Congrats to the Democrats for winning the baseball game

[Pogo]

Their tactics are very unethical.

You don't shoot the other team's players. Seriously, who the hell does that?

Too soon?

Anyway, I agree. Shooting the opposing baseball team should be illegal. Hopefully someone passes a law against it.

But the thing is, they shot him before the game even started. So the umpire couldn't do jack shit about it because he had no jurisdiction.

Well, he coulda called it fair or foul.

 

[Pogo]

Do you have a phone, a bathroom, indoor plumbing?

I know the area where he lives. Most likely no!

You have no clue where I live. You prolly don't even know where you live since you're afraid to go out, lest the eeeebil neeeegroes and Joooooos get you.

Which is a stupid fear, since nobody gets you.

He's probably going off the tigers logo.

That's an LSU logo. I have no connection with LSU, I only put that up today when I read that both teams on the field were wearing LSU logos for Steve Scalise. If he was going by my regular avatar, he must think I live in Portugal.

Yea the LSU tigers, LOUISIANA state university. That's where he probably thought you lived. As in "tigerland"

Yabbut I only put that up yesterday. He knows I'm in Carolina. But he doesn't know where in Carolina.

 

[Pogo]

And yet every time there is a shooting of some importance you and your lefty buddies fall all over yourself claiming a rightwinger did or that rhetoric from the right caused it.

I do huh?

Link(s)? Any time? Anywhere?

You need to go learn to read. I've been calling out Composition/Generalization fallacies since the day I got here. Go ahead, try to find evidence of my actually using one. Happy hunting, idiot.

I keep asking for that list of democrats shot by republicans.

What kind of moron would make up a list like that?
Oh wait, look who I'm talking to....

I can remind you that in the past the left has claimed rightwing rhetoric lead to a number of shootings and I don't recall you disagreeing.

"The left" did that huh?

What did they do, come out on stage like a chorus, with a conductor and a script? Kind of a "follow the bouncing ball" deal?


Fucking dolt.

Actually, Hillary Clinton and the President of Mexico did exactly that. It coincided with the Dems shipping weapons to Mexican drug cartels.

I uh, don't think Hillary Clinton and the President of Mexico comprise "the left".
Don't think they're even in it.

I'm sure the fantasy of a political party having an arsenal to ship around has a creative, if hastily patched-together-in-the-moment, backstory too but I'll pass.

Silly libs will swear the Dems never sent weapons to drug cartels and tried to pin it on gun shops to bring in a new era of non-effective gun control, yet that is exactly what they tried to do.

I have no idea what the fuck you're yammering about.

 

[JBond]

And yet every time there is a shooting of some importance you and your lefty buddies fall all over yourself claiming a rightwinger did or that rhetoric from the right caused it.

I do huh?

Link(s)? Any time? Anywhere?

You need to go learn to read. I've been calling out Composition/Generalization fallacies since the day I got here. Go ahead, try to find evidence of my actually using one. Happy hunting, idiot.

I keep asking for that list of democrats shot by republicans.

What kind of moron would make up a list like that?
Oh wait, look who I'm talking to....

I can remind you that in the past the left has claimed rightwing rhetoric lead to a number of shootings and I don't recall you disagreeing.

"The left" did that huh?

What did they do, come out on stage like a chorus, with a conductor and a script? Kind of a "follow the bouncing ball" deal?


Fucking dolt.

Actually, Hillary Clinton and the President of Mexico did exactly that. It coincided with the Dems shipping weapons to Mexican drug cartels.

I uh, don't think Hillary Clinton and the President of Mexico comprise "the left".
Don't think they're even in it.

I'm sure the fantasy of a political party having an arsenal to ship around has a creative, if hastily patched-together-in-the-moment, backstory too but I'll pass.

Silly libs will swear the Dems never sent weapons to drug cartels and tried to pin it on gun shops to bring in a new era of non-effective gun control, yet that is exactly what they tried to do.

I have no idea what the fuck you're yammering about.

Typical. Playing the uninformed moron card. Hillary did that a ton also. You mentioned the stage and following the bouncing ball. That is exactly what Dems wanted America to do after they sent weapons to drug lords.

 

[Pogo]

I do huh?

Link(s)? Any time? Anywhere?

You need to go learn to read. I've been calling out Composition/Generalization fallacies since the day I got here. Go ahead, try to find evidence of my actually using one. Happy hunting, idiot.


What kind of moron would make up a list like that?
Oh wait, look who I'm talking to....


"The left" did that huh?

What did they do, come out on stage like a chorus, with a conductor and a script? Kind of a "follow the bouncing ball" deal?


Fucking dolt.

Actually, Hillary Clinton and the President of Mexico did exactly that. It coincided with the Dems shipping weapons to Mexican drug cartels.

I uh, don't think Hillary Clinton and the President of Mexico comprise "the left".
Don't think they're even in it.

I'm sure the fantasy of a political party having an arsenal to ship around has a creative, if hastily patched-together-in-the-moment, backstory too but I'll pass.

Silly libs will swear the Dems never sent weapons to drug cartels and tried to pin it on gun shops to bring in a new era of non-effective gun control, yet that is exactly what they tried to do.

I have no idea what the fuck you're yammering about.

Typical. Playing the uninformed moron card. Hillary did that a ton also. You mentioned the stage and following the bouncing ball. That is exactly what Dems wanted America to do after they sent weapons to drug lords.

Still no idea where this rambling incoherency is going. Dafuk does any of this have to do with your logical Lump Fallacies?

You have no clue wtf I'm talking about do ya?

 

[JBond]

Actually, Hillary Clinton and the President of Mexico did exactly that. It coincided with the Dems shipping weapons to Mexican drug cartels.

I uh, don't think Hillary Clinton and the President of Mexico comprise "the left".
Don't think they're even in it.

I'm sure the fantasy of a political party having an arsenal to ship around has a creative, if hastily patched-together-in-the-moment, backstory too but I'll pass.

Silly libs will swear the Dems never sent weapons to drug cartels and tried to pin it on gun shops to bring in a new era of non-effective gun control, yet that is exactly what they tried to do.

I have no idea what the fuck you're yammering about.

Typical. Playing the uninformed moron card. Hillary did that a ton also. You mentioned the stage and following the bouncing ball. That is exactly what Dems wanted America to do after they sent weapons to drug lords.

Still no idea where this rambling incoherency is going. Dafuk does any of this have to do with your logical Lump Fallacies?

You have no clue wtf I'm talking about do ya?

You asked about staging and bouncing balls. That is something Dems want Americans to believe in and follow. I simply sited a well know example of manipulation by the silly Dems. The Democrat gun running to drug lords had one purpose only. The Dems told us the reason they did it. Hillary held a press conference beating up gun store owners and listed new restrictions she wanted, and at the exact same time the Administration was arming drug cartels. Sorry you are incapable of keeping up.

 

[Pogo]

I uh, don't think Hillary Clinton and the President of Mexico comprise "the left".
Don't think they're even in it.

I'm sure the fantasy of a political party having an arsenal to ship around has a creative, if hastily patched-together-in-the-moment, backstory too but I'll pass.

Silly libs will swear the Dems never sent weapons to drug cartels and tried to pin it on gun shops to bring in a new era of non-effective gun control, yet that is exactly what they tried to do.

I have no idea what the fuck you're yammering about.

Typical. Playing the uninformed moron card. Hillary did that a ton also. You mentioned the stage and following the bouncing ball. That is exactly what Dems wanted America to do after they sent weapons to drug lords.

Still no idea where this rambling incoherency is going. Dafuk does any of this have to do with your logical Lump Fallacies?

You have no clue wtf I'm talking about do ya?

You asked about staging and bouncing balls. That is something Dems want Americans to believe in and follow. I simply sited a well know example of manipulation by the silly Dems. The Democrat gun running to drug lords had one purpose only. The Dems told us the reason they did it. Hillary held a press conference beating up gun store owners and listed new restrictions she wanted, and at the exact same time the Administration was arming drug cartels. Sorry you are incapable of keeping up.

I didn't "ask" about any of that shit. I called you out for a bullshit Lump Fallacy. That's not a clinical term, it's what I call y'all who fixate on labels and then lump some entire population into it, as if it's some kind of Borg.

Such as for example, Hillary Clinton and the President of Mexico equating to "the left". Such as whatever this "drug lord" thing being engineered by a political party. You don't seem capable of figuring out that one "Democrat" (or whatever label) is not the same thing as "all Democrats".

And then you pull anyone you want out of that bag and by some kind of rhetorical voodoo they become ---- "the left". Or "the right". Or "Democrats" or "Republicans" or "socialists" or whatever label you're playing with because your primitive little mind can't grasp the concept of "individual".

You're completely lost.

 

[JBond]

Silly libs will swear the Dems never sent weapons to drug cartels and tried to pin it on gun shops to bring in a new era of non-effective gun control, yet that is exactly what they tried to do.

I have no idea what the fuck you're yammering about.

Typical. Playing the uninformed moron card. Hillary did that a ton also. You mentioned the stage and following the bouncing ball. That is exactly what Dems wanted America to do after they sent weapons to drug lords.

Still no idea where this rambling incoherency is going. Dafuk does any of this have to do with your logical Lump Fallacies?

You have no clue wtf I'm talking about do ya?

You asked about staging and bouncing balls. That is something Dems want Americans to believe in and follow. I simply sited a well know example of manipulation by the silly Dems. The Democrat gun running to drug lords had one purpose only. The Dems told us the reason they did it. Hillary held a press conference beating up gun store owners and listed new restrictions she wanted, and at the exact same time the Administration was arming drug cartels. Sorry you are incapable of keeping up.

I didn't "ask" about any of that shit. I called you out for a bullshit Lump Fallacy. That's not a clinical term, it's what I call y'all who fixate on labels and then lump some entire population into it, as if it's some kind of Borg.

Such as for example, Hillary Clinton and the President of Mexico equating to "the left". Such as whatever this "drug lord" thing being engineered by a political party. You don't seem capable of figuring out that one "Democrat" (or whatever label) is not the same thing as "all Democrats".

And then you pull anyone you want out of that bag and by some kind of rhetorical voodoo they become ---- "the left". Or "the right". Or "Democrats" or "Republicans" or "socialists" or whatever label you're playing with because your primitive little mind can't grasp the concept of "individual".

You're completely lost.

It is relevant because she was the Democrat nominee. Of course it was more than just her. The entire Democrat leadership thought it was a grand plan. I lump idiots like you with the other pathetic losers because you deserve it. You are the same goofball that brought up staging and bouncing balls, both which obviously entertain you. All I did was post a relevant example of your stage and balls analogy. Then you went full retard.

 

[Pogo]

I have no idea what the fuck you're yammering about.

Typical. Playing the uninformed moron card. Hillary did that a ton also. You mentioned the stage and following the bouncing ball. That is exactly what Dems wanted America to do after they sent weapons to drug lords.

Still no idea where this rambling incoherency is going. Dafuk does any of this have to do with your logical Lump Fallacies?

You have no clue wtf I'm talking about do ya?

You asked about staging and bouncing balls. That is something Dems want Americans to believe in and follow. I simply sited a well know example of manipulation by the silly Dems. The Democrat gun running to drug lords had one purpose only. The Dems told us the reason they did it. Hillary held a press conference beating up gun store owners and listed new restrictions she wanted, and at the exact same time the Administration was arming drug cartels. Sorry you are incapable of keeping up.

I didn't "ask" about any of that shit. I called you out for a bullshit Lump Fallacy. That's not a clinical term, it's what I call y'all who fixate on labels and then lump some entire population into it, as if it's some kind of Borg.

Such as for example, Hillary Clinton and the President of Mexico equating to "the left". Such as whatever this "drug lord" thing being engineered by a political party. You don't seem capable of figuring out that one "Democrat" (or whatever label) is not the same thing as "all Democrats".

And then you pull anyone you want out of that bag and by some kind of rhetorical voodoo they become ---- "the left". Or "the right". Or "Democrats" or "Republicans" or "socialists" or whatever label you're playing with because your primitive little mind can't grasp the concept of "individual".

You're completely lost.

It is relevant because she was the Democrat nominee. Of course it was more than just her. The entire Democrat leadership thought it was a grand plan. I lump idiots like you with the other pathetic losers because you deserve it. You are the same goofball that brought up staging and bouncing balls, both which obviously entertain you. All I did was post a relevant example of your stage and balls analogy. Then you went full retard.

::::::wwwhhoooossshhhh:::::

You need to quit playing "my first keyboard" and go learn how to read.

 

[Seawytch]

They should change up their organization of this event. Instead of Dem/Rep, it needs to be teams made up of both parties playing each other...

 

[Siete]

They should change up their organization of this event. Instead of Dem/Rep, it needs to be teams made up of both parties playing each other...

there ya go.

put everyones name in the hopper and draw teams ... best team wins.

 

[koshergrl]

Homegrown terrorists, started right here:

We're Organizing for Action.

Red & Black Anarchists

 

[koshergrl]

BTW, on that antifa page, the Rural Organizing Project, also a commie grass roots movement that lies about what they do, posts as well.

 

[Pogo]

They should change up their organization of this event. Instead of Dem/Rep, it needs to be teams made up of both parties playing each other...

there ya go.

put everyones name in the hopper and draw teams ... best team wins.

Where would the competition be? That's just a baseball game.
--- which is great for the participants but what does the audience have to attach to?

 

[easyt65]

Their tactics are very unethical.

You don't shoot the other team's players. Seriously, who the hell does that?

"Democrats" didn't do that. "James Hodgkinson" did that.
I understand there's rampant ignorance around this joint on the finer distinctions between the concepts of "singular" and "plural'. That's weird.

Dude, it was a JOKE. Relax...

 

[toobfreak]

Congrats to the Democrats for winning the baseball game

I never doubted the outcome. While the Dems had all their attention on hitting fowl balls at the GOP, the GOP had half of their attention all night on watching the stands and field for pistols, crossbows and brass knuckles, and figured they better let the Democrats win gracefully so as not to piss off any more loons!

 

[bripat9643]

They should change up their organization of this event. Instead of Dem/Rep, it needs to be teams made up of both parties playing each other...

there ya go.

put everyones name in the hopper and draw teams ... best team wins.

What would be the point of that?

 

[Seawytch]

They should change up their organization of this event. Instead of Dem/Rep, it needs to be teams made up of both parties playing each other...

there ya go.

put everyones name in the hopper and draw teams ... best team wins.

What would be the point of that?

Good, clean, bipartisan fun. Competing charities.

I'm sure they could find something to compete over that's a-political.

 

[Siete]

They should change up their organization of this event. Instead of Dem/Rep, it needs to be teams made up of both parties playing each other...

there ya go.

put everyones name in the hopper and draw teams ... best team wins.

What would be the point of that?

I played baseball AND football for 15 years in some of the most competitive enviornments in the country, and not one time was the game about Democrats vs Republicans.

 

[OldLady]

40-39-1

Democrats lead by one game after tonight

This year's game raised over a million dollars

A record for this charity game

It was funny--on the news this a.m. they mentioned the game, but not who won. Too divisive? Gosh, they sure are neck and neck over the years, huh? Glad they made a lot of $$$. They worked hard to play a good game.