Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Come on syrenn pick a good topic and have a debate! Healthcare, Immigration etc make this happen.
come on ck.... that is a VERY good topic for debate. We shall see if the liar still wants to lie....
He said i may pick a topic and judges...... there were no riders on that......
boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooCome on syrenn pick a good topic and have a debate! Healthcare, Immigration etc make this happen.
come on ck.... that is a VERY good topic for debate. We shall see if the liar still wants to lie....
He said i may pick a topic and judges...... there were no riders on that......
That's not a debate, we get enough of that nonsense in the Kindling Zone. Pick something else..
outside of the flame zone.
Syrenn may pick the topic.
Syrenn may pick 3 of 5 judges
Syrenn may choose how many posts for each before the thread is over
What say you Syrenn?
fyi Conjob, most women will decline an invitation to be stalked ........so you decline...........
Come on syrenn pick a good topic and have a debate! Healthcare, Immigration etc make this happen.
Sorry but this sounds super creepy. Even if you believe the problems Syrenn has with Conhog are unfounded, you know the nature of the problems.
Encouraging her to have anything to do with Conhog sounds like encouraging someone to go play minigolf with someone she has sought a restraining order against.
A judge might not grant the restraining order but to try to throw the two parties together socially?
Uber creepy.
Quit hijacking a thread with stupidity. This is for a debate on current/past events not dinner and a movie. Go home Amelia
good lord, it's going to be a blood bath.
Hope'n conhog has life insurance and some next of kid to ID the remains.
If it's the sock debate I'd love to be a judge.
If you cave to CK's demands, not so much.
Come on syrenn pick a good topic and have a debate! Healthcare, Immigration etc make this happen.
Sorry but this sounds super creepy. Even if you believe the problems Syrenn has with Conhog are unfounded, you know the nature of the problems.
Encouraging her to have anything to do with Conhog sounds like encouraging someone to go play minigolf with someone she has sought a restraining order against.
A judge might not grant the restraining order but to try to throw the two parties together socially?
Uber creepy.
Quit hijacking a thread with stupidity. This is for a debate on current/past events not dinner and a movie. Go home Amelia
The highly esteemed members are out enjoying the forums, I'm not sure what happened to the well known creeps.Come on syrenn pick a good topic and have a debate! Healthcare, Immigration etc make this happen.
come on ck.... that is a VERY good topic for debate. We shall see if the liar still wants to lie....
He said i may pick a topic and judges...... there were no riders on that......
Let's debate the merits of catering to well known creeps while locking out highly esteemed members of the community who wisely object to the coddling based on years of experience and abuse...
No woman would forgive a stalker and extend their friendship to them........Obviously, Conjob is infatuated with Syrenn.
Just more evidence of his proclivity for stalking female board members ..........
I think it's in his best interest to try to calm things down a little. Maybe that's what he is trying to do.
who "won or lost" in that thread is not only debatable it is irrelevant to THIS challenge.Even if you think you "won" you should be more than ready to accept this more formal challenge.
as i said.... we have been this way before ...and you lost.
i also said...if you want to talk about your socks honestly... i would be happy to question you.
So.... take it or leave it. Your choice.
so you decline...........
Last time I scoured the web for news there were no mentions of socks or conhog. Maybe Perez Hilton covered it?Sorry but this sounds super creepy. Even if you believe the problems Syrenn has with Conhog are unfounded, you know the nature of the problems.
Encouraging her to have anything to do with Conhog sounds like encouraging someone to go play minigolf with someone she has sought a restraining order against.
A judge might not grant the restraining order but to try to throw the two parties together socially?
Uber creepy.
Quit hijacking a thread with stupidity. This is for a debate on current/past events not dinner and a movie. Go home Amelia
conjog and his socks...are current and past events..... haven't you been keeping up or are you just uninformed on the subject.....or just informed with one side of the subject?
Come on syrenn pick a good topic and have a debate! Healthcare, Immigration etc make this happen.
Sorry but this sounds super creepy. Even if you believe the problems Syrenn has with Conhog are unfounded, you know the nature of the problems.
Encouraging her to have anything to do with Conhog sounds like encouraging someone to go play minigolf with someone she has sought a restraining order against.
A judge might not grant the restraining order but to try to throw the two parties together socially?
Uber creepy.
Quit hijacking a thread with stupidity. This is for a debate on current/past events not dinner and a movie. Go home Amelia
She's not the one that declined.who "won or lost" in that thread is not only debatable it is irrelevant to THIS challenge.Even if you think you "won" you should be more than ready to accept this more formal challenge.
as i said.... we have been this way before ...and you lost.
i also said...if you want to talk about your socks honestly... i would be happy to question you.
So.... take it or leave it. Your choice.
so you decline...........
Obviously, Conjob is infatuated with Syrenn.
Just more evidence of his proclivity for stalking female board members ..........
I think it's in his best interest to try to calm things down a little. Maybe that's what he is trying to do.
Yeah, maybe... Maybe he should care about challenging a certain topic instead of challenging this particular person, if he really cared about "calming things down". Welcome to the USMB Tavern. Pull up a bar stool, have a drink and relax. Play some music and watch a game on the big screen. Have a nibble of some pub grub to go along with your nip. The place is a little bit naughty and a little bit nice.
This is not the place for politics but a place to engage in just about everything else. If you find yourself in a thread where what you are talking about does not really belong there, instead of getting a room of your own or thread of your own, come here, pull up a chair and continue. MILD flaming is fine, but nothing to heated! Joke around, slap some backs, be a bit raucous and rowdy. Just remember, the bartender has a bat to take care of the troublemakers!
So, name your poison, the bar is well stocked of all of the things you love to drink! We have soft, hard and everything in-between. Tell us about your favorite libations, belly up to the bar and have a good time.
LOL This thread is the penultimate attempt at mini modding.
Last time I scoured the web for news there were no mentions of socks or conhog. Maybe Perez Hilton covered it?Quit hijacking a thread with stupidity. This is for a debate on current/past events not dinner and a movie. Go home Amelia
conjog and his socks...are current and past events..... haven't you been keeping up or are you just uninformed on the subject.....or just informed with one side of the subject?
The Bull Ring Rules and Guidelines
+ONLY the participants are allowed to debate/participate/comment in the thread (members can "like" rebuttals/arguments and neg/pos rep debater(s) ~ 2/48 will still apply~ )
+Debaters determine terms and/or rules of debate i.e debate can be ongoing or close on a certain day or time etc.
+3 Judges will be appointed and agreed upon by the participants (optional). Judges will determine the winner of the debate at it's closing and post results in the Bull Ring Discussion and Call-Out Forum
+After debate is finished the thread will be closed (applies only to debates that have a time frame attached. Participant(s) will contact staff to close thread )
+Member/Team Challenges will be made via PM or the appropriate forum (see below)
+Discussions on past, present and future debates will be made in the appropriate forum (see below)
+Outside of participating members, the Bull Ring is READ-ONLY. Failure to comply will result in non-participating members being removed from the Bull Ring (Forum will no longer be visible to member)
*To discuss current/past/future debates or to challenge other members/teams please use the Bull Ring Discussion and Call-Outs Forum. Again, the Bull Ring is READ-ONLY*
================================================== ================================================== ================================================== ==========
The OP should be formatted accordingly:
Topic: Topic or Topics being Debated
Debate Rule(s): *50 posts, *1 hour, *on-going, etc
Judges: Usernames of the 3 Judges (if applicable)
Like the good lackey you areSorry but this sounds super creepy. Even if you believe the problems Syrenn has with Conhog are unfounded, you know the nature of the problems.
Encouraging her to have anything to do with Conhog sounds like encouraging someone to go play minigolf with someone she has sought a restraining order against.
A judge might not grant the restraining order but to try to throw the two parties together socially?
Uber creepy.
Quit hijacking a thread with stupidity. This is for a debate on current/past events not dinner and a movie. Go home Amelia
Home?
No thank you. I think I'll stick around to watch who denies which facts. Good to be aware of such weaknesses. Will help in future challenges.
We have done this in the legal section before...and you lost... remember? So unless you want to discuss your many socks/persona honestly..... ask dante to jack you off.
http://www.usmessageboard.com/law-a...57-okay-lawyers-i-wanna-know-who-s-right.html
oh...and just a side note...i will be interested to see if this thread goes poof as so many of your other damning threads have.
You're beyond fucking stupid. I'm tired of attempting to have a rational discussion with someone who is so fucking retarded they are trying to make the claim that sailing around the world so solo is no more dangerous than playing football.
I pray to God that you NEVER have children, you are without a doubt one of the most ignorant fucking persons I have ever come across and NO child deserves you as a mother. Please stay on some form of birth control.
The highly esteemed members are out enjoying the forums, I'm not sure what happened to the well known creeps.
come on ck.... that is a VERY good topic for debate. We shall see if the liar still wants to lie....
He said i may pick a topic and judges...... there were no riders on that......
Let's debate the merits of catering to well known creeps while locking out highly esteemed members of the community who wisely object to the coddling based on years of experience and abuse...
Last time I scoured the web for news there were no mentions of socks or conhog. Maybe Perez Hilton covered it?
conjog and his socks...are current and past events..... haven't you been keeping up or are you just uninformed on the subject.....or just informed with one side of the subject?
Last time i looked at the rules of the bull ring... it did not stipulate the subject matter to be discussed, nor where such matter must be gleaned.
The Bull Ring Rules and Guidelines
+ONLY the participants are allowed to debate/participate/comment in the thread (members can "like" rebuttals/arguments and neg/pos rep debater(s) ~ 2/48 will still apply~ )
+Debaters determine terms and/or rules of debate i.e debate can be ongoing or close on a certain day or time etc.
+3 Judges will be appointed and agreed upon by the participants (optional). Judges will determine the winner of the debate at it's closing and post results in the Bull Ring Discussion and Call-Out Forum
+After debate is finished the thread will be closed (applies only to debates that have a time frame attached. Participant(s) will contact staff to close thread )
+Member/Team Challenges will be made via PM or the appropriate forum (see below)
+Discussions on past, present and future debates will be made in the appropriate forum (see below)
+Outside of participating members, the Bull Ring is READ-ONLY. Failure to comply will result in non-participating members being removed from the Bull Ring (Forum will no longer be visible to member)
*To discuss current/past/future debates or to challenge other members/teams please use the Bull Ring Discussion and Call-Outs Forum. Again, the Bull Ring is READ-ONLY*
================================================== ================================================== ================================================== ==========
The OP should be formatted accordingly:
Topic: Topic or Topics being Debated
Debate Rule(s): *50 posts, *1 hour, *on-going, etc
Judges: Usernames of the 3 Judges (if applicable)
