Congress Can Remove Donald Trump From Office Without Impeaching Him

[JoeB131]

Why do you need 2 houses Joe, as a Socialist, you only need 1 and it should be the smallest of 1, because otherwise you "energy efficient" goes out the door. My doublewide, has golden faucets, marble foyer and fireplace, hardwood floors, and top of the line windows and doors.

sure it does... only you value yourself by how much you supposedly own.

But Joe, it isn't about me, Joe, it is about you calling Trump crazy, but if you don't like Trump, sell off your houses, Joe, head to your Socialist Utopian Paradise, Cuba, and live your dream there. We the People, Joe, don't like you and don't want you here any more....
Capitalist Cuba....Communist Cuba....

Guy, I think you are a little confused. Cuba was a shithole for most of its people before Castro, that's why they rose up against Batista.

Now, one could argue Castro did a bad job of running the country, or you can argue that Cuba is a miserable place because we've been waging a vindictive 60 year economic war against it. Since you don't have the intellect to have THAT discussion, it's moot point.

54% of Americans voted against Trump. We the people had our say, we were ignored.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Let us return to the topic of the thread. "He did this, he didn't do that, I don't like this policy, I hate that proposal . . ." I don't care. Doesn't matter. Liking or disliking the man or his policies proves nothing either way about mental health. Likewise, the opinions of a bunch of biased, unethical doctors who've never met him, let alone treated him in a professional capacity, means nothing except that I certainly would not seek treatment from them for anything, and they should probably all be up in front of a medical review board.

The fact remains that the 25th Amendment provides only for a transition of power in the event the President is completely incapacitated, and it sets the bar extremely high on the definition of "incapacitated". Like it or not, holding political views that you disagree with or being a boorish ass in general do not qualify as "incapacitated". Even being an utterly abysmal President - if that were, in fact, to happen - does not qualify as "incapacitated". That would still require you to impeach him.

So the 25th Amendment is not going to provide you a clever little workaround to invalidate a legal election. If you can't deal with that, then I'd say it's not Donald Trump who has the mental illness.

You are right about a mental disorder being insufficient grounds for removal of an American president.

That president's refusal to address said disorder just may be.

No. Keep struggling to justify yourself. It's amusing.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Let us return to the topic of the thread. "He did this, he didn't do that, I don't like this policy, I hate that proposal . . ." I don't care. Doesn't matter. Liking or disliking the man or his policies proves nothing either way about mental health. Likewise, the opinions of a bunch of biased, unethical doctors who've never met him, let alone treated him in a professional capacity, means nothing except that I certainly would not seek treatment from them for anything, and they should probably all be up in front of a medical review board.

The fact remains that the 25th Amendment provides only for a transition of power in the event the President is completely incapacitated, and it sets the bar extremely high on the definition of "incapacitated". Like it or not, holding political views that you disagree with or being a boorish ass in general do not qualify as "incapacitated". Even being an utterly abysmal President - if that were, in fact, to happen - does not qualify as "incapacitated". That would still require you to impeach him.

So the 25th Amendment is not going to provide you a clever little workaround to invalidate a legal election. If you can't deal with that, then I'd say it's not Donald Trump who has the mental illness.

You are right about a mental disorder being insufficient grounds for removal of an American president.

That president's refusal to address said disorder just may be.

No. Keep struggling to justify yourself. It's amusing.

His lunacy was just confirmed in today's hearing.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Let us return to the topic of the thread. "He did this, he didn't do that, I don't like this policy, I hate that proposal . . ." I don't care. Doesn't matter. Liking or disliking the man or his policies proves nothing either way about mental health. Likewise, the opinions of a bunch of biased, unethical doctors who've never met him, let alone treated him in a professional capacity, means nothing except that I certainly would not seek treatment from them for anything, and they should probably all be up in front of a medical review board.

The fact remains that the 25th Amendment provides only for a transition of power in the event the President is completely incapacitated, and it sets the bar extremely high on the definition of "incapacitated". Like it or not, holding political views that you disagree with or being a boorish ass in general do not qualify as "incapacitated". Even being an utterly abysmal President - if that were, in fact, to happen - does not qualify as "incapacitated". That would still require you to impeach him.

So the 25th Amendment is not going to provide you a clever little workaround to invalidate a legal election. If you can't deal with that, then I'd say it's not Donald Trump who has the mental illness.

You are right about a mental disorder being insufficient grounds for removal of an American president.

I didn't say that. I said disagreeing with him and disliking him weren't proof of him having a mental disorder.

I expect that if the President started displaying serious schizophrenia or dissociative disorder or something, the necessary people would have him declared incapacitated. But being an asshole is a behavior problem, not a mental disorder, and certainly not incapacitating.

Not all mental disorders incapacitate a person. There are highly functioning narcissists of whom Donald Trump is one.

Would you agree that even a personality disorder can cause chaos and unbalance an administration if not the entire nation?

The president is supposed to set the tone, no?

Is that a fact, Dr. Freud? Where was it you received your psychiatric training, again? And why didn't they ever mention to you how unprofessional and unethical it is to diagnose people you've never even met?

Only a lunatic would choose to ignore his lunacy.

thats what you were all told to believe. No one was calling Trump Crazy in the media until the election. That's because its an invention of the power structure who sees Trump as a threat to themselves.

No one needs to be told anything. It's self evident.

In other words, you've got shit and you're just hoping people will believe you because you say it.

No, it's self evident.
That means that it requires no instruction to understand. Any person will come to that conclusion, unless of course they themselves are damaged so as not to see it readily.

No, the only thing that's self-evident is that leftists define "lunacy" as "disagreeing with them".

 

[Cecilie1200]

Let us return to the topic of the thread. "He did this, he didn't do that, I don't like this policy, I hate that proposal . . ." I don't care. Doesn't matter. Liking or disliking the man or his policies proves nothing either way about mental health. Likewise, the opinions of a bunch of biased, unethical doctors who've never met him, let alone treated him in a professional capacity, means nothing except that I certainly would not seek treatment from them for anything, and they should probably all be up in front of a medical review board.

The fact remains that the 25th Amendment provides only for a transition of power in the event the President is completely incapacitated, and it sets the bar extremely high on the definition of "incapacitated". Like it or not, holding political views that you disagree with or being a boorish ass in general do not qualify as "incapacitated". Even being an utterly abysmal President - if that were, in fact, to happen - does not qualify as "incapacitated". That would still require you to impeach him.

So the 25th Amendment is not going to provide you a clever little workaround to invalidate a legal election. If you can't deal with that, then I'd say it's not Donald Trump who has the mental illness.

You are right about a mental disorder being insufficient grounds for removal of an American president.

That president's refusal to address said disorder just may be.

No. Keep struggling to justify yourself. It's amusing.

His lunacy was just confirmed in today's hearing.

I note that you didn't specify this confirmation at all, which leads me to believe that you are, again, defining "lunacy" as "disagreeing with leftists".

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Let us return to the topic of the thread. "He did this, he didn't do that, I don't like this policy, I hate that proposal . . ." I don't care. Doesn't matter. Liking or disliking the man or his policies proves nothing either way about mental health. Likewise, the opinions of a bunch of biased, unethical doctors who've never met him, let alone treated him in a professional capacity, means nothing except that I certainly would not seek treatment from them for anything, and they should probably all be up in front of a medical review board.

The fact remains that the 25th Amendment provides only for a transition of power in the event the President is completely incapacitated, and it sets the bar extremely high on the definition of "incapacitated". Like it or not, holding political views that you disagree with or being a boorish ass in general do not qualify as "incapacitated". Even being an utterly abysmal President - if that were, in fact, to happen - does not qualify as "incapacitated". That would still require you to impeach him.

So the 25th Amendment is not going to provide you a clever little workaround to invalidate a legal election. If you can't deal with that, then I'd say it's not Donald Trump who has the mental illness.

You are right about a mental disorder being insufficient grounds for removal of an American president.

That president's refusal to address said disorder just may be.

No. Keep struggling to justify yourself. It's amusing.

His lunacy was just confirmed in today's hearing.

I note that you didn't specify this confirmation at all, which leads me to believe that you are, again, defining "lunacy" as "disagreeing with leftists".

I suppose you should watch the hearing then.

 

[Cecilie1200]

You are right about a mental disorder being insufficient grounds for removal of an American president.

That president's refusal to address said disorder just may be.

No. Keep struggling to justify yourself. It's amusing.

His lunacy was just confirmed in today's hearing.

I note that you didn't specify this confirmation at all, which leads me to believe that you are, again, defining "lunacy" as "disagreeing with leftists".

I suppose you should watch the hearing then.

So basically, you have nothing.

 

[Hum Dinger]

What the hell? Ca you believe this Time.com headline? Utter desperation from the worst leftist rag in America.

Presidential psychology is quickly becoming a bipartisan issue. Recently, Senator Al Franken said that he and several of his GOP colleagues shared the opinion that President Donald Trump is “not right mentally.” Shortly thereafter, 35 mental health professionals — psychiatrists, psychologists and social workers — took to the pages of the New York Times to register their own concerns that the President was demonstrating “grave emotional instability.”

These controversial armchair diagnoses are powerless on their own. But what if there was something that Senator Franken and his concerned colleagues could actually do? Constitutionally speaking, there might be

This ridiculous story, along with a video is @ Congress Can Remove Donald Trump From Office Without Impeaching Him

Trump does have serious mental issues, why haven't you figured that out by now

Okay lib, name the clinical mental issues and how you arrived at the diagnosis so I can laugh in your face.

Narcissistic personality disorder - Mayo Clinic

 

[Wry Catcher]

Nixon did not to be impeached, when the party of the POTUS decides the current occupant of the Oval is a deterement to the party, he left. Trump however is not Nixon, Trump is a Narcissist and a megalomaniac and will put the country in danger before he will admit he is done. Wag the Dog?

 

[Cecilie1200]

What the hell? Ca you believe this Time.com headline? Utter desperation from the worst leftist rag in America.

Presidential psychology is quickly becoming a bipartisan issue. Recently, Senator Al Franken said that he and several of his GOP colleagues shared the opinion that President Donald Trump is “not right mentally.” Shortly thereafter, 35 mental health professionals — psychiatrists, psychologists and social workers — took to the pages of the New York Times to register their own concerns that the President was demonstrating “grave emotional instability.”

These controversial armchair diagnoses are powerless on their own. But what if there was something that Senator Franken and his concerned colleagues could actually do? Constitutionally speaking, there might be

This ridiculous story, along with a video is @ Congress Can Remove Donald Trump From Office Without Impeaching Him

Trump does have serious mental issues, why haven't you figured that out by now

Okay lib, name the clinical mental issues and how you arrived at the diagnosis so I can laugh in your face.

Narcissistic personality disorder - Mayo Clinic

Irrelevant until such time that Donald Trump suffering from this at a disorder level is confirmed by an actual psychiatrist actually treating him. It is meaningless for as long as it's simply average goobers on the Internet projecting it onto him because they don't like him.

 

[Eloy]

Let us return to the topic of the thread. "He did this, he didn't do that, I don't like this policy, I hate that proposal . . ." I don't care. Doesn't matter. Liking or disliking the man or his policies proves nothing either way about mental health. Likewise, the opinions of a bunch of biased, unethical doctors who've never met him, let alone treated him in a professional capacity, means nothing except that I certainly would not seek treatment from them for anything, and they should probably all be up in front of a medical review board.

The fact remains that the 25th Amendment provides only for a transition of power in the event the President is completely incapacitated, and it sets the bar extremely high on the definition of "incapacitated". Like it or not, holding political views that you disagree with or being a boorish ass in general do not qualify as "incapacitated". Even being an utterly abysmal President - if that were, in fact, to happen - does not qualify as "incapacitated". That would still require you to impeach him.

So the 25th Amendment is not going to provide you a clever little workaround to invalidate a legal election. If you can't deal with that, then I'd say it's not Donald Trump who has the mental illness.

You are right about a mental disorder being insufficient grounds for removal of an American president.

I didn't say that. I said disagreeing with him and disliking him weren't proof of him having a mental disorder.

I expect that if the President started displaying serious schizophrenia or dissociative disorder or something, the necessary people would have him declared incapacitated. But being an asshole is a behavior problem, not a mental disorder, and certainly not incapacitating.

Not all mental disorders incapacitate a person. There are highly functioning narcissists of whom Donald Trump is one.

Would you agree that even a personality disorder can cause chaos and unbalance an administration if not the entire nation?

The president is supposed to set the tone, no?

I do agree with you about a personality disorder having the potential to create chaos in the White House.
Trump has been president for only weeks and every day there are more outrageous claims made by him.
Were I in the military, I'd be handing-in my resignation.

 

[HaShev]

What the hell? Ca you believe this Time.com headline? Utter desperation from the worst leftist rag in America.

Presidential psychology is quickly becoming a bipartisan issue. Recently, Senator Al Franken said that he and several of his GOP colleagues shared the opinion that President Donald Trump is “not right mentally.” Shortly thereafter, 35 mental health professionals — psychiatrists, psychologists and social workers — took to the pages of the New York Times to register their own concerns that the President was demonstrating “grave emotional instability.”

These controversial armchair diagnoses are powerless on their own. But what if there was something that Senator Franken and his concerned colleagues could actually do? Constitutionally speaking, there might be

This ridiculous story, along with a video is @ Congress Can Remove Donald Trump From Office Without Impeaching Him

I think we need to understand that they no longer have to take aim from a tall bldg or grassy knoll, now they can take any president out just by demonizing his character through control of media propaganda and file false charges that is feed with these false narratives, that get repeated enough times like how cults program their followers, eventually they'll believe any delusional narative through repetition of propaganda.
And these political terrorists don't play by our rules, so it gives them an advantage with our hands tied by proper protocol and theirs hands free to do their corrupt tactics.

 

[regent]

We should add another requirement for presidential candidates other than today's being 35 and so on, They should be OKayed by a panel of some type of mental experts.

 

[HaShev]

We should add another requirement for presidential candidates other than today's being 35 and so on, They should be OKayed by a panel of some type of mental experts.

With the string of deaths attached to Clinton and his excessive lying and rape issues and Obamas excessive lying and delusional campaign promises they would have never made it through any such panel.
Use that for other offices and
Elizabeth Warren, Chuck Schumer, Dem VP candidate CAIN, and Cummins would never be elected to their offices and many more.
We'd have nobody to run the Gov't in fact, 1/3 think a statue of a man on a stick is their creator and that talking to it is normal human behavior.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Let us return to the topic of the thread. "He did this, he didn't do that, I don't like this policy, I hate that proposal . . ." I don't care. Doesn't matter. Liking or disliking the man or his policies proves nothing either way about mental health. Likewise, the opinions of a bunch of biased, unethical doctors who've never met him, let alone treated him in a professional capacity, means nothing except that I certainly would not seek treatment from them for anything, and they should probably all be up in front of a medical review board.

The fact remains that the 25th Amendment provides only for a transition of power in the event the President is completely incapacitated, and it sets the bar extremely high on the definition of "incapacitated". Like it or not, holding political views that you disagree with or being a boorish ass in general do not qualify as "incapacitated". Even being an utterly abysmal President - if that were, in fact, to happen - does not qualify as "incapacitated". That would still require you to impeach him.

So the 25th Amendment is not going to provide you a clever little workaround to invalidate a legal election. If you can't deal with that, then I'd say it's not Donald Trump who has the mental illness.

You are right about a mental disorder being insufficient grounds for removal of an American president.

I didn't say that. I said disagreeing with him and disliking him weren't proof of him having a mental disorder.

I expect that if the President started displaying serious schizophrenia or dissociative disorder or something, the necessary people would have him declared incapacitated. But being an asshole is a behavior problem, not a mental disorder, and certainly not incapacitating.

Not all mental disorders incapacitate a person. There are highly functioning narcissists of whom Donald Trump is one.

Would you agree that even a personality disorder can cause chaos and unbalance an administration if not the entire nation?

The president is supposed to set the tone, no?

I do agree with you about a personality disorder having the potential to create chaos in the White House.
Trump has been president for only weeks and every day there are more outrageous claims made by him.
Were I in the military, I'd be handing-in my resignation.

And they'd reject it, because you have a, you know, contract with them that you have to fulfill, and whether or not you like the Commander in Chief is pretty irrelevant to them.

 

[meaner gene]

And they'd reject it, because you have a, you know, contract with them that you have to fulfill, and whether or not you like the Commander in Chief is pretty irrelevant to them.

Can a soldier refuse to follow a lawful order, if that order is given by a delusional leader? I can see Trump ordering the troops to the North Korean DMZ.