Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not a problem. Alabama got it right.The problem is with displays at a county courthouse celebrating the Confederacy
The Civil Right Act of 1964 was a violation of the 10th Amendment and interfered with private businesses. Liberals like to hold-up the biggest piece of shit Amendment passed by the radical Republicans after the war...the 14th. Most abused Amendment of the Constitution. 13th and 15th are fine. Bill of Rights over time has been selectively incorporated to the states. 14th is moot. Court didn’t need the 14th to do this.The South has always been CONSERVATIVE.
Look at the Governors of Alabama.
You mean like George Wallace?
Exactly.
This George Wallace?
Nape. The George Wallace who was actually active in politics.
"I am having nothing to do with this so-called civil rights bill. The liberal left-wingers have passed it. Now let them employ some pinknik social engineers in Washington, D.C., to figure out what to do with it."
But your quote from much later in his life is an inspiring reminder that people can change. Thanks for that.
There is no comparison to “National Socialist “ of Nazi, Germany and the free-market agrarian society of Antebellum South.NAZIS is not a good analogy ONLY because the Third Reich lasted twice as long as the loser Con-federacy did......maybe if the Con-federacy leaders had be held responsible in war crime trials like the leading NAZIS did, we wouldn't have had the Lost Cause Movement.Do you understand the fucking stupidity of a Nazi analogy, and pretending that 12 percent is the same as fucking ZERO POINT TWO percent?
I mean, I was talking to RW. He is the fucking moron that made that comparison, and stood by it. And that is the conversation you jumped into. If you want to comment on his fucking stupid post, then address his fucking stupid post.
I am discussing the rest of this issue, in the rest of this thread. THIS bit, is about the stupid shit you people say, and me calling you on it.
If you don't want to discuss how fucking stupid you libs are, when you just use buzz words, with no understanding of what the words actually mean, because you are fucking retarded,
THEN DON'T.
What you fucking don't fucking underfuckingstand in this fuckingly fucked analogy, is that fucking bad actors don't fucking all fucking work the same fucking way. Just because fucking Nazis fucking dealt in fucking genocide while fucking slaveholders fucking enslaved people, doesn't fucking affuckingfect the fucking fact that fucking Germany doesn't fucking hang up fucking statues and fucking monuments trying to fucking dilute and fucking sanitize and fucking whitewash the fucking inhufuckingmanity of their own fucking past, as do the fucking UDC edifices. Fucking both of them lost their fucking wars, did they fucking not?
Goodness gracious, that is a specious comparison.
And you are doing the same stupid fucking thing that rw and supercrackhead are doing. Pretending that some very minor similarity, means that they should have been dealt with the exact same way, and that if not, it is some sort of problem.
My point stands. There are good reasons for the way that we, here in America, dealt with the aftermath of the Civil War, and just saying "nazis" is not a good analogy, and in fact, is fucking stupid, and if you do that, then you are fucking stupid.
If you continue, I will point out some of the other many ways that the two sets of people are very different, and the two situations are very different, and thus, how incredibly fucking stupid you are.
The analogy is flying over Purell's hood because he keeps trying to compare "the Nazis" with "the Confederates" instead of the real point of comparison, which is to compare "what the Lost Cause tried to do about the Confederacy's image" with "what Germany did NOT try to do with the Nazi image".
What Democrats of those days were also conservative, racist.
Conservatives have never been in favor of church bombings. Where did you get the idea they were?
The South has always been CONSERVATIVE.
As far as Alabama, they were certainly leftist for many years, going for the FDR Raw Deal 4 times in succession, voted for Wilson, Cox, Adlai E Stevenson, Al Smith, etc. All the liberal candidates.
Look at the Governors of Alabama.
You mean like George Wallace?
What you want a statue for him now.
Just making the point that he was elected in the deep south, after he flipped on the segregation issue, with a base in the rural white poor.
Just another example of real history conflicting with the leftard fantasy that history was all about race.
Conservatives have never been in favor of church bombings. Where did you get the idea they were?
The South has always been CONSERVATIVE.
As far as Alabama, they were certainly leftist for many years, going for the FDR Raw Deal 4 times in succession, voted for Wilson, Cox, Adlai E Stevenson, Al Smith, etc. All the liberal candidates.
Look at the Governors of Alabama.
You mean like George Wallace?
What you want a statue for him now.
Just making the point that he was elected in the deep south, after he flipped on the segregation issue, with a base in the rural white poor.
Just another example of real history conflicting with the leftard fantasy that history was all about race.
If he ran today it would be as a republican.
WTF???Lincoln was one of the biggest liberals of his day.The Civil Right Act of 1964 was a violation of the 10th Amendment and interfered with private businesses. Liberals like to hold-up the biggest piece of shit Amendment passed by the radical Republicans after the war...the 14th. Most abused Amendment of the Constitution. 13th and 15th are fine. Bill of Rights over time has been selectively incorporated to the states. 14th is moot. Court didn’t need the 14th to do this.This George Wallace?
Nape. The George Wallace who was actually active in politics.
"I am having nothing to do with this so-called civil rights bill. The liberal left-wingers have passed it. Now let them employ some pinknik social engineers in Washington, D.C., to figure out what to do with it."
But your quote from much later in his life is an inspiring reminder that people can change. Thanks for that.
The Republicans of the period immediately after (and before) the War WERE the Liberals, Dumbass.
That is why the south seceded
Lincoln never advocated for Socialized Medicine or recognizing men in dresses as "broads".
What makes you think he was a lib? In actuality, Honest Abe- the proto-ditto-head, wanted to get black people off of the Democrat plantations.
Freed the slaves from who?Built this nation. Wrote the Constitution. Freed the slaves. Won two world wars and passed Civil Rights Act of 1964 and put a man on the Moon. Yep...white people are so bad.If he could see what society looks like now...he would never had did what he did.Lincoln was one of the biggest liberals of his day.The Civil Right Act of 1964 was a violation of the 10th Amendment and interfered with private businesses. Liberals like to hold-up the biggest piece of shit Amendment passed by the radical Republicans after the war...the 14th. Most abused Amendment of the Constitution. 13th and 15th are fine. Bill of Rights over time has been selectively incorporated to the states. 14th is moot. Court didn’t need the 14th to do this.
The Republicans of the period immediately after (and before) the War WERE the Liberals, Dumbass.
That is why the south seceded
This land mass would be much better off if euros "had never did what they did".
I'm guessing he thinks Lincoln was a lib because he was a warmonger and hated State's rights.Lincoln was one of the biggest liberals of his day.The Civil Right Act of 1964 was a violation of the 10th Amendment and interfered with private businesses. Liberals like to hold-up the biggest piece of shit Amendment passed by the radical Republicans after the war...the 14th. Most abused Amendment of the Constitution. 13th and 15th are fine. Bill of Rights over time has been selectively incorporated to the states. 14th is moot. Court didn’t need the 14th to do this.Nape. The George Wallace who was actually active in politics.
"I am having nothing to do with this so-called civil rights bill. The liberal left-wingers have passed it. Now let them employ some pinknik social engineers in Washington, D.C., to figure out what to do with it."
But your quote from much later in his life is an inspiring reminder that people can change. Thanks for that.
The Republicans of the period immediately after (and before) the War WERE the Liberals, Dumbass.
That is why the south seceded
Lincoln never advocated for Socialized Medicine or recognizing men in dresses as "broads".
What makes you think he was a lib? In actuality, Honest Abe- the proto-ditto-head, wanted to get black people off of the Democrat plantations.
I'm guessing he thinks Lincoln was a lib because he was a warmonger and hated State's rights.Lincoln was one of the biggest liberals of his day.The Civil Right Act of 1964 was a violation of the 10th Amendment and interfered with private businesses. Liberals like to hold-up the biggest piece of shit Amendment passed by the radical Republicans after the war...the 14th. Most abused Amendment of the Constitution. 13th and 15th are fine. Bill of Rights over time has been selectively incorporated to the states. 14th is moot. Court didn’t need the 14th to do this.
The Republicans of the period immediately after (and before) the War WERE the Liberals, Dumbass.
That is why the south seceded
Lincoln never advocated for Socialized Medicine or recognizing men in dresses as "broads".
What makes you think he was a lib? In actuality, Honest Abe- the proto-ditto-head, wanted to get black people off of the Democrat plantations.
Liberal views of Lincoln
Abolition
human rights
Worker protections
Did you believe those things in 1860?I'm guessing he thinks Lincoln was a lib because he was a warmonger and hated State's rights.Lincoln was one of the biggest liberals of his day.The Republicans of the period immediately after (and before) the War WERE the Liberals, Dumbass.
That is why the south seceded
Lincoln never advocated for Socialized Medicine or recognizing men in dresses as "broads".
What makes you think he was a lib? In actuality, Honest Abe- the proto-ditto-head, wanted to get black people off of the Democrat plantations.
Liberal views of Lincoln
Abolition
human rights
Worker protections
I've always been in favor of Abolition, RW.
Remember, we Poles freed the slave in 1347 - long before America.
And I certainly believe in protecting workers from Predatory unions with strict Right to Work laws. Slavery is forcing people to work and that is wrong. But so is not allowing someone to work
Did you believe those things in 1860?I'm guessing he thinks Lincoln was a lib because he was a warmonger and hated State's rights.Lincoln was one of the biggest liberals of his day.
That is why the south seceded
Lincoln never advocated for Socialized Medicine or recognizing men in dresses as "broads".
What makes you think he was a lib? In actuality, Honest Abe- the proto-ditto-head, wanted to get black people off of the Democrat plantations.
Liberal views of Lincoln
Abolition
human rights
Worker protections
I've always been in favor of Abolition, RW.
Remember, we Poles freed the slave in 1347 - long before America.
And I certainly believe in protecting workers from Predatory unions with strict Right to Work laws. Slavery is forcing people to work and that is wrong. But so is not allowing someone to work
Lincoln did
Did you believe those things in 1860?I'm guessing he thinks Lincoln was a lib because he was a warmonger and hated State's rights.Lincoln never advocated for Socialized Medicine or recognizing men in dresses as "broads".
What makes you think he was a lib? In actuality, Honest Abe- the proto-ditto-head, wanted to get black people off of the Democrat plantations.
Liberal views of Lincoln
Abolition
human rights
Worker protections
I've always been in favor of Abolition, RW.
Remember, we Poles freed the slave in 1347 - long before America.
And I certainly believe in protecting workers from Predatory unions with strict Right to Work laws. Slavery is forcing people to work and that is wrong. But so is not allowing someone to work
Lincoln did
The blacks in Poland were already free for more than 500 years by 1860. The Polish Lincoln, Casimir the Great, signed their emancipation in the great year of 1347
Did you believe those things in 1860?I'm guessing he thinks Lincoln was a lib because he was a warmonger and hated State's rights.Lincoln never advocated for Socialized Medicine or recognizing men in dresses as "broads".
What makes you think he was a lib? In actuality, Honest Abe- the proto-ditto-head, wanted to get black people off of the Democrat plantations.
Liberal views of Lincoln
Abolition
human rights
Worker protections
I've always been in favor of Abolition, RW.
Remember, we Poles freed the slave in 1347 - long before America.
And I certainly believe in protecting workers from Predatory unions with strict Right to Work laws. Slavery is forcing people to work and that is wrong. But so is not allowing someone to work
Lincoln did
The blacks in Poland were already free for more than 500 years by 1860. The Polish Lincoln, Casimir the Great, signed their emancipation in the great year of 1347
Did you believe those things in 1860?I'm guessing he thinks Lincoln was a lib because he was a warmonger and hated State's rights.
Liberal views of Lincoln
Abolition
human rights
Worker protections
I've always been in favor of Abolition, RW.
Remember, we Poles freed the slave in 1347 - long before America.
And I certainly believe in protecting workers from Predatory unions with strict Right to Work laws. Slavery is forcing people to work and that is wrong. But so is not allowing someone to work
Lincoln did
The blacks in Poland were already free for more than 500 years by 1860. The Polish Lincoln, Casimir the Great, signed their emancipation in the great year of 1347
If that is the case.....move the statues to Poland
I have 50 years of policy and facts that tells what happened.....When Wallace ran for president, why didn't he run as a Democrat??You mean like George Wallace?
What you want a statue for him now.
Just making the point that he was elected in the deep south, after he flipped on the segregation issue, with a base in the rural white poor.
Just another example of real history conflicting with the leftard fantasy that history was all about race.
Oh I remember...because he would have been rejected....
Can you tell me the liberal policies that Wallace ran on??
I really do get tired of having to slap the shit out of closet racists with facts...but I got time today.....
"But by the fall of 1968, George Wallace had pulled the major parties to the right" <<-- liberals don't pull both parties to the right do they??
"Republican presidential nominee Richard Nixon conceded the Deep South to him and came up with a “southern strategy” designed to appeal to white backlash over civil rights." <<-- Who were the ones pissed off at the civil rights movement?? Liberals or Conservatives??
"[Wallace] boasted of his crowd sizes; complained of “rigged polls” and accused the media of treating him unfairly, all while working to ensure the spotlight stayed on him." Like Trump....
His platform was very much conservative, instead of "Make America Great Again" -- Wallace named his campaign "Stand Up For America" -- and his supporters were known for saying things like “When George Wallace is elected president, he’s going to line up all these n-----s and shoot them,’’ Tom Turnipseed recalled. “I said, ‘Oh, hell no’ … this guy was dead serious.”
Stand Up For America: George Wallace's chaotic, prophetic campaign
We have seen this before...and we have also seen how folks like you will blatantly try to rewrite that history because once again, you are on the wrong side of it....sounds like a personal problem to me
Why did you not address my point, about what happened after he flipped on that issue?
50 years later, it is the Republican party (CONSERVATIVES) who are still butt hurt about the civil rights movement....
50 years later, it is the Republican party (CONSERVATIVES) who are still trying to gut the Voting Rights Act....
50 years later, it is the Republican party (CONSERVATIVES) who are still trying to pass policies that discriminate against minority groups....
Now, who are these prominent conservatives who were standing along side of MLK during the civil rights movement?
So, are all the statues of the traitors who fought for slavery gone yet? No? Give it time...
The Civil Right Act of 1964 was a violation of the 10th Amendment and interfered with private businesses. Liberals like to hold-up the biggest piece of shit Amendment passed by the radical Republicans after the war...the 14th. Most abused Amendment of the Constitution. 13th and 15th are fine. Bill of Rights over time has been selectively incorporated to the states. 14th is moot. Court didn’t need the 14th to do this.You mean like George Wallace?
Exactly.
This George Wallace?
Nape. The George Wallace who was actually active in politics.
"I am having nothing to do with this so-called civil rights bill. The liberal left-wingers have passed it. Now let them employ some pinknik social engineers in Washington, D.C., to figure out what to do with it."
But your quote from much later in his life is an inspiring reminder that people can change. Thanks for that.
The Republicans of the period immediately after (and before) the War WERE the Liberals, Dumbass.
When another one of you Dimwinger half wits claimed a bunch of "Dixiecrats" who filibustered the Civil Rights Act flipped to the Republican party you posted this:Helms, Gramm, Lott, Shelby weren't in the Senate in 1964.
I NEVER SAID THEY WERE you FUCKING ILLITERATE HACK.
Exactly, Pogo claimed Lott was involved in the filibuster of the CRA
BULLSHIT. I said *NO SUCH THING*. Prove me wrong LIAR.
FUCK outta here.
The Dixiecrats who flipped Republican over civil rights hissyfits.You don't assign me homework, fool.Dimwingers are working overtime today on their revisionist history.
Your party is the party of Jim Crow, filibustering the Civil Rights Act, electing KKK Leaders as Senate Majority Leader, and the formation of the KKK.
No known political party members were involved in the forming of the KKK, which point we did here seven hundred posts ago as well as over and over and over and over and over and over and over through the years here. Oh and that includes BOTH KKKs, the original one of 1865 and the much larger one of 1915. Now some historians will say there was a third KKK in 1949, that one actually never got off the ground but if you count that, no party for that guy either.
As for KKK and elections, here's some homework for ya.
Guess the political party, win a prize. The prize is you get to go back and read the early part of the thread where this shit was debunked, complete with pictures.
- Owen Brewster
- Rice Means
- Ed Jackson
- D.C. Stephenson
- Ben Paulen
- George Luis Baker
- Albert Johnson
- Clarence Morley
- Herbert Hoover
- Calvin Coolidge
Robert KKK Byrd, Grand Kleagle of the KKK and Dem Senator until 2010,
Which party filibustered the Civil Rights Act?
oops!
When did Robert C. Byrd, Al Gore Sr., or J William Fulbright flip to the GOP? How about Stennis, or Eastland, or Orval E. Faubus?
Actually, virtually none of the Dems who filibustered Civil Rights switched to the GOP.
BULLSHIT. Thurmond was the first to do so, in September 1964.
You remember Thurmond? Trent Lott said if he'd been elected "we wouldn't have had all these problems down through all these years". Oh yeah Lott switched too.