The Rabbi
Diamond Member
- Sep 16, 2009
- 67,733
- 7,923
still have that comprehension problem I see....A. You haven't read it.
B. This is why:
That you didn't know this is telling.
Now, answer the question...what part pertains to a Bedouin in the desert of the Sinai?
It's you have that have the problem.
Once captured by the US military, that person is in the jurisdiction of the United States.
If that's not enough for you..because it should be..the United States is a signatory nation to the Geneva Convention.
The Bush administration had to carve out a rather unique and almost unprecedented approach to torture that hasn't been used since the civil war and call them "Enemy Combatants."
That was profoundly unconstitutional and against the bedrock principles of this country.
Shockingly none of that is true.
The BoR is not a roving shield that protects Americans everywhere under all circumstances. The Geneva Convention is meaningless here. The Bush administration did not engage in torture, no matter how many times the Left invokes the term. The Supreme Court used the term enemy combatants in ex parte Quirin in the 1940s, so there is good precedent for what Bush did. ANd we know it worked because Obama has continued most of his policies.