iceberg
Diamond Member
- May 15, 2017
- 36,788
- 14,920
- 1,600
no. but if you didn't care then, you only do it now cause you hate trump.Lets just say you're right about Hill Just for argument sake Does that give the POS that's President the right to scam America ?? and btw Hill wasn't Presidentman - you're on top of it eddie! i remember with gentle fondness all the anger and bitterness you spewed at hillary for all of her Clinton Foundation bullshit and all she did to make herself rich at our expense in so many ways.Wonder how much the orange anus is making personally from the fed for housing for security etc etc The POS does nothing unless it enriches himA recent investigation by the Washington Post estimates that since taking office, the President’s three trips to his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida have already cost the federal treasury some $10 million. At this rate, the report says, travel and security for Trump and his family could run up a bill in the hundreds of millions of dollars by the end of his term.
That’s not normal. Citing a conservative-leaning watchdog group called Judicial Watch, which monitored expenses during the administration of former President Barack Obama and plans to continue their work with the new White House, the Post said Obama’s extracurricular travel and safety expenses likely amounted to about $97 million over eight years in office.
In the five weeks since his inauguration, the President has already spent three weekends at Mar-a-Lago, which he has begun referring to as the “Winter White House,” indicating that more is in store for the lavish private club situated on a beachfront property that was not designed with presidential security in mind. Some of the estimated $10 million spent on these three trips included paying for the Coast Guard to patrol the shoreline, according to the Post.
Trump's Mar-a-Lago Trips May Have Already Cost Taxpayers $10 Million
wait. no. that wasn't you was it?
i hate the actions moreso than people. and if someone i am apathetic about does some serious bullshit and it doesn't raise my ire, it's not going to when someone i hate does it simply because i hate them.
you either allow actions or you don't. you don't allow actions based on who does it - then you get the bullshit we live in today where one person can get away with anything while another can't do a damn thing. kinda sucks doesn't it?