Dude. George Wallace was one of the greatest segregationists in our history, and AFTER he flipped on that issue, he ran for the governor ship of a deep south state and won, with his base being, according to you fucktards, the most racist demographic in the country..
DOOD. Wallace by then was more than well known, not only around the state where he'd been running since the '50s but nationally. He won for the same reason Rump did --- name recognition.
/offtopic
Really? A man who personified segregation, flips on the issue, AND DOES NOT LOSE HIS SUPPORTERS, even in the DEEP SOUTH?
That is an incredibly powerful historical fact, and it destroys your race baiting narrative.
NAME RECOGNITION?!
![]()
Yep. And the fact that your only response is an unrelated Googly Image shows you're beaten.
Err, there were words there, that made a point?
Oh, wait, you were just lying. Sorry, don't know why I didn't consider that first.
Your lie is dismissed. You are a lying asshole.
And George Wallace won the Governorship of a Deep South State, with the support of the most rural and poor white voters in the state, despite running on a pro-civil rights platform.
This fact, completely destroys your race baiting narrative. You lose, loser.
Once AGAIN for the intellectually bereft, he ran on his NAME. That's all he needed by then, even by well before then. For fuck's sake he ran his WIFE in the mid-'60s and SHE won on his name. Decisively.
And if your view of the world was true, his "betrayal" of segregation, would have spread like wildfire though the voters of the Deep South, and they would have turned on him, is a racist rage.
Instead, they didn't seem to care at all. If anything, they followed him gladly.
Your world view, conflicts with documented history. Mine does not.
Are you able to deal with this, in anything resembling a sane fashion?