Creationists

[zombiehunter696]

Wow! You should really bone up on your own religious beliefs.

Evolution of morality - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Theory of Evolution and the evolution of morality are two separate things. The idea that all animals share a common ancestor days nothing about morality. Biological evolution plays no part in the evolution of morality. Just because the word evolution is there, doesn't mean they are one in the same. Of course, being the dishonest creationist you are, you don't care about that. As long as you can shine any kind of negative light on your opponents, you're happy.

Your dishonest attempt to paint evolution as a religion is noted. Typical dishonesty coming from a creationist.

If matter is the only reality, and humans came from the process of evolution, where did human behavior come from Einstein?

Human behavior evolved alongside evolution. Not by the same process as evolution. The two are separate. Social science explain human behavior and it's origins more than biological science.

 

[zombiehunter696]

It would probably help if you'd actually READ Darwin.

Creationists? Read about the Theory of Evolution? Keep dreaming. They thrive on not knowing about it and passing that ignorance to there just as ignorant flocks. If they knew about it, it might be harder for them to misrepresent it.

Just keep repeating that to yourself and maybe it will come true.

Just keep repeating that there's evidence of a designer to yourself and the ignorant idiots that listen to you, and maybe it'll come true.

 

[Hollie]

Oh boy! Now THERE'S an unimpeachable source!

It was brought to our attention by UR ,she=hollie either practiced plagiarism or she had another name on another site where she just copied and pasted this persons responses to creationist and IDer's.

So go ahead and look up to hollie or are you hollie,hmm.

Just another caveat... out of all the posters here, who condescendingly calls people "dear". Umm, that would be Hawly and CandySleez.

It's a standard tactic of the Christian Flat-Earthers' to resort to juvenile name-calling as their arguments are pointless.

 

[UltimateReality]

First of all, I'm not giving you or anyone else here a way you can reach me personally.

Second, I'm not going back to read 850 pages of stuff to find out what you think the best evidence of a designer is. I have better things to do with my time.

Exactly. So why waste mine?

Why not just tell me what you think is the best evidence of a designer?

Why not seek the truth for yourself? If truth is what you actually seek, it can be found for the low, low price of $13.59.

[ame=http://www.amazon.com/Signature-Cell-Evidence-Intelligent-Design/dp/0061472794/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1355798107&sr=8-1&keywords=signature+in+the+cell]Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design: Stephen C. Meyer: 9780061472794: Amazon.com: Books[/ame]


It's a common tactic of materialist fundies to play silly control games by trying to force one to link to a previous post when a simple google search would net all the information one needed regarding the scientific evidence for a designer espoused in this thread, that is, if they were really interested in what was said and not in playing foolish games.

https://www.google.com/search?q=ult...b747fe93862d6b&bpcl=40096503&biw=1403&bih=900

 

[UltimateReality]

The Theory of Evolution and the evolution of morality are two separate things. The idea that all animals share a common ancestor days nothing about morality. Biological evolution plays no part in the evolution of morality. Just because the word evolution is there, doesn't mean they are one in the same. Of course, being the dishonest creationist you are, you don't care about that. As long as you can shine any kind of negative light on your opponents, you're happy.

Your dishonest attempt to paint evolution as a religion is noted. Typical dishonesty coming from a creationist.

If matter is the only reality, and humans came from the process of evolution, where did human behavior come from Einstein?

Human behavior evolved alongside evolution. Not by the same process as evolution. The two are separate. Social science explain human behavior and it's origins more than biological science.

You miss the point entirely.

 

[UltimateReality]

It was brought to our attention by UR ,she=hollie either practiced plagiarism or she had another name on another site where she just copied and pasted this persons responses to creationist and IDer's.

So go ahead and look up to hollie or are you hollie,hmm.

Just another caveat... out of all the posters here, who condescendingly calls people "dear". Umm, that would be Hawly and CandySleez.

It's a standard tactic of the Christian Flat-Earthers' to resort to juvenile name-calling as their arguments are pointless.

Yes, the fundamentalist materialist tend to resort to condescending terms since they have no logical rebuttal to the arguments presented.

 

[UltimateReality]

"Life cannot sustain DNA damage going unrepaired. What this new research shows is that not only is the elaborate DNA repair machinery necessary, but that it is equipped with an incredible high speed search capability, which also is necessary.

This means that in addition to all the other complexities that early evolution must have created, it also must have bequeathed RecA its rapid search capability."

Darwin's God: Here is That New DNA Repair Paper That Has Evolution Crashing Again

 

[Hollie]

Just another caveat... out of all the posters here, who condescendingly calls people "dear". Umm, that would be Hawly and CandySleez.

It's a standard tactic of the Christian Flat-Earthers' to resort to juvenile name-calling as their arguments are pointless.

Yes, the fundamentalist materialist tend to resort to condescending terms since they have no logical rebuttal to the arguments presented.

You suffer from self-imposed ignorance. There is no logical rebuttal to your appeals to supermagical gawds. Supernatural realms are by definiton; illogical. Your angry, paranoid delusions that cause you to lash out in childish tantrums because your claims to gawds are not taken seriously is the result of your intellectual and emotional failings. Blaming others for the failures of your religious beliefs to make a rational argument is pointless.

 

[CandySlice]

It was brought to our attention by UR ,she=hollie either practiced plagiarism or she had another name on another site where she just copied and pasted this persons responses to creationist and IDer's.

So go ahead and look up to hollie or are you hollie,hmm.

Just another caveat... out of all the posters here, who condescendingly calls people "dear". Umm, that would be Hawly and CandySleez.

It's a standard tactic of the Christian Flat-Earthers' to resort to juvenile name-calling as their arguments are pointless.

But could ANYTHING be more predictable??? You can set your watch by it. First the condesencion, then the sad but game attempts at trying to pawn off their pitious remarks as humor, then comes the 'I couldn't be bothered' stage and finally here comes the ever popular name calling. After this there is usually a crescendo of awps and non sequiters and finally they realize, far too late to redeem themselves, that they've backed themselves into a corner and must therefore exit in shame, only to begin the whole process over again the next day, secure in the knowledge that nobody will remember what was said the night before.
How do you live in that kind of bubble??

 

[Hollie]

"Life cannot sustain DNA damage going unrepaired. What this new research shows is that not only is the elaborate DNA repair machinery necessary, but that it is equipped with an incredible high speed search capability, which also is necessary.

This means that in addition to all the other complexities that early evolution must have created, it also must have bequeathed RecA its rapid search capability."

Darwin's God: Here is That New DNA Repair Paper That Has Evolution Crashing Again

Here Is yet another reminder of just how pointless and irrelevant Christian ministries have become. Another cut and paste from the Flat Earth'ers.

 

[UltimateReality]

Top Ten Problems for Evolution:

1. Lack of a viable mechanism for producing high levels of complex and specified information. Related to this are problems with the Darwinian mechanism producing irreducibly complex features, and the problems of non-functional or deleterious intermediate stages.

2.The failure of the fossil record to provide support for Darwinian evolution. (For details, see "Punctuated Equilibrium and Patterns from the Fossil Record" or "Intelligent Design Has Scientific Merit in Paleontology");

3.The failure of molecular biology to provide evidence for a grand "tree of life." (For details, see: "A Primer on the Tree of Life");

4. Natural selection is an extremely inefficient method of spreading traits in populations unless a trait has an extremely high selection coefficient;

5. The problem that convergent evolution appears rampant -- at both the genetic and morphological levels, even though under Darwinian theory this is highly unlikely. (For details, see "Convergent Genetic Evolution: 'Surprising' Under Unguided Evolution, Expected Under Intelligent Design" and "Dolphins and Porpoises and...Bats? Oh My! Evolution's Convergence Problem");

6. The failure of chemistry to explain the origin of the genetic code. (For details, see "The origin of life remains a mystery" or "Problems with the Natural Chemical 'Origin of Life'");

7. The failure of developmental biology to explain why vertebrate embryos diverge from the beginning of development. (For details, see: "Evolving views of embryology," "A Reply to Carl Zimmer on Embryology and Developmental Biology," "Current Textbooks Misuse Embryology to Argue for Evolution");

8. The failure of neo-Darwinian evolution to explain the biogeographical distribution of many species. (For details, see "Sea Monkey Hypotheses Refute the NCSE's Biogeography Objections to Explore Evolution" or "Sea Monkeys Are the Tip of the Iceberg: More Biogeographical Conundrums for Neo-Darwinism");

9. A long history of inaccurate predictions inspired by neo-Darwinism regarding vestigial organs or so-called "junk" DNA. (For details, ] see: "Intelligent Design and the Death of the 'Junk-DNA' Neo-Darwinian Paradigm," "The Latest Proof of Evolution: The Appendix Has No Important Function," or "Does Darrel Falk's Junk DNA Argument for Common Descent Commit 'One of the Biggest Mistakes in the History of Molecular Biology'?);

10. Humans show many behavioral and cognitive traits and abilities that offer no apparent survival advantage (e.g. music, art, religion, ability to ponder the nature of the universe).

Links provided in original article:

What Are the Top Ten Problems with Darwinian Evolution? - Evolution News & Views

 

[UltimateReality]

"Life cannot sustain DNA damage going unrepaired. What this new research shows is that not only is the elaborate DNA repair machinery necessary, but that it is equipped with an incredible high speed search capability, which also is necessary.

This means that in addition to all the other complexities that early evolution must have created, it also must have bequeathed RecA its rapid search capability."

Darwin's God: Here is That New DNA Repair Paper That Has Evolution Crashing Again

Here Is yet another reminder of just how pointless and irrelevant Christian ministries have become. Another cut and paste from the Flat Earth'ers.

Yet another ad hominem attack for the 500th time. Just once surprise us all and actually address the point that is made. In your own words would be nice but even a RELEVANT cut and paste that you've actually read would be better than your worthless attacks.

 

[UltimateReality]

Just another caveat... out of all the posters here, who condescendingly calls people "dear". Umm, that would be Hawly and CandySleez.

It's a standard tactic of the Christian Flat-Earthers' to resort to juvenile name-calling as their arguments are pointless.

But could ANYTHING be more predictable??? You can set your watch by it. First the condesencion, ...

We can all assume you are referring to yourself, right dear. Seriously, Sweetie? oh and spell check is your friend.

 

[CandySlice]

It's a standard tactic of the Christian Flat-Earthers' to resort to juvenile name-calling as their arguments are pointless.

Yes, the fundamentalist materialist tend to resort to condescending terms since they have no logical rebuttal to the arguments presented.

You suffer from self-imposed ignorance. There is no logical rebuttal to your appeals to supermagical gawds. Supernatural realms are by definiton; illogical. Your angry, paranoid delusions that cause you to lash out in childish tantrums because your claims to gawds are not taken seriously is the result of your intellectual and emotional failings. Blaming others for the failures of your religious beliefs to make a rational argument is pointless.

If his 'God' is so attentive why didn't he make UR smart enough to hold up his end of the conversation??

 

[CandySlice]

It's a standard tactic of the Christian Flat-Earthers' to resort to juvenile name-calling as their arguments are pointless.

But could ANYTHING be more predictable??? You can set your watch by it. First the condesencion, ...

We can all assume you are referring to yourself, right dear. Seriously, Sweetie? oh and spell check is your friend.

Right! I forgot to include the spelling police phase. How lax of me.

 

[CandySlice]

Also absent in the first draft was the ever popular 'I know you are but what am I'. Very importrant in establishing the intellectual age of the poster in question.

 

[UltimateReality]

It's a standard tactic of the Christian Flat-Earthers' to resort to juvenile name-calling as their arguments are pointless.

Yes, the fundamentalist materialist tend to resort to condescending terms since they have no logical rebuttal to the arguments presented.

You suffer from self-imposed ignorance. There is no logical rebuttal to your appeals to supermagical gawds. Supernatural realms are by definiton; illogical. Your angry, paranoid delusions that cause you to lash out in childish tantrums because your claims to gawds are not taken seriously is the result of your intellectual and emotional failings. Blaming others for the failures of your religious beliefs to make a rational argument is pointless.

Your self-loathing is evident to all by your self-loathingy posts and your self-loathing expressions. Why do you loath yourself so much? Where does your faith in your supermagical darwinism and supermagical pseudoscience come from and does your supermagical cut and pastes from Panda's thumb make you feel supermagical inside, Hawlys. Your claims for Hawlys and your childish rants are supermagical. And the Hawlys realms, including the Hawlys Rugged Touch Gawd and the CAndySleeze supermagical impersonation is rationally pointless to your supermagicallisms and your fundie materialists fairy tale paranoid delusional LSD tag line trips. You can't possibly front a logical rebuttal until you cleanse your self-loathing and renounce the Dawkins and his supermagicallsts ways. If you could clense yourself of the dark ride tabby twins, you could achieve supercalifragilisticness on a different supermagical plain.

Do you hear how stupid you sound saying the same things over and over? Seriously!

 

[Hollie]

"Life cannot sustain DNA damage going unrepaired. What this new research shows is that not only is the elaborate DNA repair machinery necessary, but that it is equipped with an incredible high speed search capability, which also is necessary.

This means that in addition to all the other complexities that early evolution must have created, it also must have bequeathed RecA its rapid search capability."

Darwin's God: Here is That New DNA Repair Paper That Has Evolution Crashing Again

Here Is yet another reminder of just how pointless and irrelevant Christian ministries have become. Another cut and paste from the Flat Earth'ers.

Yet another ad hominem attack for the 500th time. Just once surprise us all and actually address the point that is made. In your own words would be nice but even a RELEVANT cut and paste that you've actually read would be better than your worthless attacks.

Your siily cutting and pasting from creationist websites hardly deserve to be taken seriously. You spam the thread relentlessly with Christian religious dogma that is cloaked in a burqa of false science claims and manufactured data.

You're little more than a bad joke.

 

[UltimateReality]

Hawly and CandySleeze, I'm surprised your caregiver lets you play on the computer this late, especially after your DTS ramblings about God dispensing with you.

 

[UltimateReality]

Here Is yet another reminder of just how pointless and irrelevant Christian ministries have become. Another cut and paste from the Flat Earth'ers.

Yet another ad hominem attack for the 500th time. Just once surprise us all and actually address the point that is made. In your own words would be nice but even a RELEVANT cut and paste that you've actually read would be better than your worthless attacks.

Your siily cutting and pasting from creationist websites hardly deserve to be taken seriously. You spam the thread relentlessly with Christian religious dogma that is cloaked in a burqa of false science claims and manufactured data.

You're little more than a bad joke.

Hawly is an equal opportunity Bigot. She hates Muslims too.

Why do you loath yourself so bad?