Cops Raid Women’s Restroom, Assault and Drag Lesbian Out Thinking She’s a Man

[Pop23]

Why is it that our modern libs just cannot be happy until we remove the "men's-" and the "women's-" prefixes from all public restrooms?

In most private homes, the bathrooms are not gender specific either.

Of course, the doors close and are able to be locked if there is a non family member visiting, for example.

But in public places, there actually has long been a perfectly good non sexually discriminatory reason for gender specific restrooms. The reasons haven't changed. Liberals are merely asserting that our collective attitudes must bend to THEIR notions of fairness.

Meanwhile, the scumbags bent on committing sex crimes are being given easier access. And the libbies see nothing wrong here.

Sigh.....just layers of stupid.

First, there is no known case of a transgender women going into a public bathroom and committing a sex crime. So you might as well create unicorn leash laws for as little the laws prevent the crimes you're discussing.

Second, 'scumbags' are already attacking people in bathrooms. They just go in when no one is looking. Negating the 'bathroom law' issues entirely. As someone who is going to sexually assault someone is going to give a fiddler's fuck about bathroom ordinances.

Third, if someone goes into a bathroom to do anything other than use the facilities, that is already against the law. So if someone is taking pictures, hanging out in a stall, or anything other than going to the bathroom, the police can already act. Making the law utterly unnecessary.

Fourth, such laws stupidly create bathroom police. Where police and private citizens feel the need to ask for ID, harass people, even assault them.....all in the bid to enforce laws that do exactly jack shit for personal safety. Meaning you've literally created the danger you're trying to prevent. All while protecting no one.

Fifth, lesbians can look like guys. You've guaranteed their harassment and assault over nothing. All while protecting no one.

Sixth, transgender men look like men. So you're guaranteed to freak some women out when bearded, muscular dudes are forced to use the ladies room.

Seventh, transgender women look like women. When they are forced into the men's room, many are harrassed or assaulted. Meaning that you've again created the very problem you're claiming to seek to prevent. All while protecting no one.

These laws are worse than useless. As the protect no one. All while harming real people.

But to allow trans males and not all males would be an arbitrary application of the law, and as such, illegal discrimination to any male wanting access.

this argument has been refuted as many times as it's been brought up.

Nobody's even attempted, give it a shot lil fella

false! you not accepting the outcome is not the same the result.



1

English please

 

[daws101]

because you cant see anything, if it had been a setup as you erroneously claim, the filmmaker would have made sure to shoot it in the bathroom so you could see them throwing her out of it .
that's not what you see.
she's already outside when the clip starts , and a cop is blocking the door of what presumably is the shitter.

Then she wasn't taken out of a restroom.

really? Here you go RW: Shocking Footage Shows Police Forcing Lesbian to Leave Women's Bathroom

If she's not in a restroom then she couldn't be forced out lil dude

you're contradicting yourself ...
btw the lil dude nickname you are so fond of calling me is hilarious because it so far from reality.

I doubt it, you argue like a 12 year old. Lil dude

that's also a contradiction
you claim to want an adult debate but the kind of shit you post says just the opposite.

 

[daws101]

Sigh.....just layers of stupid.

First, there is no known case of a transgender women going into a public bathroom and committing a sex crime. So you might as well create unicorn leash laws for as little the laws prevent the crimes you're discussing.

Second, 'scumbags' are already attacking people in bathrooms. They just go in when no one is looking. Negating the 'bathroom law' issues entirely. As someone who is going to sexually assault someone is going to give a fiddler's fuck about bathroom ordinances.

Third, if someone goes into a bathroom to do anything other than use the facilities, that is already against the law. So if someone is taking pictures, hanging out in a stall, or anything other than going to the bathroom, the police can already act. Making the law utterly unnecessary.

Fourth, such laws stupidly create bathroom police. Where police and private citizens feel the need to ask for ID, harass people, even assault them.....all in the bid to enforce laws that do exactly jack shit for personal safety. Meaning you've literally created the danger you're trying to prevent. All while protecting no one.

Fifth, lesbians can look like guys. You've guaranteed their harassment and assault over nothing. All while protecting no one.

Sixth, transgender men look like men. So you're guaranteed to freak some women out when bearded, muscular dudes are forced to use the ladies room.

Seventh, transgender women look like women. When they are forced into the men's room, many are harrassed or assaulted. Meaning that you've again created the very problem you're claiming to seek to prevent. All while protecting no one.

These laws are worse than useless. As the protect no one. All while harming real people.

But to allow trans males and not all males would be an arbitrary application of the law, and as such, illegal discrimination to any male wanting access.

this argument has been refuted as many times as it's been brought up.

Nobody's even attempted, give it a shot lil fella

false! you not accepting the outcome is not the same the result.



1

English please

learn to read please.

 

[daws101]

total bullshit !
the camera and the person shooting it are in a hall way or foyer is some public space a mall maybe .

Because you can't see a toilet?

because you cant see anything, if it had been a setup as you erroneously claim, the filmmaker would have made sure to shoot it in the bathroom so you could see them throwing her out of it .
that's not what you see.
she's already outside when the clip starts , and a cop is blocking the door of what presumably is the shitter.

Then she wasn't taken out of a restroom.

I

I know right. You claimed she was, then she wasn't even in one.

That's how a troll rolls

I claimed nothing of the kind talk about reading shit into a conversation .

 

[Pop23]

Because you can't see a toilet?

because you cant see anything, if it had been a setup as you erroneously claim, the filmmaker would have made sure to shoot it in the bathroom so you could see them throwing her out of it .
that's not what you see.
she's already outside when the clip starts , and a cop is blocking the door of what presumably is the shitter.

Then she wasn't taken out of a restroom.

I

I know right. You claimed she was, then she wasn't even in one.

That's how a troll rolls

I claimed nothing of the kind talk about reading shit into a conversation .

It's a magic bathroom right? Has no toilets so it's not a bathroom, but one someone could be forced out of.

Let me guess filmmaker, the twilight zone?

 

[IlarMeilyr]

Why is it that our modern libs just cannot be happy until we remove the "men's-" and the "women's-" prefixes from all public restrooms?

In most private homes, the bathrooms are not gender specific either.

Of course, the doors close and are able to be locked if there is a non family member visiting, for example.

But in public places, there actually has long been a perfectly good non sexually discriminatory reason for gender specific restrooms. The reasons haven't changed. Liberals are merely asserting that our collective attitudes must bend to THEIR notions of fairness.

Meanwhile, the scumbags bent on committing sex crimes are being given easier access. And the libbies see nothing wrong here.

Sigh.....just layers of stupid.

First, there is no known case of a transgender women going into a public bathroom and committing a sex crime. So you might as well create unicorn leash laws for as little the laws prevent the crimes you're discussing.

Second, 'scumbags' are already attacking people in bathrooms. They just go in when no one is looking. Negating the 'bathroom law' issues entirely. As someone who is going to sexually assault someone is going to give a fiddler's fuck about bathroom ordinances.

Third, if someone goes into a bathroom to do anything other than use the facilities, that is already against the law. So if someone is taking pictures, hanging out in a stall, or anything other than going to the bathroom, the police can already act. Making the law utterly unnecessary.

Fourth, such laws stupidly create bathroom police. Where police and private citizens feel the need to ask for ID, harass people, even assault them.....all in the bid to enforce laws that do exactly jack shit for personal safety. Meaning you've literally created the danger you're trying to prevent. All while protecting no one.

Fifth, lesbians can look like guys. You've guaranteed their harassment and assault over nothing. All while protecting no one.

Sixth, transgender men look like men. So you're guaranteed to freak some women out when bearded, muscular dudes are forced to use the ladies room.

Seventh, transgender women look like women. When they are forced into the men's room, many are harrassed or assaulted. Meaning that you've again created the very problem you're claiming to seek to prevent. All while protecting no one.

These laws are worse than useless. As the protect no one. All while harming real people.

Sky, you hapless hump. The layers of stupid are the very few layers of your brain.

I was not discussing transgender women.

I was discussing the prospect that rapists might USE the no-gender bathroom as a means of just gaining entry into a WOMEN's public restroom, you utterly brain dead shit for brains motherfucker.

Try to keep up, you pathetic fucking idiot.

 

[daws101]

because you cant see anything, if it had been a setup as you erroneously claim, the filmmaker would have made sure to shoot it in the bathroom so you could see them throwing her out of it .
that's not what you see.
she's already outside when the clip starts , and a cop is blocking the door of what presumably is the shitter.

Then she wasn't taken out of a restroom.

I

I know right. You claimed she was, then she wasn't even in one.

That's how a troll rolls

I claimed nothing of the kind talk about reading shit into a conversation .

It's a magic bathroom right? Has no toilets so it's not a bathroom, but one someone could be forced out of.

Let me guess filmmaker, the twilight zone?

You're raving .
The clip never showed the bathroom not even the door.
So you have no point.

 

[daws101]

Why is it that our modern libs just cannot be happy until we remove the "men's-" and the "women's-" prefixes from all public restrooms?

In most private homes, the bathrooms are not gender specific either.

Of course, the doors close and are able to be locked if there is a non family member visiting, for example.

But in public places, there actually has long been a perfectly good non sexually discriminatory reason for gender specific restrooms. The reasons haven't changed. Liberals are merely asserting that our collective attitudes must bend to THEIR notions of fairness.

Meanwhile, the scumbags bent on committing sex crimes are being given easier access. And the libbies see nothing wrong here.

Sigh.....just layers of stupid.

First, there is no known case of a transgender women going into a public bathroom and committing a sex crime. So you might as well create unicorn leash laws for as little the laws prevent the crimes you're discussing.

Second, 'scumbags' are already attacking people in bathrooms. They just go in when no one is looking. Negating the 'bathroom law' issues entirely. As someone who is going to sexually assault someone is going to give a fiddler's fuck about bathroom ordinances.

Third, if someone goes into a bathroom to do anything other than use the facilities, that is already against the law. So if someone is taking pictures, hanging out in a stall, or anything other than going to the bathroom, the police can already act. Making the law utterly unnecessary.

Fourth, such laws stupidly create bathroom police. Where police and private citizens feel the need to ask for ID, harass people, even assault them.....all in the bid to enforce laws that do exactly jack shit for personal safety. Meaning you've literally created the danger you're trying to prevent. All while protecting no one.

Fifth, lesbians can look like guys. You've guaranteed their harassment and assault over nothing. All while protecting no one.

Sixth, transgender men look like men. So you're guaranteed to freak some women out when bearded, muscular dudes are forced to use the ladies room.

Seventh, transgender women look like women. When they are forced into the men's room, many are harrassed or assaulted. Meaning that you've again created the very problem you're claiming to seek to prevent. All while protecting no one.

These laws are worse than useless. As the protect no one. All while harming real people.

Sky, you hapless hump. The layers of stupid are the very few layers of your brain.

I was not discussing transgender women.

I was discussing the prospect that rapists might USE the no-gender bathroom as a means of just gaining entry into a WOMEN's public restroom, you utterly brain dead shit for brains motherfucker.

Try to keep up, you pathetic fucking idiot.

Rapists in women's restrooms is nothing new ..

 

[bucs90]

Why is it that our modern libs just cannot be happy until we remove the "men's-" and the "women's-" prefixes from all public restrooms?

In most private homes, the bathrooms are not gender specific either.

Of course, the doors close and are able to be locked if there is a non family member visiting, for example.

But in public places, there actually has long been a perfectly good non sexually discriminatory reason for gender specific restrooms. The reasons haven't changed. Liberals are merely asserting that our collective attitudes must bend to THEIR notions of fairness.

Meanwhile, the scumbags bent on committing sex crimes are being given easier access. And the libbies see nothing wrong here.

Sigh.....just layers of stupid.

First, there is no known case of a transgender women going into a public bathroom and committing a sex crime. So you might as well create unicorn leash laws for as little the laws prevent the crimes you're discussing.

Second, 'scumbags' are already attacking people in bathrooms. They just go in when no one is looking. Negating the 'bathroom law' issues entirely. As someone who is going to sexually assault someone is going to give a fiddler's fuck about bathroom ordinances.

Third, if someone goes into a bathroom to do anything other than use the facilities, that is already against the law. So if someone is taking pictures, hanging out in a stall, or anything other than going to the bathroom, the police can already act. Making the law utterly unnecessary.

Fourth, such laws stupidly create bathroom police. Where police and private citizens feel the need to ask for ID, harass people, even assault them.....all in the bid to enforce laws that do exactly jack shit for personal safety. Meaning you've literally created the danger you're trying to prevent. All while protecting no one.

Fifth, lesbians can look like guys. You've guaranteed their harassment and assault over nothing. All while protecting no one.

Sixth, transgender men look like men. So you're guaranteed to freak some women out when bearded, muscular dudes are forced to use the ladies room.

Seventh, transgender women look like women. When they are forced into the men's room, many are harrassed or assaulted. Meaning that you've again created the very problem you're claiming to seek to prevent. All while protecting no one.

These laws are worse than useless. As the protect no one. All while harming real people.

Sky, you hapless hump. The layers of stupid are the very few layers of your brain.

I was not discussing transgender women.

I was discussing the prospect that rapists might USE the no-gender bathroom as a means of just gaining entry into a WOMEN's public restroom, you utterly brain dead shit for brains motherfucker.

Try to keep up, you pathetic fucking idiot.

He'll never grasp it man.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

Why is it that our modern libs just cannot be happy until we remove the "men's-" and the "women's-" prefixes from all public restrooms?

In most private homes, the bathrooms are not gender specific either.

Of course, the doors close and are able to be locked if there is a non family member visiting, for example.

But in public places, there actually has long been a perfectly good non sexually discriminatory reason for gender specific restrooms. The reasons haven't changed. Liberals are merely asserting that our collective attitudes must bend to THEIR notions of fairness.

Meanwhile, the scumbags bent on committing sex crimes are being given easier access. And the libbies see nothing wrong here.

Sigh.....just layers of stupid.

First, there is no known case of a transgender women going into a public bathroom and committing a sex crime. So you might as well create unicorn leash laws for as little the laws prevent the crimes you're discussing.

Second, 'scumbags' are already attacking people in bathrooms. They just go in when no one is looking. Negating the 'bathroom law' issues entirely. As someone who is going to sexually assault someone is going to give a fiddler's fuck about bathroom ordinances.

Third, if someone goes into a bathroom to do anything other than use the facilities, that is already against the law. So if someone is taking pictures, hanging out in a stall, or anything other than going to the bathroom, the police can already act. Making the law utterly unnecessary.

Fourth, such laws stupidly create bathroom police. Where police and private citizens feel the need to ask for ID, harass people, even assault them.....all in the bid to enforce laws that do exactly jack shit for personal safety. Meaning you've literally created the danger you're trying to prevent. All while protecting no one.

Fifth, lesbians can look like guys. You've guaranteed their harassment and assault over nothing. All while protecting no one.

Sixth, transgender men look like men. So you're guaranteed to freak some women out when bearded, muscular dudes are forced to use the ladies room.

Seventh, transgender women look like women. When they are forced into the men's room, many are harrassed or assaulted. Meaning that you've again created the very problem you're claiming to seek to prevent. All while protecting no one.

These laws are worse than useless. As the protect no one. All while harming real people.

Sky, you hapless hump. The layers of stupid are the very few layers of your brain.

I was not discussing transgender women.

I was discussing the prospect that rapists might USE the no-gender bathroom as a means of just gaining entry into a WOMEN's public restroom, you utterly brain dead shit for brains motherfucker.

Try to keep up, you pathetic fucking idiot.

Rapists in women's restrooms is nothing new ..

Well, yes. It is.

But even to the extent they've gone to such places before, it would certainly not be something (before) that would have been permitted. THAT kind of makes it easier. And making violent sex-related criminal behavior EASIER is not a rational policy preference.

 

[daws101]

Why is it that our modern libs just cannot be happy until we remove the "men's-" and the "women's-" prefixes from all public restrooms?

In most private homes, the bathrooms are not gender specific either.

Of course, the doors close and are able to be locked if there is a non family member visiting, for example.

But in public places, there actually has long been a perfectly good non sexually discriminatory reason for gender specific restrooms. The reasons haven't changed. Liberals are merely asserting that our collective attitudes must bend to THEIR notions of fairness.

Meanwhile, the scumbags bent on committing sex crimes are being given easier access. And the libbies see nothing wrong here.

Sigh.....just layers of stupid.

First, there is no known case of a transgender women going into a public bathroom and committing a sex crime. So you might as well create unicorn leash laws for as little the laws prevent the crimes you're discussing.

Second, 'scumbags' are already attacking people in bathrooms. They just go in when no one is looking. Negating the 'bathroom law' issues entirely. As someone who is going to sexually assault someone is going to give a fiddler's fuck about bathroom ordinances.

Third, if someone goes into a bathroom to do anything other than use the facilities, that is already against the law. So if someone is taking pictures, hanging out in a stall, or anything other than going to the bathroom, the police can already act. Making the law utterly unnecessary.

Fourth, such laws stupidly create bathroom police. Where police and private citizens feel the need to ask for ID, harass people, even assault them.....all in the bid to enforce laws that do exactly jack shit for personal safety. Meaning you've literally created the danger you're trying to prevent. All while protecting no one.

Fifth, lesbians can look like guys. You've guaranteed their harassment and assault over nothing. All while protecting no one.

Sixth, transgender men look like men. So you're guaranteed to freak some women out when bearded, muscular dudes are forced to use the ladies room.

Seventh, transgender women look like women. When they are forced into the men's room, many are harrassed or assaulted. Meaning that you've again created the very problem you're claiming to seek to prevent. All while protecting no one.

These laws are worse than useless. As the protect no one. All while harming real people.

Sky, you hapless hump. The layers of stupid are the very few layers of your brain.

I was not discussing transgender women.

I was discussing the prospect that rapists might USE the no-gender bathroom as a means of just gaining entry into a WOMEN's public restroom, you utterly brain dead shit for brains motherfucker.

Try to keep up, you pathetic fucking idiot.

He'll never grasp it man.

Skylar is female .
Her grasp of the situation is realistic unlike yourself.

 

[daws101]

Why is it that our modern libs just cannot be happy until we remove the "men's-" and the "women's-" prefixes from all public restrooms?

In most private homes, the bathrooms are not gender specific either.

Of course, the doors close and are able to be locked if there is a non family member visiting, for example.

But in public places, there actually has long been a perfectly good non sexually discriminatory reason for gender specific restrooms. The reasons haven't changed. Liberals are merely asserting that our collective attitudes must bend to THEIR notions of fairness.

Meanwhile, the scumbags bent on committing sex crimes are being given easier access. And the libbies see nothing wrong here.

Sigh.....just layers of stupid.

First, there is no known case of a transgender women going into a public bathroom and committing a sex crime. So you might as well create unicorn leash laws for as little the laws prevent the crimes you're discussing.

Second, 'scumbags' are already attacking people in bathrooms. They just go in when no one is looking. Negating the 'bathroom law' issues entirely. As someone who is going to sexually assault someone is going to give a fiddler's fuck about bathroom ordinances.

Third, if someone goes into a bathroom to do anything other than use the facilities, that is already against the law. So if someone is taking pictures, hanging out in a stall, or anything other than going to the bathroom, the police can already act. Making the law utterly unnecessary.

Fourth, such laws stupidly create bathroom police. Where police and private citizens feel the need to ask for ID, harass people, even assault them.....all in the bid to enforce laws that do exactly jack shit for personal safety. Meaning you've literally created the danger you're trying to prevent. All while protecting no one.

Fifth, lesbians can look like guys. You've guaranteed their harassment and assault over nothing. All while protecting no one.

Sixth, transgender men look like men. So you're guaranteed to freak some women out when bearded, muscular dudes are forced to use the ladies room.

Seventh, transgender women look like women. When they are forced into the men's room, many are harrassed or assaulted. Meaning that you've again created the very problem you're claiming to seek to prevent. All while protecting no one.

These laws are worse than useless. As the protect no one. All while harming real people.

Sky, you hapless hump. The layers of stupid are the very few layers of your brain.

I was not discussing transgender women.

I was discussing the prospect that rapists might USE the no-gender bathroom as a means of just gaining entry into a WOMEN's public restroom, you utterly brain dead shit for brains motherfucker.

Try to keep up, you pathetic fucking idiot.

Rapists in women's restrooms is nothing new ..

Well, yes. It is.

But even to the extent they've gone to such places before, it would certainly not be something (before) that would have been permitted. THAT kind of makes it easier. And making violent sex-related criminal behavior EASIER is not a rational policy preference.

Not buying it.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Shocking Footage Shows Police Forcing Lesbian to Leave Women's Bathroom

License, registration and proof of Genitalia please



Footage has surfaced alleging to show police officers forcing an unidentified woman to leave a women's restroom facility, once again proving the dire impactof the recent swath of anti-LGBT laws across the country. The woman, reportedly a lesbian, is called "sir" by the officers as she's unfairly tasked with attempting to convince them she's a woman. The footage, uploaded to Facebook by Tamara McDaniel, has quickly garnered millions of views since first being shared last week.

The officers are heard demanding ID from the woman, who reveals she doesn't have one on her. A male officer is then seen screaming in the woman's face as friends plead for the officers to properly deescalate the situation. These pleas, however, are instead met with hostility and repeated requests for an ID. Of course, this loudly begs the question: Why the hell should anyone have to show an ID just to use the restroom? The exact location of the footage, which made it to the Daily Star after surfacing on Facebook, is unknown.

Leftards and their fake staged outrages.

 

[bucs90]

Shocking Footage Shows Police Forcing Lesbian to Leave Women's Bathroom

License, registration and proof of Genitalia please



Footage has surfaced alleging to show police officers forcing an unidentified woman to leave a women's restroom facility, once again proving the dire impactof the recent swath of anti-LGBT laws across the country. The woman, reportedly a lesbian, is called "sir" by the officers as she's unfairly tasked with attempting to convince them she's a woman. The footage, uploaded to Facebook by Tamara McDaniel, has quickly garnered millions of views since first being shared last week.

The officers are heard demanding ID from the woman, who reveals she doesn't have one on her. A male officer is then seen screaming in the woman's face as friends plead for the officers to properly deescalate the situation. These pleas, however, are instead met with hostility and repeated requests for an ID. Of course, this loudly begs the question: Why the hell should anyone have to show an ID just to use the restroom? The exact location of the footage, which made it to the Daily Star after surfacing on Facebook, is unknown.

How many times will this obvious hoax be posted.

Any proof it's a hoax or are you wishing it was?

The cameras rolling IN A BATHROOMS when the police arrive.

The shot is placed to catch all parties in frame.

The shot is steady, not a bit bouncy

The statements appear practiced.

The only thing missing is a teleprompter

Hey man....I'm on the right side of this issue but this isn't a hoax.

The camera is probably set up because most of the women in there objected to what they thought was a male in there and called cops....and the camera gal knew the cops were coming. Because....most women don't want dudes in their restrooms.

I do think they may have gone out with the intent to provoke such a response though. Maybe.



And I DEFINITELY THINK the Democrats should KEEP UP THIS FIGHT to allow dudes into the girls room. Please dems....please intensify this fight!!!!

You....you realize that she's not a dude, right? That police harassed a woman for trying to use the ladies bathroom.

The point is people there thought it was a dude and called cops. Their job was to enforce whatever laws their jurisdiction had regarding this....at the request of the citizen(s) who called.

 

[daws101]

Shocking Footage Shows Police Forcing Lesbian to Leave Women's Bathroom

License, registration and proof of Genitalia please



Footage has surfaced alleging to show police officers forcing an unidentified woman to leave a women's restroom facility, once again proving the dire impactof the recent swath of anti-LGBT laws across the country. The woman, reportedly a lesbian, is called "sir" by the officers as she's unfairly tasked with attempting to convince them she's a woman. The footage, uploaded to Facebook by Tamara McDaniel, has quickly garnered millions of views since first being shared last week.

The officers are heard demanding ID from the woman, who reveals she doesn't have one on her. A male officer is then seen screaming in the woman's face as friends plead for the officers to properly deescalate the situation. These pleas, however, are instead met with hostility and repeated requests for an ID. Of course, this loudly begs the question: Why the hell should anyone have to show an ID just to use the restroom? The exact location of the footage, which made it to the Daily Star after surfacing on Facebook, is unknown.

Leftards and their fake staged outrages.

They learned it from anti choice assholes and Trump has perfected it!

 

[daws101]

How many times will this obvious hoax be posted.

Any proof it's a hoax or are you wishing it was?

The cameras rolling IN A BATHROOMS when the police arrive.

The shot is placed to catch all parties in frame.

The shot is steady, not a bit bouncy

The statements appear practiced.

The only thing missing is a teleprompter

Hey man....I'm on the right side of this issue but this isn't a hoax.

The camera is probably set up because most of the women in there objected to what they thought was a male in there and called cops....and the camera gal knew the cops were coming. Because....most women don't want dudes in their restrooms.

I do think they may have gone out with the intent to provoke such a response though. Maybe.



And I DEFINITELY THINK the Democrats should KEEP UP THIS FIGHT to allow dudes into the girls room. Please dems....please intensify this fight!!!!

You....you realize that she's not a dude, right? That police harassed a woman for trying to use the ladies bathroom.

The point is people there thought it was a dude and called cops. Their job was to enforce whatever laws their jurisdiction had regarding this....at the request of the citizen(s) who called.

But they kept her out anyway.
Your point?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Shocking Footage Shows Police Forcing Lesbian to Leave Women's Bathroom

License, registration and proof of Genitalia please



Footage has surfaced alleging to show police officers forcing an unidentified woman to leave a women's restroom facility, once again proving the dire impactof the recent swath of anti-LGBT laws across the country. The woman, reportedly a lesbian, is called "sir" by the officers as she's unfairly tasked with attempting to convince them she's a woman. The footage, uploaded to Facebook by Tamara McDaniel, has quickly garnered millions of views since first being shared last week.

The officers are heard demanding ID from the woman, who reveals she doesn't have one on her. A male officer is then seen screaming in the woman's face as friends plead for the officers to properly deescalate the situation. These pleas, however, are instead met with hostility and repeated requests for an ID. Of course, this loudly begs the question: Why the hell should anyone have to show an ID just to use the restroom? The exact location of the footage, which made it to the Daily Star after surfacing on Facebook, is unknown.

Leftards and their fake staged outrages.

They learned it from anti choice assholes and Trump has perfected it!

Psychos.

 

[daws101]

Shocking Footage Shows Police Forcing Lesbian to Leave Women's Bathroom

License, registration and proof of Genitalia please



Footage has surfaced alleging to show police officers forcing an unidentified woman to leave a women's restroom facility, once again proving the dire impactof the recent swath of anti-LGBT laws across the country. The woman, reportedly a lesbian, is called "sir" by the officers as she's unfairly tasked with attempting to convince them she's a woman. The footage, uploaded to Facebook by Tamara McDaniel, has quickly garnered millions of views since first being shared last week.

The officers are heard demanding ID from the woman, who reveals she doesn't have one on her. A male officer is then seen screaming in the woman's face as friends plead for the officers to properly deescalate the situation. These pleas, however, are instead met with hostility and repeated requests for an ID. Of course, this loudly begs the question: Why the hell should anyone have to show an ID just to use the restroom? The exact location of the footage, which made it to the Daily Star after surfacing on Facebook, is unknown.

Leftards and their fake staged outrages.

They learned it from anti choice assholes and Trump has perfected it!

Psychos.
View attachment 73622

Funny I do that every time you post.

 

[Skylar]

How many times will this obvious hoax be posted.

Any proof it's a hoax or are you wishing it was?

The cameras rolling IN A BATHROOMS when the police arrive.

The shot is placed to catch all parties in frame.

The shot is steady, not a bit bouncy

The statements appear practiced.

The only thing missing is a teleprompter

Hey man....I'm on the right side of this issue but this isn't a hoax.

The camera is probably set up because most of the women in there objected to what they thought was a male in there and called cops....and the camera gal knew the cops were coming. Because....most women don't want dudes in their restrooms.

I do think they may have gone out with the intent to provoke such a response though. Maybe.



And I DEFINITELY THINK the Democrats should KEEP UP THIS FIGHT to allow dudes into the girls room. Please dems....please intensify this fight!!!!

You....you realize that she's not a dude, right? That police harassed a woman for trying to use the ladies bathroom.

The point is people there thought it was a dude and called cops. Their job was to enforce whatever laws their jurisdiction had regarding this....at the request of the citizen(s) who called.

The point is.......that the police harassed a woman trying to use the ladies room. One who violated no law, nor did anything illegal.

How was the public 'protected' by harrassing this young woman?

 

[bucs90]

Any proof it's a hoax or are you wishing it was?

The cameras rolling IN A BATHROOMS when the police arrive.

The shot is placed to catch all parties in frame.

The shot is steady, not a bit bouncy

The statements appear practiced.

The only thing missing is a teleprompter

Hey man....I'm on the right side of this issue but this isn't a hoax.

The camera is probably set up because most of the women in there objected to what they thought was a male in there and called cops....and the camera gal knew the cops were coming. Because....most women don't want dudes in their restrooms.

I do think they may have gone out with the intent to provoke such a response though. Maybe.



And I DEFINITELY THINK the Democrats should KEEP UP THIS FIGHT to allow dudes into the girls room. Please dems....please intensify this fight!!!!

You....you realize that she's not a dude, right? That police harassed a woman for trying to use the ladies bathroom.

The point is people there thought it was a dude and called cops. Their job was to enforce whatever laws their jurisdiction had regarding this....at the request of the citizen(s) who called.

But they kept her out anyway.
Your point?

They kept "IT" out...because it refused to identify.