

Further, I'm afraid there was no such thing as "the Democrat plantations". Obviously no one needed a political party to run a plantation, let alone one that wasn't even in existence until the 1830s, but also the Democrat domination of the "Solid South" didn't even begin until AFTER that War. Curses, Linear Time strikes again.

Liberalism is against abolition. I don't know if remember Dr. Ben Carson back during the 2016 campaign comparing Obamacare with slavery. Getting rid of the ACA is the modern moral equivalent of the abolitionist movement. Leading ministers railed against slavery back in the early to mid 19th century, same today with Socialized Medicine where leading theologians like John Hagee and Robert Jeffress preach against it.

Abolition *IS* Liberalism. The whole essence of "all men are created equal". I told you before, you have NO clue what you're babbling about incoherently. Liberalism and the noble experiment threw off the idea that an authoritarian King and Clergy should run things, said fuck that and put the people in charge of themselves. That was the whole POINT.

Let us recall that those who blathered on about "all men are created equal" were genocidal slavers who envisioned a system in which only white male aristocrats had any representation at all.

Not all of them (second POTUS for example). It was the ideal --- the pressing issue of the time was getting rid of King George. However those same Liberals wrote into the Constitution that the slave trade had to stop.

 

[Nostra]

Dimwingers are working overtime today on their revisionist history.

Your party is the party of Jim Crow, filibustering the Civil Rights Act, electing KKK Leaders as Senate Majority Leader, and the formation of the KKK.

No known political party members were involved in the forming of the KKK, which point we did here seven hundred posts ago as well as over and over and over and over and over and over and over through the years here. Oh and that includes BOTH KKKs, the original one of 1865 and the much larger one of 1915. Now some historians will say there was a third KKK in 1949, that one actually never got off the ground but if you count that, no party for that guy either.

As for KKK and elections, here's some homework for ya.

1. Owen Brewster
2. Rice Means
3. Ed Jackson
4. D.C. Stephenson
5. Ben Paulen
6. George Luis Baker
7. Albert Johnson
8. Clarence Morley
9. Herbert Hoover
10. Calvin Coolidge

Guess the political party, win a prize. The prize is you get to go back and read the early part of the thread where this shit was debunked, complete with pictures.

You don't assign me homework, fool.

Robert KKK Byrd, Grand Kleagle of the KKK and Dem Senator until 2010,

Which party filibustered the Civil Rights Act?

oops!

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

Lincoln never advocated for Socialized Medicine or recognizing men in dresses as "broads".

What makes you think he was a lib? In actuality, Honest Abe- the proto-ditto-head, wanted to get black people off of the Democrat plantations.

You continue to dig the earth of cluelessness with a post-hole digger. Going all the way to China?

Liberalism has NOTHING to do with "Socialize Medicine"or "recognizing men in dresses as "broads", whatever that means.

Liberalism has very much to do with Abolition. You might have got a clue about that from the line "all men are created equal". Then again I believe you were the same asshat that tried to get away with characterizing the Birmingham church bomber as a "Liberal", of which he would be the antithesis.

Further, I'm afraid there was no such thing as "the Democrat plantations". Obviously no one needed a political party to run a plantation, let alone one that wasn't even in existence until the 1830s, but also the Democrat domination of the "Solid South" didn't even begin until AFTER that War. Curses, Linear Time strikes again.

Liberalism is against abolition. I don't know if remember Dr. Ben Carson back during the 2016 campaign comparing Obamacare with slavery. Getting rid of the ACA is the modern moral equivalent of the abolitionist movement. Leading ministers railed against slavery back in the early to mid 19th century, same today with Socialized Medicine where leading theologians like John Hagee and Robert Jeffress preach against it.

Abolition *IS* Liberalism. The whole essence of "all men are created equal". I told you before, you have NO clue what you're babbling about incoherently. Liberalism and the noble experiment threw off the idea that an authoritarian King and Clergy should run things, said fuck that and put the people in charge of themselves. That was the whole POINT.

Let us recall that those who blathered on about "all men are created equal" were genocidal slavers who envisioned a system in which only white male aristocrats had any representation at all.

Not all of them (second POTUS for example). It was the ideal --- the pressing issue of the time was getting rid of King George. However those same Liberals wrote into the Constitution that the slave trade had to stop.

And how did that work out?

 

[Bush92]

Lincoln was one of the biggest liberals of his day.
That is why the south seceded

Lincoln never advocated for Socialized Medicine or recognizing men in dresses as "broads".

What makes you think he was a lib? In actuality, Honest Abe- the proto-ditto-head, wanted to get black people off of the Democrat plantations.

You continue to dig the earth of cluelessness with a post-hole digger. Going all the way to China?

Liberalism has NOTHING to do with "Socialize Medicine"or "recognizing men in dresses as "broads", whatever that means.

Liberalism has very much to do with Abolition. You might have got a clue about that from the line "all men are created equal". Then again I believe you were the same asshat that tried to get away with characterizing the Birmingham church bomber as a "Liberal", of which he would be the antithesis.

Further, I'm afraid there was no such thing as "the Democrat plantations". Obviously no one needed a political party to run a plantation, let alone one that wasn't even in existence until the 1830s, but also the Democrat domination of the "Solid South" didn't even begin until AFTER that War. Curses, Linear Time strikes again.

Liberalism is against abolition. I don't know if remember Dr. Ben Carson back during the 2016 campaign comparing Obamacare with slavery. Getting rid of the ACA is the modern moral equivalent of the abolitionist movement. Leading ministers railed against slavery back in the early to mid 19th century, same today with Socialized Medicine where leading theologians like John Hagee and Robert Jeffress preach against it.

Abolition *IS* Liberalism. The whole essence of "all men are created equal". I told you before, you have NO clue what you're babbling about incoherently. Liberalism and the noble experiment threw off the idea that an authoritarian King and Clergy should run things, said fuck that and put the people in charge of themselves. That was the whole POINT.

Let us recall that those who blathered on about "all men are created equal" were genocidal slavers who envisioned a system in which only white male aristocrats had any representation at all.

“Genocidal slavers?” Slaves were considered an expensive property back then. Plantation owners had to pay to feed them, house them, clothe them, and pay for medical care. Kinda like the government is doing today with their ancestors.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

Dimwingers are working overtime today on their revisionist history.

Your party is the party of Jim Crow, filibustering the Civil Rights Act, electing KKK Leaders as Senate Majority Leader, and the formation of the KKK.

No known political party members were involved in the forming of the KKK, which point we did here seven hundred posts ago as well as over and over and over and over and over and over and over through the years here. Oh and that includes BOTH KKKs, the original one of 1865 and the much larger one of 1915. Now some historians will say there was a third KKK in 1949, that one actually never got off the ground but if you count that, no party for that guy either.

As for KKK and elections, here's some homework for ya.

1. Owen Brewster
2. Rice Means
3. Ed Jackson
4. D.C. Stephenson
5. Ben Paulen
6. George Luis Baker
7. Albert Johnson
8. Clarence Morley
9. Herbert Hoover
10. Calvin Coolidge

Guess the political party, win a prize. The prize is you get to go back and read the early part of the thread where this shit was debunked, complete with pictures.

You don't assign me homework, fool.

Robert KKK Byrd, Grand Kleagle of the KKK and Dem Senator until 2010,

Which party filibustered the Civil Rights Act?

oops!

The Dixiecrats who flipped Republican over civil rights hissyfits.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

Lincoln never advocated for Socialized Medicine or recognizing men in dresses as "broads".

What makes you think he was a lib? In actuality, Honest Abe- the proto-ditto-head, wanted to get black people off of the Democrat plantations.

You continue to dig the earth of cluelessness with a post-hole digger. Going all the way to China?

Liberalism has NOTHING to do with "Socialize Medicine"or "recognizing men in dresses as "broads", whatever that means.

Liberalism has very much to do with Abolition. You might have got a clue about that from the line "all men are created equal". Then again I believe you were the same asshat that tried to get away with characterizing the Birmingham church bomber as a "Liberal", of which he would be the antithesis.

Further, I'm afraid there was no such thing as "the Democrat plantations". Obviously no one needed a political party to run a plantation, let alone one that wasn't even in existence until the 1830s, but also the Democrat domination of the "Solid South" didn't even begin until AFTER that War. Curses, Linear Time strikes again.

Liberalism is against abolition. I don't know if remember Dr. Ben Carson back during the 2016 campaign comparing Obamacare with slavery. Getting rid of the ACA is the modern moral equivalent of the abolitionist movement. Leading ministers railed against slavery back in the early to mid 19th century, same today with Socialized Medicine where leading theologians like John Hagee and Robert Jeffress preach against it.

Abolition *IS* Liberalism. The whole essence of "all men are created equal". I told you before, you have NO clue what you're babbling about incoherently. Liberalism and the noble experiment threw off the idea that an authoritarian King and Clergy should run things, said fuck that and put the people in charge of themselves. That was the whole POINT.

Let us recall that those who blathered on about "all men are created equal" were genocidal slavers who envisioned a system in which only white male aristocrats had any representation at all.

“Genocidal slavers?” Slaves were considered an expensive property back then. Plantation owners had to pay to feed them, house them, clothe them, and pay for medical care. Kinda like the government is doing today with their ancestors.

You forgot how much better off they were under slavery.

 

[Pogo]

You continue to dig the earth of cluelessness with a post-hole digger. Going all the way to China?

Liberalism has NOTHING to do with "Socialize Medicine"or "recognizing men in dresses as "broads", whatever that means.

Liberalism has very much to do with Abolition. You might have got a clue about that from the line "all men are created equal". Then again I believe you were the same asshat that tried to get away with characterizing the Birmingham church bomber as a "Liberal", of which he would be the antithesis.

Further, I'm afraid there was no such thing as "the Democrat plantations". Obviously no one needed a political party to run a plantation, let alone one that wasn't even in existence until the 1830s, but also the Democrat domination of the "Solid South" didn't even begin until AFTER that War. Curses, Linear Time strikes again.

Liberalism is against abolition. I don't know if remember Dr. Ben Carson back during the 2016 campaign comparing Obamacare with slavery. Getting rid of the ACA is the modern moral equivalent of the abolitionist movement. Leading ministers railed against slavery back in the early to mid 19th century, same today with Socialized Medicine where leading theologians like John Hagee and Robert Jeffress preach against it.

Abolition *IS* Liberalism. The whole essence of "all men are created equal". I told you before, you have NO clue what you're babbling about incoherently. Liberalism and the noble experiment threw off the idea that an authoritarian King and Clergy should run things, said fuck that and put the people in charge of themselves. That was the whole POINT.

Let us recall that those who blathered on about "all men are created equal" were genocidal slavers who envisioned a system in which only white male aristocrats had any representation at all.

Not all of them (second POTUS for example). It was the ideal --- the pressing issue of the time was getting rid of King George. However those same Liberals wrote into the Constitution that the slave trade had to stop.

And how did that work out?

The trade discontinued 1808, the earliest date the Constitution would allow.

Obviously that wasn't all there was to be done. And sure enough it didn't get done for too long, because money.

 

[Nostra]

This George Wallace?

Nape. The George Wallace who was actually active in politics.

"I am having nothing to do with this so-called civil rights bill. The liberal left-wingers have passed it. Now let them employ some pinknik social engineers in Washington, D.C., to figure out what to do with it."

But your quote from much later in his life is an inspiring reminder that people can change. Thanks for that.

The Civil Right Act of 1964 was a violation of the 10th Amendment and interfered with private businesses. Liberals like to hold-up the biggest piece of shit Amendment passed by the radical Republicans after the war...the 14th. Most abused Amendment of the Constitution. 13th and 15th are fine. Bill of Rights over time has been selectively incorporated to the states. 14th is moot. Court didn’t need the 14th to do this.

The Republicans of the period immediately after (and before) the War WERE the Liberals, Dumbass.

Lincoln was one of the biggest liberals of his day.
That is why the south seceded

Lincoln never advocated for Socialized Medicine or recognizing men in dresses as "broads".

What makes you think he was a lib? In actuality, Honest Abe- the proto-ditto-head, wanted to get black people off of the Democrat plantations.

I'm guessing he thinks Lincoln was a lib because he was a warmonger and hated State's rights.