- Mar 3, 2013
- 82,924
- 44,604
It drives me crazy when people dismiss a story because they find the source suspect rather than taking the time to refute what is being reported. So.........once again..........what aspect of this particular story reported by RS are you disputing? Did you read the article, or the one written by The Hill?What aspect of the reporting by Raw Story are you disputing?So does Rawstory.
This reporting coincides with what Raw Story reported.
But Schumer said that there were still a "few outstanding issues," including hundreds of billions in aid to corporations that Democrats are calling a "slush fund." Democrats have also pointed to a provision they say would let Mnuchin authorize loans or grants but not disclose the recipients for six months.
Democrats late Sunday blocked the stimulus package from moving forward in the Senate.
"The bill still includes something that most Americans don't want to see. Large corporate bailouts with almost no strings attached," Schumer said on Monday.
![]()
Schumer ‘confident’ stimulus coronavirus deal will be reached Monday
Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) said on Monday that congressional leaders and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin would reach a deal on a massive coronavirus stimulus package lat…thehill.com
What aspect of the reporting by Raw Story are you disputing?
they aren't known for facts.
I feel about Rawstroy the way you feel about Tucker.
they have a history of falsehoods and partisan reporting.
"The bill still includes something that most Americans don't want to see. Large corporate bailouts with almost no strings attached," Schumer said on Monday.
have you read the bill?
What does Schumer want in it that McConnell is against?
It drives me crazy when people dismiss a story because they find the source suspect
Like you did with Tuckers statement?
hypocrite.