GMCGeneral
Diamond Member
The only ones treasonous are hard Left Communists like you.America defeated treasonous conservatives in 1865; America can defeat treasonous conservatives again.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The only ones treasonous are hard Left Communists like you.America defeated treasonous conservatives in 1865; America can defeat treasonous conservatives again.
You shouldn't do meth, not even once. But it looks like that ship has sailed.
You forgot we aren't from England or from down under. If government wanted to trash our rights you forget the numbers in our military from private to generals that would not stand for the abuse of citizens. Whole bases and forts would side with right. We will never be disarmed or stand for abuse. The group supporting government are the ones sucking on government sugar tit so in battle they would be useless. Also x military would not go along with government abuse. All men put their pants on one leg at a time. Just because ones as you who would give up freedom for safety doesn't make you a majority especially in the US.Irish War of Independence - This was a guerrilla war. No direct confrontation, just quickly engage, do what damage you can and withdraw.
Basically, if a rebel was spotted and ran for it, he could run into any nearby house, and civilians would take him in and hide him. Enormous support from the local population.
And since the British weren't going to massacre whole villages in retaliation, it worked well.
Vietnam War -- Massive support from the Soviets and Chinese. The terrain, jungles and mountains, neutralized the superiority of American firepower. Soviets supplied ground to air missiles to counter American air superiority.
Americans wanted to win the locals over to the American side, so they were gentile with the locals.
Afghanistan -- Mountainous, rugged, terrain that neutralized a lot of American firepower. Enormous support from the local civilians.
Americans wanted to win the locals over to the American side, so they were gentile with the locals.
Columbia -- The FARC waged a guerilla war for decades. The jungle protected them, and they made massive amounts of cash off of cocaine. They probably had a lot of local support too.
So, American guerillas waging war against America.
At most half the population would support the guerillas. The other half would be recording the guerillas every move on their smartphones and uploading it to the FBI.
Some terrain in America would be very good for waging guerilla warfare. We have mountain ranges, forest and swamps that would stop a lot of American fire power.
But we also have a lot of open areas like the whole Great Plains which would be perfect for armored vehicles and other modern military devices.
Could these American guerillas arm themselves with modern weapons? I don't think there's a country on earth that would want to cross America by importing weapons and ammo, to American rebels.
So, I don't think a guerilla war in America would stand much of a chance.
Whole bases and forts would side with right. We will never be disarmed or stand for abuse.
Spoken like a true Communist scumbag.A RW fantasy
If the right takes up arms against our country, they can count on very little support from our military.
Any sympathy for Conservative Rebels will end the first time they shoot one of their buddies
That's because you ARE one! All far Left turds are Communists.COMMIES!
I see Commies!
That's because you ARE one! All far Left turds are Communists.
They tried all that in 1861; it didn't work out so well.Irish War of Independence - This was a guerrilla war. No direct confrontation, just quickly engage, do what damage you can and withdraw.
Basically, if a rebel was spotted and ran for it, he could run into any nearby house, and civilians would take him in and hide him. Enormous support from the local population.
And since the British weren't going to massacre whole villages in retaliation, it worked well.
Vietnam War -- Massive support from the Soviets and Chinese. The terrain, jungles and mountains, neutralized the superiority of American firepower. Soviets supplied ground to air missiles to counter American air superiority.
Americans wanted to win the locals over to the American side, so they were gentile with the locals.
Afghanistan -- Mountainous, rugged, terrain that neutralized a lot of American firepower. Enormous support from the local civilians.
Americans wanted to win the locals over to the American side, so they were gentile with the locals.
Columbia -- The FARC waged a guerilla war for decades. The jungle protected them, and they made massive amounts of cash off of cocaine. They probably had a lot of local support too.
So, American guerillas waging war against America.
At most half the population would support the guerillas. The other half would be recording the guerillas every move on their smartphones and uploading it to the FBI.
Some terrain in America would be very good for waging guerilla warfare. We have mountain ranges, forest and swamps that would stop a lot of American fire power.
But we also have a lot of open areas like the whole Great Plains which would be perfect for armored vehicles and other modern military devices.
Could these American guerillas arm themselves with modern weapons? I don't think there's a country on earth that would want to cross America by importing weapons and ammo, to American rebels.
So, I don't think a guerilla war in America would stand much of a chance.
You are correct, but it worked out for the Vietnamese and Afghanis. Captain Jack of the Modocs made the US Cavalry look pretty inept for a short period as well.They tried all that in 1861; it didn't work out so well.
Paper ApeI think an American Civil War plays out differently… I think what you end up with is a Three-way conflict between Leftist Revolutionary Group, Right-Wing Revolutionary Gtoups and the Government. Eventually leading to the country breaking up into anywhere from 2-6 separate nations.
Negativist Defeatists Are DisloyalInteresting scenario.
Let me point out one flaw.
It's a struggle between the rural and the urban.
Most states have a mixture of rural and urban. You can't divide it up.
Austin is left wing a.f. and Austin is in Texas.
Blue Helmets Blowing in the WindChina would gladly supply the Cartel’s in Mexico with the weapons that would be sold here in the States, so yes it could happen and you must remember the Military would also be split, so yes a war could be fought but the U.N. would put boots on the ground to try to stop it…
There is no such thing as an American guerilla. The mere fact of being a guerilla, means you do not embrace American values.Irish War of Independence - This was a guerrilla war. No direct confrontation, just quickly engage, do what damage you can and withdraw.
Basically, if a rebel was spotted and ran for it, he could run into any nearby house, and civilians would take him in and hide him. Enormous support from the local population.
And since the British weren't going to massacre whole villages in retaliation, it worked well.
Vietnam War -- Massive support from the Soviets and Chinese. The terrain, jungles and mountains, neutralized the superiority of American firepower. Soviets supplied ground to air missiles to counter American air superiority.
Americans wanted to win the locals over to the American side, so they were gentile with the locals.
Afghanistan -- Mountainous, rugged, terrain that neutralized a lot of American firepower. Enormous support from the local civilians.
Americans wanted to win the locals over to the American side, so they were gentile with the locals.
Columbia -- The FARC waged a guerilla war for decades. The jungle protected them, and they made massive amounts of cash off of cocaine. They probably had a lot of local support too.
So, American guerillas waging war against America.
At most half the population would support the guerillas. The other half would be recording the guerillas every move on their smartphones and uploading it to the FBI.
Some terrain in America would be very good for waging guerilla warfare. We have mountain ranges, forest and swamps that would stop a lot of American fire power.
But we also have a lot of open areas like the whole Great Plains which would be perfect for armored vehicles and other modern military devices.
Could these American guerillas arm themselves with modern weapons? I don't think there's a country on earth that would want to cross America by importing weapons and ammo, to American rebels.
So, I don't think a guerilla war in America would stand much of a chance.
How many of the Summer 2020 (AntiFa, BLM, etc.) rioters, looters, vandals, murders, and insurrectionists were arrested and sentenced?Hoooow?
By arresting and sentencing the Jan 6th rioters?
Clouds Before the DelugeLike the Jan 6th Riot.
A couple thousand of disorganized people will show up, break stuff.
They'll all get arrested.
Just a couple of factors overlooked here.Irish War of Independence - This was a guerrilla war. No direct confrontation, just quickly engage, do what damage you can and withdraw.
Basically, if a rebel was spotted and ran for it, he could run into any nearby house, and civilians would take him in and hide him. Enormous support from the local population.
And since the British weren't going to massacre whole villages in retaliation, it worked well.
Vietnam War -- Massive support from the Soviets and Chinese. The terrain, jungles and mountains, neutralized the superiority of American firepower. Soviets supplied ground to air missiles to counter American air superiority.
Americans wanted to win the locals over to the American side, so they were gentile with the locals.
Afghanistan -- Mountainous, rugged, terrain that neutralized a lot of American firepower. Enormous support from the local civilians.
Americans wanted to win the locals over to the American side, so they were gentile with the locals.
Columbia -- The FARC waged a guerilla war for decades. The jungle protected them, and they made massive amounts of cash off of cocaine. They probably had a lot of local support too.
So, American guerillas waging war against America.
At most half the population would support the guerillas. The other half would be recording the guerillas every move on their smartphones and uploading it to the FBI.
Some terrain in America would be very good for waging guerilla warfare. We have mountain ranges, forest and swamps that would stop a lot of American fire power.
But we also have a lot of open areas like the whole Great Plains which would be perfect for armored vehicles and other modern military devices.
Could these American guerillas arm themselves with modern weapons? I don't think there's a country on earth that would want to cross America by importing weapons and ammo, to American rebels.
So, I don't think a guerilla war in America would stand much of a chance.
College Education Is Cliff's Notes EducationShay's Rebellion is an early example of Americans rebelling against the US.
Shay was mad about not receiving any pay for his part in the American Revolution.
Then when the Revolution was over, the government taxed the hell out of him and his fellow soldiers.
He figured he'd gotten rid of one bad government; he could get rid of another. So, him and about 400 other farmers decided to attack the armory to seize a bunch of government guns.
Shays's Rebellion - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org