Cooperation/participation in impeachment...

Rustic

Diamond Member
Oct 3, 2015
58,769
5,894
1,940
Is a 100% admission of guilt… Why the fuck would Trump do such a thing?… LOL
 
Obstructing the investigation makes him look pretty damn guilty too.
 
Obstructing the investigation makes him look pretty damn guilty too.
Actually, the 5th Ammendment says he's not obligated to give them shit (even concerning a witch hunt)...

But thank you for pointing out that the Democrats think the U S Constitution is irrelevant!!!
 
Last edited:
Nancy is terrified to have the House vote to authorize the impeachment inquiry, the way it has always been done. The Constitution says the <whole> House has the sole power of Impeachment. It does not say that the speaker of the house may start the impeachment process.


The House of Representatives ... shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

Article I, Section 2, Clause 5
 
Obstructing the investigation makes him look pretty damn guilty too.

Having clandestine impeachment investigations makes you look pretty damn guilty too. How is the public going to accept it when they say, we find Trump guilty of X. We can't tell you why, we can't tell you from whom, just take our word for it.
 
Obstructing the investigation makes him look pretty damn guilty too.
Actually, the 5th Ammendment says he's not obligated to give them shit (even concerning a witch hunt)...

But thank you for pointing out that the Democrats think the U S Constitution is irrelevant!!!
Everyone who ever took the fifth was clearly guilty as hell and had no further defense. Not sure it even applies to the White House or other governmental entities who are required to comply with oversight.
 
Obstructing the investigation makes him look pretty damn guilty too.
Actually, the 5th Ammendment says he's not obligated to give them shit (even concerning a witch hunt)...

But thank you for pointing out that the Democrats think the U S Constitution is irrelevant!!!
Everyone who ever took the fifth was clearly guilty as hell and had no further defense. Not sure it even applies to the White House or other governmental entities who are required to comply with oversight.
Wow, so everybody in Obama's administration was guilty as hell???

Thanks for the admission!!!
 
Obstructing the investigation makes him look pretty damn guilty too.
Actually, the 5th Ammendment says he's not obligated to give them shit (even concerning a witch hunt)...

But thank you for pointing out that the Democrats think the U S Constitution is irrelevant!!!
Everyone who ever took the fifth was clearly guilty as hell and had no further defense. Not sure it even applies to the White House or other governmental entities who are required to comply with oversight.
Wow, so everybody in Obama's administration was guilty as hell???

Thanks for the admission!!!
Well why then didn't the republicans impeach Obama if he was so allegedly lawless? Pundits and bloggers can make all the allegations in the world but the bullshit ends under oath and under cross-examination.
 
Is a 100% admission of guilt… Why the fuck would Trump do such a thing?… LOL
China knows...

China rejects Trump’s call to investigate Biden and son

"China has rejected U.S. President Donald Trump’s call to investigate his Democrat rival Joe Biden and Biden’s son, saying Beijing had no intention of intervening in U.S. domestic affairs."

Do you think Trump has the slightest clue about anything EXCEPT earning more money?
 
Is a 100% admission of guilt… Why the fuck would Trump do such a thing?… LOL
China knows...

China rejects Trump’s call to investigate Biden and son

"China has rejected U.S. President Donald Trump’s call to investigate his Democrat rival Joe Biden and Biden’s son, saying Beijing had no intention of intervening in U.S. domestic affairs."

Do you think Trump has the slightest clue about anything EXCEPT earning more money?
His financials are his business... And nobody else’s
 
Is a 100% admission of guilt… Why the fuck would Trump do such a thing?… LOL
China knows...

China rejects Trump’s call to investigate Biden and son

"China has rejected U.S. President Donald Trump’s call to investigate his Democrat rival Joe Biden and Biden’s son, saying Beijing had no intention of intervening in U.S. domestic affairs."

Do you think Trump has the slightest clue about anything EXCEPT earning more money?
His financials are his business... And nobody else’s
His financials are his business... And nobody else’s
How did that work out for Al Capone?
9857801a6880ec5037f5e0e5663f3463.jpg

Which gangster posed/poses the biggest threat to America, Trump or Capone?
 
Nancy is terrified to have the House vote to authorize the impeachment inquiry, the way it has always been done. The Constitution says the <whole> House has the sole power of Impeachment. It does not say that the speaker of the house may start the impeachment process.


The House of Representatives ... shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

Article I, Section 2, Clause 5
Thanks for finding that! It says:
The Constitution does not specify how impeachment proceedings are to be initiated. Until the early 20th century, a House member could rise and propose an impeachment, which would then be assigned to a committee for investigation. Presently, it is the House Judiciary Committee that initiates the process and then, after investigating the allegations, prepares recommendations for the whole House's consideration. If the House votes to adopt an impeachment resolution, the Chairman of the Judiciary Committee recommends a slate of "managers," whom the House subsequently approves by resolution. These Representatives subsequently become the prosecution team in the impeachment trial in the Senate (see Section 3, Clause 6 below).[35]

The present investigation has not gotten that far. Pelosi is doing exactly what is outlined here.
 
Obstructing the investigation makes him look pretty damn guilty too.
Recruiting whistleblowers offering to pay their mortgages Makes democrats look like nazis
Recruiting whistleblowers offering to pay their mortgages Makes democrats look like nazis
What evidence can you supply to support your claim regarding whistle-blowers and their mortgages?
Ukraine whistleblower’s lawyers work for group that offers to pay officials who leak against Trump

Fucking google is burying these stories wow
 
Nancy is terrified to have the House vote to authorize the impeachment inquiry, the way it has always been done. The Constitution says the <whole> House has the sole power of Impeachment. It does not say that the speaker of the house may start the impeachment process.


The House of Representatives ... shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

Article I, Section 2, Clause 5
Thanks for finding that! It says:
The Constitution does not specify how impeachment proceedings are to be initiated. Until the early 20th century, a House member could rise and propose an impeachment, which would then be assigned to a committee for investigation. Presently, it is the House Judiciary Committee that initiates the process and then, after investigating the allegations, prepares recommendations for the whole House's consideration. If the House votes to adopt an impeachment resolution, the Chairman of the Judiciary Committee recommends a slate of "managers," whom the House subsequently approves by resolution. These Representatives subsequently become the prosecution team in the impeachment trial in the Senate (see Section 3, Clause 6 below).[35]

The present investigation has not gotten that far. Pelosi is doing exactly what is outlined here.

The argument is over how to launch an "impeachment inquiry". For Nixon and Clinton the whole House voted to initiate. For Trump, Nancy made the assignment, which limits GOP participation using subpoenas, and other issues outlined in McCarthy's letter.
McCarthy asks Pelosi to suspend impeachment inquiry until she defines procedures
So the WH is not playing along, the WH wants the courts to stipulate what the Constitution requires for the initiation of an "Impeachment Inquiry".

"The Constitution does not specify how impeachment proceedings are to be initiated. Until the early 20th century, a House member could rise and propose an impeachment, which would then be assigned to a committee for investigation."
 
Obstructing the investigation makes him look pretty damn guilty too.
Recruiting whistleblowers offering to pay their mortgages Makes democrats look like nazis
Recruiting whistleblowers offering to pay their mortgages Makes democrats look like nazis
What evidence can you supply to support your claim regarding whistle-blowers and their mortgages?
Ukraine whistleblower’s lawyers work for group that offers to pay officials who leak against Trump

Fucking google is burying these stories wow

from your link....but does not pay clients' rent or mortgage, noting potential ethical issues with attorneys doing so.
 
Obstructing the investigation makes him look pretty damn guilty too.

Having clandestine impeachment investigations makes you look pretty damn guilty too. How is the public going to accept it when they say, we find Trump guilty of X. We can't tell you why, we can't tell you from whom, just take our word for it.
Ray!!!
Orange man Bad!!!!
Stop it!!!
 
Obstructing the investigation makes him look pretty damn guilty too.
Recruiting whistleblowers offering to pay their mortgages Makes democrats look like nazis
Recruiting whistleblowers offering to pay their mortgages Makes democrats look like nazis
What evidence can you supply to support your claim regarding whistle-blowers and their mortgages?
Ukraine whistleblower’s lawyers work for group that offers to pay officials who leak against Trump

Fucking google is burying these stories wow

from your link....but does not pay clients' rent or mortgage, noting potential ethical issues with attorneys doing so.
Lol seriously wow
 

Forum List

Back
Top